PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Kelsey

Publications and source records attributed to G Kelsey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Limited evolutionary conservation of imprinting in the human placenta.

The epigenetic phenomenon of genomic imprinting provides an additional level of gene regulation that is confined to a limited number of genes, frequently, but not exclusively, important for embryonic development. The evolution and maintenance of imprinting has been linked to the balance between the allocation of maternal resources to the developing fetus and the mother's well being. Genes that are imprinted in both the embryo and extraembryonic tissues show extensive conservation between a mouse and a human. Here we examine the human orthologues of mouse genes imprinted only in the placenta, assaying allele-specific expression and epigenetic modifications. The genes from the KCNQ1 domain and the isolated human orthologues of the imprinted genes Gatm and Dcn all are expressed biallelically in the human, from first-trimester trophoblast through to term. This lack of imprinting is independent of promoter CpG methylation and correlates with the absence of the allelic histone modifications dimethylation of lysine-9 residue of H3 (H3K9me2) and trimethylation of lysine-27 residue of H3 (H3K27me3). These specific histone modifications are thought to contribute toward regulation of imprinting in the mouse. Genes from the IGF2R domain show polymorphic concordant expression in the placenta, with imprinting demonstrated in only a minority of samples. Together these findings have important implications for understanding the evolution of mammalian genomic imprinting. Because most human pregnancies are singletons, this absence of competition might explain the comparatively relaxed need in the human for placental-specific imprinting.

Alleles↗

Epigenetics and imprinting of the trophoblast -- a workshop report.

Genomic imprinting is a remarkable process that causes genes to be expressed or repressed depending on their parental-origin. Imprinted genes play important roles in prenatal growth and organ development. Postnatally, imprinted genes can contribute to the regulation of metabolic pathways and behaviour associated with the control of resources. One of the most important sites of imprinted gene action is the placenta. During this workshop at the 11th meeting of the International Federation of Placenta Associations/European Placenta Group held in Glasgow, a series of short talks were presented providing an overview of the evolution, function and mechanisms of imprinting in mammals with particular reference to the placenta. In addition, epigenetic control of trophoblast development and function were considered. This report summarises the contributions to the workshop.

Animals↗

Delayed diagnosis of congenital factor IX deficiency (Christmas disease) in a girl with Turner's Syndrome.

Patients with Turner's syndrome are at risk of X-linked recessive disorders. We report a case of a young girl with Turner's syndrome with persistent mildly abnormal coagulation studies associated with a mild to moderate bleeding diathesis. The abnormalities were initially attributed to intrahepatic cholestasis and were partially responsive to vitamin K. After an interval of several years an episode of unexplained iron deficiency anaemia prompted re-investigation of the mild coagulopathy. Disproportionate reduction in the factor IX concentration and restoration of haemostasis with factor IX concentrate lead to a revised provisional diagnosis of mild haemophilia B which was subsequently confirmed by sequencing the factor IX gene.

Anemia↗

Imprinting the Gnas locus.

Gnas is an enigmatic and rather complex imprinted gene locus. A single transcription unit encodes three, and possibly more, distinct proteins. These are determined by overlapping transcripts from alternative promoters with different patterns of imprinting. The canonical Gnas transcript codes for Gsalpha, a highly conserved signalling protein and an essential intermediate in growth, differentiation and homeostatic pathways. Monoallelic expression of Gnas is highly tissue-restricted. The alternative transcripts encode XLalphas, an unusual variant of Gsalpha, and the chromogranin-like protein Nesp55. These transcripts are expressed specifically from the paternal and maternal chromosomes, respectively. Their existence in the Gnas locus might imply functional connections amongst them or with Gsalpha. In this review, we consider how imprinting of Gnas was discovered, the phenotypic consequences of mutations in each of the gene products, both in the mouse and human, and provide some conjectures to explain why this elaborate imprinted locus has evolved in this manner in mammals.

Animals↗

Identification and properties of imprinted genes and their control elements.

