PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Ollenschläger

Publications and source records attributed to G Ollenschläger.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Evidence based guidelines and clinical pathways: complementation or contradiction?].

Even methodological sound guidelines will only achieve their goals when the recommendations are transferred into practice. Guideline introduction and dissemination must therefore be accompanied by active implementation measures. For inpatient care clinical pathways can serve as tools, especially taking advantage of their sequential character. Complementary evidence based guidelines can serve as an optimal source of systematically appraised evidence in developing clinical pathways. Considering them is of major help to assure that the content of clinical pathways is in accordance with evidence. The article highlights methodological requirements in guideline and pathway development and gives prospects on how both tools can be used together.

Biomedical Research↗
PubMed2004

[The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma - part 2: recommendations and key topics for a national guideline on bronchial asthma].

BACKGROUND: In order to promote the quality of asthma management in Germany, a national asthma guidelines clearing project was initiated in 2000 by the German Guidelines Clearinghouse (Sponsors: German Medical Association (GMA), National Association of the Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP), German Hospital Federation, Federal Association of the Statutory Sickness Funds. This Part shows the key topics which should be dealt with in a German guideline on bronchial asthma. SUMMARY POINTS: For quality promotion of bronchial asthma management in Germany, the development of a national evidence-based guideline, using the internationally accepted quality criteria for clinical practice guidelines, was recommended by an expert group of the German Guideline Clearinghouse. The experts identified and peer-reviewed 16 out of 54 guidelines, which might be useful as benchmarks and examples for a German asthma guideline. From the peer review results, the expert group identified 18 key topics for a national asthma guideline.

Asthma↗
PubMed2004

[Glossary on patient safety -- a contribution to on-target-definition and to appreciate the subjects of "patient safety"].

Since the release of the report "To Err is Human" by the American Institute of Medicine (IOM) the subject "Medical Risks, Errors and Patient Safety" has gained increasing interest in literature. In Germany, neither extensive statistics nor generally significant epidemiological studies regarding common errors associated with damages caused to patients' health exist. In recent years the subject has become increasingly interesting both in specialist discussion and it the lay press; it has become evident that the different use of terms, especially those originating from the Anglo-Saxon language, can lead to misunderstandings. Hence, as one of the first steps of its action programme, the expert panel "Patient Safety" of the German Agency for Quality in Medicine has compiled a glossary of technical terms to provide adequate support to the discussion this important subject of nomenclature.

Germany↗
PubMed2004

Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N).

Clinical practice guidelines are regarded as powerful tools to achieve effective health care. Although many countries have built up experience in the development, appraisal, and implementation of guidelines, until recently there has been no established forum for collaboration at an international level. As a result, in different countries seeking similar goals and using similar strategies, efforts have been unnecessarily duplicated and opportunities for harmonisation lost because of the lack of a supporting organisational framework. This triggered a proposal in 2001 for an international guidelines network built on existing partnerships. A baseline survey confirmed a strong demand for such an entity. A multinational group of guideline experts initiated the development of a non-profit organisation aimed at promotion of systematic guideline development and implementation. The Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) was founded in November 2002. One year later the Network released the International Guideline Library, a searchable database which now contains more than 2000 guideline resources including published guidelines, guidelines under development, "guidelines for guidelines", training materials, and patient information tools. By June 2004, 52 organisations from 27 countries had joined the network including institutions from Oceania, North America, and Europe, and WHO. This paper describes the process that led to the foundation of the G-I-N, its characteristics, prime activities, and ideas on future projects and collaboration.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

[Assessment and implementation of guidelines].

The importance of guidelines increases continuously on the political level whereas on the user level reservations and uncertainty persist. Consequently guidelines are not considered as they should be. Guidelines will develop their effectiveness only if they are firmly implemented in the delivery process. Acceptance problems spring from problems in development and from aspects of dissemination and implementation not sufficiently considered so far. Therefore a lot of countries have developed quality criteria for guidelines and programmes for quality promotion. To further the use of guidelines in the care process aspects of dissemination and implementation have to be recognized even in the development process. This has not been recognized sufficiently so far. Implementation of guidelines is a systematic approach which has to be connected seamlessly with other activities (e. g. quality management). The implementation process should be accompanied and evaluated so that a continuous adjustment is possible. Most of the existing guideline programmes do not consider this sufficiently. The following contribution gives a survey of results and introduces means and instruments for assessment and implementation of guidelines.

Forecasting↗
PubMed2003

[The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma-part 1: Methodology and results of formal appraisal].

