PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

G Sarosy

Publications and source records attributed to G Sarosy.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics of elemental platinum (ultrafiltrate and total) after a thirty minute intravenous infusion of ormaplatin.

Preclinical data suggest that ormaplatin (tetrachloro-(dl-trans)-1, 2-diamminocyclohexaneplatinum) has substantial activity in cisplatin-resistant tumor models and may be less nephrotoxic than cisplatin. Based on these data we initiated a phase I clinical trial in patients with refractory metastatic cancer. This report characterizes the pharmacokinetic profile of both the total plasma concentrations of elemental platinum and the unbound ultrafiltrate concentrations of elemental platinum, following a 30 min intravenous infusion of ormaplatin. Platinum concentrations were determined by AAS, and pharmacokinetic parameters for both the total plasma concentration and the ultrafiltrate concentration of elemental platinum were determined using both compartmental and noncompartmental methods. Twenty-eight patients (14 males and 14 females; median age, 58) received ormaplatin. There was a linear relationship between Cmax and dose (r2 = 0.945) and AUC and dose (r2 = 0.976). Ormaplatin is more accurately described by a two-compartment model than by a one-compartment model. The distribution half-life (t1/2 alpha) was 0.3 h and the terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) was 39.1 h. The volume of the central compartment (V) was 68.6 L and the volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was 183 L. Like total plasma platinum, unbound platinum is also best characterized by a two-compartment model. The elimination of free platinum is also biphasic with a distribution half-life (t1/2 alpha) of 0.3 h and a terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) of 19.3 h. The mean volume of the central compartment (V) was 200.5 L, and the mean volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was 560.5 L. Clinical development of ormaplatin has been terminated due to increased frequency of neurological complications noted over other platinum agents; however, the pharmacokinetics are, in general, similar to those of other clinically used platinum compounds.

Adult

Clinical investigation of a cytostatic calcium influx inhibitor in patients with refractory cancers.

Carboxyamido-triazole (CAI) is a synthetic inhibitor of non-excitable calcium channels that reversibly inhibits angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, and metastatic potential. Inhibition of calcium influx and calcium-dependent events is a potential common mechanism underlying these effects of CAI. The cytostatic and antiangiogenic properties of CAI led to its development for clinical investigation. In a Phase I clinical trial open to patients with refractory solid tumors, 49 patients received p.o. administered CAI daily or every other day. Two oral formulations, PEG-400 CAI solution and a gelatin capsule containing CAI in PEG-400, were tested. All administered dosages of CAI yielded plasma concentration at or above the range demonstrated to be effective in inhibiting signaling and cancer progression in vitro and in preclinical models (1 microgram/ml, 2.3 microM). Toxicity of p.o. administered CAI most commonly consisted of dose-related grade 1-2 nausea, vomiting, and occasional anorexia. CAI administration at bedtime ameliorated gastrointestinal complaints in many patients; others required addition of simple antiemetic regimens, usually consisting of metoclopropamide or prochlorperazine. Gastrointestinal complaints were the cause for compliance-limiting toxicity at 175 mg/m2/day of the liquid formulation and 125 mg/m2/day of the gelatin capsule formation. Reversible and rare sensory axonal neuropathy (grade 3, 1 patient) and neutropenia (grade 4, 1 patient) were dose-limiting toxicities observed at the 330 mg/m2 every-other-day liquid CAI dose level. No evidence of cumulative end organ damage or central nervous system injury was observed. Disease stabilization and improvement in performance status was observed. Disease stabilization and improvement in performance status was observed in 49% of evaluable patients who had disease progression before CAI. Disease stabilization and associated improvement in performance status was seen in patients with renal cell carcinoma (7 months), pancreaticobiliary carcinomas (3, 5, and 5 months), melanoma (7 months), ovarian cancer (7 months), and non-small cell lung cancer (3 months). The recommended Phase II doses from this trial are 150 mg/m2/day in the liquid formation and 100 mg/m2/day in the gelatin capsule formation.

Administration, Oral

A phase I study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovary.

We have conducted a disease specific phase I study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovary. This was done to take advantage of the cellular and molecular synergism between paclitaxel and DNA-damaging agents, with the hope of avoiding paclitaxel-cisplatin toxicities. Paclitaxel was given as a 24-hr CIVI, after which cyclophosphamide was given as a 60-min infusion. Cycles of therapy were repeated every 3 weeks; and granulocyte colony-simulating factor (G-CSF) was given in a "flexible" dosing fashion. Starting doses were 170 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 750 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen at the doses of 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1250 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide. DLT was cumulative thrombocytopenia. There were six nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicities experienced in the study. Eleven of 20 evaluable patients (55%) have achieved an objective response (4 CCR;7 PR). Three of four CCRs were confirmed by negative findings at peritoneoscopy. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-4) and 17 individuals had platinum-refractory disease. We conclude that paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide is an active combination in recurrent ovarian cancer and that further study is needed to determine if this combination is truly better than paclitaxel alone.

