Biomedical subjects

G R Barnes

Publications and source records attributed to G R Barnes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Quantitative differences in smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.

Recently it has been suggested that smooth pursuit (SP) and saccadic (SAC) eye movements share many common brain substrates in the planning and control of eye movements (Krauzlis in J Neurophysiol 91:591-603, 2004). Evidence is mounting that these two types of eye movements may also share similar mechanisms used to drive both reactive and predictive eye movement responses (Missal and Keller in J Neurophysiol 88:1880-1892, 2002, Keller and Missal in Ann NY Acad Sci 1004:29-39, 2003). The objective of this study was to quantify these similarities by establishing whether the behavioural response properties of human eye movements to predictive (PRD) and randomized (RND) conditions are quantitatively similar for both SP and SAC in directly comparable paradigms. Two previous studies have attempted to evaluate the coordination and motor preparation time of SP and saccadic eye movements (Erkelens in Vis Res 46:163-170, 2006; Joiner and Shelhamer in Exp Brain Res, Epub ahead of print, 2006). However, no previous study has quantitatively evaluated PRD and RND conditions to discretely presented SP and SAC tasks. We used simple SAC and SP paradigms in blocks of PRD and RND presentations, with eye movements monitored throughout using an IR-limbus eye-tracking system (Skalar). Twelve normal subjects (aged between 20 and 39 years) participated in the study which took place over two recording sessions, on two separate days. Data were analysed for two main comparable descriptive statistics: latency and eye velocity/displacement gain. The results presented here support the notion that SP and SAC share common brain substrates/mechanisms in the generation of responses to PRD and RND visual targets but differ in the movement preparation time.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The occluded onset pursuit paradigm: prolonging anticipatory smooth pursuit in the absence of visual feedback.

Humans can produce anticipatory smooth pursuit (ASP) for a few hundred ms prior to the appearance of a moving target. Once visual feedback is available, however, it is difficult to distinguish ASP from the visually-driven response with which it merges. Here we have developed a paradigm that extends the anticipatory period to show unequivocally how ASP can evolve over periods of up to 600 ms before being influenced by visual feedback. ASP was evoked by repeated presentation of constant velocity (ramp) stimuli preceded by auditory cues. The target was occluded during the initial part of the ramp, so that when it became visible it had already moved to an eccentric position. The occlusion period (T occ) varied from 0 to 500 ms in 100 ms increments; for each period ramps were presented in blocks of 8 with velocity held constant at 8, 16, 24 or 32 degrees/s. Eye displacement trajectories showed that subjects attempted to match the unseen target trajectory with a mixture of saccades and smooth pursuit. The smooth component was initiated progressively earlier in relation to target appearance as T occ increased, leading to progressively higher ASP gains by the time the target became visible. This prolongation of ASP throughout the occlusion period reveals the underlying internal drive that produces it, a drive that under normal circumstances quickly becomes masked by visual feedback.

Cues↗

PubMed2005

Attention and selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements.

Humans cannot typically produce smooth eye movements in the absence of a moving stimulus. However, they can produce predictive smooth eye movements if they expect a target of a known velocity to reappear. Here, we observed that participants could extract velocity information from two simultaneously presented moving targets in order to produce a subsequent predictive smooth eye movement for one of the two targets. Subjects fixated a stationary cross during the presentation of two targets, moving rightward at different velocities. In the next presentation, a single target was presented, which participants tracked with their eyes. A static cue, presented 700 ms before the moving target, indicated which of the two targets would be presented. Predictive eye movements were of an appropriate velocity, even when participants did not know in advance which of the two targets would subsequently be cued. However, the scaling of predictive eye velocity was marginally less accurate in this divided attention condition than when participants knew the identity of the cued target in advance, or a single target was presented during fixation. In a second experiment, we found that the velocity cued on the previous trial had a greater effect than the uncued velocity on the current trial. The negligible effect of the uncued velocity indicates that participants were extremely effective at selectively reproducing one of two recently viewed velocities. However, other influences, such as past history, also affected predictive smooth eye movements.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Scaling of smooth anticipatory eye velocity in response to sequences of discrete target movements in humans.