BACKGROUND: In order to promote quality of asthma management in Germany, a national asthma guidelines clearing project was initiated in 2000 by the German Guidelines Clearinghouse (Sponsors: German Medical Association (GMA), National Association of the Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP), German Hospital Federation, Federal Association of the Statutory Sickness Funds. Part 1 of this article shows the methodology and the results of the appraisal, part 2 (to be published) shows the key topics which should be dealt with in a german guideline on bronchial asthma. OBJECTIVES: To identify and compare evidence-based, high-quality German- and English language asthma guidelines as benchmarks for ongoing guideline development and implementation programmes. To disseminate information about asthma guidelines developed in accordance with current methodological know-how. To identify and consent key topics for a national evidence-based guideline for Germany. METHODS: Search procedure, formal appraisal: Systematic search using literature databases (XMED, incl. Medline and Embase) and English-/German-language guideline databases (via www. leitlinien.de), published between January 1990 and March 2000. Abstract screening of the search results according to the inclusion criteria (n = 54 of a total of 502 hits). Methodological guideline evaluation of 16 guidelines using the German checklist for methodological guideline appraisal. Appraisal of guidelines' contents: Peer review of guidelines with the following inclusion criteria: Bronchial Asthma-general, German and English language, based in references published later than 1994, new guideline or actual update. Peer review was performed by a multidisciplinary focus group of EBM experts (clinical and ambulatory settings). No expert was involved in guideline production during the review period. RESULTS: Methodological appraisal: 16 out of guidelines were in accordance with the formal minimal standard with a wide range within the following domains: "description of the development process", "declaration of authors' independence", "explicit link between recommendations and the supporting evidence", "management options", "tools for implementation". The focus group recommended for future national asthma guidelines to rely on the following procedures: (1) to formulate the recommendations using standardized, clearly described consensus methods basing on evidence retrieved and selected in a systematic way (2) to prove links between recommendations and supporting evidence (3) to develop guideline versions for health care professionals as well as for consumer/patients (4) to develop guideline-based education tools (5) to ensure periodical updates of the asthma guideline (6) to consider the methodological recommendations and to give reasons for deviations from the methodological recommendations. APPRAISAL OF GUIDELINES CONTENT: None of the guidelines identified comprised information about all of the following key topics considered to be relevant for a German national guideline by the focus group: (1) intended guideline users/goals, (2) definition (3) cause of disease, (4) form of disease, (5) severity, (6) diagnosis, (7) therapeutic goals, (8) prevention, (9) pharmacotherapy, (10) non-pharmacotherapy, (11) therapy control and compliance, (12) emergency treatment, (13) rehabilitation, (14) comorbidity, (15) special aspects, (16) coordination of care, (17) quality assurance/quality management, (18) implementation. SUMMARY POINTS: For quality promotion of bronchial asthma management in Germany, the development of a national evidence-based guideline, using the internationally accepted quality criteria for clinical practice guidelines, was recommended by an expert group of the German Guideline Clearinghouse. The experts identified and peer-reviewed 16 out of 54 guidelines, which might be useful as benchmarks and examples for a German asthma guideline. From the peer review results, the expert group identified 18 key topics for a national asthma guideline.

Asthma↗
PubMed2003

[The German Quality Management System for Outpatient Care (Q-M-A) Checklist--an instrument for assessing quality management systems in outpatient care].

Quality management systems had originally been designed for industrial purposes and were hardly applicable for small enterprises, there have been adjustments to the two main applications EFQM and ISO enabling utilisation also in ambulatory care. There are also different approaches like the Dutch Visitatiae concept which reflects the needs of GP's and is based on peer exchange. The presented paper gives an overview of existing quality management and certification systems and presents an instrument for evaluation. This checklist was developed by an interdisciplinary expert panel of the Agency for Quality in Medicine and serves as an aid for users and graders of quality management systems with regard to the feasibility of these systems.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2002

[Well-informed on health matters--how well? The German 'Clearinghouse for Patient Information'--objective, background and methods].

OBJECTIVE: Health information for lay people in print or electronic form are internationally recognised as useful tools and as necessary in the decision-making process of individuals. The effectiveness of offered patient information depends on quality and accessibility. Because much of the available health information is significantly deficient, the Agency for Quality in Medicine developed a programme for assessing the quality of specialised health and medical information for all non-medically trained persons. The German 'Clearinghouse for Patient Information' project is an adjunct to the already established German 'Clearinghouse for Clinical Guidelines'. METHOD: The basis for quality improvement for specialised medical information consists 1. in the determination of demands on quality for patient information published in the German language, 2. development of a standardised instrument for assessing the quality of specialised medical information by non-medically trained persons, 3. establishment of an Internet portal for evaluated and rated material, and 4. the establishment and organisation of relevant partnerships with information providers and users of health and medical information. The principle building block to rate medical information for lay people are the DISCERN criteria for good patient information. The results of the quality rating of specialised medical information are made available to the public with emphasis on promoting transparency of the assessment and rating processes used. RESULTS: The Internet-based patient information service of the Agency for Quality in Medicine (www.patienten-information.de 19.06.02) has currently a selection of approximately 800 information items covering fifty disease topics with fully or partially evaluated and rated information. Partnerships to appropriate information providers and users are already established and have been tested in special single projects. CONCLUSION: To advance the process of quality improvement for medical information for non-medical and lay persons, it is essential to develop and to intensify the cooperation with stake holders and partners at different levels. Only through close cooperation with others it is possible to create a basis to continuously develop and improve the information quality assessment instrument further. In addition, effective strategies need to be developed to disseminate these endeavours to patients and consumers of health information in a user-friendly and transparent way.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗
PubMed2002

[Knowledge management in rehabilitation--proposal for a systematic development of clinical practice guidelines].