Adenocarcinoma

Borderline ovarian tumors.

Borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) is an epithelial tumor with a low rate of growth and a low potential to invade or metastasize. This tumor often is associated with a significantly better prognosis than epithelial ovarian cancer. Most tumors are either serous or mucinous in histology and present as early stage lesions. However, stage III lesions with peritoneal implants are not uncommon. Patients with early stage lesions have an excellent prognosis. Patients with higher stage lesions have a worse prognosis. Long-term follow-up of patients with BOT is required since the tumor can recur up to 20 years after the initial diagnosis. Recently, investigators have begun to identify subsets of patients with a worse prognosis, such as patients with aneuploid tumors. Treatment for early stage lesions is surgical and conservative surgery can be accomplished successfully in younger patients who desire to maintain fertility. Treatment for later stage lesions has been approached in a variety of ways. All approaches initially begin with maximal cytoreductive surgery. Studies suggest that early stage disease should be managed with surgery alone. Conflicting results on the usefulness of adjuvant therapy for patients with later stage disease have been obtained. At this time, the usefulness of adjuvant therapy for advanced disease remains undetermined. Further understanding of the basis of the disease and analysis of specific higher risk subsets might identify patients in whom adjuvant therapy could be tested in the setting of controlled clinical trials.

Biomarkers, Tumor

Paclitaxel dose intensity.

Paclitaxel is effective in the treatment of cancer of the ovary and cancer of the breast, as well as other malignancies. We have analyzed available phase II data in these two diseases, to assess the possibility that paclitaxel dose intensity may be important in the induction of disease response. When analyzed by the methods developed by Hrynuik and Levin, available data suggest that the relationship between objective disease response and paclitaxel dose intensity in recurrent cancer of the ovary is strongly statistically significant with a two-sided p value of 0.022. Available data suggest that the relationship in breast cancer is even stronger, with a two-sided p value of 0.004. In both diseases, optimal results have been observed at the dose schedule of 250 mg/m2/21 days, given as a 24 hour IV infusion. We have also performed an analysis comparing the only two prospective randomized studies that examined the potential role of dose intensity for this drug in cancer of the ovary. At 135 mg/m2/21 days, the objective response rate was 13.2%; and at 250 mg/m2/21 days, the objective response rate was 35.9%. The response rate seen at the intermediate dose of 175 were intermediate to 135 and 250; and linear regression analysis shows a correlation coefficient for these data of 0.946. Since flexible cytokine support may be essential in maintaining paclitaxel dose intensity, we have also discussed this approach as well as the paclitaxel dosing strategy that is associated with optimal clinical results in recurrent cancer of the ovary.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and cyclophosphamide in human ovarian cancer: molecular rationale and early clinical results.

The three most active types of agents in the treatment of cancer of the ovary are platinum compounds (cisplatin or carboplatin), bifunctional alkylating agents (cyclophosphamide, melphalan, etc), and the recently developed natural product paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ). In an effort to improve long-term disease-free survival in patients with advanced disease, we have developed a three-drug regimen consisting of cisplatin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is given as bone marrow support using a flexible dosing approach. The molecular basis for this approach is founded in the positive molecular interactions between cisplatin and bifunctional alkylating agents and between paclitaxel and DNA-damaging agents. Cisplatin and cyclophosphamide damage DNA by two very different mechanisms; the respective importance of DNA strand "kinking" versus DNA strand "cross-linking" may explain the positive cell kill interaction between these two drugs. Paclitaxel appears to markedly slow the repair of DNA lesions caused by DNA-damaging agents, which may include radiation-induced lesions, cisplatin adducts, and cyclophosphamide cross-links. Clinical data to date from several different groups strongly suggest that these molecular interactions translate into positive clinical benefit in human ovarian cancer. Preliminary data from our clinical trial show that these three agents are well tolerated in the doses administered and that this combination shows exceptional promise as a possible therapeutic advance in this disease.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

