PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Lionel

Publications and source records attributed to G Lionel.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Bladder-sparing surgery in locally advanced nonurological pelvic malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: The urinary bladder is commonly involved in pelvic malignancy. The incidence of apparent extension into adjacent organs in locally advanced colorectal malignancy is 5-12%. It is not known with other pelvic malignancy. No guidelines are available for its management. Often a dilemma exists between cystectomy and a bladder-sparing procedure. We studied the validity of bladder-sparing surgery (BSS) in locally advanced nonurological pelvic malignancy. METHODS: Hospital records of patients who underwent BSS along with other surgeries (abdomino-perineal resection, anterior resection, anterior exenteration, debulking surgery and total pelvic exenteration) from January 1992 to May 2003 were reviewed. RESULTS: BSS was done in 15 patients. 10 had locally advanced colorectal malignancy, 3 with soft tissue masses of the lateral pelvic wall, 1 had ovarian malignancy and the other had residual mass following radiotherapy and chemotherapy of cancer cervix. In those with locally advanced colorectal malignancy, symptoms suggestive of lower urinary tract involvement were present in 8 (80%). Urine examination and ultrasonography was not helpful in suggesting bladder involvement, unlike CT scan of abdomen and pelvis. Preoperative cystoscopy showed endoscopic evidence of bladder involvement in 7 (87.5%). Bladder was involved supratrigonally in 7. Partial cystectomy was done in 9 patients. The left ureter was involved in 6 patients, and they required ureteric reimplantation. Palliative transurethral resection was done in 1 patient with tumor infiltration at the bladder neck and prostate. 50% patients had bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms at 1 year. One patient died in the immediate postoperative period due to a nonurological cause. Overall 3-year survival rate was 40%. CONCLUSION: Unlike primary bladder cancers these lesions are not multifocal and hence en block conservative bladder-sparing surgery can be offered. Preoperative CT scan or MRI can predict lower urinary tract involvement and help in decision-making by both surgeon and patient. The ultimate decision for bladder sparing is based on intraoperative findings. Sparing the bladder might provide better quality of life by avoiding urinary diversion without altering survival.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2004

Does failure to visualize the ureter distal to an impacted calculus constitute an impediment to successful lithotripsy?

BACKGROUND: A severe degree of ureteral obstruction is viewed as a predictor of poor outcome in shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Impacted stones are often considered a contraindication to in-situ SWL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Impaction in our study was defined as failure to visualize the ureter distal to the calculus with proximal hold-up of contrast for as long as 3 hours on an intravenous urogram (IVU). We evaluated 30 patients with impacted ureteral calculi, who were compared with a second unimpacted group matched for stone size and stone location. The calculi were reorganized into < or =10-mm and >10-mm groups. The results were compared in terms of clearance rates, number of shockwaves, number of sessions, and number of days between the start of SWL and clearance. RESULTS: Between January 1998 and December 2001, 30 impacted stones were treated with lithotripsy. Complete clearance rates in the impacted as well as the non-impacted group were 76.7%. There was no statistical difference in the number of shockwaves, sessions, or time to clearance. The results were poorer in lower-ureteral than upper-ureteral calculi, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. However, the differences between the < or =10-mm and >10-mm stones were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Impaction on an IVU does not affect the results of lithotripsy.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

The use of spiral computed tomographic angiography for the assessment of living kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography can replace conventional angiography and intravenous urography for the assessment of potential kidney donors. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of spiral CT in potential kidney donor workup. METHODS: Over a period of 1 year, from December 1995 to December 1996, 16 consecutive potential renal donors had intravenous pyelography, percutaneous transfemoral angiography with selective renal angiography and spiral CT angiography. The spiral CT and renal angiograms were assessed independently by two radiologists. The number of renal arteries, presence or absence of renal artery stenoses and associated parenchymal abnormalities were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 39 renal arteries were detected. Conventional transverse scans viewed in a cine loop format detected all 39 vessels, while the maximum intensity projection and shaded surface display demonstrated only 37. All 39 vessels were detected by the catheter angiography. With the exception of one potential donor with fibromuscular dysplasia, 15 donors were accepted. There was 100% accuracy between the two methods of visualization for the renal arteries. A simple renal cyst was noted in both spiral CT and conventional angiogram, while another had gallstones in spiral CT. CONCLUSIONS: Spiral CT angiography performed as an outpatient procedure is less invasive, less expensive, and provides good images of the arterial and venous anatomy. It has the potential to replace conventional catheter angiography and intravenous pyelogram in the assessment of potential renal donors.

Angiography↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the preliminary experience.

BACKGROUND: Recent improvements in video technology and surgical instrumentation have resulted in the application of minimally invasive techniques to many surgical procedures including splenectomy and adrenalectomy. Nephrectomy requires a long flank incision with division of abdominal musculature and possible subcostal nerve damage. Severe postoperative pain and a prolonged recuperative period may result, and the cosmetic outcome may not be satisfactory. A new surgical approach utilizing laparoscopic dissection and delivery of the kidney through a small incision was performed to circumvent these problems. The aim of this paper is to describe the technique of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) and present the preliminary outcome. METHODS: Over the 12-month period between May 1997 and April 1998, 16 donors underwent donor nephrectomy by a laparoscopic approach. The procedure was assessed with regard to its safety, feasibility and advantages over the open method. RESULTS: All the nephrectomies were completed without conversion to an open procedure. The average postoperative pain score on a visual analogue scale of 1-10 was 2 in LLDN. The donors required 36 mg morphine on average over 36 h postoperatively. Postoperative stay averaged 3 days. One donor developed an infective complication along the wound drain tract which settled with adequate drainage and antibiotics. All the removed donor kidneys were transplanted with immediate good function. There were no surgical complications or graft losses. The recipients' serum creatinine was in the range of 96-181 mmol/L 3 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Significant potential advantages of LLDN include less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization and decreased recuperative time. This preliminary experience indicates LLDN to be effective in terms of safety and feasibility.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