PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G P Band

Publications and source records attributed to G P Band.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task.

The error negativity (Ne/ERN) and error positivity (Pe) are two components of the event-related brain potential (ERP) that are associated with action monitoring and error detection. To investigate the relation between error processing and conscious self-monitoring of behavior, the present experiment examined whether an Ne and Pe are observed after response errors of which participants are unaware. Ne and Pe measures, behavioral accuracy, and trial-to-trial subjective accuracy judgments were obtained from participants performing an antisaccade task, which elicits many unperceived, incorrect reflex-like saccades. Consistent with previous research, subjectively unperceived saccade errors were almost always immediately corrected, and were associated with faster correction times and smaller saccade sizes than perceived errors. Importantly, irrespective of whether the participant was aware of the error or not, erroneous saccades were followed by a sizable Ne. In contrast, the Pe was much more pronounced for perceived than for unperceived errors. Unperceived errors were characterized by the absence of posterror slowing. These and other results are consistent with the view that the Ne and Pe reflect the activity of two separate error monitoring processes, of which only the later process, reflected by the Pe, is associated with conscious error recognition and remedial action.

Adolescent↗

The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends.

When children grow older they respond faster and are less susceptible to interference caused by task-irrelevant information. These observations suggested the hypothesis that a global mechanism may account for developmental change in the speed of responding and that inhibitory function may underlie the ability to activate speeded responses. The current study examined these issues by comparing the performance of 4 age groups (5-, 8-, and 11-year-olds and young adults) on a battery of 6 speeded performance tasks, 4 of which required the inhibition of response activation. An analysis of reaction and inhibition times supported a hypothesis of generalized developmental changes in response activation, but revealed a less pronounced development of inhibition. A nonselective mechanism of response inhibition seems to be fully developed during early childhood.

Adult↗

Age effects on response monitoring in a mental-rotation task.

A mental-rotation task was presented to young (18-28 years) and old (60-76 years) adults to simultaneously assess age-related changes in performance, response monitoring and adaptive behavior. Relative to young participants, older adults were less inclined to adjust their speed at the expense of accuracy. They displayed a larger number of slow errors, smaller error potentials (Ne and Pe), more immediate corrections of errors when detected, and a larger speed reduction on trials following an error. The data suggest that for older adults an increase of task complexity sometimes caused a radical failure in determining the correct response, rather than a gradual reduction of efficiency.

Adolescent↗

Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms.

What is the neurophysiological locus of inhibition when preparation for a manual response is countermanded? This paper evaluates data and models that pertain to inhibitory mechanisms operating in stop paradigms. In a model of De Jong, Coles and Logan (1995), (Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 3, 498-511), a mechanism for nonselective inhibition operates peripheral to the motor cortex, while a selective mechanism operates at a central cortical level. We argue, however, that a peripheral mechanism of inhibition is incorrectly inferred from inhibition data available to date. Neurophysiological and psychophysiological data suggest that inhibitory processes always involve the cortex, and inhibitory effects are exerted upstream from the primary motor cortex. The prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia are candidate agents of response inhibition, whereas possible sites of inhibition are the thalamus and motor cortex.

Cerebral Cortex↗

Sources of interference from irrelevant information: a developmental study.

The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying reductions in the susceptibility to interference from irrelevant information that are evident in the developing child. In the first experiment, where the task was to focus on one stimulus dimension and to ignore a second dimension, variations in the degree of spatial integration in multidimensional stimulus configurations did not influence interference effects. Developmental trends in selective attention could not be attributed to age changes in the accessibility of dimensional structure. The second experiment, where the task was to focus on a central arrow stimulus and to ignore flanking arrows, allowed further examination of the mechanisms involved in developmental changes in interference effects. The primary source of the developmental decrease in interference from irrelevant information was found to be in the rate at which the output of perceptual analysis is coupled to the preparation and execution of a motor response, rather than in perceptual filtering or in response preparation. The combined results suggest that age changes in selective attention are mediated to an important extent by changes in the speed and efficiency of stimulus-response translation processes. These findings are discussed in terms of developmental theories of interference control.

Attention↗

Mental rotation interferes with response preparation.

Reaction times (RTs) and lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) were studied to find out whether response preparation begins after mental rotation finishes, as assumed by discrete-stage models. Stimuli were disoriented normal or mirror-image characters, with character name determining which hand would respond. In Experiment 1, the normal/mirror-image information determined whether the response was to be executed (go) or withheld (no-go), and LRPs indicated that responses were weakly prepared before the end of mental rotation. Mental rotation was not required in Experiment 2, and significantly more response preparation was observed. In Experiment 3, probe RT trials embedded in the mental rotation task indicated that hand information is available to the response preparation process during rotation. Apparently, some response preparation occurs before mental rotation finishes, but rotation interferes with response preparation.

Adolescent↗