PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Osterhout

Publications and source records attributed to G Osterhout.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative intravitreal antibiotic therapy for experimental Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most effective intravitreal antibiotic treatment of vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant Enterococcus faecalis endophthalmitis. DESIGN: Animal experiment. SETTING: Seventy-eight New Zealand white rabbits received an intravitreal injection of 10(5) vancomycin-sensitive or -resistant E faecalis organisms in one eye. Infections were allowed to proceed 3 hours before dividing animals randomly into the following treatment groups (n = 6, each): the vancomycin-sensitive E faecalis model--(1) vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL), (2) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and amikacin (0.4 mg/0.1 mL), (3) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and gentamicin (0.1 mg/0.1 mL), (4) combined vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL) and ceftazidime (2 mg/0.1 mL), (5) combined ampicillin (5 mg/0.1 mL) and gentamicin (0.1 mg/0.1 mL), and (6) pristinamycin (1 mg/0.1 mL); and the vancomycin-resistant E faecalis model--(1)same as above, excluding group 4. Control groups received sterile balanced salt solution. Twenty-four hours following intravitreal treatment, vitreous humor was collected for quantitative bacteriological studies. RESULTS: Intravitreal therapy with combined vancomycin and amikacin provided the most effective reduction of vancomycin-sensitive E faecalis organisms compared with combined vancomycin and gentamicin therapy (P =.10, Wilcoxon's rank sum test) or any other treatment group (P < .01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). For vancomycin-resistant E faecalis endophthalmitis model, the combined ampicillin and gentamicin therapy was the most effective, followed by the combined vancomycin and amikacin therapy (P < .01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with intravitreal vancomycin plus amikacin and with intravitreal ampicillin plus gentamicin provide an effective bactericidal therapy for severe experimental vancomycin-sensitive and -resistant E faecalis endophthalmitis, respectively.

Animals↗

Grouping of some clinically relevant gram-positive rods by automated fatty acid analysis. Diagnostic implications.

One hundred and ninety-four strains of aerobically growing Gram-positive rods of the genera Corynebacterium, Actinomyces, Arcanobacterium, Erysipelothrix, Listeria, Oerskovia, Nocardia, Rhodococcus, and of unnamed Center for Disease Control (CDC) groups were checked for cellular fatty acid profiles with the microbial Identification System (Microbial ID, Newark, Del., USA). In order to obtain unified data usable for the clinical laboratory, 24 or 48 h sheep blood agar cultures were used. It was thought that grouping and perhaps identification could be aided by this approach. With the aid of numerical analysis, four groups (two consisting of two subgroups each) were established. The discriminatory ability of the scheme, however, was only 77.2%, indicating that grouping of an unknown isolate could be done with some accuracy, but that speciation would still require biochemical testing.

Bacterial Infections↗