Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to G Pabst.
A "Level A" in vitro/in vivo correlation was established for a sustained release theophylline (CAS 58-55-9) preparation (Bronchoretard) under investigation. Such a functional relationship is a valuable tool for predicting the in vivo performance of a product. Additionally, the in vitro specification limits could be justified or even enlarged based on such an extrapolation.
Sustained release theophylline (CAS 58-55-9) preparations may be dosed once or alternatively twice-a-day, depending on the intention of a theophylline therapy. A once-a-day dosage regimen is considered appropriate in patients with nocturnal asthma attacks, whereas a twice-a-day regimen is advantageous for guaranteeing bronchodilatation and to control the underlying inflammatory disease. Therefore, pharmacokinetic characteristics of both modes of administration were evaluated in a randomised, two-way crossover study in 18 female and male elderly volunteers under multiple-dose conditions. The shape of the pharmacokinetic profiles showed the expected and pronounced differences, while the extent of absorption was bioequivalent. Twice daily administration decreased the nocturnal maximum concentration and at the same time increased the minimum concentration. At the expense of the nocturnal excess, the peak-trough fluctuations (PTF) were reduced from 92.1% to 39.5%. Plateau times of 11.4 h and 20.2 h were achieved with both modes of administration. As for theophylline with its narrow therapeutic range, high quality sustained release preparations distinguish themselves by long plateau times and small peak-trough fluctuations such as those observed with the preparation under investigation. When using this preparation, therapeutic concentrations necessary for safety and efficacy are assured under either a once- or a twice-daily dosing regimen.
A new sustained release theophylline (CAS 58-55-9) formulation was especially designed for the elderly and children. Microcapsules of theophylline, administered as a suspension in water, proved to be a suitable dosage form for a clientele with impaired or difficult deglutition. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of 2 batches at the lower (T1) and upper (T2) in vitro dissolution specification range of this new formulation and a pellet formulation (R) as a comparator were evaluated in an open, randomised, 3-way, multiple dose, crossover study with an asymmetric dosage regimen of 400 mg and 200 mg theophylline. Smooth and safe plasma concentrations with a high and long-lasting plateau were achieved with this new formulation. Plateau times which are independent of the asymmetric dosage regimen ranged from 16.4 h (T1) to 13.8 h (T2) and could therefore cover sufficient time of the dosage interval. Maximum plasma levels of 9.6 micrograms/ml and 10.0 micrograms/ml were attained 6.6 and 6.1 h after dosing of T1 and T2, coinciding perfectly with the time of the critical morning dip at 2-6 a.m. With a nocturnal excess of 15.5% (T1) and 17.9% (T2), this circadian-tailored asymmetric dosage regimen proved to take into account the chronopathology of asthma and the chronopharmacokinetics of theophylline sustained release preparations. Bioequivalence of all 3 formulations compared with each other with regard to rate (Cmax ss) and extent (AUCss) of absorption could be established for the 2 batches at the upper and lower in vitro specification range and for both batches of the new formulation compared to the reference. All in all, the safety and efficacy of this new liquid sustained release theophylline preparation could be established. Furthermore, in vitro specifications were justified according to current EC guidelines.
Selegiline, used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, inhibits the intracerebral degradation of dopamine and the uptake of catecholamines. Due to a high volume of distribution and also a high rate of biotransformation the concentrations of selegiline in plasma are rather low. In addition, there are indications that selegiline binds to erythrocytes. An open, randomized, 2-way cross-over study was performed in 24 healthy male volunteers to determine bioavailability and pharmacokinetic parameters of 2 oral selegiline preparations after single dose administration. Statistical tests were applied to the pharmacokinetic parameters AUCinf, AUC0-8, AUCz, Cmax and tmax. The terminal half-lives t1/2 for selegiline with geometric means of 1.69 h (n = 22) and 1.76 h (n = 21) for treatments A and B and for N-desmethyl-selegiline with geometric means of 1.98 h and 1.96 h for treatments A and B agreed very well. AUCinf of selegiline could be compared between treatments for 14 subjects only. The geometric mean ratio was 97.80% with a 90% confidence interval that ranged from 79.58%-120.17% and thus exceeded the (80%, 125%) range by a very small margin. After correction for the actual dose contained in each of the 2 preparations the geometric mean ratio was calculated to 98.39% with a 90% confidence interval that ranged from 80.06%-120.90% and thus was fully contained within the (80%, 125%) acceptance range. Treatments also agreed very well with respect to AUCinf of N-desmethyl-selegiline, the active metabolite of selegiline, with a geometric mean ratio of 96.14% with a 90% confidence interval that ranged from 92.41%-100.01% so that bioequivalence of the 2 treatments could be shown very clearly with respect to this metabolite. The AUC of N-desmethyl-selegiline in serum is about 6-fold higher than that of the parent drug. It is assessed with low variability. Thus, it is reasonable to base the judgement for or against bioequivalence primarily on the data obtained for the metabolite although "a larger acceptance range may be acceptable if inevitable and clinically acceptable" for the parent compound selegiline which certainly can be classified as a "highly variable compound".
