PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G M Fless

Publications and source records attributed to G M Fless.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Binding and degradation of lipoprotein(a) and LDL by primary cultures of human hepatocytes. Comparison with cultured human monocyte-macrophages and fibroblasts.

Although lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) has structural similarities to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) that include the presence of apolipoprotein B100, there is some disagreement over the strength of its interaction with the LDL receptor and its cellular catabolism by the LDL receptor-mediated pathway. To clarify this subject we evaluated LDL receptor-mediated binding and degradation of Lp(a) and LDL in three human cell lines. The binding of 50 nmol/L Lp(a) at 37 degrees C to the LDL receptor of primary hepatocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts was only 10%, 29%, and 29% of the respective value obtained with 50 nmol/L LDL. Analysis of 4 degrees C binding curves indicated that Lp(a) and LDL had equal affinities for the LDL receptor of fibroblasts, whereas maximal binding of Lp(a) was remarkably lower than that of LDL. LDL receptor-mediated degradation of 50 nmol/L Lp(a) in hepatocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts was only 17%, 22%, and 26%, respectively, of the value obtained with 50 nmol/L LDL and varied greatly among the cells in that it was lowest in hepatocytes, an order of magnitude greater in macrophages, and two orders of magnitude greater in fibroblasts. In contrast, the nonspecific degradation rate of Lp(a) was similar to that of LDL in each of the three tested cell lines. However, the proportion of the degradation of Lp(a) that was nonspecific varied greatly, being 76%, 58%, and 33% in hepatocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts, respectively. These studies indicate that not only is Lp(a) recognized by the LDL receptor but also that, in fibroblasts, Lp(a) and LDL have equal affinities for the LDL receptor, although Lp(a) has a much lower receptor occupancy than LDL. Additionally, they show that there are great cellular differences in the LDL receptor-mediated degradation of Lp(a). If these results can be extrapolated in vivo, where normal LDL levels are 40- to 50-fold higher than those of Lp(a), it would be unlikely that the hepatic LDL receptor is significantly involved in the degradation of Lp(a).

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed1994

Macrophage foam cell lipoprotein(a)/apoprotein(a) receptor. Cell-surface localization, dependence of induction on new protein synthesis, and ligand specificity.

Understanding the interaction of the atherogenic lipoprotein, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], with macrophages may provide important insight into the physiology and pathophysiology of this lipoprotein. We have recently shown that cholesterol loading of macrophages, such as occurs in atheroma foam cells, leads to marked upregulation of a novel receptor activity for native Lp(a) and its plasminogen-like protein component, apoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. We show here that the Lp(a)/apo(a) receptor activity on cholesterol-loaded macrophages is trypsin sensitive, indicating that a cell-surface protein is involved and that the upregulation by cholesterol loading requires new protein synthesis. Ligand studies revealed that the foam cell receptor activity recognizes Lp(a) containing both small and large isoforms of apo(a) as well as rhesus monkey Lp(a), which contains an inactive kringle-4(37) (K4(37) lysine-binding domain. Elastase degradation products of plasminogen did not compete for 125I-labeled recombinant apo(a) [125I-r-apo(a)] internalization and degradation by foam cells, indicating that the K4(37) sequence, as well as the K5 and "protease" domains of apo(a), are not sufficient for receptor interaction. Consistent with these data, the degradation of 125I-r-apo(a) was completely blocked by an anti-Lp(a) polyclonal antibody that does not cross-react with plasminogen. Furthermore, the multiple sialic residues of apo(a) are also not involved in receptor interaction, since desialylated r-apo(a) interacted with foam cells as well as native r-apo(a). In contrast, reduced and denatured r-apo(a) was degraded by foam cells only slightly better than by control cells [28% increased degradation by foam cells versus 450% for native r-apo(a)], suggesting that the upregulated receptor activity recognizes certain secondary and tertiary structural features of apo(a).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of the lysine binding functions of lipoprotein(a) and plasminogen.

