PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G M Brough

Publications and source records attributed to G M Brough.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Mycophenolate mofetil in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis--a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We have assessed indications, duration and tolerability of treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), and compared clinical outcome with a control cohort treated with other immunosuppressive drugs. METHODS: The clinical records of 109 patients treated with MMF and 63 control subjects receiving other immunosuppressive drugs were reviewed. Data covering a 5-yr period from commencement of treatment or until last assessment date were collected. RESULTS: MMF and control groups were well-matched in terms of basic demographic and clinical parameters. Treatment with MMF was very well tolerated. Of all patients, 12% experienced adverse reactions with gastrointestinal (GI) tract disturbances and infections being most frequent. MMF was discontinued due to disease stabilization in 9%, side effects in 8% and no effect on the disease activity in 14% of the patients. There was a significantly lower frequency of clinically significant pulmonary fibrosis in the MMF-treated cohort (P = 0.037) and significantly better 5-yr survival from disease onset and from commencement of treatment (P = 0.027 and P = 0.012, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of modified Rodnan skin score and forced vital capacity (FVC) change. CONCLUSIONS: MMF is very well tolerated and appears to be at least as effective as the other current therapies for dcSSc. Our results provide support for further evaluation of MMF in a prospective trial.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

A cross-sectional comparison of three self-reported functional indices in scleroderma.

OBJECTIVES: In scleroderma, outcome measures such as skin score provide only limited information about the functional impact of the disease. The requirement for validated and convenient instruments that reliably reflect disease morbidity is now recognized. This study compares the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) with two more recently developed scleroderma-specific tools: scleroderma-visual analogue scales (scleroderma-VAS) and the UK scleroderma Functional Score (UKFS). In addition, the use of clinical and laboratory measures as predictors of disease severity have been examined. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients were studied. Subjects completed the 20-item HAQ-DI, the scleroderma-VAS and a questionnaire related to hand and muscle function (UKFS). Clinical details, measurement of maximal hand-spread, fist-closure and investigations for internal organ involvement were recorded. RESULTS: Over 68% of patients with diffuse disease had moderate to severe disease on the UKFS, compared with 44% with limited disease. The mean UKFS in diffuse disease was 14.7 (s.d. 9.1) and 10.6 (s.d. 8.5) in the limited subset (P=0.02). The mean HAQ-DI in diffuse disease was 1.23 (s.d. 0.77) and 0.79 (s.d. 0.75) in the limited subset (P=0.005). The HAQ-DI showed significant correlation with UKFS (r=0.9; P < 0.001). Several clinical and laboratory measures were associated with higher HAQ-DI and UKFS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comparative study of the UKFS and the HAQ-DI. These data show a strong correlation between assessment methods. Higher scores correlated with clinical and laboratory indicators of severe disease. Used together, these inexpensive tools assess general and organ-specific symptoms, as well as functional limitation.

Adult↗