We investigated the ability to generate anticipatory smooth pursuit to sequences of constant velocity (ramp) stimuli of increasing complexity. Previously, it was shown that repeated presentation of sequences composed of four ramps with two speeds in two directions, evoked anticipatory smooth pursuit after only one or two presentations. Here, sequences of four or six ramps, each having a choice of four speeds and either one or two directions (uni- or bi-directional) were examined. The components of each sequence were presented as discrete ramps (duration: 400 ms; randomised velocity: 10-40 degrees/s), each starting from the centre with 1,200 ms periods of central fixation between ramps, allowing anticipatory activity to be segregated from prior eye movement. Auditory warning cues occurred 600 ms prior to each target presentation. Anticipatory smooth eye velocity was assessed by calculating eye velocity 50 ms after target onset (V 50), prior to the availability of visual feedback. Despite being required to re-fixate centre during inter-ramp gaps, subjects could still generate anticipatory smooth pursuit with V 50 comparable to single speed control sequences, but with less accuracy. In the steady state V 50 was appropriately scaled in proportion to upcoming target velocity for each ramp component and thus truly predictive. Only one to two repetitions were required to attain a steady-state for unidirectional sequences (four or six ramps), but three or four repeats were required for bi-directional sequences. Results suggest working memory can be used to acquire multiple levels of velocity information for prediction, but its use in rapid prediction is compromised when direction as well as speed must be retained.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Predicting the duration of ocular pursuit in humans.

This study examines the effects of expectation on the timing of ocular pursuit termination. Human subjects pursued repeated, constant velocity (15 or 30 degrees/s) target motion stimuli (ramps), moving left or right. Ramps were of constant duration (RD = 240, 480, 720 or 960 ms), resulting in anticipatory slowing of eye velocity prior to ramp termination and target extinction. At unexpected intervals RD was increased or decreased, but velocity remained constant. When RD increased eye velocity continued to decline, even though the target remained visible and continued to move. It took approximately 180 ms before eye velocity started to recover towards the steady state velocity level for the continued target motion. When RD decreased, eye velocity continued as if for a longer ramp duration, again taking approximately 180 ms before eye velocity started to decrease. These results suggest that timing of the response to the expected ramp duration had been pre-programmed on the basis of prior experience of ramp duration. Moreover, adjustments to timing occurred rapidly, within the second presentation of the new RD. Responses were compared to control conditions with randomised ramp duration. Eye velocity declined later in the controls for RD < or = 720 ms, as expected, but exhibited similar decline in predictable and randomised conditions for RD = 960 ms. Further controls established that eye velocity could only be reliably maintained until the end of the ramp when the target was expected to continue in motion after the end of the ramp. The results suggest that estimates of stimulus duration are made continuously in all conditions, based on expectancy of target termination.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Target selection for predictive smooth pursuit eye movements.

