PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G R Gaydos

Publications and source records attributed to G R Gaydos.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Stress, depression, and anxiety predict average symptom severity and daily symptom fluctuation in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Forty-one subjects diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were recruited from across the United States. Regressions were conducted to evaluate the relation among stress, depression, anxiety, anger, and SLE symptom complaints. Negative weighting of major life events predicted symptom history. Significant hierarchical regressions using negative weighting of major life events, impact of daily stress, depression, anxiety, and anger were found for severity of joint pain, abdominal distress, and rash. Analyses using 1-day-lagged predictors yielded similar results. Within-subject analyses suggested that there was much individual variability in the strength of the stress-illness relation. Thus, some individuals appeared to be stress responders, while others did not. Findings for impact of minor life events and depression were consistent across the different levels of analyses. It was concluded that stress, depression, anxiety, and anger are associated with, and may exacerbate, self-reported symptomatology of SLE patients.

Adult↗

Feedback effects on sequential ordering in humans.

Under various feedback conditions, 38 college undergraduates were asked to rearrange abstract graphic characters on a computer screen, placing them in arbitrarily designated "correct" sequences. Two sets of seven horizontally arrayed stimuli were used. In Experiment 1, subjects in Group 1 learned to arrange the first set under Selection Feedback in which a "+" appeared above each character after it was selected in the correct order and to arrange the second set under Order Feedback in which a correct response produced a copy of the character in its correct ordinal position at the top of the screen. For Group 2 the order of these conditions was reversed. In Experiment 2, for subjects in Group 3, correct responses produced neither of these types of feedback. Subjects in Group 4 received Order Feedback only until the first set was correctly ordered once. Order Feedback was more effective than Selection Feedback during initial acquisition of the first set but not during maintenance; no differences were found for the second set. Only 2 of 9 subjects successfully put the characters in correct sequential order under the No Feedback condition. When, in Experiment 2, Order Feedback was eliminated after the first correctly arranged sequence, the steady-state criteria were met more slowly than in Experiment 1.

Journal Article↗