PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Knupfer

Publications and source records attributed to G Knupfer.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Abstaining for foetal health: the fiction that even light drinking is dangerous.

There is a strong ideological and political movement in the USA to convince pregnant women not to drink any alcohol. An examination of the research literature on the results of drinking during pregnancy does not provide any evidence that light drinking is harmful to the foetus. The chief defects in the research that make conclusions about the effects of 'moderate' or 'light' drinking invalid are the ways in which drinking patterns are categorized: a) usually the categories used are 'average per day', the different effects of binging and light drinking being thus confused; b) often the heaviest drinking category is described as 'two or more drinks a day', sometimes even 'one or more'. Obviously, one cannot tell whether any instances of foetal damage occurring in that group came from women who drank only two drinks each day, which would be light drinking, or from those who drank ten drinks each day since 'ten drinks a day' is part of the category 'two or more'.

Alcohol Drinking↗

The prevalence in various social groups of eight different drinking patterns, from abstaining to frequent drunkenness: analysis of 10 U.S. surveys combined.

Ten surveys of drinking in the U.S.A. were combined, producing a sample size of 12,603 cases. The present study uses only non-Hispanic Black and White races, bringing the total number down to 9891. Eight drinking categories were used, the heaviest being those who drank at least eight drinks at least three times a week. Classification by sex, age, race and socio-economic status produced 72 social subgroups. The distribution of drinking patterns varied a great deal in these subgroups; frequent light drinkers, for example, were 0% in one subgroup and 42% in another; abstainers were 0% in one group and, in another, 76%. The type of classification of 'heavier' drinkers so often used in surveys of small sample size, where the lower limit of amount of drinking is unrealistically low, may give a false impression of the distribution of drinking patterns. We found that the proportions of respondents falling into our categories 1, 2, 3 and 4 (corresponding to many definitions of 'heavier' drinkers) are not good predictors of frequent drunkenness, or of serious problems.

Adult↗