Dose-intense taxol: high response rate in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (Taxol), a diterpene plant product that promotes tubulin polymerization, has documented activity against a number of solid tumors, including ovarian cancer and breast cancer. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to conduct a phase II clinical trial investigating the response of patients with advanced recurrent ovarian carcinoma to high-dose paclitaxel combined with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). METHODS: A prospective phase II clinical trial of patients with advanced-stage, recurrent ovarian cancer was undertaken. Patients received 250 mg/m2 paclitaxel every 21 days; cycles were given on a rigid schedule; delays were permitted only for extreme circumstances. G-CSF at a dose of 10 micrograms/kg per day was given to ameliorate myelo-suppression. If a patient showed fever and neutropenia, G-CSF dosage was increased to 20 micrograms/kg per day so that paclitaxel dose intensity could be maintained. Patients were assessed for response every two cycles, and those with complete radiographic resolution of disease underwent peritoneoscopy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were assessable for response. Twenty-one had a reduction in tumor volume greater than 50%, yielding an objective response rate of 48% (21 of 44 patients; 95% confidence interval, 32%-63%). Six (14%) of the 44 patients had complete radiographic resolution of disease; two of the six also had negative biopsy specimens and washings at peritoneoscopy. Age, number of prior regimens, and clinical platinum resistance did not influence response rate or ability to maintain dose intensity. Dose intensity was maintained at the targeted level for up to 14 consecutive cycles of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a 48% response rate with dose-intense paclitaxel for patients with advanced-stage, platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer. The response rate is higher than previously reported for paclitaxel at a lower dose in similar cohorts of patients treated without G-CSF. Comparison of phase II studies of paclitaxel suggests a dose-response relationship. Therapy with dose-intense paclitaxel and G-CSF should be considered for patients with advanced, platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Adult

Age does not influence taxol dose intensity in recurrent carcinoma of the ovary.

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer, it is common practice to treat elderly patients in a less aggressive fashion than young patients. This approach is based on the notion that age is associated with poor patient tolerance to aggressive chemotherapy. Relatively little data exist to support this contention. The most exciting new chemotherapy agent to be developed in the last 10 years is taxol, a diterpeniod derivative of the Northwestern yew Taxus brevifolia. METHODS: The ability to administer dose-intensive taxol to adult patients with recurrent ovarian cancer was assessed retrospectively, and the question was asked whether the administered dose intensity of taxol was unfavorably influenced by age. Forty-eight patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma received taxol at an initial dose of 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Age in this cohort ranged from 26 to 74 years, with a median of 55. Twenty-nine percent (14 of 48) of the patients treated were 61 years of age or greater. Criteria for administration of taxol included a creatinine clearance of > 45 ml/minute, minimal abnormalities in liver function tests, good performance status, and the absence of substantial comorbid disease. RESULTS: Elderly patients in this cohort (age > 60 years) did not differ from younger patients with respect to administered dose intensity, number of cycles of therapy administered, or the occurrence of serious or mild toxicities.

Adult

Steady-state plasma concentrations and effects of taxol for a 250 mg/m2 dose in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with ovarian cancer.

Taxol, a natural product initially isolated from the stem bark of the western yew Taxus brevifolia, is undergoing phase II and III evaluation due to its reported activity against a variety of tumors. Previous studies have described correlations between plasma concentrations and toxicity when taxol is given (a) at lower doses, (b) for shorter infusion times, and (c) without granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Because the 24-h infusion schedule is most commonly used in current clinical trials, we attempted to correlate steady-state plasma concentrations of taxol achieved with a 24-h continuous i.v. infusion with toxicities and responses. Plasma samples from 48 refractory ovarian cancer patients were obtained 1-2 h prior to the end of the first taxol infusion. Taxol concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Interpatient variation of taxol plasma concentrations was small (mean +/- SD, 0.85 +/- 0.21 microM. Total taxol body clearance was 256 +/- 72 ml min-1 m-2 (mean +/- SD). Taxol plasma protein binding was 88.4% +/- 1.3% (mean +/- SD, n = 9). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity, mainly leukopenia, occurred in 92% of the patients. The leukopenia was transient and did not warrant a reduction in the dose of taxol. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 8% of the patients. No severe hypersensitivity reaction or grade 3-4 neurotoxicity was observed. Correlations of plasma concentrations and toxicities were not feasible due to the high frequency of hematologic effects and the low frequency of nonhematologic toxicity. The low degree of interpatient variation in plasma concentrations hindered the development of correlations with response.

Blood Proteins

The absence of cumulative bone marrow toxicity in patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovary receiving dose-intense taxol and granulocyte colony stimulating factor.

