PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G S Arul

Publications and source records attributed to G S Arul.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Ecthyma gangraenosum--a trap for the unwary.

Neutropaenic patients are at particular risk of developing a pseudomonal fasciitis known as ecthyma gangraenosum. Despite the similarities with necrotising fasciitis, Fournier's gangrene has a very different aetiology and management.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2000

Mucin gene expression in Barrett's oesophagus: an in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mucin genes are expressed in a site specific manner throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Little is known about the expression pattern in the oesophagus. In this study we have investigated MUC gene expression in both the normal oesophagus and specialised intestinal metaplasia (Barrett's oesophagus). PATIENTS: Archived paraffin embedded material from eight specimens of normal oesophagus, 18 Barrett's oesophagus, eight gastric metaplasia, six high grade dysplasia, and six cases of adenocarcinoma were examined for expression of the mucin genes MUC1-6. METHODS: Mucin mRNA was detected by in situ hybridisation using [(35)S] dATP labelled oligonucleotide probes. Mucin core protein was detected by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Normal oesophagus expressed MUC5B in the submucosal glands and MUC1 and MUC4 in the stratified squamous epithelium. Barrett's oesophagus strongly expressed MUC5AC and MUC3 in the superficial columnar epithelium, MUC2 in the goblet cells, and MUC6 in the glands. In high grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma there was downregulation of MUC2, MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6, but upregulation of MUC1 and MUC4 in half of the specimens examined. CONCLUSIONS: Normal oesophagus and Barrett's oesophagus have a novel pattern of mucin gene expression. Barrett's oesophagus expressed the mucins associated with normal gastric epithelium and normal intestinal epithelium. While most mucin genes were downregulated in severely dysplastic and neoplastic tissues, there was upregulation of the membrane bound mucins MUC1 and MUC4. This may prove useful in detecting early signs of progression to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Role of surgical biopsies in the management of bone marrow transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) patients frequently develop life-threatening problems that have similar clinical presentations but differing aetiologies. Despite intensive investigation by haematological, biochemical, and microbiological means, accurate diagnosis is not always possible. Histological and microbiological examination of biopsies from the affected organ may be indicated to enable an accurate diagnosis to be made in these patients. Here we assess the indications, findings, and outcomes in patients who have required surgical biopsy after BMT. PROCEDURE: We retrospectively reviewed all BMT patients who had surgical biopsies between February 1994 and January 1997. Twenty-six patients (1-46 years, median age 10 years) underwent 40 biopsies from the upper and lower GI tract, lung, or liver. Indications for BMT were: relapsed leukaemia = 18; other types of leukaemia = 3; aplastic anaemia=3; other diseases = 2. Type of BMT: matched related donor = 3, unrelated T-cell depleted donor = 23. RESULTS: Eleven (42%) cases had a change in management; 4 (16%) patients avoided further aggressive therapy because of poor prognosis. Unexpected diagnoses were found in 7 biopsies: 1 acute colitis, 1 duodenal ulcer, 1 liver aspergilloma, 2 transfusion siderosis, 1 radiation fibrosis of the lung, and 1 cytomegalovirus infection of the lung. Three patients were noted to have complications after their procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical biopsies for undiagnosed problems can be of benefit in the management of very sick patients who have received bone marrow transplantations. Despite the fact that these patients are so unwell, there is a low rate of complications related to surgery and anaesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The standard of laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography: a quality control study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: One reason why many surgeons do not attempt laparoscopic cholangiography is that it is considered to be technically difficult and to produce poor-quality images. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparison was made of twenty randomly selected intraoperative cholangiograms taken during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for each year from 1991 to 1994 (n = 80) by assigning a score (0-4) on the basis of anatomical parameters and radiographic quality. Twenty randomly selected intraoperative cholangiograms taken during open cholecystectomy (OC) were used as controls. RESULTS: The average score for the laparoscopic cholangiograms (LCs) was significantly lower than the average for OC cholangiograms (2.3 vs. 3.4, P< 0.001). In addition, a learning curve was demonstrated, which showed significant improvement in the quality of LCs over the years. Analysis showed that in LCs, only 34 % succeeded in demonstrating the entire biliary tree and only 49% managed to show the extrahepatic duct system. Choledocholithiasis could only be ruled out in 53 % of LC films, compared with 80 % of controls. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an improvement in the quality of laparoscopic cholangiography, it remains inferior to cholangiography during open cholecystectomy. Recommendations are made regarding ways in which improvements could be achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Coeliac axis thrombosis associated with the combined oral contraceptive pill: a rare cause of an acute abdomen.