Imprinted genes have the unusual characteristic that the copy from one parent is destined to remain inactive. Though few in number they nonetheless constitute a functionally important part of the mammalian genome. With their memory of parental origin, imprinted genes represent an important model for the epigenetic regulation of gene function and will provide invaluable paradigms to test whether we can predict epigenetic state from DNA sequence. Since their first discovery, systematic screens and some good fortune have led to identification of over seventy imprinted genes in the mouse and human: recent microarray analysis may reveal many more. With a significant number of imprinted genes now identified and completion of key mammalian genome sequences, we are able systematically to examine the organization of imprinted loci, properties of their control elements and begin to recognize common themes in imprinted gene regulation.

Alleles↗

An intragenic methylated region in the imprinted Igf2 gene augments transcription.

DNA methylation is usually associated with transcriptional silencing, but in the imprinted mouse Igf2 gene, the paternally expressed copy is methylated in two discrete differentially methylated regions (DMRs). DMR1 is located upstream of the fetal promoters and has been shown to be a methylation sensitive silencer. Here we examine the role of the intragenic DMR2 by gene targeting. In contrast to DMR1, deletion of DMR2 on the maternal allele did not lead to activation of the silent Igf2 gene. Deletion of a 54 bp methylated core region in DMR2 on the paternal allele, however, reduced Igf2 mRNA levels and was associated with fetal growth retardation. Nuclear run-on assays showed that the core region influenced transcription initiation, and luciferase reporter assays suggested that its methylation increases transcription. These results reveal a novel mechanism of gene expression whereby intragenic methylation can increase levels of transcription.

Alleles↗

Imprinted genes and the coordination of fetal and postnatal growth in mammals.

A substantial proportion of genes that control fetal growth in placental mammals are imprinted. Imprinted genes can act in fetal tissues to regulate growth by cell proliferation, cell death and the make up of extracellular space. Imprinted growth-promoting genes such as Igf2 probably act predominantly in an endocrine fashion, thus coordinating organ growth with the growth of the organism. In overgrowth and growth deficiency syndromes, however, imprinted growth factors can act by more local mechanisms, resulting in disproportionate growth. In addition to controlling fetal growth directly and thereby determining the nutritional demand of the fetus, imprinted genes can also apparently limit the nutritional supply to the fetus through the placenta. Imprinted genes may also be involved in postnatal growth up to weaning.

Animals↗

Generation of monoparental embryos for investigation into genomic imprinting.

The seminal work of McGrath and Solter (1) and independently of Surani et al. (2) in 1984 established the fundamental principle of nuclear nonequivalency; that is, chromosomes of both paternal and maternal origin are required for development to term in mammals. This was achieved through the creation of diploid reconstituted zygotes, which contained either two maternal or two paternal pronuclei. Embryos containing pronuclei exclusively of maternal or paternal origin display characteristic developmental abnormalities and fail to develop to term. This failure is partially explained by the observation that paternally and maternally derived genomes have complementary roles during embryogenesis, contributing differentially to embryonic and extraembryonic lineages (2-5). These reconstitutions were accomplished by nuclear transplantation and karyoplast fusion using HVJ or Sendai virus-assisted fusion (1). These experiments laid the foundation for the discovery and exploration of this unique form of non-Mendelian mammalian gene regulation whereby expression of genes and hence phenotype were dictated by the parent from whom they where inherited. This parent-of-origin phenomenon is known as genomic imprinting.

Animals↗

Identification of imprinted loci by methylation: use of methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis (Me-RDA).

The technique of representational difference analysis (RDA) was originally described by Lisitsyn et al. (1993) as a means of identifying differences between complex genomes by the use of subtractive hybridisation (1). This protocol for methylation-sensitive RDA (Me-RDA) describes adaptations to the original technique that, by the use of oligonucleotides for HpaII or Hin6I sites, allow the identification of sequences whose methylation differs between two sources of DNA. Differences in the methylation of the maternal and paternal alleles of imprinted genes have been described for most imprinted genes studied to date (2). The importance of methylation in the control of imprinted gene expression has been clearly demonstrated by the perturbation of allelic expression in mice deficient in Dnmt1, the major mammalian DNA methyltransferase (3), and methylation has been suggested to fulfill the necessary requirements of an "imprint" (4).

