PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Pritchard

Publications and source records attributed to G Pritchard.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Clopidogrel bioavailability: absence of influence of food or antacids.

Two open, randomized, crossover bioavailability studies were carried out to assess the influence of concurrent antacid medication and food on the bioavailability of clopidogrel. A fed/fasting study was conducted in 12 elderly male subjects. Each subject took a single 75 mg dose of clopidogrel on two occasions-in the morning after an overnight fast, either during a standardized breakfast, or with breakfast delayed by 4 hours after dosing. A washout period of 7 days was observed between the two dosings. Twelve healthy male subjects participated in the antacid study. They fasted overnight and for 4 hours after dosing and took a single 75 mg dose of clopidogrel at 8:00 a.m. on two occasions separated by a washout period of 14 days. For one dose, Maalox 2 x 400 mg tablets were taken 1 hour before the clopidogrel dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters of SR26334, the main circulating metabolite of clopidogrel, were derived from plasma concentrations of the latter compound determined before and at regular intervals over 36 hours after dosing. For the fed/fasting study, mean Cmax values (+/-SD) were 2.7+/-0.62 mg/L and 2.1+/-0.96 mg/L for the fasting state and the fed state, respectively and the 90% CI of Cmax ratio was [0.57 - 0.97]. Mean AUC(0-obs) values (AUC to the last observed value) were 7.1+/-1.6 mg.h/L and 7.4+/-1.64 mg.h/L, respectively, and the 90% Cl of AUC ratios were [0.90 - 1.02] and [0.89 - 0.97], respectively. For the antacid study, mean Cmax values were 2.6+/-0.84 mg/L and 2.5+/-0.87 mg/L for the no-antacid regimen and the antacid regimen, respectively, and the 90% CI of Cmax ratio was [0.74 - 1.16]. Mean AUC(0-obs) values were 6.3+/-1.34 mg.h/L and 5.8+/-1.33 mg.h/L, respectively, and the 90% CI of AUC ratios was [0.89+/-0.97]. Thus, exposure to SR26334, and therefore net absorption of clopidogrel, was not significantly modified by food or by prior antacid ingestion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Do trandolapril and indomethacin influence renal function and renal functional reserve in hypertensive patients?

AIMS: To assess the effect of trandolapril (2 mg once daily) and indomethacin (25 mg three times daily), alone and in combination, on renal function and renal functional reserve in hypertensive patients (DBP 95-115 mmHg) requiring regular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four way crossover design. After 3 weeks treatment renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were measured using the p-aminohippurate (PAH) and inulin methods. Renal functional reserve was estimated by measuring RPF and GFR at the end of an intravenous infusion of dopamine 2 microg kg(-1) and 10% amino acid solution. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in RPF between treatments: -22.79 ml min(-1) (95% CI -54.82, 9.24) for placebo and trandolapril, -10.37 ml min(-1) (95% CI -30.7, 9.96) for placebo and indomethacin, -14.78 ml min(-1) (95% CI -50.33, 20.77) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. There was no significant difference in functional reserve RPF between treatments: -34.96 ml min(-1) (95% CI -119.8, 49.88) for placebo and trandolapril, 29.78 ml min(-1), -15.18, 74.74) for placebo and indomethacin, and -25.84 ml min(-1) (95% CI -87.62, 35.94) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. There was no significant difference in GFR between treatments: -1.01 ml min(-1) (95% CI -7.45, 5.42) for placebo and trandolapril, -7.88 ml min(-1) (95% CI -15.08, -0.68) for placebo and indomethacin, and -0.36 ml min(-1) (95% CI -7.58, 6.86) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. There was no significant difference in functional reserve GFR between treatments: 5.13 ml min(-1) (95% CI -4.97, 15.23) for placebo and trandolapril, 6.31 ml min(-1) (95% CI -1.88, 14.5) for placebo and indomethacin, 7.21 ml min(-1) (95% CI 1.26, 13.16) for placebo and trandolapril with indomethacin. CONCLUSION: In hypertensives chronic treatment with NSAIDs or ACEI alone or in combination did not change RPF or GFR and did not change renal functional reserve capacity of RPF or GFR.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Indomethacin does not attenuate the hypotensive effect of trandolapril.