Previous work has indicated that after exposure to a moving stimulus, people are able to produce predictive smooth eye movements prior to reappearance of the stimulus. Here, we investigated whether subjects are able to extract relevant velocity information from two simultaneously presented targets and use this information to produce a subsequent predictive response. A trial consisted of a series of two or five presentations of moving stimuli, preceded 500 ms earlier by an audio warning cue. In the first one or four presentations, subjects fixated during the presentation of two moving targets and in the final presentation they tracked a single moving target. During fixation, two moving targets were presented concurrently, originating from the fixation point and moving horizontally to the right at differing velocities (10, 20, 30 or 40 degrees /s), with each target being presented at the same velocity throughout a trial. In the tracking presentation, the fixation cross was extinguished and only a single target was presented, which the subjects were required to track with their eyes. To cue which of the two targets would be presented, the appropriate target was presented statically at the same time as the audio warning cue. A significant relationship was found between eye velocity 100 ms after the start of the tracking target (i.e. prior to visual feedback) and the cued target velocity. Thus, subjects were able to make predictive eye movements that were of appropriate velocity for the cued target, despite fixating and being uncertain which target was relevant, during previous exposure.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new technique for co-registration of Magnetoencephalography (MEG) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We compare the accuracy of a new bite-bar with fixed fiducials to a previous technique whereby fiducial coils were attached proximal to landmarks on the skull. METHODS: A bite-bar with fixed fiducial coils is used to determine the position of the head in the MEG co-ordinate system. Co-registration is performed by a surface-matching technique. The advantage of fixing the coils is that the co-ordinate system is not based upon arbitrary and operator dependent fiducial points that are attached to landmarks (e.g. nasion and the preauricular points), but rather on those that are permanently fixed in relation to the skull. RESULTS: As a consequence of minimizing coil movement during digitization, errors in localization of the coils are significantly reduced, as shown by a randomization test. Displacement of the bite-bar caused by removal and repositioning between MEG recordings is minimal ( approximately 0.5 mm), and dipole localization accuracy of a somatosensory mapping paradigm shows a repeatability of approximately 5 mm. The overall accuracy of the new procedure is greatly improved compared to the previous technique. CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest reliability and accuracy of target localization with the new design is superior to techniques that incorporate anatomical-based fiducial points or coils placed on the circumference of the head.

Brain↗

PubMed2004

Dissociating the spatio-temporal characteristics of cortical neuronal activity associated with human volitional swallowing in the healthy adult brain.

Human swallowing represents a complex highly coordinated sensorimotor function whose functional neuroanatomy remains incompletely understood. Specifically, previous studies have failed to delineate the temporo-spatial sequence of those cerebral loci active during the differing phases of swallowing. We therefore sought to define the temporal characteristics of cortical activity associated with human swallowing behaviour using a novel application of magnetoencephalography (MEG). In healthy volunteers (n = 8, aged 28-45), 151-channel whole cortex MEG was recorded during the conditions of oral water infusion, volitional wet swallowing (5 ml bolus), tongue thrust or rest. Each condition lasted for 5 s and was repeated 20 times. Synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) analysis was performed on each active epoch and compared to rest. Temporal sequencing of brain activations utilised time-frequency wavelet plots of regions selected using virtual electrodes. Following SAM analysis, water infusion preferentially activated the caudolateral sensorimotor cortex, whereas during volitional swallowing and tongue movement, the superior sensorimotor cortex was more strongly active. Time-frequency wavelet analysis indicated that sensory input from the tongue simultaneously activated caudolateral sensorimotor and primary gustatory cortex, which appeared to prime the superior sensory and motor cortical areas, involved in the volitional phase of swallowing. Our data support the existence of a temporal synchrony across the whole cortical swallowing network, with sensory input from the tongue being critical. Thus, the ability to non-invasively image this network, with intra-individual and high temporal resolution, provides new insights into the brain processing of human swallowing.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Anticipatory VOR suppression induced by visual and nonvisual stimuli in humans.

We compared the predictive behavior of smooth pursuit (SP) and suppression of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in humans by examining anticipatory smooth eye movements, a phenomenon that arises after repeated presentations of sudden target movement preceded by an auditory warning cue. We investigated whether anticipatory smooth eye movements also occur prior to cued head motion, particularly when subjects expect interaction between the VOR and either real or imagined head-fixed targets. Subjects were presented with horizontal motion stimuli consisting of a visual target alone (SP), head motion in darkness (VOR), or head motion in the presence of a real or imagined head-fixed target (HFT and IHFT, respectively). Stimulus sequences were delivered as single cycles of a velocity sinusoid (frequency: 0.5 or 1.0 Hz) that were either cued (a sound cue 400 ms earlier) or noncued. For SP, anticipatory smooth eye movements developed over repeated trials in the cued, but not the noncued, condition. In the VOR condition, no such anticipatory eye movements were observed even when cued. In contrast, anticipatory responses were observed under cued, but not noncued, HFT and IHFT conditions, as for SP. Anticipatory HFT responses increased in proportion to the velocity of preceding stimuli. In general, anticipatory gaze responses were similar in cued SP, HFT, and IHFT conditions and were appropriate for expected target motion in space. Anticipatory responses may represent the output of a central mechanism for smooth-eye-movement generation that operates during predictive SP as well as VOR modulations that are linked with SP even in the absence of real visual targets.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Object motion perception is shaped by the motor control mechanism of ocular pursuit.