Animals↗

An imprinted transcript, antisense to Nesp, adds complexity to the cluster of imprinted genes at the mouse Gnas locus.

The Gnas locus in distal mouse chromosome (Chr) 2 is emerging as a complex genomic region. It contains three imprinted genes in the order Nesp-Gnasxl-Gnas. Gnas encodes a G protein alpha-subunit, and Nesp and Gnasxl encode proteins of unknown function expressed in neuroendocrine tissue. Together, these genes form a single transcription unit because transcripts of Nesp and Gnasxl are alternatively spliced onto exon 2 of Gnas. Nesp and Gnasxl are expressed from opposite parental alleles, with Nesp encoding a maternal-specific transcript and Gnasxl encoding a paternal-specific transcript. We now identify a further imprinted transcript in this cluster. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis of Nesp expression in 15. 5-days-postcoitum embryos carrying only maternal or paternal copies of distal Chr 2 revealed an isoform that is exclusively paternally, rather than maternally, expressed. Strand-specific reverse transcription-PCR showed that this form is an antisense transcript. The existence of a paternally expressed antisense transcript was confirmed by Northern blot analysis. The sequence is contiguous with genomic sequence downstream of Nesp and encompasses Nesp exons 1 and 2 and an intervening intron. We propose that Nespas is an additional control element in the imprinting region of mouse distal Chr 2; it adds further complexity to the Gnas-imprinted gene cluster.

Animals↗

Deletion of a silencer element in Igf2 results in loss of imprinting independent of H19.

Igf2 and H19 are closely linked, reciprocally imprinted genes on mouse distal chromosome 7. The paternally expressed Igf2 encodes a potent fetal growth factor and the maternally expressed H19 encodes a non-coding RNA (refs 1,2). Shared endoderm-specific enhancers 3' to H19 are necessary for transcription of the maternal copy of H19 and the paternal copy of Igf2 (ref. 3), a chromatin boundary upstream of H19 preventing access of the enhancers to the maternal Igf2 promoters. Mesoderm-specific control elements have not been identified, and the role of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in Igf2 has not been addressed. Two DMRs in Igf2 are methylated on the active paternal allele, suggesting that they contain silencers. Here we have deleted the DMR1 region in Igf2. Maternal transmission of the deletion results in biallelic expression of Igf2 in most mesodermally derived tissues without altering H19 imprinting or expression. Paternal or maternal transmission leads to continued postnatal transcription of Igf2, in contrast to the wild-type allele, which is silenced soon after birth. These results reveal a mesodermal silencer, which may be regulated by methylation and which has a major role in H19-independent expression and imprinting control of Igf2. Our results establish a new mechanistic principle for imprinted genes whereby epigenetically regulated silencers interact with enhancers to control expression, and suggest a new mechanism for loss of imprinting (LOI) of Igf2, which may be important in a number of diseases.

Animals↗

Igf2 imprinting in development and disease.

Igf2 is one of the first imprinted genes discovered and occupies a centre stage in the study of imprinting. This is because it has dramatic effects on the control of fetal growth, it is involved in growth disorders and in cancer, it interacts with products of other imprinted genes, and its imprinting status is under complex regulation in a cluster of tightly linked imprinted genes. Here we review briefly the key features of Igf2 imprinting in normal development and in disease, and hope to show what a fascinating subject of study this gene and its biology provides.

Animals↗

Identification of imprinted loci by methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis: application to mouse distal chromosome 2.