Forty-eight patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovary were treated with taxol and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), with a target taxol dose intensity of 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (83.3 mg/m2/week). We have assessed the patterns of granulocyte and platelet toxicity seen in this cohort. Individual patients received up to nine cycles of therapy. Criteria for entry onto protocol included good end organ function, good performance status and the absence of substantial co-morbid disease. Mean taxol dose intensity was 79.0 mg/m2/week for the whole cohort and did not diminish with increased duration of therapy. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were well controlled, with the average duration of platelet and neutropenic nadirs being less than 1 day for all cycles. There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity for granulocytes nor platelets, for up to eight cycles of therapy. We conclude that taxol, when given with G-CSF support, can be safely administered in a dose-intense fashion for multiple cycles of therapy, without cumulative bone marrow toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma

Clinical development of Taxol.

Taxol is the first of a novel class of anticancer drugs, the taxanes. Taxol's unique effects include its ability to polymerize tubulin into stable microtubules in the absence of cofactors and to induce the formation of stable microtubule bundles. During its development, formidable challenges were overcome: a suitable formulation was developed, an adequate supply was ensured, severe hypersensitivity reactions were diminished in incidence and severity, and clinical efficacy was demonstrated. Phase II evaluation is still underway; to date, clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in ovarian, breast, non-small-cell lung, and head and neck cancer. Response rates were low in early studies in melanoma, prostate, colon, cervix, and renal cancer, but for these tumors, additional evaluation is ongoing with a higher Taxol dose or different schedule. In December 1992, Food and Drug Administration approval was granted for use of Taxol as second-line therapy in ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, important questions regarding optimal use of this important new drug remain. These include determination of optimal dose and schedule and development of suitable combination chemotherapy regimens. The clinical development of Taxol and current status of phase I, II, and III clinical trials are reviewed.

Animals

Taxol dose intensification and its clinical implications.

Taxol is the most exciting new anticancer agent developed in the past two decades. Of great interest is its level of activity in ovarian cancer, as well as substantial activity in breast cancer, nonsmall-cell lung cancer, melanoma, and other malignancies. Recent studies suggest that when taxol is administered in a fashion to increase milligram dosage per unit time (mg/m2/week), the response rate in patients with ovarian cancer is markedly increased. This article reviews studies that suggest taxol dose intensity is important in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.

Breast Neoplasms

Patient treatment on a compassionate basis: documentation of high adverse drug reaction rate.

The special exception mechanism was established by the Division of Cancer Treatment (DCT), National Cancer Institute (NCI), for the provision of anticancer drugs not yet approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to patients on a compassionate basis. Strict guidelines have been established for the distribution of drugs through this mechanism and for the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with investigational drugs. These guidelines have been used to format the data base which is maintained on all ADRs submitted by investigators. In this paper, the incidence of ADRs with the eleven investigational drugs most frequently administered on special exception protocols was determined for a twelve month time period, January 1, 1985 through December 31, 1985. On special exception protocols, the overall incidence rate of ADRs was significantly greater than that seen on research protocols for the time period. For three drugs, Methyl-G, DBD, and AMSA, the ADR incidence rate was seven to fifteen-fold greater on special exception protocols than on research protocols. In an analysis of all ADRs submitted to the FDA for the twelve months time period, no difference was found in the frequency of distribution of either types of adverse effects or the causal assessments of ADRs on special exception and research protocols.

Antineoplastic Agents

Phase I study of taxol and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with refractory ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To increase the taxol dose beyond the current standard dose intensity of 175 mg/m2 per 21 days in patients with refractory ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients who had platinum-refractory or recurrent advanced-stage ovarian cancer were treated with taxol in a phase I trial and were given granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Taxol was administered at doses of 170, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. G-CSF was given as a daily subcutaneous injection that started 24 hours after the completion of the taxol infusion. RESULTS: Four patients required either taxol dose reduction or delay. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was peripheral neuropathy, and it occurred at 300 mg/m2. This toxicity was manifested clinically as a stocking-and-glove sensory disturbance that primarily affected proprioception, and was associated with objective changes on nerve conduction studies in affected individuals. Mucositis was rarely observed. Substantial myelosuppression was observed, but was not dose-limiting. Five of 14 assessable patients experienced an objective response to therapy, with another five individuals who experienced a 30% to 45% reduction in tumor mass. CONCLUSION: Taxol can be safely administered in doses up to 250 mg/m2 with G-CSF support, which may make it possible to study taxol dose intensification.

Adult

Phase I trial and biochemical evaluation of tiazofurin administered on a weekly schedule.

