PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G J Rodrigo

Publications and source records attributed to G J Rodrigo.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

First-line therapy for adult patients with acute asthma receiving a multiple-dose protocol of ipratropium bromide plus albuterol in the emergency department.

We designed a larger, double-blind, randomized, prospective trial to test our hypothesis that patients with acute asthma given combination high dose therapy with ipratropium bromide (IB) and beta(2)-agonists will have greater improvement in pulmonary function and fewer hospital admissions than those given beta(2)-agonists alone. One hundred eighty patients (mean age +/- SD, 34.3 +/- 10.5 yr) who presented to an emergency department (ED) for treatment of an exacerbation of asthma (baseline FEV(1) < 50% of predicted) were assigned in a randomized, double-blind fashion to receive albuterol and placebo (n = 92) or albuterol and IB (n = 88). Both drugs were administered through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-min intervals for 3 h (24 puffs or 2,880 microg of albuterol and 504 microg of IB each hour). Primary outcome measures were improvement in pulmonary function (FEV(1) or peak expiratory flow [PEF]), and hospital admission rates. In both groups, pulmonary function improved significantly over baseline values (p < 0.01). Subjects who received IB had an overall 20.5% (95% CI: 2.6 to 38.4%) (p = 0.02) greater improvement in PEF and a 48.1% (95% CI: 19.8 to 76.4%) (p = 0.001) greater improvement in FEV(1) from the control group. At the end of protocol (3 h), 39% (n = 36) of patients in the control group and 20% (n = 18) in the IB group were admitted (p = 0.01). The use of high doses of IB reduced the risk of hospital admission 49% (relative risk = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.83). Five (95% CI: 3 to 17) patients would need to be treated with high doses of IB to prevent a single admission. Kaplan-Meier-estimated curves of the proportion of patients who reached the discharge threshold during the 3 h of treatment, showed a significant difference in favor of the IB group (log-rank test = 0.005). A subgroup analysis showed that patients most likely to benefit from the addition of high doses of IB were those with more severe obstruction (FEV(1) </= 30% of predicted) and long duration of symptoms before the ED presentation (>/= 24 h). On the contrary, previous use of inhaled beta(2)-agonists did not modify the admission rate and the pulmonary function response to IB. In conclusion, our data support a substantial therapeutic benefit from the addition of IB to albuterol administered in high doses through MDI plus spacer, particularly in patients with FEV(1) less than 30%, and with long duration of symptoms before the ED presentation (>/= 24 h).

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Rapid-onset asthma attack: a prospective cohort study about characteristics and response to emergency department treatment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the frequency of rapid-onset asthma attacks (ROAAs) and slow-onset asthma attacks (SOAAs) in adult patients with acute, severe disease (18 to 50 years old), who presented to an emergency department (ED); and (2) to establish whether ROAA patients differ from SOAA patients in terms of clinical and spirometric characteristics; and (3) in terms of the response of treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred three patients (with peak expiratory flow [PEF] or FEV(1) of < 50% of predicted value) with acute exacerbations of asthma were enrolled in the trial using a prospective cohort study. Asthma attacks were classified as an ROAA (< 6 h of symptoms) or an SOAA (> or = 6 h). All patients were treated with albuterol, four puffs at 10-min intervals (100 microg per actuation), delivered by metered-dose inhaler with a spacer device during 3 h. RESULTS: On the basis of previously determined criteria, 11.3% of patients were classified as having a ROAA. Male patients comprised 53.6% of the ROAA group (p = 0.03). In ROAA patients, the exacerbation was less likely to be attributed to respiratory tract infection (p = 0.001) and more likely to have no identifiable cause (p = 0.0001). Also, ROAA patients had lower pulmonary function (FEV(1)) at presentation (mean difference, - 0. 13; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.22 to - 0.04 L; p = 0.04) than SOAA patients. At the end of treatment, ROAA patients had an overall 48.0 L/min (95% CI, 14.1 to 81.8 L/min) greater improvement in PEF and a 0.31 L (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.54 L) greater improvement in FEV(1) than SOAA patients. Also, ROAA patients presented with less accessory muscle use (p < 0.05) and higher oxygen saturation (p = 0. 005). Finally, SOAA patients showed an increased incidence of hospital admission (relative risk, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.01 to 15.0). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study support the notion that ROAAs constitute a distinct but uncommon acute asthma ED presentation, with a predominance of male patients. Upper respiratory tract infection was not believed to be a significant trigger factor in these patients, and ROAA patients had rapid deterioration of their conditions followed by a more rapid response to treatment and a lower hospital admission rate than SOAA patients. Thus, we have identified a subgroup of patients who appear to have common characteristics with patients with sudden-onset near-fatal/fatal asthma.

Acute Disease↗