A new sustained-release theophylline formulation was especially designed for the elderly and children. Microcapsules of theophylline, administered as a suspension in water, proved to be a suitable dosage form for a clientele with impaired or difficult deglutition. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of 2 batches at the lower (T1) and the upper (T2) in vitro dissolution specification range of this new formulation and a pellet formulation (R) as a comparator were evaluated in an open, randomized, 3-way, multiple-dose, crossover study design with an asymmetric dosage regimen of 400 mg and 200 mg theophylline. Smooth and safe plasma concentrations with a high and long-lasting plateau were achieved with this new formulation. Plateau times which are independent of the asymmetric dosage regimen ranged from 16.4 hours (T1) to 13.8 hours (T2) and could therefore span sufficient time of the dosage interval. Maximum serum levels of 9.6 micrograms/ml and 10.0 micrograms/ml were attained 6.6 and 6.1 hours after dosing of T1 and T2, coinciding perfectly with the time of the critical morning dip at 2-4 a.m. With a nocturnal excess of 15.5% (T1) and 17.9% (T2) this circadian-tailored asymmetric dosage regimen proved to take into account the chronopathology of asthma and the chronopharmacokinetics of theophylline sustained-release preparations. Bioequivalence of all 3 formulations versus each other with regard to rate (Cmaxss) and extent (AUC(tau)ss) of absorption could be established for the 2 batches at the upper and lower in vitro specification range and for both batches of the new formulation compared to the reference. All in all, safety and efficacy of this new liquid prolonged-release theophylline could be established. Furthermore, in vitro specifications could be justified according to current EU guidelines.
The efficacy of a multiple oral dose treatment with mebhydroline (Omeril coated tablets, 100 mg t.i.d.) was examined in 3 studies which were performed in a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled 2-way cross-over design. A second target was to investigate the suitability of different pharmacodynamic models for testing the efficacy of antihistamines. Study A involved a nasal provocation with a specific allergen in 11 symptom-free patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis. In study B, a nasal provocation with histamine was investigated in 11 healthy volunteers. Study C involved a cutaneous provocation with a specific allergen in 12 symptom-free patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis/atopy. The mebhydroline treatment's superiority over placebo was shown statistically at the 95% confidence level for the symptoms itchy nose in study A and for nasal congestion in study B. In study C, allergen-induced weals (planimetric measurement) and itching (visual analog scale) were significantly changed by mebhydroline. A qualitative evaluation revealed a reaction intensity that differed between the 2 treatments to a clinically relevant degree, however, without reaching significance. On the basis of the data it is expected that the clinical efficacy of mebhydroline may be further substantiated in confirmatory clinical trials which should include placebo and positive controls. The test methods used differed in their suitability for measuring the pharmacodynamic effects of antihistamines. Overall, the most clear-cut results were seen in hay fever patients using a specific allergen for provocation. The planimetric assessment of weal response should be preferred as a cutaneous model. Both AR and AARM have their clinical relevance. Based on highly significant results of a subgroup analysis there are indications in favor to AR, but momentary there is no definite conclusion in favor of or against either of the 2 methods.
In the course of this study, both the bioavailability and the most important pharmacokinetic parameters of a newly development mexiletine (CAS 31828-71-4) preparation (Mexiletine-ratiopharm mite, dosage 200 mg of mexiletine) were to be determined in comparison to a commercial reference preparation registered according to the AMG 1976, after single oral administration. For this purpose, the test and the reference preparation were examined in healthy male volunteers according to a randomized, 2-way crossover design. Both preparations entrained maximum plasma levels of approx. 300 ng/ml 3.5-4 h following administration. For the areas under the curve, values around 4000 h x ng/ml were found; the plasma half-life of the test preparation was 7.55, for the reference preparation 7.75 h. The statistical comparison (ANOVA, confidence interval according to Westlake, Pratt-Wilcoxon-Test) of the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained in the study clearly resulted in bioequivalence of the newly developed mexiletine preparation and the reference drug. No side effects worth mentioning were observed after administration of either preparation, thus good and comparable clinical tolerability of both preparations may be presumed.
