Biomedical subjects

G Jenster

Publications and source records attributed to G Jenster.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Co-occurrence based meta-analysis of scientific texts: retrieving biological relationships between genes.

MOTIVATION: The advent of high-throughput experiments in molecular biology creates a need for methods to efficiently extract and use information for large numbers of genes. Recently, the associative concept space (ACS) has been developed for the representation of information extracted from biomedical literature. The ACS is a Euclidean space in which thesaurus concepts are positioned and the distances between concepts indicates their relatedness. The ACS uses co-occurrence of concepts as a source of information. In this paper we evaluate how well the system can retrieve functionally related genes and we compare its performance with a simple gene co-occurrence method. RESULTS: To assess the performance of the ACS we composed a test set of five groups of functionally related genes. With the ACS good scores were obtained for four of the five groups. When compared to the gene co-occurrence method, the ACS is capable of revealing more functional biological relations and can achieve results with less literature available per gene. Hierarchical clustering was performed on the ACS output, as a potential aid to users, and was found to provide useful clusters. Our results suggest that the algorithm can be of value for researchers studying large numbers of genes. AVAILABILITY: The ACS program is available upon request from the authors.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2001

Androgen regulation of the cell-cell adhesion molecule-1 (Ceacam1) gene.

Previous studies have established that the cell-cell adhesion molecule-1 (CEACAM1, previously known as C-CAM1) functions as a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer and is involved in the regulation of prostate growth and differentiation. However, the molecular mechanism that modulates CEACAM1 expression in the prostate is not well defined. Since the growth of prostate epithelial cells is androgen-regulated, we investigated the effects of androgen and the androgen receptor (AR) on CEACAM1 expression. Transient transfection experiments showed that the AR can enhance the Ceacam1 promoter activity in a ligand-dependent manner and that the regulatory element resides within a relatively short (-249 to -194 bp) segment of the 5'-flanking region of the Ceacam1 gene. This androgen regulation is likely through direct AR-promoter binding because a mutant AR defective in DNA binding failed to upregulate reporter gene expression. Furthermore, electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that the AR specifically binds to this sequence, and mutation analysis of the potential ARE sequences revealed a region within the sequence that was required for the AR to activate the Ceacam1 gene. Therefore, the regulation of Ceacam1 gene expression by androgen may be one of the mechanisms by which androgen regulates prostatic function.

Androgens↗

PubMed2001

Repression of androgen-regulated gene expression by dominant negative androgen receptors.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-dependent transcription activator responsible for male sexual development. In order to specifically inhibit the AR pathway, dominant negative ARs were constructed by inactivation of the major transactivation domains of the wild type AR and fusing this mutant (AR122) to the Krüppel-associated box (KRAB) repressor domain and/or histone deacetylase (HDAC1). The HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 protein was the most successful dominant negative AR, capable of repressing the wild type AR ninefold when co-expressed at a 1:1 plasmid ratio. A maximal repression of 41-fold was achieved when HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 was cotransfected with the wild type AR at a 4:1 plasmid ratio. HDAC1-KRAB-AR122 repressed transcription in a ligand-dependent manner since it inhibited a constitutively active AR mutant (AR5) only in the presence of agonists. High concentrations of partial agonists such as RU486, cyproterone acetate, and estradiol were also capable of triggering repression by HDAC1-KRAB-AR122. The potent dominant negative AR proteins might prove useful tools to inhibit AR function in vitro and in vivo.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Ligand-independent activation of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer by growth factors and cytokines.

During the course of prostate cancer progression, cells convert from an androgen-dependent to an androgen-independent growth status. At this late stage, the role of the androgens testosterone and dihydrotestosterone and their nuclear receptor, the androgen receptor (AR), is unclear. Has the growth pathway, initiated by the AR, been bypassed in androgen-independent tumours? Mounting evidence suggests the opposite. Prostate cancer cells that have acquired the ability to survive and grow in a low androgen environment might be activating the AR pathway using growth factors, cytokines, and steroids other than androgens.

Cytokines↗

PubMed2000

Androgen induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 gene: role of androgen receptor and transcription factor Sp1 complex.

