PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G P Horsten

Publications and source records attributed to G P Horsten.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

The influence of dosage time of midazolam on its pharmacokinetics and effects in humans.

The influence of dosage time of midazolam on its pharmacokinetics and effects on the central nervous system were investigated in six healthy volunteers, with pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling. Each volunteer received single oral doses of 15 mg midazolam on four separate occasions: 8 AM, 2 PM, 8 PM, and 2 AM. An almost significant circadian variation was found in elimination half-life, shortest at 2 PM (1.26 +/- 0.47 hours, mean +/- SD) and longest at 2 AM (1.57 +/- 0.44 hours) (p = 0.05). Drug effects measured were alpha activity of the electroencepalograph and P100 latency of the visual-evoked response. The maximum drug effect (Emax) model described the concentration-effect relationship, extended with either a threshold drug concentration or a sigmoidicity parameter. A significant circadian variation was found in baseline alpha activity: highest at 8 AM (109% +/- 19% of the 24-hour mean) and lowest at 2 AM (80% +/- 12%). For alpha activity the drug concentration at half-maximum effect of both threshold Emax model and sigmoid Emax model showed lower values at 8 AM and 2 AM and higher values at 2 PM and 8 PM. However, these differences were either not significant (p = 0.10, threshold model) or on the verge of statistical significance (p = 0.05, sigmoid model). No circadian variation was found in the parameters describing the effect on the visual-evoked response. We conclude that the sensitivity of the central nervous system to midazolam, as reflected in alpha activity, possibly shows a circadian variation.

Administration, Oral↗

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of midazolam effects on the human central nervous system.

The effect of midazolam on alpha-activity of the EEG and latency of the P-100 of the visual evoked response (VER) was studied in six healthy subjects. Drug concentration was related to effect with the Emax model that was used with either a threshold drug concentration or a sigmoid exponent. An effect compartment was included in the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Four subjects showed hysteresis, and mean values of half-lives-k(eo) ranged from 0.26 to 0.60 hour. Mean values of EC50 ranged from 42.0 to 48.1 ng/ml. Goodness of fit did not differ significantly between the sigmoid Emax model and the threshold Emax model. The sigmoid exponent estimated was 3.7 +/- 1.8 (EEG, mean +/- SD) and 2.9 +/- 1.4 (VER); the threshold concentration was estimated at 15.7 +/- 11.1 ng/ml (EEG) and 11.3 +/- 7.0 ng/ml (VER). We conclude that the Emax model adequately describes the relationship between midazolam concentration and effect and that the sigmoid exponent can be substituted by a threshold drug concentration, with a comparable fit of the model to the data.

Central Nervous System↗

The effect of labyrinthectomy on flash-induced nystagmus (FIN).

After bilateral labyrinthectomy the maximum slow phase velocity of flash-induced nystagmus (FIN) was diminished; the flash induced after-nystagmus was always absent. Unilateral labyrinthectomy resulted in a weaker FIN response on stimulation of both eyes, but the best response was seen after contralateral stimulation. These findings are discussed in relation to reported effects of labyrinthectomy on OKN, "central nystagmus" and vestibular nuclear discharge activity.

Animals↗

Flash induced nystagmus (FIN) in the rabbit: input-output relations.

Flash-induced nystagmus (FIN) was elicited by monocular flicker-stimulation at 20-40 Hz. It was found more often in albino than in pigmented rabbits. Slow phase velocity (SPV) showed a gradual increase, then a steady-state level in most animals and an after-response after cessation of stimulation. incremental and decremental phase mainly showed an exponential change in SPV. Apparent time constants were in the range of 5-40 sec. Simultaneous recording of both eyes revealed greater velocity and amplitude of both phases of FIN in the stimulated eye. FIN can be specified as a type of nystagmus that is evoked by monocular essentially open-loop stimulation of the crossed ("subcortical") visual pathway. Direction-selective elements in the retina may play a specific role and their predominant orientation gives rise to nystagmus in adducting direction in the flicker-stimulated eye as if it were exposed to optokinetic stimulation in the temporonasal direction.

Animals↗