PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Moraglia

Publications and source records attributed to G Moraglia.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

On binocular unmasking of signals in noise: further tests of the summation hypothesis.

Observers detected the presence of Gabor signals in fields of two-dimensional broadband Gaussian noise encased by a frame of uniform noise. These images, displayed for 1 sec on a t.v. monitor, were seen through a simple-lens stereoscope. While the left and right eye were presented with the same view of the noise frame, the right-eye Gaussian noise field was right-shifted relative to the left-eye's by 20.3 min arc along the horizontal axis. Useful interocular cues concerning signal presence were not available in one set of trials (control condition), the right-eye signal being displaced by the same amount and direction as that of the noise. In another set of trials (experimental condition), such cues were made available by presenting the Gabor signals in exactly corresponding locations in the centres of the two frames. We tested the predictions of a model in terms of which the usefulness of binocular cues for the "unmasking" of the signal rests upon the characteristics of the summed monocular inputs, specifically the signal-to-noise ratio in the summed pattern. The two-dimensional power spectrum for the summed Gaussian noises shows "notches" at specific horizontal- and vertical-frequency intersections where the power density is at or close to zero. If the spectral power in the summed Gabor signal is concentrated at these locations in the experimental condition, the signal should be unmasked. Accordingly, the spatial frequencies and orientation of three Gabor patterns were chosen in such a way that the power density of the summed signals would fit in notches of the power spectrum of the summed noise, while it would overlap with a noise peak for a fourth Gabor signal. The findings were consistent with the summation hypothesis: binocular masking level differences of up to 18 dB were observed, but only for the three signals "falling" in the two-dimensional noise notches.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Binocular unmasking with unequal interocular contrast: the case for multiple Cyclopean eyes.

Under certain conditions, the detection threshold for a sinusoidal grating embedded in a noisy background may be an order of magnitude lower when binocular cues are available than when monocular cues only are present. Such binocular unmasking occurs only when the degree of interocular disparity for the target differs from that of the background. Two classes of models have been advanced to account for such unmasking. The first assumes that orientation-specific, spatial frequency channels in each eye encode the amplitude and phase of the spatial frequency component of the pattern the channel is tuned to detect. Thus, a difference in interocular disparity between target and background could result in interocular amplitude and/or phase differences in left- and right-eye spatial frequency channels. When, however, there are no disparity differences between target and background, there will be no interocular differences in amplitude and phase in the left- and right-eye channels. In this model, then, binocular unmasking reflects the binocular system's ability to respond to interocular amplitude and/or phase differences in the patterns presented to the two eyes. In the second class of models, it is assumed that the left- and right-eye patterns are first summed to form a "Cyclopean" eye. In these models, detection depends on the effect this summation process has on the power spectrum of the summated patterns. To decide between these two classes of models, we observed the occurrence of binocular unmasking when (1) the contrast of masker and signal was varied identically in both eyes and (2) the contrast of masker and signal was varied in one eye only. Consistent with our previous research, we found that the results can be accounted for in terms of a linear summation model of binocular unmasking; the alternative interocular phase detection model was disproved. The implications of these findings for binocular contrast summation in the absence of visual noise are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Binocular unmasking with vertical disparity.

We recently found (Schneider, Moraglia, & Jepson, 1989) that the contrast threshold for the detection of a visual signal in a noisy background can be considerably lower when binocular cues are available then when monocular cues only are present. Here, we investigated the occurrence of binocular unmasking with vertical interocular disparities. Subjects reported about the presence of Gabor signals in fields of two-dimensional broadband Gaussian noise surrounded by a frame of uniform noise. They saw these stimuli through a stereoscope; in all cases, the right-eye noise field was vertically displaced relative to the left one in either an upward or a downward direction, by up to 67.6'. In one condition, the right-eye signal was displaced by an amount equal to that of the noise, so that no opportunities for binocular unmasking existed; in the other, it appeared in exactly corresponding locations in the two fields--here, binocular disparities could be used to unmask the signal. Enhanced signal detectability, by up to 12.7 dB, was observed in the latter case for both directions of displacement, but only for displacements of 13.52' and only when the signal's orientation was horizontal. We argue that these effects result from the summation of monocular inputs carried out by linear binocular mechanisms.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Effects of direction and magnitude of horizontal disparities on binocular unmasking.

Conditions under which binocular unmasking (BU), as an analogue of binaural unmasking, occurs have been explored. Observers were to detect through a stereoscope a Gabor signal in patches of two-dimensional broadband gaussian noise surrounded by a frame of uniform noise. The right-eye gaussian field was displaced relative to the left eye so that it appeared either in front of or behind the frame. Performance when signal disparity was equal to that of the noise--a condition functionally equivalent to monocular processing--was compared to that obtained when signal disparity was zero--a case in which BU should occur. Enhanced signal detectability of up to 12 dB and of nearly constant magnitude was observed in the latter condition when uncrossed disparities of up to 67.60 min visual angle and display durations of 1 s were employed. Signal detectability declined appreciably with increasing disparity (both crossed and uncrossed) when display duration was reduced to 90 ms, thus preventing the occurrence of compensatory vergence eye movements. It is suggested that BU effects may result from a process of linear summation of monocular inputs.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Binocular unmasking: an analog to binaural unmasking?