Previous studies have shown that androgen up-regulates expression of the p21 (WAF1, CIP1, SDI1, CAP20) gene, which contains a canonical androgen response element (ARE) in its proximal promoter region. We undertook the current studies to determine whether elements in the p21 promoter other than the ARE mediate androgen action. We found that deletion of the ARE did not completely abolish the promoter responsiveness to androgen, suggesting that additional cis-regulatory elements within the p21 core promoter may also be involved in androgen responsiveness. The p21 core promoter is GC-rich and contains six binding sites for transcription factor Sp1. We determined whether one or more of these Sp1 sites mediate androgen responsiveness of the p21 promoter. To do so, we used a transient transfection assay with p21 promoter-luciferase reporter constructs. The reporter activity of a construct lacking the ARE but containing all six Sp1 sites was induced approximately 3-fold by androgen. Mutation of Sp1-3 nearly eliminated basal promoter activity as well as androgen responsiveness, whereas deletion of Sp1-1 and Sp1-2 sites and mutation of Sp1-4, Sp1-5, and Sp1-6 sites had relatively little effect. We also used the mammalian one-hybrid assay and coimmunoprecipitation assay to show that androgen receptor (AR) and transcription factor Sp1 interact with one another. The current studies suggest a model in which AR and transcription factor Sp1 not only bind to their respective consensus sites within the p21 promoter, but also complex with one another, thereby recruiting coactivators and general transcription factors and inducing p21 transcription.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1999

Specific androgen receptor activation by an artificial coactivator.

Transcription activation of steroid receptors, such as the androgen receptor (AR), is mediated by coactivators, which bridge the receptor to the preinitiation complex. To develop a tool for studying the role of the AR in normal development and disease, we constructed artificial coactivators consisting of the transcription activation domains of VP16 or p65/RelA and the AR hinge and ligand-binding domain (ARLBD), which has been shown to interact with the AR N-terminal domain. The artificial VP16-ARLBD and ARLBD-p65 coactivators interacted with the AR N terminus and wild-type AR in an androgen-dependent and androgen-specific manner. VP16-ARLBD and ARLBD-p65 enhanced the AR transactivity up to 4- and 13-fold, respectively, without affecting the expression of the AR protein. The coactivators did not enhance the transcription activity of the progesterone receptor (PR) or the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), showing their specificity for the AR. In addition, to construct PR- and GR-specific coactivators, the VP16 activation domain was fused to the PR and GR hinge/ligand-binding domain. Although VP16-PRLBD and VP16-GRLBD interacted with the C-terminal portion of steroid receptor coactivator-1, they did not enhance the transcription activity of their receptor. The presented strategy of directing activation domains or other protein activities into the DNA-bound AR complex provides a novel means of manipulating AR function in vitro and in vivo.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1999

Discovery and characterization of endometrial epithelial messenger ribonucleic acids using the ovine uterine gland knockout model.

Prolonged exposure of the developing neonatal ovine uterus to a progestin from birth prevents uterine gland development and creates an adult endometrial phenotype characterized by the absence of glandular epithelium, the uterine gland knockout (UGKO) phenotype. This study used endometrium from normal and UGKO sheep to identify messenger RNAs (mRNAs) expressed differentially in the endometrial epithelium using the molecular techniques of mRNA differential display PCR (DD-PCR) and suppression subtractive complementary DNA (cDNA) hybridization (SSH). Sequence analyses of DD- and SSH-identified and cloned cDNAs indicated similarity of some to known mRNAs, including beta-lactoglobulin, alkaline phosphatase, type B and D endogenous sheep retroviruses, gp330/megalin, matrix Gla protein, and others. Other cDNAs were not similar to any known sequences and are considered novel, although some of these match human expressed sequence tags. In situ hybridization analyses of uteri from cyclic and pregnant ewes indicated that all DD-PCR- and SSH-identified mRNAs were expressed in either the endometrial lumenal and/or glandular epithelium, although some were also expressed in other uterine cell types. Northern and in situ hybridization analyses revealed that patterns of mRNA expression for most clones were affected by the day of the estrous cycle and pregnancy in a manner consistent with regulation by progesterone. Studies demonstrate the utility of the ovine UGKO model as a tool with which to identify known and novel uterine epithelial-specific genes. Cloned cDNAs identified here are expressed sequence tags useful for comparative and physical genetic mapping and may be used to reveal new factors and pathways regulating endometrial function.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

The role of the androgen receptor in the development and progression of prostate cancer.