A clinical study was performed on 18 healthy volunteers to compare the gastrointestinal daily blood loss induced by oral intake of three different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, lysine clonixinate (CAS 55837-30-4), ibuprofen (CAS 15687-27-1) and acetylsalicylic acid (CAS 50-78-2 ASA). For quantitative determination of gastrointestinal blood loss, autologous erythrocytes were radiolabelled in vitro with 51Cr and reinfused at study start. The amount of radioactivity excreted in faeces was measured during a placebo baseline phase of three days, a treatment phase of five days with thrice daily dosing of ASA, ibuprofen or lysine clonixinate and a subsequent wash-out phase of five days. The highest increase of mean daily blood loss over baseline was observed after treatment with ASA (+ 1.66 ml/d versus baseline). Treatment with ibuprofen led to an increase of mean daily blood loss by + 0.52 ml/d. During treatment with lysine clonixinate the mean increase of daily blood loss was +0.32 ml/d versus baseline. In the ibuprofen and lysine clonixinate treatment groups the values of mean daily blood loss decreased during the wash-out phase with respect to the verum phase, whereas the mean daily blood loss during the wash-out phase after treatment with ASA even increased in comparison to the verum phase (mean daily blood loss: +2.07 ml/d versus baseline.
The study objective was to determine the bioavailability and main pharmacokinetic parameters of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, CAS 55-63-0) following cutaneous application of two different glyceryl trinitrate patches using a randomized cross-over design. The two patches investigated were Deponit 5 (a newly developed test patch) and an already marketed reference patch. Thirty-seven healthy male volunteers were included in this study; 36 of them completed the investigation. Blood samples were withdrawn up to 15 h after start of patch application and plasma concentrations of glyceryl trinitrate were quantified by a GC/MS method. For the areas under the curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable sample, AUC(O-Tlast), mean values of 1545 (test patch, n = 35) and 1686 h.pg/ml (reference patch, n = 35) were found. The corresponding peak glyceryl trinitrate plasma levels were 253 and 263 pg/ml, respectively; they were reached after 6.58 h (test patch) and 7.72 h (reference patch). The statistical comparison (ANOVA, confidence intervals) of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in the study resulted in bioequivalence of both patches. Typical side-effects known and described under glyceryl trinitrate therapy were also observed in this study.
In the course of this study both the bioavailability and main pharmacokinetic parameters of the glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, CAS 55-63-0) metabolites 1,2 and 1,3-glyceryl dinitrate (1,2-GDN and 1,3-GDN) were to be determined following transdermal application of a glyceryl trinitrate test patch (Deponit 5) and an already marketed reference patch. For this purpose, both patches were examined in healthy volunteers according to a randomized two-way cross-over design, blood samples were withdrawn up to 15 h after start of patch application and the plasma concentrations of both metabolites were quantified using a GC/MS method. The investigation showed the following results: Metabolite 1,2-glyceryl dinitrate: For the area under the curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable sample (AUC(0-Tlast) arithmetic mean values of 23.77 h.ng/ml (test patch) and 27.83 h.ng/ml (reference patch) were found. The corresponding peak plasma levels were 2.45 ng/ml and 2.93 ng/ml, respectively; they were reached after 6.4 h (test patch) and 8.31 h (reference patch). Metabolite 1,3-glyceryl dinitrate: The arithmetic mean values for AUC(0-Tlast) were 3.32 h.ng/ml (test patch) and 3.81 h.ng/ml (reference patch). The maximum plasma levels were 0.35 ng/ml and 0.41 ng/ml for the test and reference preparation, reached after 6.4 h and after 7.86 h, respectively. The statistical comparison (ANOVA, confidence intervals) showed bioequivalence between both patches concerning the metabolites investigated. The typical side effects known after nitrate therapy also occurred in the course of this study.
The possible influence of food and fat content of meals on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of a 350 mg sustained-release theophylline (CAS 58-55-9) preparation (Bronchoretard) was investigated after single-dose oral administration to 18 volunteers in a randomized 3-way cross-over design. The treatments investigating an administration of the test preparation in a fasting state, after a standard meal and after a high-caloric fat evening meal, according to the commonly applied rules, could be shown to be equivalent with respect to the amount of bioavailability (AUC) and the observed maximal concentrations (Cmax). Pharmacokinetic parameters describing sustained-release characteristics were not changed either to any relevant degree. As expected, the co-administration of food resulted in a physiologically determined delay in absorption, which probably is not therapeutically relevant during long-term administration.