Regions of apoprotein(a) of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] exhibit striking primary sequence homology to the kringles of plasminogen. The kringles of plasminogen are lysine binding structures and mediate interactions of plasmin(ogen) with substrates and inhibitors. In the current study, the lysine binding properties of Lp(a) have been compared to those of plasminogen and isolated kringle 4 of plasminogen (K4). An analytical assay was implemented to quantitate the interaction of kringle-containing molecules with lysine-Sepharose beads. Radioiodinated ligands, Lp(a), plasminogen, and K4, bound to the beads, and their interactions were inhibited by lysine analogues in a dose-dependent fashion. A series of omega-aminocarboxylic acids inhibited Lp(a), plasminogen, and K4 binding to the lysine-Sepharose beads, but marked differences in the effectiveness of these compounds were observed with each ligand. In this series of compounds, 6-aminohexanoic acid was the most potent inhibitor of binding to lysine-Sepharose for all three ligands. The pH had little effect on the inhibition of plasminogen binding by these compounds. For Lp(a), a low pH caused a marked decrease in inhibition by the 5-carbon and 4-carbon omega-amino acids. In addition, tranexamic acid was 750-fold more potent than lysine in inhibiting plasminogen and 55-fold more potent for K4 binding to the beads. In contrast, the differential potency of these compounds on Lp(a) binding was only 3-fold. These results suggest that the kringles of Lp(a) possess lysine binding functions which are similar, but not identical, to those of plasminogen and its K4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acetylation↗
PubMed1993

Cholesterol loading of macrophages leads to marked enhancement of native lipoprotein(a) and apoprotein(a) internalization and degradation.

Lipoprotein(a) levels in the plasma are strongly correlated with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Although the mechanism of this effect is not known, the interaction of lipoprotein(a) with macrophages may be important. Previous work has shown that macrophages in culture internalize and degrade native lipoprotein(a) poorly. In the present study, the interaction of Lp(a) with mouse peritoneal and human monocyte-derived macrophages that were cholesterol-loaded, such as occur in atheromata, was investigated. 125I-Lp(a) degradation was increased 4-5-fold in macrophages that had been loaded with cholesterol by incubation with acetyl-LDL for 2-4 days. The enhanced degradation of Lp(a) by foam cells was chloroquine-sensitive and dependent upon the presence of calcium in the extracellular medium. Incubation of the macrophages with acetyl-LDL plus an inhibitor of acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase, which increased the free cholesterol content and decreased the cholesteryl ester content of the cells, resulted in an even greater up-regulation of 125I-Lp(a) degradation (8-23-fold over control macrophages). The interaction of Lp(a) with cholesterol-loaded macrophages involved the apoprotein(a) moiety of Lp(a) since 125I-apoprotein(a), but not 125I-Lp(a-), was degraded to a much greater extent by foam cells compared to control macrophages. The uptake and degradation of Lp(a) in foam cells was not mediated by LDL, scavenger, LDL receptor-related protein (LRP), or plasminogen receptors. Thus, cholesterol loading of macrophages markedly enhances the internalization and lysosomal degradation of Lp(a) and apo(a) by a calcium-dependent receptor activity different from known lipoprotein receptors.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Interactions of a fluorescently labeled peptide with kringle domains in proteins.

The tripeptide Lys-Cys-Lys has been synthesized and covalently labeled at the cysteine sulfhydryl with 4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid to produce a fluorescent labeled peptide (FLP). When excited at 340 nm, the FLP fluorescence strongly with maximal intensity at 405 nm. Addition of proteins containing the kringle lysine-binding domain, such as human lipoprotein (a) and plasminogen kringle 4, significantly attenuate the fluorescence intensity of the FLP. Other proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, did not affect the quantum yield of FLP fluorescence. When human lipoprotein (a) is bound to a lysine-Sepharose affinity column, FLP was found to effectively elute the protein, indicating that the peptide can compete with lysine for the kringle-binding site on lipoprotein (a). The data suggest that FLP binds specifically to kringles through the lysine residues on the peptide, and that binding significantly affects the fluorescence from the labeled peptide. These properties of FLP make it a potentially useful tool for studying the relative affinity of different kringles for lysine binding, which is thought to be an important mechanism for kringle-target protein interactions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Rhesus monkey lipoprotein(a) binds to lysine Sepharose and U937 monocytoid cells less efficiently than human lipoprotein(a). Evidence for the dominant role of kringle 4(37).

Rhesus lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) binds less efficiently than human Lp(a) to lysine-Sepharose and to cultured U937 cells. Studies using elastase-derived plasminogen fragments indicated that neither kringle 5 nor the protease domain of Lp(a) are required in these interactions pointing at an involvement of the K4 region. Comparative structural analyses of both the human and simian apo(a) K4 domain, together with molecular modeling studies, supported the conclusion that K4(37) plays a dominant role in the lysine binding function of apo(a) and that the presence of arginine 72 rather than tryptophan in this kringle can account for the functional deficiency observed with rhesus Lp(a). These in vitro results suggest that rhesus Lp(a) may be less thrombogenic than human Lp(a).