Androgens are essential for the development, growth, and maintenance of the prostate. They exert their effects via the intracellular androgen receptor (AR), which is a ligand-dependent transcription activator. As is the case with normal prostate development, primary prostatic cancers are largely dependent on androgens for growth and survival. Most patients respond favorably to androgen ablation and antiandrogen therapy, which has become a standard treatment of metastatic disease. However, virtually all patients will relapse with clinically defined androgen-independent cancer. This phenomenon raises the question of how cancer cells survive and grow in the low androgen environment? Two of the routes cells can take to adapt are (1) bypassing and (2) sensitizing the AR pathway. The vast numbers of AR abnormalities observed in prostate tumors from patients treated with hormonal therapy suggest that many cells sensitize or change the AR pathway. To continue to activate this pathway in a low androgen environment, cells can (1) mutate the AR to become promiscuously activated by different steroids, (2) amplify the AR, (3) activate the AR in a ligand-independent manner by growth factors and cytokines, or (4) amplify coactivators. Alternatively, prostate cancer cells that have lost AR expression must have bypassed the AR pathway. Activation of oncogenes and autocrine growth factor stimulation are two mechanisms that likely contribute to becoming completely androgen-independent. From all the studies on AR function in prostate cancer, it is clear that the AR plays an important role in cancer development and progression. Moreover, the AR pathway remains important in most cells from patients with clinically defined androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Androgens↗

PubMed1998

Coactivators and corepressors as mediators of nuclear receptor function: an update.

The past 3 years have been an exciting time in the field of hormone receptor research because of the discovery and characterization of novel groups of proteins that mediate the transcriptional activity of steroid receptors. These classes of proteins, called coactivators and corepressors, have greatly enhanced our understanding of how steroid receptors activate or inhibit transcription of their target genes. Multiple coactivators have been identified that fit the definition of a protein that connects or bridges the DNA-bound receptor to proteins in the preinitiation complex and thereby enhance transcription. Besides this bridging function, some coactivators can modify chromatin by histone acetylation and make promoters more accessible for the binding of other transcription factors. This finding explains old data concerning steroid receptor-induced nucleosome displacement and indicates a dual role for coactivators as bridging factors and chromatin remodeling proteins. The opposites of coactivators are corepressors, which are recruited into the receptor-DNA-bound complex in the absence of ligand and actively inhibit transcription of the target gene. Although unliganded steroid receptors are associated with heat shock proteins and do not bind to their response elements, the binding of antagonists to these receptors can result in the recruitment of corepressors. The expression level and repertoire of coactivators and corepressors have become important determinants in the functional activity of steroid hormones and their receptors.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase.

Steroid receptors and coactivator proteins are thought to stimulate gene expression by facilitating the assembly of basal transcription factors into a stable preinitiation complex. What is not clear, however, is how these transcription factors gain access to transcriptionally repressed chromatin to modulate the transactivation of specific gene networks in vivo. The available evidence indicates that acetylation of chromatin in vivo is coupled to transcription and that specific histone acetyltransferases (HATs) target histones bound to DNA and overcome the inhibitory effect of chromatin on gene expression. The steroid-receptor coactivator SRC-1 is a coactivator for many members of the steroid-hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-inducible transcription factors. Here we show that SRC-1 possesses intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity and that it also interacts with another HAT, p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF). The HAT activity of SRC-1 maps to its carboxy-terminal region and is primarily specific for histones H3 and H4. Acetylation by SRC-1 and PCAF of histones bound at specific promoters may result from ligand binding to steroid receptors and could be a mechanism by which the activation functions of steroid receptors and associated coactivators enhance formation of a stable preinitiation complex, thereby increasing transcription of specific genes from transcriptionally repressed chromatin templates.

Acetylation↗

PubMed1997

Steroid receptor induction of gene transcription: a two-step model.