In the course of this study the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profile of a newly developed 2.5 mg (per valve release) oral isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN, CAS 87-33-2) spray preparation (Isoket Spray) were determined and compared with the results for an already marketed reference spray preparation following single application. For this purpose, the test and reference spray were examined in 18 healthy volunteers according to a randomized 2-way cross-over design. Blood samples were collected during 12 h p.a. and plasma concentrations of ISDN and its metabolites isosorbide-2-mononitrate (IS-2-MN) and isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) were quantified by a GC-method. Both sprays showed mean maximum concentrations of ISDN in plasma of nearly 18 ng/ml about 7 min after drug intake with arithmetic mean values for the areas under the curve AUC0-12 of 7.01 (test spray) and 7.30 h.ng/ml (reference spray). For the metabolic products IS-2-MN and IS-5-MN (values for the reference spray in brackets) the corresponding maximum concentrations were 4.15 (4.21) ng/ml and 16.1 (15.9) ng/ml, respectively, and for the areas under the curve AUC0-12 values of 9.75 (9.92) h.ng/ml for IS-2-MN and 104.3 (99.7) h.ng/ml for IS-5-MN in the mean were calculated. Statistical evaluation of all pharmacokinetic parameters revealed bioequivalence between the two preparations. Typical side-effects known and described under isosorbide dinitrate therapy were also observed in this study.
The objective of this randomized five-way cross-over study with healthy male volunteers was to determine, one the one hand, the bioavailability and main pharmacokinetic parameters of 4 sustained release diltiazem (Surecaps, CAS 42399-41-7) test preparations with ascending doses (180, 240, 300, 360 mg), administered as single application, versus an immediate release 60 mg diltiazem reference preparation, which was given thrice a day at 8-h intervals. On the other hand, the study also allowed the evaluation of a possible dose linearity of the test substance diltiazem. Plasma concentrations of diltiazem and its major metabolite desacetyl-diltiazem were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) up to 48 h after single dosing of the sustained release preparations as well as after repeated doses of the immediate release formulation. The undesired side effects/concomitant symptoms observed are known to occur after diltiazem administration. For the area under the curve, e.g. calculated from time 0 to the last quantifiable sample (AUC0-Tlast), the study revealed for the parent compound diltiazem mean values of 926.2, 1602.4, 1873.2 and 2415.7 h.ng/ml after administration of the 4 sustained release test preparations, respectively; for the immediate release reference preparation the value was 1007.2 h.ng/ml. Concerning the main metabolite desacetyl-diltiazem the corresponding values for the 4 sustained release formulations were 138.6, 236.9, 280.2 and 345.6 h.ng/ml, respectively. The corresponding value for the immediately release formulation was 127.5 h.ng/ml. Concerning a possible dose linearity of diltiazem, statistical analysis revealed a convincing linear relationship between at least 3 of the 4 sustained release preparations, therefore linearity may be assumed between 240 and 360 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The objective of this study was to determine both the pharmacokinetic parameters and the bioavailability of two commercial 20-mg isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) preparations (test and reference preparation) after single oral administration. For this purpose, the test and the reference preparation were examined in 24 healthy male volunteers according to a randomized 2-way cross-over design, blood samples were withdrawn up to 24 hours postadministration, and plasma concentrations of IS-5-MN were quantified by a gas chromatography (GC) method. Both preparations led to peak plasma levels of approximately 360 ng/mL IS-5-MN in the mean 0.76 hour (test) and 0.94 hour (reference preparation) after application; the plasma half-lives were about 5.2 hours, and for the areas under the curve (AUC(0-infinity)), mean values of 2741 (test preparation) and 2742 hour.ng/mL (reference preparation) were found. The statistical comparison (analysis of variance, confidence intervals) of the pharmacokinetic parameters found in the study resulted in bioequivalence of both IS-5-MN preparations. The undesired side effects/concomitant symptoms observed are known to occur after IS-5-MN administration.
The potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between moxonidine and digoxin at steady-state was investigated in 15 healthy male volunteers. Multiple oral doses of 0.2mg moxonidine twice daily and 0.2mg digoxin once daily were administered alone and in combination in a randomised 3-period crossover design. The drugs were administered for at least 5 days. The results indicate that neither moxonidine nor digoxin influences the pharmacokinetics of the other drug under steady-state conditions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Two different single dose cross-over bioavailability studies were performed comparing a new oral furosemide preparation (test preparation = preparation A) with a marketed standard with a marketed standard preparation (reference preparation = preparation B). Test and reference preparation contained 40 mg of furosemide each. Into both studies, 18 healthy male volunteers were included; 4 volunteers participated in both studies. In study 1, the volunteers ingested the tested preparations together with 300 ml of an electrolyte solution in order to substitute volume and electrolyte deficits. Additional 200 ml were given 30 min post dose, 500 ml during the next 30 min and 1000 ml during the second hour after drug intake. In study 2, the tested preparations were ingested together with 200 ml of water without any additional volume substitution. The plasma concentration curves of study 1 showed a double peaking with a first maximum of furosemide levels at 1 h and a second peak at 3 h and 4 h, respectively, on average. The concentration-time curves of study 2 showed a single peak 1 h p.a. in the mean for both preparations. The relative bioavailability of preparation A was about 67% in study 1 compared to study 2. Preparation B showed a relative bioavailability of 59% in study 1 compared to study 2.