A visual analog to binaural unmasking was explored. The observer's task was to detect, under stereoscopic viewing conditions, an apertured sinusoidal grating added to a square patch of visual noise. In the experimental condition, the square patch of noise was presented within a frame such that the right-eye noise was a shifted version of the left-eye noise. Because of the disparity in the noise images, subjects perceived, under stereoscopic viewing conditions, that the noise patch was located behind the frame. When sinusoidal signals were added to this noise patch, the signals were clearly more detectable when the signal disparity was zero than when the signal disparity equaled that of the noise patch, demonstrating the existence of visual unmasking. Hence, under appropriate circumstances, binocular processing, in addition to providing information about depth, can also enhance the detectability of visual patterns.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed1989

Visual search along the colour dimension.

Subjects searched for a chromatic target among coloured background items. With low target-background chromatic similarity, response latencies remained uniformly short whether the target was present or not and whether the items were chromatically homogeneous or not. Latencies increased with increases in target-background similarity and were longest with heterogeneous backgrounds, with which the effects of trial also became manifest. We employed Treisman's model of visual search to account for these findings. In particular, we suggest that similarity increases forced a shift from a preattentive to an attentive search, the latter being importantly shaped by the background's level of chromatic variance.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Visual search: spatial frequency and orientation.

Observers searched for a Gaussian-windowed patch of sinewave grating (Gabor pattern) through displays containing varying numbers of other such patterns (distractors). When the spatial frequencies of target and distractors differed by +/- 2 octaves and their orientations by +/- 60 degrees, the search proceeded spatially in parallel irrespective of whether the target could be discriminated in terms of spatial frequency differences alone, orientation differences alone, or their combination. However, when target and distractors differed by only +/- .5 octave in spatial frequency and by +/- 15 degrees in orientation, the search was serial and self-terminating, again irrespective of the nature of the target-distractor differences. These findings show that, contrary to some suggestions, the preattentive detection of targets defined by conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation may occur, but only when the spectral distance between target and distractors allows their encoding by independent mechanisms.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Display organization and the detection of horizontal line segments.

Observers searched for a horizontal line segment through displays containing varying numbers of elements differing from the target and from each other in terms of orientation. These elements were always positioned on imaginary concentric circles centered in the middle of the display. They were allocated to these positions either randomly or in such a way that their orientation was equal to that of the tangent to the circle at that position. The search for the target line appeared to proceed spatially in parallel with the latter class of displays, and serially with the former. These findings are explained and discussed within the context of the attentive-preattentive dichotomy that characterizes spatial vision.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Is pattern masking predicted by the cross-correlation between signal and mask?

We sought to determine whether the cross-correlation between signals and masks consisting of Gaussian modulated grating patterns is consistent with observed psychophysical masking effects. Our experimental results support this relationship, and suggest further specifications for the determinants of pattern masking effects.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1987

On the detection of signals in non-white noise.

We have studied the detection, by human observers, of suprathreshold bandlimited signals embedded at various locations in non-white, Gaussian filtered noise. Detection models based upon the direct cross-correlation between the signal and the noise image (matched filtering) cannot account for the results of our experiments. Our findings point instead at a detection process occurring at the level of signal decomposition, and jointly determined by: (a) the differential outputs of discrete, bandlimited spatial analyzers selectively responsive to different components of the signal; and (b) variable detection rules adaptively related to such outputs and to the type of signal information available to the observer.

Humans↗
PubMed1987

The concept of spatial frequency channels cannot explain some visual masking effects.

Visual masking is assumed to be predictable by the degree to which mask and signal spatial frequency amplitudes are similar. In this masking experiment we have clearly shown this not to be the case by studying the effects of factorial combinations of signal-mask amplitude and phase spectra. Results show that the amplitude spectra characteristics do not predict masking, and a better predictor of these results appears to be the correlations between the mask and signal's luminance profiles. These results, therefore, show that the spatial similarity between two images, as may be processed by "spatial frequency channels" cannot be determined by the similarities between these channel outputs as defined by the (output) modulated amplitudes.

Humans↗
PubMed1985

On the detection of Gabor signals and discrimination of Gabor textures.

We have explored the detection and discrimination of Gabor signals in two different paradigms in order to determine the signals' relative importance for spatial vision. In the first experiment we determined the "detection efficiency" of five such signals presented in isolation, and our results support the conclusion that, for optimal detection, the Gaussian profile should only span (to 1/e decay values) approximately two cycles. In three subsequent experiments we have observed the discriminability of textures composed of such signals over a range of spatial frequencies, Gaussian windows and orientation differences. Our results are consistent with the detection data only insofar as the discrimination thresholds vary in a predictable way with the Gaussian window parameters. Finally, we have determined the degree to which texture discrimination, in terms of differences in both orientation and spatial frequency, can be predicted from the independent manipulations of both codes within a given Gaussian window size.

Discrimination, Psychological↗