G Salasidis | PubMed Health

PubMed2000

Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the most common procedures performed today, and wound complications are a major source of morbidity and cost. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is any difference in wound outcome (including cost in a Canadian context) between a subcuticular suture technique and skin stapling technique for closure of sternal and leg incisions in CABG patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing CABG were prospectively, randomly placed to have their sternal and leg incisions closed with either a subcuticular suture technique or with a skin clip. Data were obtained through chart review, in-hospital assessments and follow-up visits. Nonblinded assessments were made regarding wound leakage, inflammation, infection, necrosis, swelling, dehiscence and cosmesis. Each of the parameters was graded on a scale from 1 to 4. The cost was evaluated in Canadian dollars. RESULTS: There were trends toward increased rates of in-hospital sternal (P=0.09) and leg (P=0.17) incision inflammation when the wounds were closed with skin clips. There was a significantly greater (P=0.05) rate of sternal wound infection with clips, as well as a tendency (P=0.15) toward a greater rate of mediastinitis at follow-up assessment. Cosmetic outcome was similar for both groups. The cost incurred was significantly greater when skin clips were used for closure. There was a greater than threefold difference, which translates to a greater than $10,000 difference over one year. CONCLUSIONS: Closure with a subcuticular technique achieves better outcomes than the use of skin clips. When factoring in the increased cost incurred by using clips, as well as other intangible factors such as surgical skill acquisition, subcuticular suture closure appears to be a favourable method of wound closure in CABG patients compared with the use of skin stapling techniques.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

One-stage midline unifocalization and complete repair in infancy versus multiple-stage unifocalization followed by repair for complex heart disease with major aortopulmonary collaterals.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect, and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries have traditionally required multiple unifocalization staging operations before undergoing complete repair. Recently, the feasibility of a single-stage unifocalization and repair was demonstrated by Hanley. In this report, we describe our experience with each approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: Since 1989, 11 of 12 patients with pulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect, and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries have undergone complete surgical correction. The first seven patients were subjected to staged bilateral unifocalizations, with repair being achieved in six (group I). The last five patients have undergone a single-stage midline unifocalization and repair via a sternotomy (group II). Four of these were infants (2 weeks to 9 months) and one was 13 years old. All patients in group I had tetralogy of Fallot, whereas in group II three patients had tetralogy of Fallot, one patient had double-outlet right ventricle, and one patient had complete atrioventricular canal and transposition. In group I, the median age at the first operation was 43 weeks. Complete repair was performed at a median age of 3.5 years, with a mean number of 3.3 operations required. In group II, only one operation was required to achieve complete repair at a median age of 28 weeks. The postoperative right ventricular/left ventricular pressure ratio was 0.49 in group I and 0.45 in group II. One intraoperative death and one late death occurred in group I and no early or late deaths in group II. Currently, four patients in group I and all five patients in group II are alive and well. CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention with both surgical approaches can lead to complete biventricular repair in most patients. Because the single-stage midline unifocalization and repair can achieve a completely repaired heart in infancy with one operation, it is currently our approach of choice.

Aorta, Thoracic↗