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study to determine if indomethacin attenuates the hypotensive effect of trandolapril. Twenty-three hypertensive patients (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-115) requiring NSAID were recruited. Seventeen completed the study. Three week treatment periods: trandolapril 2 mg od and indomethacin 25 mg tds, trandolapril 2 mg and placebo, indomethacin and placebo, placebo and placebo. Clinic and ambulatory BP after 3 weeks of each treatment. Study had 85% power to detect a 5 mm Hg difference in BP (s.d. 7 mm Hg). End of treatment clinic BPs were: 152.9/98 mm Hg (95% CI 147.2, 158.6/95.8, 101.4) with placebo and placebo; 150.4/94.9 mm Hg (95% CI 144.7, 156.1/92.1, 97.7) with trandolapril and indomethacin; 148.2/96.5 mm Hg (95% CI 142.5, 153.9/93.7, 99.3) with trandolapril and placebo; and 156.6/97.4 mm Hg (95% CI 150.9, 162.3/94.6, 100.2) with indomethacin and placebo. There were no significant interactions between trandolapril and indomethacin for clinic systolic BP (SBP) (P = 0.79) or clinic DBP (P = 0.87). When trandolapril treatments (placebo or with indomethacin) were compared to treatments without trandolapril (placebo or indomethacin), trandolapril lowered clinic SBP by 5.4 mm Hg (P = 0.047) and DBP by 2.3 mm Hg (P = 0.08). Mean ambulatory BP was: 140.6/88.2 mm Hg (trandolapril and placebo); 142.8/89.7 mm Hg (trandolapril and indomethacin); 149.6/95.0 mm Hg, (indomethacin and placebo); 147.7/94.0 mm Hg (placebo and placebo). Compared with placebo, trandolapril and placebo lowered BP by 6.5/7.5 mm Hg (P < 0.001, SBP; P < 0.001, DBP). Compared with indomethacin, trandolapril and indomethacin lowered BP by 5.0/5.5 mm Hg (P = 0.001, SBP; P < 0.001, DBP). In the present study trandolapril 2 mg lowered clinic SBP and ambulatory BP, but indomethacin did not attenuate this. Indomethacin had no significant effect on either clinic or ambulatory BP. The antihypertensive effects of trandolapril in this study were modest. Patient selection factors may have contributed to the observed responses, but it seems unlikely from these data that a clinically important drug interaction has occurred.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A randomized trial of dietary intervention with essential fatty acids in patients with categorized cysts.

Two hundred women with breast cysts proven by aspiration were entered into a randomized double-blind trial of Efamol (evening primrose oil) at a dose of 6 capsules daily or equivalent placebo dose for a year. Cysts were categorized by initial electrolyte composition, and follow-up continued for 1 year posttherapy. Recurrent cyst formation in the first year was slightly (but not significantly) lower in the Efamol group compared with the placebo-treated group. The Efamol treatment was well tolerated as the dropout rate was only 7% and equal in both the active and placebo groups. The initial electrolyte composition did not predict for cyst recurrence.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Buerger's disease of the sigmoid colon.

Buerger's disease of the sigmoid colon is reported. This is an unusual site of involvement by the disease. Review of the literature has revealed only four other cases.

Colon, Sigmoid↗
PubMed1983

Prevalence of chlamydial infection in promiscuous women.

Chlamydia trachomatis was isolated from the cervix of 18 (33%) of 55 women who admitted to two or more casual sexual contacts to one (3%) of 32 women who admitted to one casual contact in the preceding month. The chlamydial infections did not produce characteristic clinical features. Since promiscuous women are at high risk of acquiring chlamydial infection, they should be regarded as a priority group when resources for chlamydial isolation are limited.

Chlamydia Infections↗