Coactivators, such as steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1A) and CREB (cAMP response element binding protein)-binding protein (CBP), are required for efficient steroid receptor transactivation. Using an in vitro transcription assay, we found that progesterone receptor (PR)-driven transcription is inhibited by a dominant negative PR ligand-binding domain-interacting region of SRC-1A, indicating that SRC-1A is required for actual transcriptional processes. In addition, these coactivators also possess intrinsic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity and bind to each other and another HAT, p300/CBP-associated factor. Here we show that the human PR also interacts with p300/CBP-associated factor in vitro. Recruitment of multiple HATs to target promoters suggests an important role for chromatin remodeling in transcriptional activation of genes by steroid receptors. In transient transfection assays, we found that addition of a histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, strongly potentiated PR-driven transcription. In contrast, directing histone deacetylase-1 (HD1) to a promoter using the GAL4 DNA binding domain inhibited transcription. Furthermore, PR transactivation was repressed by recruiting HD1 into the PR-DNA complex by fusing HD1 to a PR ligand-binding domain-interacting portion of SRC-1. Collectively, these results suggest that targeted histone acetylation by recruited HAT cofactors and histone deacetylation are important factors affecting PR transactivation. Recruitment of coactivators and HATs by the liganded PR in vivo may result in (i) remodeling of transcriptionally repressed chromatin to facilitate assembly and (ii) enhanced stabilization of the preinitiation complex by the activation functions of coactivators and the liganded PR itself.

Chromatin↗

PubMed1997

Role of co-activators and co-repressors in the mechanism of steroid/thyroid receptor action.

Steroid/thyroid hormone receptors are ligand-dependent transcription factors that regulate diverse aspects of growth, development, and homeostasis by binding as homodimers or heterodimers to their cognate DNA response elements to modulate transcription of target genes. Transactivation by steroid/ thyroid hormone receptors involves a conserved AF-2 domain located in the distal carboxy-terminus of the receptors. The existence of co-factors, termed co-activators or adapters, was first suggested by transcriptional squelching between progesterone receptors and estrogen receptors. Co-repressors were also postulated to contribute to the silencing function of unliganded thyroid hormone receptor (TR). The yeast two-hybrid system and Far-Western blotting have been used to identify several proteins that interact with members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily in a ligand-sensitive manner. Our laboratory cloned the first functional co-activator, termed steroid receptor co-activator-one (SRC-1), that appears to be a general co-activator for all steroid receptors tested and enhances transactivation of steroid hormone-dependent target genes. Subsequently, many more putative co-activators have been reported, including the SRC-1 related proteins, TIF2 and GRIP1, and other putative and unrelated co-activators such as ARA70, Trip1, RIP140, and TIF1. In addition, another co-activator, CREB-binding protein (CBP), has been shown to enhance steroid receptor-dependent target gene transcription. CBP and SRC-1 interact and synergistically enhance transcriptional activation by the ER and PR. Therefore, a ternary complex-consisting of CBP, SRC-1, and liganded steroid receptors-may form to increase the rate of hormone-responsive gene transcription. Similarly, co-repressors, such as SMRT and N-CoR, for TR and retinoic acid receptors (RAR) have been identified. The unliganded TR and RAR have been shown to inhibit basal promoter activity; this silencing of target gene transcription by unliganded receptors is mediated by these co-repressors. Collectively, available evidence supports the following model of steroid-responsive gene transcription. Upon binding of agonist the receptor changes its conformation in the ligand-binding domain that enables recruitment of co-activators, which allows the receptor to interact with the basal transcriptional machinery more efficiently and to activate transcription. In contrast, binding of antagonists induces a different conformational change in the receptor. Although some antagonist-bound receptor can dimerize and bind to its cognate DNA element, it fails to dislodge the associated co-repressors, which results in a nonproductive interaction with the basal transcriptional machinery. Similarly, the TR and RAR associate with co-repressors in the absence of ligand, thereby resulting in a negative interaction with the transcriptional machinery that silences target gene expression. In the case of mixed agonist/antagonists, such as 4-hydroxytamoxifen, activation of gene transcription may depend on the relative ratio of co-activators and co-repressors in the cell or cell-specific factors that determine the relative agonistic or antagonistic potential of different compounds. These co-activators and co-repressors appear to act as an accelerator and/or a brake that modulates transcriptional regulation of hormone-responsive target gene expression. Thus, the recent discovery of co-activators and co-repressors expands our knowledge of the mechanisms of steroid receptor action.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity.