We report a case of coeliac axis thrombosis and splenic infarction presenting in a girl of 14 years who had been on the oral contraceptive pill (OCP), Marvelon (ethinyloestradiol 30 microg plus desogestrel 150 microg, Organon, Cambridge, UK), for 3 weeks. She had no other risk factors for thrombo-embolism. Diagnosis was made with duplex Doppler ultrasound and confirmed with dynamically-enhanced comput-ed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography, thus avoiding the need for percutaneous arteriography. Though mesenteric thrombo-embolic disease is recognised in association with use of the combined OCP, it has not previously been reported to affect the coeliac axis. Paediatricians and surgeons should be aware of the risks to young girls on the OCP, and consider it in their differential diagnosis of the acute abdomen.

Abdomen, Acute↗
PubMed1998

Where should paediatric surgery be performed?

We have tried to review the evidence for the organisation of paediatric surgical care. Difficulties arise because of the lack of published data from district general hospitals concerning paediatric surgical conditions. Hence much of the debate about the surgical management of children is based on anecdotal evidence. However, at a time when the provision of health care is being radically reorganised to an internal market based on a system of purchasers and providers it is more important than ever to understand the issues at stake. Two separate issues have been discussed: the role of the specialist paediatric centre and the provision of non-specialist paediatric surgery in district general hospitals. There are arguments for and against large regional specialist paediatric centres. The benefits of centralisation include concentration of expertise, more appropriate consultant on call commitment, development of support services, and junior doctor training. The disadvantages include children and their families having to travel long distances for care, and the loss of expertise at a local level. If specialist paediatric emergency transport is available the benefits of centralisation far outweigh the adverse effects of having to take children to a regional paediatric intensive care centre. Specialist paediatric centres are aware of the importance of treating children and their parents as a family unit as highlighted by the Platt committee; this is an important challenge and enormous improvements have occurred to provide proper accommodation for families while their children are treated in hospital. To keep these arguments of large distances and separation from the home in context, one paediatric intensive care unit in Victoria, Australia, providing a centralised service to a region larger in are than England and with a similar admission rate, has a lower mortality rate than the decentralised paediatric intensive care provided in the Trent region of the UK. There is clear evidence that all neonatal surgery and anaesthesia should be conducted only by specialists. The debate now centres around the number of complex surgical cases a unit should treat to maintain its specialist status. The NHS executive, in its guidelines on contracting for specialist services, emphasises that "Sensible contracting needs to take into account the optimum population size not only for the stability of contracted referrals but also to give sufficient 'critical mass' for clinical effectiveness." Achieving this balance has consequences, not just for the maintenance of surgical expertise, but for the essential ancilliary services. There is clear evidence in anaesthesia that anaesthetists doing small numbers of neonatal procedures had significantly worse results. The same seems to be true in the fields of oncology, radiology, pathology, and intensive care. The reasons why the results of management of certain paediatric conditions are better at specialist centres are open to speculation. Presumably greater exposure to rare complex cases, concentration of expertise, more peer review, and a trickle down effect of the multidisciplinary approach all help to keep health care workers up to date with current world practice. In addition, it allows for appropriate specialist on call rotas and dedicated junior staff. If insufficient numbers of specialist surgical cases are being treated at a centre then the whole multidisciplinary team suffers. The 1989 NCEPOD report states "that paediatricians and general surgeons must recognise that small babies differ from other patients not only in size, and that they pose quite separate problems of pathology and management." The need for large centres of paediatric surgical expertise is now accepted by the Royal College of Surgeons of England, the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, the Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, the Royal College of Anaesthetists, the Audit

Anesthesiology↗