PubMed1997
This article summarizes the discussions of the faculty and chairpersons on four major topics on postsurgical adhesions examined at the symposium, "Adhesions: Pathogenesis and Prevention". These topics are: 1) clinical significance; 2) pathogenesis; 3) research status and directions; and 4) recommendations for reduction or prevention. Abdominal postsurgical adhesions develop following trauma to the mesothelium, which is damaged often by surgical handling and instrument contact, foreign materials such as sutures and glove dusting powder, desiccation, and overheating. Postoperative adhesions occur after most surgical procedures and can result in serious complications, including intestinal obstruction, infertility, and pain. A long-term and unpredictable problem, postoperative adhesions impact the surgical workload and hospital resources, resulting in considerable health care expenditures. Although understanding of the pathogenesis of adhesions has improved recently, the molecular mechanisms involved continue to be delineated. Adhesions result from the normal peritoneal wound healing response and develop in the first five to seven days after injury. Adhesion formation and adhesion-free re-epithelialization are alternative pathways, both of which begin with coagulation which initiates a cascade of events resulting in the buildup of fibrin gel matrix. If not removed, the fibrin gel matrix serves as the progenitor to adhesions by forming a band or bridge when two peritoneal surfaces coated with it are apposed. The band or bridge becomes the basis for the organization of an adhesion. Protective fibrinolytic enzyme systems of the peritoneum, such as the plasmin system, can remove the fibrin gel matrix. However, surgery dramatically diminishes fibrinolytic activity. The pivotal events determining whether the pathway taken is adhesion formation or re-epithelialization are therefore the apposition of two damaged surfaces and the extent of fibrinolysis. Research in postsurgical adhesion formation and prevention abounds in a variety of avenues of investigation, including: 1) identification on a molecular level of the components involved in adhesiogenesis and their interactions; 2) clarification of the role of fibrin and fibrinolysis in adhesion formation; 3) standardization of design in preclinical and clinical studies of adhesion formation and prevention; 4) delineation of the relationship between adhesion formation and adhesive complications; and 5) elucidation of efficient, site-specific methods of prophylactic drug delivery. Currently, it seems logical to focus preventive research on development of barriers, fibrinolytic drugs, and selected agents such as phospholipids. The major strategies for adhesion prevention or reduction are adjusting surgical practice and applying adjuvants. Surgeons should adjust their major practices by: 1) becoming aware of the potential adhesive complications of a procedure; 2) minimizing the invasiveness of surgery; and 3) minimizing surgical trauma, ischemia, exposure to intestinal contents, introduction of foreign material into the body, and the use of talc- or starch-containing gloves. Available adjuvants include a newly developed by hyaluronic acid-phosphate-buffered saline solution applied intraoperatively to protect peritoneal surfaces from indirect surgical trauma and three mechanical barriers. One of these, a bioresorbable membrane consisting of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in both general and gynecological surgery. The other two barriers, one made of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and one developed from oxidized regenerated cellulose, are indicated only for use in gynecological surgery.