PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G McMorland

Publications and source records attributed to G McMorland.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Conservative lower back treatment reduces inhibition in knee-extensor muscles: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Knee-joint pathologies, such as anterior knee pain (AKP), are associated with strength deficits and reduced activation of the knee extensors, which is referred to as muscle inhibition (MI). MI is thought to prevent full functional recovery, and treatment modalities that help to reduce or eliminate MI appear necessary for successful rehabilitation. Clinical observations suggest that AKP is typically associated with sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction. It is unknown whether SI-joint dysfunction contributes to knee-extensor deficits and whether correction of SI-joint dysfunction alleviates MI. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess whether conservative low back treatment reduces lower limb MI. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized, controlled, double-blind study the effects of conservative lower back treatment on knee-extensor strength and MI were evaluated in patients with AKP. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with AKP were randomly assigned to either a treatment or a control group. After a lower back functional assessment, the treatment group received a conservative treatment in the form of a chiropractic spinal manipulation aimed at correcting SI-joint dysfunction. The control group underwent a lower back functional assessment but received no joint manipulation. Before and after the manipulation or the lower back functional assessment, knee-extensor moments, MI, and muscle activation during full effort, isometric knee extensions were measured. RESULTS: Patients showed substantial MI in both legs. Functional assessment revealed SI-joint dysfunction in all subjects (23 symptomatic and 5 asymptomatic). After the SI-joint manipulation, a significant decrease in MI of 7.5% was observed in the involved legs of the treatment group. MI did not change in the contralateral legs of the treatment group or the involved and contralateral legs of the control group. There were no statistically significant changes in knee-extensor moments and muscle activation in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that SI-joint manipulation reduces knee-extensor MI. Spinal manipulation may possibly be an effective treatment of MI in the lower limb musculature.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Chiropractic management of mechanical neck and low-back pain: a retrospective, outcome-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that spinal manipulation is an effective treatment for mechanical neck and low-back pain (LBP). Treatment efficacy is important to establish for these symptoms because combined they account for a considerable amount of disability and substantial associated direct and indirect costs to society. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of patients undergoing chiropractic treatment for mechanical neck or LBP. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective, outcome-based analysis was done for patients seeking care at a private chiropractic practice over a 1-year period. A total of 512 files were reviewed, with 119 patients selected for inclusion. Patients were included if their chief symptom was uncomplicated mechanical neck or LBP. Diagnoses included cervical, lumbar, or sacroiliac joint sprain/strain (International Code of Diagnostics version 9 [ICD-9] code: 847.1, 847.3, 846.1, respectively), discogenic LBP (ICD-9: 722.1), and headaches (ICD-9: 784.0) because many patients with neck pain presented with concomitant headaches. Disability and pain were measured with the modified Oswestry scale (for the patients with LBP), Neck Disability Index, and an 11-box visual analogue pain scale before and after treatment. Treatment consisted of spinal manipulation, various soft-tissue techniques, home-care instructions, and ergonomic and return-to-activity advice, including rehabilitative exercises. Patients received an average of 12 treatments over a 4-week period. Statistical analysis was performed on pretreatment and posttreatment values for both disability and pain. Stratification was based on duration (acute/subacute, chronic, acute exacerbation of a chronic condition) and severity (mild, moderate, or severe) of symptoms. RESULTS: Statistically significant reductions in disability and pain scores were achieved in all groups. An average 52.5% and 52.9% reduction in pain and disability, respectively, was achieved in the low-back group. The chronic LBP group realized a less statistically significant reduction of pain and disability (19.7% and 19.8%, respectively) than the acute/subacute (66.8% and 62.5%) or the chronic/recurrent group (56. 5% and 63.4%). The differences were statistically significant. Patients with neck pain had an average 53.8% and 48.4% reduction in their pain and disability, respectively. Patients with concomitant neck pain and headaches had statistically significant higher pretreatment and posttreatment disability and pain scores than those with only neck pain. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between groups stratified according to pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients attending a private chiropractic clinic for treatment of mechanical neck pain or LBP had statistically significant reductions in their pain-related disability after treatment. These results indicate that chiropractic manipulation is beneficial for the treatment of mechanical neck pain and LBP. However, care must be taken when drawing conclusions from these outcomes. The study design does not account for the natural history of low back- or neck pain-related disability and therefore does not allow for claims of treatment efficacy. In addition, it has been suggested that patients presenting to medical doctors with these symptoms have significant overlying comorbidity when compared with patients presenting to a chiropractor.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1995

Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a comparison of fentanyl with morphine.

This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had been made comfortable in the postanaesthetic recovery room with the appropriate opioid solution (mean dose required = fentanyl 375 micrograms or morphine 16 mg). Initial PCA settings were bolus 1 ml (fentanyl 25 micrograms or morphine 1 mg), lockout time ten minutes, and no background infusion. Both analgesic solutions provided effective analgesia for a mean of 37 hr with high levels of patient satisfaction, and there were no differences in VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction, or for side effects (nausea, itch, and sleepiness) between fentanyl or morphine. However, more patients in the fentanyl group required supplementary boluses or alterations to the PCA settings (13/18 vs 4/19: P = 0.005), and one patient was removed from the study due to inadequate analgesia. We conclude that fentanyl is not recommended for routine PCA use following Caesarean section.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with anterior knee pain.

BACKGROUND: Evidence exists that conservative rehabilitation protocols fail to achieve full recovery of muscle strength and function after joint injuries. The lack of success has been attributed to the high amount of muscle inhibition found in patients with pathologic conditions of the knee joint. Clinical evaluation shows that anterior knee pain is typically associated with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, which may contribute to the muscle inhibition observed in this patient group. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether sacroiliac joint manipulation alters muscle inhibition and strength of the knee extensor muscles in patients with anterior knee pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: The effects of sacroiliac joint manipulation were evaluated in patients with anterior knee pain. The manipulation consisted of a high-velocity low-amplitude thrust in the side-lying position aimed at correcting sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Before and after the manipulation, torque, muscle inhibition, and muscle activation for the knee extensor muscles were measured during isometric contractions using a Cybex dynamometer, muscle stimulation, and electromyography, respectively. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients (mean age, 30.5 +/- 13.0 years) with either unilateral (n = 14) or bilateral (n = 4) anterior knee pain. RESULTS: Patients showed substantial muscle inhibition in the involved and the contralateral legs as estimated by the interpolated twitch technique. After the manipulation, a decrease in muscle inhibition and increases in knee extensor torques and muscle activation were observed, particularly in the involved leg. In patients with bilateral anterior knee pain, muscle inhibition was decreased in both legs after sacroiliac joint adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal manipulation might offer an interesting alternative treatment for patients with anterior knee pain and muscle inhibition. Because this clinical outcome study was of descriptive nature rather than a controlled design, biases might have occurred. Thus the results have to be verified in a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial before firm conclusions can be drawn or recommendations can be made.

Adult↗