PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G R Grissom

Publications and source records attributed to G R Grissom.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Problem-service 'matching' in addiction treatment. A prospective study in 4 programs.

BACKGROUND: Our initial attempts to "match" substance-abuse patients from an employee assistance program to an optimal setting or program failed. Scientifically, we found no differential predictors of better outcomes by setting or program. From a practical perspective, it was impossible to place patients in the intended programs. This led to a second study, designed to identify specific patient problems and match professional services to those problems within each of the 4 programs. METHODS: Ninety-four new patients admitted to 4 substance-abuse treatment programs were randomly assigned to standard treatment and treated in the usual manner or were assigned to "matched" services, in which patients received at least 3 professional sessions directed at their important employment, family, or psychiatric problems. RESULTS: Matched patients stayed in treatment longer, were more likely to complete treatment, and had better posttreatment outcomes than did the standard patients treated in the same programs. CONCLUSIONS: For logistical, financial, and clinical reasons, it is improbable that patients will be matched to specific types of programs. However, within any program, it is possible and practical to match appropriate services to patients' specific treatment problems. This strategy was clinically and administratively practical, attractive to patients, and responsible for a 20% to 30% increase in the effectiveness of this substance-abuse treatment system.

Adult↗

Coerced treatment for substance abuse problems detected through workplace urine surveillance: is it effective?

With the advent of on-site urine testing and other initiatives designed to reduce substance abuse at the workplace, employees who are found to have used alcohol and/or drugs have been coerced into substance abuse treatments under threat of job loss. This widespread practice has produced three questions relative to these practices. First, do these employees have significant substance abuse problems or are they merely "recreational users" who have gotten caught? Second, will these employees participate in standard treatments or will they resist them? Finally, will standard substance abuse treatments provide any benefits to these coerced patients relative to other self-referred patients in treatment? We compared the pretreatment problems, during treatment performance and posttreatment outcomes of 96 employed, insured participants who were coerced into treatment at four private treatment programs due to detection of drug use on the job, to the same measures collected on a comparison group of 161 patients from the same job sites who were self-referred admissions to the same four treatment programs. Results showed that the coerced group had significant substance abuse and other life problems at the start of treatment, but that these problems were generally less severe or chronic than those of the self-referred group. Coerced participants were significantly more likely to remain in treatment (either inpatient or outpatient) than the self-referred participants. Posttreatment follow-up of coerced patients indicated marked improvements in alcohol and drug use, employment, medical, family, and psychiatric problems. These levels of improvement were comparable to those shown by the self-referred patients. We conclude that workplace urine surveillance was successful in detecting employees with significant substance abuse related problems, and that referral to standard treatment was associated with substantial improvements in those problems.

Adult↗

Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services.

This study examined the patient and treatment factors associated with 6-month outcome in 649 opiate-, alcohol-, and cocaine-dependent (male and female) adults, treated in inpatient and outpatient settings, in 22 publicly and privately funded programs. Outcomes were predicted by similar factors, regardless of the drug problem of the patient or the type of treatment setting or funding. Greater substance use at follow-up was predicted only by greater severity of alcohol and drug use at treatment admission, not by the number of services received during treatment. Better social adjustment at follow-up was negatively predicted by more severe psychiatric, employment, and family problems at admission and positively predicted by more psychiatric, family, employment, and medical services provided during treatment.

Adult↗

Addiction Severity Index: experience in the field.

Since its introduction in 1979, the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) has become one of the world's most widely used instruments in substance abuse treatment and research. Its wide acceptance suggests that enhancements of the ASI based upon users' experience would be of considerable value to clinicians and researchers. ASI users are the best source of information regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the instrument, adequacy of the ASI manual, requirements for training ASI interviewers, etc. This paper reports findings from a survey of 25 ASI users in the United States. Topics covered include reasons for selecting the ASI, modifications to the instrument made in response to site-specific requirements, and suggestions regarding enhancements which would promote its appropriate use by well-trained interviewers.

Adult↗

Private substance abuse treatments: are some programs more effective than others?

There have been few studies of treatments for substance dependence among private programs. The present study compared the patient populations, treatment services provided and six-month outcomes of employed, insured patients referred by an employee assistance program to four private treatment programs (two inpatient and two outpatient). Subjects were alcohol and/or cocaine dependent males referred from a single employer. Ninety-four percent were successfully contacted at six-month follow-up, with confirmatory urinalysis and breathalyzer samples taken. Three results were obtained. First, there were significant and pervasive improvements shown in the total sample at follow-up. Fifty-nine percent were completely abstinent, 82% were working and only 8% required re-treatment. Second, there were significant differences among the programs in levels of improvement and six-month outcomes. Finally, the differences in efficacy were related to the differences in the nature and amount of treatment services provided.

Adult↗