PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G L Verschraegen

Publications and source records attributed to G L Verschraegen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

A simple and efficient urine sampling method for bacteriological examination in elderly women.

AIM: to determine how collecting urine voided directly into a container compares with urine obtained by suprapubic aspiration. METHOD: urine samples were collected in a sterile recipient placed in the toilet or in the bed-pan during voiding, after the vulval region had been cleaned by water. These samples were compared with samples of the same urine obtained by suprapubic aspiration. The samples were examined for pyuria and bacteriuria. Applying the Kass criteria on the voided urine specimen and assessing the presence of leucocyturia, it was possible to differentiate urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria and contamination. RESULTS: all 13 cases of infection found on suprapubic aspiration were also identified by this sampling technique. The technique produced four false-positive results. CONCLUSION: this simple sampling method may not only obviate the need for suprapubic aspiration but also for bladder catheterization in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in many elderly women.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Methicillin resistance of bacteria isolated from vitreous fluid from patients undergoing vitrectomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the resistance patterns of bacteria in vitreous fluid from patients undergoing vitrectomy for diagnostic reasons, with bacteria of other nosocomial infections. METHODS: Vitreous fluid samples (n=144) were obtained from 133 patients undergoing vitrectomy for endophthalmitis, and 11 for uveitis as suspected endophthalmitis. They were Gram stained and cultured. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were run on all isolates. RESULTS: Gram stains were positive in 45/144 cases (31%), among which 38/45 (84%) were confirmed by a positive culture. Cultures were positive in 74/144 patients (51%) with mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 44) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 13). In 133 patients endophthalmitis occurred after lens implantation (80 cases) and in 53 cases there was another origin (e.g. corneal transplantation, endogenous). In 26/80 post-lens implantation infections, culture remained negative; 32 infections occurred with coagulase-negative staphylococci, 10 with Staphylococcus aureus, 9 with streptococci and 3 with gram-negative bacteria. For endophthalmitis, ophthalmologists in our institution give an intraocular injection of vanccmycin and ceftazidim after vitrectomy. Among the 44 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci, 12 (27%) were resistant to methicillin. This is in contrast to other hospital-related coagulase-negative staphylococcus infections in general, and the resistance rate is 75% in our hospital. Only 2/13 Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from vitreous fluid are less resistant to methicillin than those isolated in other nosocomial infections.

Adult↗