PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G L Noel

Publications and source records attributed to G L Noel.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1975

Klinefelter's syndrome: examination of thyroid function, and the TSH and PRL responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone prior to and after testosterone administration.

Thyroid function and prolactin (PRL) responsiveness to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) were examined in 6 patients with Klinefelter's syndrome prior to and after therapy with testosterone. The thyroid function tests, including serum triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), thyroxine binding globulin (TBG), resin T3 uptake (RT3U), radioactive iodine uptake (RAIU), thyrotropin (TSH) stimulation and the TSH response to TRH were normal during both periods of study. Testosterone treatment had no significant effect on any of these parameters with the exception of the RT3U which increased. PRL response to TRH were significantly higher than those observed in normal men (P less than 0.05). Despite the fact that mean plasma PRL responses to TRH were decreased when the patients were restudied during testosterone therapy, they remained greater than those of normal men. Mean serum estradiol concentrations were normal and did not increase significantly during testosterone therapy. These studies suggest that: (1) thyroid function may be normal in patients with Klinefelter's syndrome more often than previously reported, and (2) patients with Klinefelter's syndrome may manifest PRL hyper-responsiveness to TRH that is decreased but not normalized during testosterone therapy. Because estradiol levels failed to increase despite a marked rise in testosterone, further studies are warranted to examine testosterone and estradiol clearance and conversion rates in patients with Klinefelter's syndrome.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree and sources of variability faculty evaluations of residents for the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Clinical Evaluation Exercise (CEX). DESIGN: Videotaped simulated CEX containing programmed resident strengths and weaknesses shown to faculty evaluators, with responses elicited using the open-ended form recommended by the ABIM followed by detailed questionnaires. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two full-time faculty internists. INTERVENTION: After the open-ended form was completed and collected, faculty members rated the resident's performance on a five-point scale and rated the importance of various aspects of the history and physical examination for the patient shown. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Very few of the resident's strengths and weaknesses were mentioned on the open-ended form, although responses to specific questions revealed that faculty members actually had observed many errors and some strengths that they had failed to document. Faculty members also displayed wide variance in the global assessment of the resident: 50% rated him marginal, 25% failed him, and 25% rated him satisfactory. Only for performance areas not directly related to the patient's problems could substantial variability be explained by disagreement on standards. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty internists vary markedly in their observations of a resident and document little. To be useful for resident feedback and evaluation, exercises such as the CEX may need to use more specific and detailed forms to document strengths and weaknesses, and faculty evaluators probably need to be trained as observers.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Does review of peripheral blood smears help in the initial workup of common anemias?

Sixty-five physicians were tested to determine the effect of their reviews of red blood cell morphology on their subsequent diagnoses of and workup plans for common anemias. The subjects read clinical and laboratory data for six pairs of cases of anemia, reviewing the blood smear for one case in each pair. They correctly identified the presence or absence of morphologic features on the blood smears 82% of the time. In spite of excellent morphologic discrimination, the number of tests ordered was not affected by blood smear review. In fact, the quality of the physicians' workup plans, measured by numbers of tests appropriately ordered and excluded, was slightly but significantly better when they did not review the smears (p less than 0.005). In addition, smear review did not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy for any of the common anemias studied. Significantly more correct diagnoses were made without smear review for vitamin B12-folate deficiency anemia (p less than 0.015) and thalassemia (p less than 0.0001). Although routine review of blood smears by physicians in the management of common anemias may provide useful information, the authors were unable to demonstrate an improvement in the number or appropriateness of tests ordered or diagnostic accuracy in spite of excellent morphologic discrimination.

Analysis of Variance↗