Biomedical subjects

G Pareek

Publications and source records attributed to G Pareek.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2002

Hand-assisted laparoscopic autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty has been previously performed successfully. This set of experiments was conducted to determine the feasibility of performing autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty laparoscopically. METHODS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty was performed on 15 mongrel dogs. The surgery was carried out with two 10-mm trocars and a 6-cm Pfannenstiel incision. The gastric wedge, supplied by the right gastroepiploic artery, was resected with two applications of an endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler. The pedicle was demucosalized, and the anastomosis to the bladder was completed through the Pfannenstiel incision. RESULTS: All of the dogs were successfully treated laparoscopically and were eating at 48 h. There was no evidence of anastomotic leak dehiscence at the gastric resection staple line. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted laparoscopic autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty can be performed successfully in dogs. This operation may offer a superior alternative to standard bladder autoaugmentation procedures in children suffering from congenital bladder disorders.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Hand-assisted demucosalized gastrocystoplasty comparing different tissue closure methods.

OBJECTIVES: To perform experiments to determine whether a new tissue sealant (SynthaSeal) could be an alternative for suture closure in minimally invasive bladder autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty using demucosalized stomach. Alternative methods to suture closure for tissue approximation such as laser tissue welding and fibrin glue have been reported. METHODS: Minimally invasive autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty with demucosalized stomach was performed on 14 female mongrel dogs. Two dogs were used to refine the technique. The remaining dogs were assigned to a suture group (n = 6) or a SynthaSeal group (n = 6). Anastomoses were performed using either SynthaSeal or suture. The in vivo bladder volumes and pressures of the groups were measured before and after gastrocystoplasty. The animals were studied on day 14. Samples of the anastomotic area were taken to measure the tensile strength and stress. Histologic analysis was conducted to assess tissue healing. The anastomotic time was recorded for each group. RESULTS: The tensile strength of the anastomoses in the SynthaSeal group was significantly increased (9.99 +/- 1.14 Newtons) compared with the suture group (5.66 +/- 0.97 Newtons) (P <0.05). The breaking stress comparisons and anastomosis times were equivalent between the two groups. The histologic evaluation revealed minor tissue devitalization and a normal inflammatory response in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive gastrocystoplasty using demucosalized stomach can be successfully performed with SynthaSeal tissue sealant. This may provide a reliable alternative to suture closure.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

PubMed2001

Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study.

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to assess the safety and efficacy of periprostatic anesthesia administration during prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May to November 2000 transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy was performed in 132 consecutive men due to an abnormal digital rectal examination and/or elevated prostate specific antigen. During biopsy 66 patients each were randomly assigned to receive an injection of 1% lidocaine or normal saline. Immediately after biopsy the pain score was recorded independently by patients and the physician using a 10-point linear scale. In addition, patients were given a descriptive questionnaire to be completed at home and mailed back within 2 weeks of biopsy. RESULTS: Mean patient perceived pain scores plus or minus standard deviation of 2.7 +/- 0.21 in the lidocaine and 4.7 +/- 0.26 in the saline groups were significantly different (p <0.0001), as were mean physician perceived scores of 2.9 +/- 0.27 and 5.1 +/- 0.34, respectively (p = 0.0001). Mean questionnaire scores for pain during biopsy of 2.3 +/- 0.13 in the lidocaine and 3.1 +/- 0.18 in the saline groups were also significantly different (p = 0.0006), as were mean questionnaire scores for pain after biopsy of 1.8 +/- 0.11 and 2.3 +/- 0.13, respectively (p <0.006). There were no adverse effects of injection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant benefit of periprostatic anesthesia over placebo in a randomized double-blind trial. This safe, simple and rapid technique should be applied at transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy to limit undue patient discomfort.

Aged↗