Imprinted genes are distinguished by different patterns of methylation on their parental alleles, a property by which imprinted loci could be identified systematically. Here, representational difference analysis (RDA) is used to clone HpaII fragments with methylation differences on the maternal and paternal copies of distal chromosome (Chr) 2 in the mouse. Uniparental inheritance for this region causes imprinting phenotypes whose molecular basis is only partially understood. RDA led to the recovery of multiple differentially methylated HpaII fragments at two major sites of imprinted methylation: paternal-specific methylation at the Nesp locus and maternal-specific methylation at the Gnasxl locus. Nesp and Gnasxl represent oppositely imprinted promoters of the Gnas gene, which encodes the G-protein subunit, Gsalpha. The organization of the Nesp-Gnasxl-Gnas region was determined: Nesp and Gnasxl were found to be 15 kb apart, and Gnasxl was found to be 30 kb upstream of Gnas. Sites of imprinted methylation were also detected at the loci for neuronatin on Chr 2 and for M-cadherin on Chr 8. RDA was highly effective at identifying imprinted methylation, and its potential applications to imprinting studies are discussed.

Animals↗

A cluster of oppositely imprinted transcripts at the Gnas locus in the distal imprinting region of mouse chromosome 2.

Imprinted genes tend to occur in clusters. We have identified a cluster in distal mouse chromosome (Chr) 2, known from early genetic studies to contain both maternally and paternally imprinted, but unspecified, genes. Subsequently, one was identified as Gnas, which encodes a G protein alpha subunit, and there is clinical and biochemical evidence that the human homologue GNAS1, mutated in patients with Albright hereditary osteodystrophy, is also imprinted. We have used representational difference analysis, based on parent-of-origin methylation differences, to isolate candidate imprinted genes in distal Chr 2 and found two oppositely imprinted genes, Gnasxl and Nesp. Gnasxl determines a variant G protein alpha subunit associated with the trans-Golgi network and Nesp encodes a secreted protein of neuroendocrine tissues. Gnasxl is maternally methylated in genomic DNA and encodes a paternal-specific transcript, whereas Nesp is paternally methylated with maternal-specific expression. Their reciprocal imprinting may offer insight into the distal Chr 2 imprinting phenotypes. Remarkably, Gnasxl, Nesp, and Gnas are all part of the same transcription unit; transcripts for Gnasxl and Nesp are alternatively spliced onto exon 2 of Gnas. This demonstrates an imprinting mechanism in which two oppositely imprinted genes share the same downstream exons.

Alternative Splicing↗

Analysis and identification of imprinted genes.

Genomic imprinting in mammals results in the unequal expression of the two parental alleles of specific genes. The existence of imprinting in the mouse emerged from nuclear transplantation studies and from the abnormal phenotypes associated with uniparental inheritance of particular chromosome segments. Over the past 5 years, 20 or so imprinted genes have been identified. This has emphasized the important roles played by some imprinted genes in development, permitted a description of the epigenetic properties associated with imprinting, and provided the first insights into the regulation of imprinting. In this article, we discuss the generation of experimental material in which imprinting effects can be analyzed, review the properties of imprinted genes, and discuss how to examine them using state-of-the-art techniques. Finally, we consider the means by which new imprinted genes can be identified.

Alleles↗

Imprinting mechanisms.

A number of recent studies have provided new insights into mechanisms that regulate genomic imprinting in the mammalian genome. Regions of allele-specific differential methylation (DMRs) are present in all imprinted genes examined. Differential methylation is erased in germ cells at an early stage of their development, and germ-line-specific methylation imprints in DMRs are reestablished around the time of birth. After fertilization, differential methylation is retained in core DMRs despite genome-wide demethylation and de novo methylation during preimplantation and early postimplantation stages. Direct repeats near CG-rich DMRs may be involved in the establishment and maintenance of allele-specific methylation patterns. Imprinted genes tend to be clustered; one important component of clustering is enhancer competition, whereby promoters of linked imprinted genes compete for access to enhancers. Regional organization and spreading of the epigenotype during development is also important and depends on DMRs and imprinting centers. The mechanism of cis spreading of DNA methylation is not known, but precedent is provided by the Xist RNA, which results in X chromosome inactivation in cis. Reading of the somatic imprints could be carried out by transcription factors that are sensitive to methylation, or by methyl-cytosine-binding proteins that are involved in transcriptional repression through chromatin remodeling.

Animals↗