In the past ten years, the German pension scheme has launched several initiatives that can be regarded as milestones on the way to a scientifically founded rehabilitation system. These initiatives were: the Rehab Commission (1989 - 1991), the Quality Assurance Programme (since 1994), and the German Research Funding Programme "Rehabilitation Sciences" (in cooperation with the Federal Ministry for Education and Research, since 1996). As a next step on this way, we propose an initiative aiming at a systematic development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines for the main diagnostic groups in rehabilitation. Guidelines for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions are an instrument to sift through the abundance of fast changing knowledge in medicine, to assess the existing knowledge according to its scientific evidence, and to transform it into recommendations for clinical practice. In rehabilitation, guidelines seem to be particularly needed because specialized knowledge is mostly disseminated through an informal "training on the job". Our proposal intends to establish a reference centre for each of the main indications (cardiology, musculoskeletal diseases, etc.). These centres should cooperate with experts from clinical practice and research, as well as with representatives of the cost-carrying agencies and patient organisations, and should systematically analyse the processes of rehabilitation in the most important diagnostic groups. Guided by a "process matrix of rehabilitation", these analyses should identify the points at which far-reaching decisions are called for during the processes of rehabilitation. At these points, the knowledge base available for rational decisions should be examined. When there is no sufficient scientific knowledge, consensus conferences should be organized in order to collect and assess the available expertise of practitioners and to establish guidelines for clinical practice. Since compliance with such guidelines could be easily checked in the routine quality assurance programme, this proposal seems to be a promising way of improving the knowledge base in rehabilitation in a rather short time.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗
PubMed2002

[Current initiatives in Germany for translating national guidelines into reality - a survey].

The role of practice guidelines as a tool for quality management in health care is now widely accepted in Germany- not only by health professionals, but also in politics. The physicians' professional associations as well as health care authorities (physicians' self-governmental bodies) and parliament introduced several incentives and regulations, aiming at a regular use of guidelines in health care. Among these the German guideline clearinghouse with the systematic approach towards identification, dissemination, and implementation of best available evidence-based guidelines, as well as the country-wide implementation of disease management guidelines seem to be effective and efficient in quality management as well as in patient care management in the German health care system. The article gives an overview on background, procedures and barriers to country-wide implementation of clinical practice guidelines within a social security health care system.

Forecasting↗
PubMed2001

Healthcare in a land called PeoplePower: nothing about me without me.

In a 5-day retreat at a Salzburg Seminar attended by 64 individuals from 29 countries, teams of health professionals, patient advocates, artists, reporters and social scientists adopted the guiding principle of 'nothing about me without me' and created the country of PeoplePower. Designed to shift health care from 'biomedicine' to 'infomedicine', patients and health workers throughout PeoplePower join in informed, shared decision-making and governance. Drawing, where possible, on computer-based guidance and communication technologies, patients and clinicians contribute actively to the patient record, transcripts of clinical encounters are shared, and patient education occurs primarily in the home, school and community-based organizations. Patients and clinicians jointly develop individual 'quality contracts', serving as building blocks for quality measurement and improvement systems that aggregate data, while reflecting unique attributes of individual patients and clinicians. Patients donate process and outcome data to national data banks that fuel epidemiological research and evidence-based improvement systems. In PeoplePower hospitals, constant patient and employee feedback informs quality improvement work teams of patients and health professionals. Volunteers work actively in all units, patient rooms are information centres that transform their shape and decor as needs and individual preferences dictate, and arts and humanities programmes nourish the spirit. In the community, from the earliest school days the citizenry works with health professionals to adopt responsible health behaviours. Communities join in selecting and educating health professionals and barter systems improve access to care. Finally, lay individuals partner with professionals on all local, regional and national governmental and private health agencies.

Community-Institutional Relations↗
PubMed2000

[Guidelines and evidence-based medicine in Germany].

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are increasingly common in the German health care system. The German physicians' self-governmental body's position regarding CPGs as a tool of Evidence-based medicine (EBM) was described in a joint policy paper concerning quality in health care in late 1998. The German Medical Association (GMA) and the National Association for Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP) stated that "the principles of EBM should be implemented into the German Health Care System" by the following means: to assess systematically and appraise critically the evidence in health care to develop evidence-based consensus CPGs for priority problems in health care to implement CPGs using graduate, post-graduate, and continuing medical education, as well as audits and CPG-based information management to evaluate quality in health care against the background of CPGs. The following paper will discuss the aims and scopes and the limits of this concept.

Aged↗