PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

G Mavrothalassitis

Publications and source records attributed to G Mavrothalassitis.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Human ETS1 oncoprotein. Purification, isoforms, -SH modification, and DNA sequence-specific binding.

The human ETS1 proto-oncogene proteins have been isolated from the T-cell leukemia line, CEM, by immunoaffinity chromatography and their identity confirmed by NH2-terminal amino acid sequencing. Incubation of CEM cells with N alpha-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK) indicates that ETS proteins can be modified in their cellular context and that pretreatment of the cells with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) protects ETS1 proteins from TLCK modification. These data show that ETS1 proteins can exist in at least two different states, -SH-available and -SH-protected. Renatured human ETS1 has DNA sequence-specific binding to the PEA3 (CAGGAAGT) motif. The ETS1.PEA3 complex can be observed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA). Purified ETS1 retards a band which is exactly the same size as a complex that is retarded from nuclear extracts prepared from CEM cells. Reduced ETS1 is required to form the ETS1.PEA3 complex, however; modification of the ETS1 -SH groups by either NEM or by TLCk does not inhibit formation of the complex. The ETS1.PEA3 complex formed with TLCK-modified ETS1 has a slower mobility than the complex formed with unmodified ETS1. Zone sedimentation analysis of purified ETS1 indicates that it is the monomer of ETS1 which binds to the PEA3 oligonucleotide.

Amino Acid Sequence

High-affinity DNA-protein interactions of the cellular ETS1 protein: the determination of the ETS binding motif.

ETS1 protein purified from CEM cells was used to select its optimum DNA-binding sequence (pu) G/CCaGGA-AGTc (py). The sequence CCGGAAGT (ETS1-3) was preferred 5:1 over CAGGAAGT (PEA3). Quantitative electrophoretic mobility-shift assays (EMSA) indicated that the purified ETS1 protein binds to either ETS1-3 or PEA3 oligonucleotide probes with high affinity (Ka = 0.5-4.0 x 10(10) M-1) and that the purified ETS1 has different binding capacities for ETS1-3 and PEA3 oligonucleotide probes. The ETS1 protein binds 2-5 times more ETS1-3 than PEA3. Competitive binding experiments showed that the ETS1-3 and PEA3 probes effectively compete for the binding of ETS1-3. However, changing the core DNA-binding sequence from GGAA to AGAA eliminates competition. Since the human ETS1 protein selected the same DNA sequence from a mixture of random oligonucleotides as did the Drosophila E74A protein (one of the most divergent members of the ETS family), this strongly suggests that all proteins containing the ETS 85 amino acid domain (sequences which define the ETS family) will bind to the same sequence.

Base Sequence

ETS family of genes in leukemia and Down syndrome.

The human ETS2 and ERG genes are members of the ETS gene family, with sequence homology to the viral ets gene of the avian erythroblastosis retrovirus, E26. These genes are located on chromosome 21 and molecular genetic analysis of Down syndrome (DS) patients with partial trisomy 21 suggested that ETS2 may be a gene within the minimal DS genetic region. We have, in fact, been able to confirm the presence of the ETS2 gene dosage in triplicate occurring in occult human 21 chromosome abnormalities. It is known that ERG and ETS2 gene translocations occur in certain specific leukemias associated with defined chromosome rearrangements [e.g., t(8;21)]. Moreover, it is known that DS individuals are at greater risk for leukemic disease than their normal familial cohorts, implying that trisomy of that region of human chromosome 21 may play a role in the development of this type of neoplasia. The human ETS genes, first identified in our laboratory, are highly conserved, being found from lower organisms, like Drosophila and sea urchin, to humans. In mammals, the ETS genes are structurally distinct, located on separate chromosomes; they are transcriptionally active and differentially regulated. The ETS2 protein is phosphorylated and turns over with a half-life of approximately 20 min. After activation with the tumor promoter, TPA, the level of ETS2 elevates 5- to 20-fold. The properties of the ETS2 protein, such as nuclear localization, phosphorylation, rapid turnover, and response to protein kinase C, indicate that this protein belongs to a group of oncogene proteins thought to have regulatory functions in the nucleus. In the mouse thymus ets-1 and ets-2 are 8-10-fold higher, respectively, in the CD4+ subset than in other subsets examined, suggesting a role in T-cell development for these genes. Cells transfected with the cellular ets-2 gene, expressing higher levels of ets-2 products, showed a stimulated proliferation response, abolished their serum requirement and formed colonies in soft agar that could induce tumors in nude mice. Collectively, these data suggest that this family of genes might play a role in controlling specific steps of the signaling transduction pathway. Thus, the ETS genes, as other genes with homology to viral oncogenes, might be instrumental in regulating cellular growth and differentiation, as well as organismal development.

Animals

Defining target sequences of DNA-binding proteins by random selection and PCR: determination of the GCN4 binding sequence repertoire.

We developed a simple and accurate method to define the sequence recognition properties of DNA-binding proteins. The method employs polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of sequences selected from a mixture of random oligonucleotides by the gel mobility-shift assay. We used this method to define the sequence requirement of the binding domain of the yeast transcriptional activator GCN4. Using a total of 200 ng of purified protein and four cycles of binding and subsequent amplification, we identified the TGA-(C/G)TCA sequence as the binding consensus of GCN4, which is consistent with the previously reported recognition sequence. In addition, our data indicate that GCN4 can bind with lower affinity to sequences that differ from the optimal sequence in one or even two positions. The most common variation was the C to A at position +2. The majority of the substitutions that still allowed binding were 3' to the central C residue indicating that the two sides of the palindromic recognition sequence are not equivalent.

Base Sequence