A comparison of costs and effectiveness of the BACTEC NR-730 system and a conventional method of blood culture.
Results and costs of the first six months experience with BACTEC NR-730 were compared with a series of blood cultures performed by the conventional method previously used. The newer technology detected the growth of 14.1% of significant isolates on the day of receipt of the specimens. The previous method lacked blind subcultures on the day of receipt and therefore detected growth only after overnight incubation. No direct comparison of the sensitivities of the methods was possible, but the percentages of cultures yielding significant isolates were similar for the two methods. With the new method, technicians needed less time for daily screening of blood cultures, fewer subcultures were required and less contamination was observed. The method used to calculate the directly-related variable costs of the two methods is set out. In the particular situation reported, workload and labor costs were such that introduction of BACTEC NR-730 resulted in a saving on variable costs.