It is still a matter of debate whether the control of smooth pursuit eye movements involves an internal drive signal from object motion perception. We measured human target velocity and target position perceptions and compared them with the presumed pursuit control mechanism (model simulations). We presented normal subjects (Ns) and vestibular loss patients (Ps) with visual target motion in space. Concurrently, a visual background was presented, which was kept stationary or was moved with or against the target (five combinations). The motion stimuli consisted of smoothed ramp displacements with different dominant frequencies and peak velocities (0.05, 0.2, 0.8 Hz; 0.2-25.6 degrees /s). Subjects always pursued the target with their eyes. In a first experiment they gave verbal magnitude estimates of perceived target velocity in space and of self-motion in space. The target velocity estimates of both Ns and Ps tended to saturate at 0.8 Hz and with peak velocities >3 degrees /s. Below these ranges the velocity estimates showed a pronounced modulation in relation to the relative target-to-background motion ('background effect'; for example, 'background with'-motion decreased and 'against'-motion increased perceived target velocity). Pronounced only in Ps and not in Ns, there was an additional modulation in relation to the relative head-to-background motion, which co-varied with an illusion of self-motion in space (circular vection, CV) in Ps. In a second experiment, subjects performed retrospective reproduction of perceived target start and end positions with the same stimuli. Perceived end position was essentially veridical in both Ns and Ps (apart from a small constant offset). Reproduced start position showed an almost negligible background effect in Ns. In contrast, it showed a pronounced modulation in Ps, which again was related to CV. The results were compared with simulations of a model that we have recently presented for velocity control of eye pursuit. We found that the main features of target velocity perception (in terms of dynamics and modulation by background) closely correspond to those of the internal drive signal for target pursuit, compatible with the notion of a common source of both the perception and the drive signal. In contrast, the eye pursuit movement is almost free of the background effect. As an explanation, we postulate that the target-to-background component in the target pursuit drive signal largely neutralises the background-to-eye retinal slip signal (optokinetic reflex signal) that feeds into the eye premotor mechanism as a competitor of the target retinal slip signal. An extension of the model allowed us to simulate also the findings of the target position perception. It is assumed to be represented in a perceptual channel that is distinct from the velocity perception, building on an efference copy of the essentially accurate eye position. We hold that other visuomotor behaviour, such as target reaching with the hand, builds mainly on this target position percept and therefore is not contaminated by the background effect in the velocity percept. Generally, the coincidence of an erroneous velocity percept and an almost perfect eye pursuit movement during background motion is discussed as an instructive example of an action-perception dissociation. This dissociation cannot be taken to indicate that the two functions are internally represented in separate brain control systems, but rather reflects the intimate coupling between both functions.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Sequence learning in human ocular smooth pursuit.