Male sexual differentiation and development proceed under direct control of androgens. Androgen action is mediated by the intracellular androgen receptor, which belongs to the superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. In the X-linked androgen insensitivity syndrome, defects in the androgen receptor gene have prevented the normal development of both internal and external male structures in 46, XY individuals. The complete form of androgen insensitivity syndrome is characterized by 46, XY karyotype, external female phenotype, intra-abdominal testes, absence of uterus and ovaries, blindly ending vagina, and gynecomastia. There is also a group of disorders of androgen action that result from partial impairment of androgen receptor function. Clinical indications can be abnormal sexual development of individuals with a predominant male phenotype with severe hypospadias and micropenis or of individuals with a predominantly female phenotype with cliteromegaly, ambiguous genitalia, and gynecomastia. Complete or gross deletions of the androgen receptor gene have not been frequently found in persons with the complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, whereas point mutations at several different sites in exons 2-8 encoding the DNA- and androgen-binding domain have been reported in both partial and complete forms of androgen insensitivity, with a relatively high number of mutations in two clusters in exons 5 and 7. The number of mutations in exon 1 is extremely low, and no mutations have been reported in the hinge region, located between the DNA-binding domain and the ligand-binding domain. The X-linked condition of spinal and bulbar muscle atrophy (Kennedy's disease) is characterized by a progressive motor neuron degeneration associated with signs of androgen insensitivity and infertility. The molecular cause of spinal and bulbar muscle atrophy is an expanded length (> 40 residues) of one of the polyglutamine stretches in the N-terminal domain of the androgen receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1995

Identification of two transcription activation units in the N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor.

To locate in detail the regions in the human androgen receptor (AR) involved in transcription activation, a series of N-terminal deletions was introduced in the wild type AR and in a constitutively active AR. The different constructs were tested for their capacity to activate transcription. Almost the entire N-terminal domain (residues 1-485) was necessary for full wild type AR activity when cotransfected with the (GRE)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. In contrast, a smaller part of the N-terminal domain (amino acids 360-528) was sufficient for the constitutively active AR to induce transcription of the same (GRE)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. This demonstrates the capacity of the AR to use different regions in the N-terminal domain as transcription activation units (TAUs). To obtain additional information of AR N-terminal TAUs, the GAL4 DNA binding domain was linked to either the entire or parts of the AR N-terminal domain and cotransfected with the (UAS)2tkCAT reporter in HeLa cells. The results confirmed that the first 485 amino acid residues accommodate a transcription activation function. When the chimeric AR-GAL4 constructs were tested on a different reporter ((UAS)5E1bCAT), a small shift in position of the TAU, responsible for full transcription activation, was observed. The data presented show that the size and location of the active TAU in the human AR is variable, being dependent on the promoter context and the presence or absence of the ligand binding domain.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Domains of the human androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor involved in binding to the nuclear matrix.

Steroid receptors have been reported to bind to the nuclear matrix. The nuclear matrix is operationally defined as the residual nuclear structure that remains after extraction of most of the chromatin and all soluble and loosely bound components. To obtain insight in the molecular mechanism of the interaction of steroid receptors with the nuclear matrix, we studied the binding of several deletion mutants of the human androgen receptor (hAR) and the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) to the nuclear matrix. Receptor binding was tested for two different nuclear matrix preparations: complete matrices, in which most matrix proteins are retained during the isolation procedure, and depleted matrices, which consist of only a subset of these proteins. The results show that the C-terminal domain of the hAR binds tightly to both depleted and complete matrices. In addition, at least one other domain of the hAR binds to complete matrices but not to depleted matrices. In contrast to the hAR, the hGR binds only to complete matrices. For this interaction both the DNA-binding domain and the C-terminal domain of the hGR are required, whereas the N-terminal domain is not. We conclude that specific protein domains of the hAR and the hGR are involved in binding to the nuclear matrix. In addition, our results indicate that the hAR and the hGR are attached to the nuclear matrix through different molecular interactions.