Affinity Labels↗
PubMed1992

Mechanisms by which lipoprotein lipase alters cellular metabolism of lipoprotein(a), low density lipoprotein, and nascent lipoproteins. Roles for low density lipoprotein receptors and heparan sulfate proteoglycans.

We sought to investigate effects of lipoprotein lipase (LpL) on cellular catabolism of lipoproteins rich in apolipoprotein B-100. LpL increased cellular degradation of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) by 277% +/- 3.8% and 32.5% +/- 4.1%, respectively, and cell association by 509% +/- 8.7% and 83.9% +/- 4.0%. The enhanced degradation was entirely lysosomal. Enhanced degradation of Lp(a) had at least two components, one LDL receptor-dependent and unaffected by heparitinase digestion of the cells, and the other LDL receptor-independent and heparitinase-sensitive. The effect of LpL on LDL degradation was entirely LDL receptor-independent, heparitinase-sensitive, and essentially absent from mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells that lack cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Enhanced cell association of Lp(a) and LDL was largely LDL receptor-independent and heparitinase-sensitive. The ability of LpL to reduce net secretion of apolipoprotein B-100 by HepG2 cells by enhancing cellular reuptake of nascent lipoproteins was also LDL receptor-independent and heparitinase-sensitive. None of these effects on Lp(a), LDL, or nascent lipoproteins required LpL enzymatic activity. We conclude that LpL promotes binding of apolipoprotein B-100-rich lipoproteins to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. LpL also enhanced the otherwise weak binding of Lp(a) to LDL receptors. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan pathway represents a novel catabolic mechanism that may allow substantial cellular and interstitial accumulation of cholesteryl ester-rich lipoproteins, independent of feedback inhibition by cellular sterol content.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Malondialdehyde modification of lipoprotein(a) produces avid uptake by human monocyte-macrophages.

Increased plasma levels of the apoB-100-containing lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are associated with an increased risk for atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction, but the mechanisms by which lipoprotein(a) may accelerate these processes remain obscure. In this study we have investigated the impact of the association of apoprotein(a) with the low density lipoprotein (LDL)-like Lp(a) particle upon specificity of receptor recognition after lipoprotein modification by malondialdehyde or transition metal-induced oxidation. We have determined that radioiodination labels both apoprotein components of Lp(a), that malondialdehyde modification produces an anionic lipoprotein comparable to native Lp(a) in Stokes' radius, and that N,N'-disubstituted 1-amino-3-iminopropene derivatives preferentially cross-link apoprotein(a) to apoB-100 protein. Like LDL, native Lp(a) is recognized in human monocyte-macrophages by the LDL receptor. Like LDL, progressive modification of Lp(a) by malondialdehyde abolishes lipoprotein recognition by the LDL receptor and produces uptake and hydrolysis by the scavenger receptor of human monocyte-macrophages. We propose that intimal retention of Lp(a) by extracellular components of the atherosclerotic reaction places the lipoprotein in a microenvironment favoring subsequent peroxidative modification. The chronic production of lipid peroxide-modified Lp(a) together with unmitigated cellular clearance by scavenger receptors may contribute to the accumulation of lipoprotein-derived lipid in macrophage-derived foam cells of the atherosclerotic reaction.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMed1992

Comparative binding and degradation of lipoprotein(a) and low density lipoprotein by human monocyte-derived macrophages.

The binding and degradation of equimolar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) isolated from the same individual were studied in primary cultures of human monocyte-derived macrophages (HMDM). At 4 degrees C, LDL receptor-mediated binding of both Lp(a) and LDL was of low affinity, being 0.8 and 0.23 microM, respectively. Competitive binding studies indicated that the binding of Lp(a) to HMDM was competed 63% by excess LDL. In contrast to the 4 degrees C binding data, the degradation of Lp(a) at 37 degrees C was mainly nonspecific because the amount of Lp(a) processed by the LDL receptor pathway in 5 h was 17% that of LDL. According to pulse-chase experiments, this phenomenon may be accounted for by the facts that less Lp(a) is bound to HMDM at 37 degrees C and that Lp(a) has a lower intrinsic degradation rate and was not due to increased intracellular accumulation or retroendocytosis of the lipoprotein. Degradation of both lipoproteins was primarily lysosomal and only modestly affected by up- or down-regulation of the LDL receptor. The rate of retroendocytosis in HMDM was approximately equal to the degradation rate and appeared to be independent of the type of lipoprotein used, up- or down-regulation of the LDL receptor, or the presence of the lysosomotropic agent chloroquine. Overall, the results indicate that HMDM degrade Lp(a) mainly via a nonspecific pathway with only 25% of total Lp(a) degradation occurring through the LDL receptor pathway. As both 37 degrees C degradation and 4 degrees C binding of LDL are mainly LDL receptor specific, the different metabolic behavior observed at 37 degrees C suggests that Lp(a) undergoes temperature-induced conformational changes on cooling to 4 degrees C that allows better recognition of Lp(a) by the LDL receptor at a temperature lower than the physiological temperature of 37 degrees C. How apo(a) affects these structural changes remains to be established.