It has been established that repeated presentation of a transient target motion stimulus such as a constant-velocity ramp leads to the build up of steady state (SS), anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements after two or three presentations. Each SS response is then composed of the anticipatory component of nonvisual origin, a visual component associated with the stimulus presentation and another nonvisual component that represents the decay of the response after extinction of the stimulus. Here we investigated the interactions that occur when each motion stimulus was itself a sequence containing more than one ramp component. Ramp components had a velocity of 15 degrees /s or 30 degrees /s to left or right and were separated by gaps of 200 ms duration. In an initial experiment, responses to 2-ramp stimuli were examined and compared with responses to the single-ramp stimuli from which they were constituted. We present evidence that the anticipatory, nonvisual components of the double-ramp response result from the linear summation of the nonvisual components of the responses to the constituent single-ramp components. In a 2nd experiment, we examined responses to a wide variety of 4-ramp sequences and again found evidence that, in the SS, the responses were formed from the linear summation of the constituent single-ramp components. Regression analysis performed on the velocity at onset of each ramp component indicated that this nonvisual part of the response was predictive of the upcoming ramp component. To confirm this, unexpected changes were introduced into single ramp components of the 4-ramp sequence after at least five prior presentations of the sequence had allowed a SS response to be established. Subjects continued to initiate a response to the modified component that was appropriate in velocity and direction for the corresponding part of the previous sequence and inappropriate for the newly modified stimulus. This preprogrammed response persisted unmodified for more than 170 ms after onset of the modified ramp component. In contrast, in the second presentation of the new sequence, the anticipatory component of the response was highly correlated with the SS response of the new sequence, but not with that of the prior sequence, showing that the preprogrammed response had been modified very rapidly. Similar behaviour was observed whichever of the 4-ramp components was modified, indicating that the velocity and direction of the anticipatory response to each component had been preprogrammed. The results suggest that velocity information related to at least four elements of a sequence can be temporarily stored and subsequently released with appropriate temporal order to form an anticipatory response throughout the whole sequence.

Brain↗

PubMed2002

Factors affecting the longevity of a short-term velocity store for predictive oculomotor tracking.

Fast (up to 30 degrees /s) anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements can be built up with repeated transient motion stimuli. It is thought that such stimuli charge a putative internal store of velocity information that can then drive anticipatory movements in the absence of a target. The aim of this study was to investigate the longevity of this store. Previous experiments with single ramp stimuli (Wells and Barnes 1998) suggested that the store lasts for only a few seconds before decaying to a baseline level. In the current study we investigate the possibility that the store was not maximally charged by single stimuli, precipitating its decay. The magnitude of the anticipatory response was indexed by smooth eye velocity 100 ms after target onset ( V(100)). In experiment 1 the build-up of the anticipatory response was examined by presenting sets of stimuli (comprising from one to five ramps) within a tracking phase and leaving a dark period (the 'gap') of 9.6 s between successive tracking phases. Each ramp was preceded by an audio warning cue and was accompanied throughout its 480 ms duration by an audio tone. Audio cues continued during the gap to reinforce timing information. V(100) for the first and last ramps of each set increased as the number of ramps was increased from one to three but reached an asymptotic level thereafter, suggesting that the velocity store is maximally charged after three presentations. In experiment 2 the store was maximally charged by presenting five ramps in each tracking phase and its decay was examined by leaving gaps of either 7.2 s or 14.4 s between successive tracking phases. V(100) was not diminished after either gap interval. In experiment 3 the velocity store was less well consolidated during tracking phases comprising two ramps. V(100) for the first response after the gap was unaffected by the 7.2 s gap interval but was significantly reduced when the gap interval was 14.4 s. The interval between the warning cue and ramp onset strongly influenced the magnitude of the anticipatory response, the optimum level being elicited by a cue time of 600 ms. In conclusion, this study has shown that the internal velocity store can be sustained for periods as long as 14.4 s provided that it is initially charged to a sufficiently high level and that accurate external timing cues are provided. Furthermore, we provide evidence to suggest that this process may be controlled by a two-part sample and hold mechanism.

Acceleration↗

PubMed2002

Anticipatory control of hand and eye movements in humans during oculo-manual tracking.