Cell Line↗

PubMed1995

Androgen receptor mutations.

Male sexual differentiation and development proceed under direct control of androgens. Androgen action is mediated by the intracellular androgen receptor, which belongs to the superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. At least three pathological situations are associated with abnormal androgen receptor structure and function: androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) and prostate cancer. In the X-linked androgen insensitivity syndrome, defects in the androgen receptor gene have prevented the normal development of both internal and external male structures in 46,XY individuals. Complete or gross deletions of the androgen receptor gene have not been found frequently in persons with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Point mutations at several different sites in exons 2-8 encoding the DNA- and androgen-binding domain, have been reported for partial and complete forms of androgen insensitivity. A relatively high number of mutations were reported in two different clusters in exon 5 and in exon 7. The number of mutations in exon 1 is extremely low and no mutations have been reported in the hinge region, located between the DNA-binding domain and the ligand-binding domain and which is encoded by the first half of exon 4. Androgen receptor gene mutations in prostate cancer are very rare and are reported only in exons 4-8. The X-linked spinal and bulbar muscle atrophy (SBMA; Kennedy's disease) is associated with an expanded length (> 40 residues) of one of the polyglutamine stretches in the N-terminal domain of the androgen receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1994

Changes in the abundance of androgen receptor isotypes: effects of ligand treatment, glutamine-stretch variation, and mutation of putative phosphorylation sites.

The SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) migration pattern of wild-type and mutated human androgen receptors (ARs) expressed in COS-1 cells was analyzed. In the absence of hormone, the wild-type AR migrated as a closely spaced 110-112 kDa doublet. Alkaline phosphatase treatment resulted in a single 110 kDa band showing that the 112 kDa upshift reflects receptors phosphorylation. Deletion of the N-terminal amino acids 46-101 or 100-142 resulted in mutant ARs migrating as single protein bands. Three consensus phosphorylation sites in this region were substituted, and the resulting mutated proteins were analyzed. Two Ser-Pro-directed kinase consensus sites at positions Ser-80 and Ser-93 were both necessary for the AR 112 kDa upshift. Substitution of the putative casein kinase II Ser-118 site had no effect on the AR migration pattern. Surprisingly, deletion of the glutamine repeat, located directly N-terminal of the Ser-Pro sites, resulted also in an AR single form. Lengthening of the glutamine repeat caused an increase in the spacing between the two isotypes of the doublet, showing that the number of glutamine residues determines the extent of the upshift. Hormone treatment induced an extra isotype with an apparent molecular mass of 114 kDa, resulting in a 110-112-114 kDa AR triplet. The hormone-induced upshift was dependent on the Ser-80 consensus phosphorylation site. Mutations in the DNA binding domain caused a different distribution of receptor protein over the three AR isotypes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1993

In vitro translation of androgen receptor cRNA results in an activated androgen receptor protein.

Translation of androgen receptor (AR) cRNA in a reticulocyte lysate and subsequent analysis of the translation products by SDS/PAGE showed a protein with an apparent molecular mass of 108 kDa. Scatchard-plot analysis revealed a single binding component with high affinity for R1881 (Kd = 0.3 nM). All AR molecules synthesized specifically bound steroid. No evidence for AR phosphorylation during in vitro synthesis was found. When AR was labelled with [3H]R1881 and analysed on sucrose-density gradients, a complex of approx. 6 S was observed. The complex was shifted to a higher sedimentation coefficient after incubation with a monoclonal AR antibody directed against an epitope in the DNA-binding domain. In the presence as well as the absence of hormone, AR molecules were able to bind to DNA-cellulose without an activation step. Gel retardation assays revealed that the AR forms complexes with a DNA element containing glucocorticoid-responsive element/androgen-responsive element sequences. Receptor-DNA interactions were stabilized by different polyclonal antibodies directed against either the N- or C-terminal part of the AR and were abolished by an antibody directed against the DNA-binding domain of the receptor. In conclusion, translation of AR cRNA in vitro yields an activated AR protein which binds steroid with high affinity. It is proposed that AR antibodies enhance AR-DNA binding by stabilizing AR dimers when bound to DNA.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