PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Ollé Fortuny

Publications and source records attributed to G Ollé Fortuny.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[On publishing and publications].

The publication of a scientific article represents the culmination of work by a group of researchers who at some point decided to pool their efforts to shed light on a scientific problem. Before an article appears in a biomedical journal, an original manuscript will have passed through a series of filters known as the "editorial process". That process provides a guarantee to future readers that information in the article contains a full and critical view of the subject. It is the authors' job to make their best effort when drafting and revising a report and checking the final version before submitting it for review. The manuscript should have the 3 main attributes of scientific writing: clarity, accuracy, and economy. In this article we discuss the sections of an article and guidelines for good clinical research practice. We also review how to present a manuscript that meets style requirements for publication.

Publishing↗
PubMed2003

[What do patients think about anesthesia? Survey on postoperative satisfaction in ambulatory surgery comparing general and subarachnoid anesthesia].

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a telephone survey to determine the degree of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique applied during outpatient arthroscopic surgery on the knee. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recorded refusals to respond to the survey and the reasons. The patients were distributed randomly in 3 groups to receive 1) general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil by continuous intravenous infusion at rates of 2 and 0.2-0.4 microgram/Kg/h, respectively; 2) subarachnoid anesthesia with lidocaine, and 3) subarachnoid anesthesia with 1.5% prilocaine. The second and third group received fixed doses of 3 mL of the local anesthetic. All patients were telephoned 48 hours after surgery and asked to answer 8 questions concerning prior experience of anesthesia, degree of satisfaction with the type of anesthesia used, postoperative pain, quality of information received about the anesthetic procedure, and undesirable side effects. RESULTS: We interviewed 120 patients and 32 refused to participate. All patients in the general anesthesia group would accept the same anesthetic technique again in future operations, whereas 85% and 82% in the lidocaine and prilocaine groups, respectively, would accept the same technique (p = 0.026). Satisfaction with anesthesia, postoperative pain, and quality of information about the anesthetic procedure was similar in all 3 groups. No important undesirable side affects were reported in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The overall satisfaction with various types of anesthesia is similar among outpatients undergoing arthroscopic surgery on the knee; therefore, patient preferences for one technique over another should be taken into more consideration.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

[Ketorolac versus tramadol: comparative study of analgesic efficacy in the postoperative pain in abdominal hysterectomy].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy of tramadol to that of ketorolac trometamol administered intravenously and at fixed times over the 24 hours after abdominal hysterectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This controlled, double blind, randomized clinical trial enrolled 76 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomies. Two treatment groups were formed: the TRA (Tramadol) group received 100 mg and the KET (Ketorolac) group 30 mg administered every 6 hours intravenously. Patients were ASA I-II and aged 35 to 65 years old. Patients were excluded from the study if hysterectomy was performed because of a tumor, or if there was a history of bleeding dyscrasias, of gastric or duodenal ulcers or of allergy to drugs in the study or if other analgesics had been used within 15 days of surgery. Analgesic efficacy was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and a verbal response scale (VRS). Need for top-up analgesia was recorded, as were the number of patients withdrawing before the end of the study and the side effects attributable to treatment. RESULTS: The mean VAS score throughout the study was 3.6 for the TRA group and 4.4 for the KET group (non-significant, p = 0.05). Likewise, VRS scores were similar. In the first 12 h after surgery, VAS scores in the TRA group were statistically lower than those of the KET group (p < 0.05). Nine patients abandoned the study before it ended: 3 in group TRA and 1 in the KET group. Three withdrew in the TRA group (2 because of vomiting and 1 for administrative reasons). Six left the KET group (4 for uncontrolled pain, 1 for impossible intubation and 1 for administrative reasons. In the TRA group, 38% experienced vomiting whereas only 8% did so in the KET group. No serious postoperative complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 12 hours following surgery, a 100 mg dose of tramadol has been shown to provide more effective pain relief than 30 mg of ketorolac administered intravenously every 6 hours. The only drawback to administering the drug intravenously was the high incidence of postoperative vomiting.

Adult↗