Binding, Competitive↗
PubMed1992

Plasma lipoprotein (a) protein concentration and coronary artery disease in black patients compared with white patients.

PURPOSE: This study examines the relation between lipoprotein (a) protein levels and other lipid parameters and coronary artery disease in white and black patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma lipoprotein (a) protein levels were measured prior to coronary angiography in a population of 127 white and 111 black patients. Each angiogram was given a total coronary artery disease score based on the number and severity of atherosclerotic coronary lesions. RESULTS: White and black patients exhibited no differences in total plasma cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. Black patients had higher lipoprotein (a) protein levels than white patients (8.6 versus 4.0 mg/dL; p < 0.0001). The extent and severity of coronary artery disease was the same in white and black patients. White and black patients with coronary artery disease had higher lipoprotein (a) levels than patients without coronary lesions (4.37 versus 1.99 mg/dL, p = 0.027 for white; 9.23 versus 6.87 mg/dL, p = 0.072 for black). In both groups of patients, there was a weak but significant positive correlation between lipoprotein (a) protein levels and coronary artery disease score. CONCLUSION: Lipoprotein (a) is higher in patients with coronary artery disease. Black patients have higher plasma lipoprotein (a) protein levels than white patients and a comparable degree of coronary artery disease. It follows that the cardiovascular pathogenicity of lipoprotein (a) is not significantly greater in black patients despite higher lipoprotein (a) levels.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1992

Postprandial lipoprotein(a) response to a single meal containing either saturated or omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in subjects with hypoalphalipoproteinemia.

We have recently reported that the apolipoprotein (apo) B-100-apo(a) complex, the protein moiety of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], has a high affinity for triglyceride(TG)-rich particles (TRP) and that this complex can affiliate with endogenous TG-rich lipoproteins. To shed more light on the apo B-100-apo(a) complex associated with plasma TRP during postprandial lipidemia, we fed five male subjects presenting with primary hypoalphalipoproteinemia (HP) and four male controls a single fat meal (60 g/m2) containing saturated fatty acids (SFA) and, 6 weeks later, an isocaloric meal containing omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The subjects were phenotyped for plasma Lp(a) and apo C-III levels, apo(a) and apo E isoforms, and lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase activities. Vitamin A was included in the meal as a marker of intestinally derived TRP. Following the SFA meal, three of the HP subjects showed a decrease in plasma levels of Lp(a) that lasted 10 to 12 hours in the presence of an increased hypertriglyceridemic response. Two HP subjects who had low preprandial lipoprotein lipase activity and elevated plasma apo C-III levels showed an increase in plasma Lp(a) levels along with the hypertriglyceridemic excursion. However, in all cases, inclusive of the controls, there was an elevation in plasma levels of TRP of Sf greater than 1,000 that contained apo B-100-apo(a) 6 to 8 hours after the meal. This TRP excursion appeared not to be related to the basal levels of plasma Lp(a), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, TGs, or apo(a) and apo E isoforms, and it did not coincide with the retinyl ester peak.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Expression and purification of kringle 4-type 2 of human apolipoprotein (a) in Escherichia coli.

