PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

G M Stephenson

Publications and source records attributed to G M Stephenson.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

A comparative study of microsomal and cytosolic S6 phosphatase activities in rat liver.

Spontaneous S6 phosphatase activities dephosphorylating Ser(P)-235 and Ser(P)-236 of the ribosomal protein S6 were measured and compared in microsomes and cytosol of rat liver. The substrate used, small (40S) ribosomal subunits 32P-labelled in vitro by protein kinase A, contained phosphorylated S6 (mainly in the diphosphorylated form) and some minor phosphorylated species. The microsomal and cytosolic S6 phosphatase activities displayed a number of distinct properties. The microsomal activity, representing ca 20% of the S6 phosphatase activity in the post-mitochondrial supernatant, was mainly due to a type-1 phosphatase and dephosphorylated only S6. The remaining post-mitochondrial S6 phosphatase activity, which was fully recovered in the cytosol, and appeared to result from a combination of type-1 (43%) and type 2 (57%) phosphatases, acted on S6 as well as on the minor phosphorylated species. The microsomal activity was 50% inhibited by MgCl2 (10 mM) and was stimulated at least 4.3 fold by MnCl2 (1 mM), while the cytosolic activity was inhibited only 18% by Mg2+ (10 mM) and was increased 2.2 fold by Mn2+ (1 mM). The microsomal activity was increased 10% (P less than 0.06) by lower doses of insulin (25 U/Kg) and 14% (P less than 0.05) by vanadate, but was not significantly (P greater than 0.10) affected by larger doses of insulin (100 U/kg), hepatectomy or cycloheximide. By comparison the cytosolic S6 phosphatase activity was unresponsive to insulin and vanadate, but was decreased 14% and 17% (P less than 0.05) by hepatectomy and cycloheximide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals

A comparative study of the microsomal S6 phosphatase and phosphorylase phosphatase activities in rat liver.

Rat liver microsomes contain type-1 S6 phosphatase (acting on the serine residues phosphorylated by protein kinase A) and type-1 phosphorylase phosphatase activities. The main aim of this study has been to characterize the microsomal S6 phosphatase activity and to compare its properties with those of the phosphorylase phosphatase activity in the same microsomal preparation. The specific activities of both microsomal S6 phosphatase and phosphorylase phosphatase were 1.6- to 1.7-fold higher in the smooth endoplasmic reticulum than in the rough sarcoplasmic reticulum. Both phosphatase activities were inhibited to a similar extent by MgCl2 (10 mM) and NaF (22 mM), were completely suppressed by glycerophosphate (80 mM) and ZnCl2(10 mM), and were stimulated by MnCl2(1 mM). When analyzed by gel filtration on Sephadex G-100 superfine, both phosphatase activities eluted as broad peaks, stretching from the void volume to 45-60 kDa. The microsomal S6 phosphatase and phosphorylase phosphatase activities also displayed the following distinct characteristics: (a) Mn2+ stimulated the S6 phosphatase activity 2.9-fold more than the phosphorylase phosphatase activity, (b) limited trypsin digestion of microsomal preparations increased the phosphorylase phosphatase activity by 1.5- to 2-fold, but decreased the S6 phosphatase activity by 50%, (c) a synthetic peptide analog of S6 (S6229-239) (200 microM), which did not act as a substrate for the microsomal S6 phosphatase and did not affect its activity, inhibited the microsomal phosphorylase phosphatase activity by about 50%, and (d) the elution profile of the phosphorylase phosphatase activity was markedly broader than that of the S6 phosphatase activity. A series of in vivo studies showed that streptozotocin-diabetes and insulin replacement therapy as well as ip injection of insulin or vanadate, which modified the microsomal S6 phosphatase activity, had no statistically significant effects on the microsomal phosphorylase phosphatase activity. Taken together, these results suggest that the microsomal S6 phosphatase and phosphorylase phosphatase activities are due to two distinct enzyme populations.

Animals