Anticipatory activity of hand and eye has been examined during oculo-manual tracking of a constant velocity visual target with a hand cursor. Both target and cursor were presented briefly (< 480 ms), but repeatedly, at regular inter-stimulus intervals (ISI). In Expt 1, the build-up of hand and eye responses was examined for target velocities varying from 10-40 deg x s(-1) with an ISI of 2.4 s. The velocity 100 ms after target onset (i.e. prior to visual feedback) for both hand and eye (V100) progressively increased over the first four presentations but then attained a steady state (SS). SS V100 values for eye and hand increased in proportion to target velocity and were thus predictive of forthcoming movement. Hand velocity exceeded eye velocity but both exhibited similar anticipatory trajectories. In Expt 2, target velocity was constant (40 deg x s(-1)) but ISI varied from 0.48-3.74 s. Subjects made anticipatory eye movements for all ISIs but hand movements were often reactive at the longest ISI. If the target failed to appear as expected, subjects initiated predictive hand and eye responses with timing appropriate for the prevailing ISI. In Expt 3, predictive responses were compared with responses to randomised presentation. Peak hand velocity was greater in the randomised mode than in the predictive condition, whereas the converse was true for peak eye velocity. This difference is discussed in terms of the mechanisms of positional error correction in hand and eye. Results provide evidence of similar anticipatory mechanisms in hand and eye, using storage of velocity and timing to achieve rapid prediction of target motion.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex.

MagnetoEncephaloGraphy (MEG) relies on the detection of cortical current flow by measurement of the associated magnetic field outside the head. The amplitude of this magnetic field depends strongly on the depth of the electrical brain activity. Additionally, radially orientated sources are magnetically silent in a concentrically homogeneous volume conductor, giving rise to the anecdotal assumptions that MEG is insensitive to both deep and gyral sources. Utilising cortical surfaces extracted from Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs) of two adult brains we constructed all possible single source elements and examined the proportion of active neocortex that is actually detectable with a whole-head MEG system. We identified those electrically active regions to which MEG is maximally sensitive by analytically computing the probability of detecting a source within a specified confidence volume. Our findings show that source depth, and not orientation, is the main factor that compromises the sensitivity of MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. There are thin strips (approximately 2 mm wide) of poor resolvability at the crests of gyri; however, these strips account for only a relatively small proportion of the cortical area and are abutted by elements with nominal tangential component yet high resolvability due to their proximity to the sensor array. Finally, we varied the extent of the patches of cortical activity, showing that small patches have a small net-current moment and are therefore less visible whereas large patches have a strong net-current moment, are generally more visible to the MEG system, yet are less appropriately modelled as single dipoles.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The role of expectancy and volition in smooth pursuit eye movements.

The most important factor allowing the generation of pursuit eye movements prior to target onset is confidence in the likelihood of imminent target appearance. We show how these anticipatory pursuit responses are essentially ballistic motor primitives and how the signal that drives them in normally defined by stored information concerning target speed, duration and direction. But we also show how static cues may be used to grade the level of these motor primitives 'on-line'. We further demonstrate that, when concatenated, these graded motor primitives can be rapidly combined to form predictive smooth movement trajectories in response to complex multi-ramp sequences.

Cues↗

PubMed2001

The cortical deficit in humans with strabismic amblyopia.

To further our understanding of the cortical deficit in strabismic amblyopia, we measured, compared and mapped functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation between the fixing and fellow amblyopic eyes of ten strabismic amblyopes. Of specific concern was whether the function of any visual area was spared in strabismic amblyopia, as recently suggested by both positron emission tomography (PET) and fMRI studies, and whether there was a close relationship between the fMRI response and known psychophysical deficits. To answer these questions we measured the psychophysical deficit in each subject and used stimuli whose relationship to the psychophysical deficit was known. We observed that stimuli that were well within the amblyopic passband did produce reduced fMRI activation, even in visual area V1. This suggests that V1 is anomalous in amblyopia. A similar level of reduction was observed in V2. In two subjects, we found that stimuli outside the amblyopic passband produced activation in visual area V3A. We did not find a close relationship between the fMRI response reduction in amblyopia and either of the known psychophysical deficits even though the fMRI response reduction in amblyopia did covary with stimulus spatial frequency.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Ocular pursuit responses to repeated, single-cycle sinusoids reveal behavior compatible with predictive pursuit.