The most frequently occurring kringle 4 domain of human apolipoprotein (a), Kringle 4-subtype 2 (K4(2)), was expressed as a fusion protein with the maltose binding protein in Escherichia coli using the "tac" promoter. Although the fusion protein was expressed without a signal sequence, 25% was secreted into the periplasmic space; the remainder was found associated with the soluble cytosolic fraction. The fusion protein was readily isolated from whole cell lysate by amylose agarose affinity chromatography. Although a factor Xa cleavage site was engineered into the fusion protein, it was found that release of the K4(2) protein was most conveniently achieved by proteolysis with subtilisin A. The cleavage product produced in this way was shown to be intact K4(2) with only the first three amino acid residues of the leading flanking peptide missing, as judged by N-terminal sequence analysis. K4(2) was isolated from the hydrolysate by FPLC on a Mono-Q column with a yield of 170 +/- 30 micrograms/g wet cells. The resulting protein was monomeric in phosphate-buffered saline as judged by size-exclusion chromatography and appeared to be folded as shown by spectroscopic and immunological assays. The recombinant K4(2) did not bind to either lysine- or proline-Sepharose, suggesting that the ligand binding activities of lipoprotein (a) may reside in the other kringle domains of apolipoprotein (a).

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗
PubMed1992

Attenuation of immunologic reactivity of lipoprotein(a) by thiols and cysteine-containing compounds. Structural implications.

Samples of human plasma having lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) protein levels between 5 and 15 mg/dl and a single apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]) isoform were incubated in vitro at pH 7.7 with various concentrations (1-20 mM) of N-acetylcysteine, homocysteine, 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME), and dithiothreitol (DTT) for 1 hour at 37 degrees C under a nitrogen atmosphere. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblot analyses using a polyclonal antibody specific for apo(a) showed a progressive decrease in apo(a) immunoreactivity as a function of reductant concentration. This decrease of apo(a) immunoreactivity was corroborated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using anti-apo(a) as the capture antibody and either anti-apo B or anti-apo(a) as the developing antibody. In turn, there was no significant decrease in the immunoreactivity of apo B-100, as assessed by ELISA using anti-apo B as both the capture and the detecting antibody. In the case of high concentrations of DTT the plasma samples had to be diluted to prevent gel formation on addition of the reductant. A progressive drop in immunoreactivity as a function of reagent concentration was also observed in pure preparations of Lp(a) incubated with the reducing agents at pH 7.7. At equivalent stoichiometries the changes were more marked than those observed with whole plasma, suggesting a quenching effect by the plasma proteins on the activity of the reductants. The changes in immunoreactivity were attended by dissociation of apo(a) from Lp(a) as assessed by Western blotting. This dissociation, which we interpret as the result of cleavage of the interchain disulfide bond(s), was complete at 5 mM DTT and 100 mM 2ME.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acetylcysteine↗
PubMed1991

Tissue-type plasminogen activator binds to and is inhibited by surface-bound lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein.

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with an increased risk of atherothrombotic disease, but the mechanism(s) by which Lp(a) potentiates atherogenesis is unknown. The extensive homology of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] to plasminogen has led us and others to postulate that Lp(a) may impair fibrinolysis. We have previously shown that Lp(a) inhibits fibrin stimulation of plasminogen activation by tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA); however, we and other investigators have been unable to demonstrate direct inhibition of t-PA by Lp(a) in solution. We now report that t-PA binds reversibly and saturably to surface-bound Lp(a) and to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and that as a result of this binding activation of plasminogen by t-PA is inhibited. The catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of t-PA when bound to polystyrene surface-bound fibrinogen increased 2.9-fold compared to t-PA bound to control wells. When bound to surface-bound Lp(a), however, the catalytic efficiency of t-PA was reduced 9.5-fold compared to t-PA bound to control wells; likewise, by binding to surface-bound LDL, the catalytic efficiency of t-PA was reduced 16-fold compared to the control. Studies with defined monoclonal antibodies suggest that major determinants of t-PA binding are its active site, the LDL receptor binding domain of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB-100), and apo(a). These data suggest a unique mechanism by which Lp(a) and LDL incorporated in an atheroma can inhibit endogenous fibrinolysis and thereby contribute to the genesis of atherothrombotic disease.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1991

Relationship between apo[a] isoforms and Lp[a] density in subjects with different apo[a] phenotype: a study before and after a fatty meal.

