[Social and economic course after amputation of the upper extremity].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Kejlaa.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Sixty-six patients with upper limb amputations were followed-up in their homes. The object of this article was to assess the course as regards the prosthesis, the extent to which this was employed, and to investigate the factors which influence the type of prosthesis and the social conditions of the patient. The amputees were divided into four groups. Twenty-six employed an active prosthesis for more than eight hours daily, six for less than eight hours daily, 16 employed passive prostheses and 18 did not employ prostheses. 65% of the amputations were performed on account of accidents. A group of six were submitted to amputation as part of the treatment of irreversible brachial plexus lesion. The investigation demonstrated the significant importance of the year of amputation. This is explained by late development of the prosthesis supply and the possibilities for rehabilitation and the legislative conditions. Great differences were observed between the prosthetic conditions at the primary equipment and at follow-up investigation. The type of prosthesis employed depended on loss of the dominant arm, prostheses available and the general condition of the individual patient. There were differences in the mental reactions for patients with planned and traumatic amputations. It is recommended that this patient group should be ensured rapid fitting with prostheses by an experienced prosthesis and adequate rehabilitation within a geographically manageable district. This patient group requires team therapy and this functions best when the relevant staff are experienced with this type of patient.
A retrospective investigation was undertaken on 62 patients with 103 fractures. Of these, 61 fractures were treated with Rush pin, ten with plate osteosynthesis and three with cerclage. Fifty-three patients were followed up. This revealed that 50% of the patients achieved excellent or satisfactory results. 39% did not have satisfactory results while six patients (9.7%) developed pseudoarthrosis and thus unacceptable results. The healing percentage was 92.3 and the infection rate 3.1. These results are considerably better than previously reported series of forearm fractures treated with medullary osteosynthesis and they are comparable with the results of plate osteosynthesis. Rush pin osteosynthesis appears to be as good as plate osteosynthesis but this should be illustrated by means of a controlled investigation.
Nine patients with severe irreversible brachial plexus lesions were submitted to arthrodesis of the shoulder joint and/or amputation of the forearm, the latter with the object of fitting an artificial limb. In one patient, the arm was re-implanted and biceps function of strength M2 was obtained. Three patients were submitted to microsurgical interventions on the plexus. All of the patients were visited in their homes after an average period of observation of three years (1-8 years). Seven patients were equipped with prostheses, three of these with myoelectric prostheses. One patient employed an orthosis and one had been submitted to arthrodesis of the shoulder joint only. Three of the patients were fitted with prostheses 12 years after the accident but nevertheless obtained good prosthetic function. One of these patients had even been fitted with a prosthesis on the non-dominant side. Forearm amputation was chosen in order to control rotation and to avoid projection of the proximal part of the prosthesis up over the shoulder joint. The absent/reduced sensibility at the level of the amputation did not result in pressure problems from the prosthesis. All of the patients used their prostheses. Pain is not an indication for amputation surgery but does not hinder a good functional result.
Material was collected concerning fatal level-crossing accidents in Denmark during the period 1.1.1980 to 31.12.1987. The epidemiological and traumatic circumstances are illustrated. A total of 51 fatal level-crossing accidents occurred which corresponds to 1% of all the annual traffic deaths in Denmark. The majority of the accidents occurred in good weather conditions and between 12 noon and 3.59 pm. Single-person accidents constituted 75%. The majority of the persons killed belonged to the local population and were familiar with the local conditions. The majority of the accidents were the local conditions. The majority of the accidents were due to poor visual conditions and lack of attention. In level-crossings with a keeper, the commonest causes were blinding by the sun and fog. The majority of the accidents occurred in level-crossings marked by light and sound signals. The risk for accidents in these crossings is six times as great as in crossings with half barriers. Private cars were most frequently involved and the persons killed in these died of head and cerebral injuries because the train buffers hit them at head height. Derailing of the trains was only seen on three occasions where the obstructing vehicles were heavy lorries. The fact that more derailings did not occur must be due to the low rate of the trains in the railway sidings where the majority of accidents occurred. A few proposals are made for prophylactic measures.
A regional prospective casualty department investigation of patients with eye injuries is compared with recent Danish investigations on the subject. The frequency, causes and the primary sites of treatment are reviewed and the pattern of referral is followed. The investigation reveals that great regional differences exist as regards the frequency and the sites of primary treatment and that injuries sustained during leisure activities resemble occupational injuries. The combination of standardized casualty department treatment and the possibility of referral to a specialist or special department appears to be a good therapeutic model for acute eye injuries.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.