The link between anticipatory smooth eye movements and prediction in sinusoidal pursuit was investigated by presentation of series of identical, single-cycle, sinusoidal target motion stimuli. Stimuli occurred at randomized intervals (1.2-2.8 s) but were preceded by an audio warning cue 480 ms before each presentation. Cycle period (T) varied from 0.64 to 2.56 s and target displacement from 4 to 20 degrees in separate series. For T </= 1.28 s, responses to the first stimulus of each series exhibited a time delay across the whole cycle (mean = 121 ms for T = 0.8 s). But, in the second and subsequent (steady-state) presentations, anticipatory movements, proportional to target velocity, were made and time delay was significantly reduced (mean = 43 ms for T = 0.8 s). Steady-state time delays were comparable to those evoked during continuous sinusoidal pursuit and less than pursuit reaction time. Even when subjects did not follow the target in the first presentation, they responded to the second presentation with reduced time delay. Throughout the experiments, three types of catch trial (A-C) were introduced. In A, the target failed to appear as expected after the warning cue. Anticipatory smooth movements were initiated, reaching a peak velocity proportional to prior target velocity around 200 ms after expected target onset. In B, the target stopped midway through the cycle. Even if the target remained on and was stationary, the eye movement continued to be driven away from the stationary target with a velocity similar to that of prior responses, reaching a peak velocity that was again proportional to expected target velocity after >/=205 ms. In C, the amplitude of the single sinusoid was unexpectedly increased or decreased. When it decreased, eye velocity throughout the first half-cycle of the response was close to that executed in response to prior stimuli of higher velocity and did not return to an appropriate level for 382-549 ms. Conversely, when amplitude increased, eye velocity remained inappropriately low for the first half-cycle. Results of A and C indicate that subjects are able to use velocity information stored from prior presentations to initiate an oculomotor drive that predominates over visual feedback for the first half-cycle. Results of B indicate that the second part of the cycle is also preprogrammed because it continued despite efforts to suppress it by fixation. The results suggest that initial retinal velocity error information can be sampled, stored, and subsequently replayed as a bi-directional anticipatory pattern of movement that reduces temporal delay and could account for predictive control during sinusoidal pursuit.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed1999

Independent control of head and gaze movements during head-free pursuit in humans.

1. Head and gaze movements are usually highly co-ordinated. Here we demonstrate that under certain circumstances they can be controlled independently and we investigate the role of anticipatory activity in this process. 2. In experiment 1, subjects tracked, with head and eyes, a sinusoidally moving target. Overall, head and gaze trajectories were tightly coupled. From moment to moment, however, the trajectories could be very different and head movements were significantly more variable than gaze movements. 3. Predictive head and gaze responses can be elicited by repeated presentation of an intermittently illuminated, constant velocity target. In experiment 2 this protocol elicited a build-up of anticipatory head and gaze velocity, in opposing directions, when subjects made head movements in the opposite direction to target movement whilst maintaining gaze on target. 4. In experiment 3, head and gaze movements were completely uncoupled. Subjects followed, with head and gaze, respectively, two targets moving at different, harmonically unrelated frequencies. This was possible when both targets were visual, and also when gaze followed a visual target at one frequency whilst the head was oscillated in time with an auditory tone modulated at the second frequency. 5. We conclude that these results provide evidence of a visuomotor predictive mechanism that continuously samples visual feedback information and stores it such that it can be accessed by either the eye or the head to generate anticipatory movements. This overcomes time delays in visuomotor processing and facilitates time-sharing of motor activities, making possible the performance of two tasks simultaneously.

Acoustic Stimulation↗