Plasma Lp[a] levels and apo[a] isoform distribution among lipoproteins isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation were studied in subjects with one-band or two-band apo[a] phenotypes as assessed by gradient gel electrophoresis before and after an oral fat load. There were no significant differences in the ultracentrifugal profile between fasting plasma and postprandial plasma that was freed of triglyceride-rich particles (TRP). One-band phenotypes exhibited a single symmetrical peak in the density gradient, whereas two-band phenotypes exhibited a multi-modal distribution. Low molecular weight apo[a] isoforms were preferentially associated with low density Lp[a] whereas high molecular weight apo[a] isoforms were found with high density Lp[a] particles. Feeding a high fat meal caused no significant increase in the total plasma level of Lp[a]. However, the isolated TRP contained the apoB-100-apo[a] complex in a quantity that represented only about 1% of its total amount in the fasting plasma. In all cases the apo[a] isoforms present in TRP were also present in the fasting plasma; however, in the two-band apo[a] phenotypes the ratio of the slow over the fast migrating band was in all cases about eightfold higher in TRP than in the fasting plasma. These observations indicate that postprandially a small percentage of apoB-100-apo[a] associates with TRP and suggest that this complex may derive from de novo synthesis rather than from a pre-existing Lp[a] plasma pool. The liver would be the source of the complex due to the presence in the latter of apoB-100.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Rhesus monkey model of familial hypercholesterolemia: relation between plasma Lp[a] levels, apo[a] isoforms, and LDL-receptor function.

We previously described a family of rhesus monkeys in which three out of six members had a spontaneous hypercholesterolemia related to a decrease in number of low density lipoprotein receptors (LDL-R) (Scanu et al. 1988. J. Lipid Res. 29: 1671-1681). During the current work an additional female normocholesterolemic offspring was generated from the mating of the original dam and sire. Moreover, from the breeding of one of the affected male offspring with six unrelated normocholesterolemic female monkeys, eight offspring were generated of which three were hypercholesterolemic on a cholesterol-free diet and exhibited the same degree of LDL-R deficiency as shown by studies in skin fibroblast cultures. All of the animals studied had levels of plasma lipoprotein[a] protein ranging between 1.0 mg/dl and 57.5 mg/dl that were only weakly correlated with total plasma cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apoB. LDL-R deficiency correlated with plasma LDL but not Lp[a]. A 7 week fat challenge (16.5% lard, 0.64% cholesterol) that raised the plasma LDL levels markedly had no effect on plasma Lp[a]. Animals with the single band apo[a] phenotype moving on SDS-PAGE faster than apoB-100 exhibited a tendency for high plasma Lp[a] levels which, however, varied widely. Wide variations in Lp[a] levels were also noted with the other apo[a] phenotypes. Taken together our results demonstrate a successful transmission to second generation animals of the LDL-R deficiency phenotype and provide evidence that this phenotype correlates well with plasma LDL levels but not Lp[a]. Our data also suggest that the apo[a] gene is only partially involved in the regulation of the plasma Lp[a] levels.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Solubility, immunochemical, and lipoprotein binding properties of apoB-100-apo[a], the protein moiety of lipoprotein[a].

The protein moiety of Lp[a] consisting of apoB and apo[a] covalently linked to each other, once freed of lipids by delipidation at pH 8.0 with mixtures of diethyl ether and ethanol, is freely water-soluble at pH values above 6.4. This is in contrast to apoB which, if prepared by similar delipidation techniques, is only soluble at alkaline pH, indicating that the coupling of the carbohydrate-rich apo[a] to apoB confers water solubility to this apolipoprotein that it does not possess on its own. When probed in a sandwich ELISA with antibodies specific to apo[a], the results suggest that some apo[a] epitopes in Lp[a] are masked by lipid but are freely accessible to antibodies in the lipid-free apoB-apo[a] complex. Examination of apoB-apo[a] with an ELISA specific for apoB showed a decreased and altered immunoreactivity of apoB when compared to either low density lipoprotein (LDL) or Lp[a]. These results are consistent with a model in which the hydrophobic lipid binding domains of apoB in apoB-apo[a] self-associate and are shielded from the aqueous environment by the hydrophilic portions of apoB and by an envelope of apo[a]. The apoB-apo[a] complex has lipophilic properties as shown by its interaction with the phospholipid-stabilized triglyceride emulsion, Intralipid. In addition, it has an avidity for all types of lipoproteins although displaying a preference for triglyceride-rich particles. In the presence of plasma, the interaction of apoB-apo[a] with all lipoproteins is reduced. Neither iodinated apo[a] nor iodinated Lp[a] nor LDL had an affinity for lipoproteins, suggesting that the lipophilic properties of apoB-apo[a] are probably due to apoB since apo[a] is rather hydrophilic and is unable to bind to lipids. Thus, the apoB-apo[a] complex has amphipathic properties with apo[a] providing the hydrophilic capacity to interact with the aqueous environment and apoB providing the hydrophobic interactions necessary to bind lipids.

Apolipoproteins A↗