Tiazofurin (2-B-D-Ribofuranosylthiazole-4-Carboxamide: NSC 286193) is a nucleoside antimetabolite that acts as a potent inhibitor of IMP dehydrogenase resulting in a guanine nucleotide deprivation. Recent in vivo biochemical observations in rats bearing hepatoma suggested a correlation between depletion of guanine nucleotides and antitumor effect. The present phase I trial utilized a weekly x 3 bolus infusion schedule, repeated every 5 weeks. Biochemical measurements of GTP and dGTP were performed in patients at each dose level. Twelve patients received 16 courses of the drug in doses ranging from 1100 to 2050 mg/m2 weekly x 3. The dose limiting toxicities were pericarditis and clinical symptoms suggestive of a more generalized serositis (chest and abdominal pain). Other toxicities included reversible elevations in CPK (MM band only) and SGOT, nausea, vomiting, and arthralgias. Neurotoxic effects were generally mild, including headaches, anxiety, and malaise. Only 1 of 6 patients evaluated for tiazofurin's biochemical activity showed a sustained depletion of guanine nucleotide pools. No antitumor activity was observed. The maximally tolerated dose of tiazofurin on this intermittent weekly x 3 schedule was 1650 mg/m2. Toxicity and the overall lack of biochemical and biologic effect at clinically achievable doses may preclude further clinical evaluation of this drug on a weekly schedule. The toxicities observed in our study were similar to those reported for phase I investigations using a considerably higher dose intensity with daily x 5 schedules.

Aged

Autologous bone marrow transplantation. Current status and future directions.

PURPOSE: To assess the current status of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous marrow transplantation in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. DATA IDENTIFICATION: Studies reported between 1978 and May 1988 were identified through computer searches using Medline and Cancerline and through extensive manual searching of bibliographies of identified books and articles. STUDY SELECTION: More than 160 studies that contained adequate response, toxicity, or survival data were selected for analysis, including peer-reviewed articles, book chapters, and proceedings of meetings. The most current or complete references were used for series reported more than once. DATA ANALYSIS: Information abstracted included regimen used, number of patients, response rates, disease-free and overall survival, and toxicities. A meta-analysis of the pooled data was done. RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS: For many tumor types, autologous marrow transplantation offers higher response rates than standard approaches. For leukemias and lymphomas, response rates of 60% to 80% may be achieved with the potential for cure. With solid tumors, response rates range from 30% in gliomas, 50% in melanomas and colon cancer, more than 60% in lung cancer, and 80% in breast cancer. Although responses tend to be short-lived, long-term survival can occasionally be seen. CONCLUSIONS: Results with autologous marrow transplantation can be improved through systematically developed, carefully designed clinical trials that may be facilitated by collaborative research. Studies should focus on disease-directed drug combinations, several courses of high-dose therapy, treatment at a time of lower tumor burden, and reducing toxicity with hematopoietic growth factors.

Antineoplastic Agents

Ifosfamide--pharmacologic overview.

Ifosfamide and its structural analogue cyclophosphamide are oxazaphosphorine nitrogen mustards, a group of compounds synthesized in West Germany more than 20 years ago. Whereas both chloroethyl groups of cyclophosphamide are attached to the same exocyclic nitrogen, one of ifosfamide's chloroethyl groups is attached to an endocyclic nitrogen. This minor structural change may account for the different pharmacologic behavior of these two compounds as well as their different spectrums of clinical activity and toxicity. Initial clinical trials of ifosfamide explored the use of a single intravenous dose. Hemorrhagic cystitis appeared to be dose-dependent and limited the use of this agent. However, the development of a systemic thiol uroprotector, such as mesna, has overcome this toxicity, permitting higher ifosfamide doses to be administered. Currently, ifosfamide is usually administered daily for five days in combination with mesna. The pharmacology and metabolism of ifosfamide may explain the toxicities associated with this compound and should be considered when designing schedules of administration.

Animals

The systemic administration of intravenous melphalan.

Melphalan (L-phenylalanine mustard) is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is commonly administered orally to treat a wide variety of malignancies, including cancers of the breast and ovary, as well as multiple myeloma. Although commercially available in Europe and Canada, intravenous (IV) melphalan remains investigational in the United States. The role of IV melphalan in cancer chemotherapy is not well defined, despite its manageable toxicity and higher and more predictable blood levels following IV administration compared with oral administration. In addition, unlike oral melphalan, an extensive phase I evaluation of IV melphalan has not been undertaken. At lower doses (eg, 30 to 70 mg/m2), both as a single agent and in combination, the activity of IV melphalan has been evaluated in only a limited number of diseases. However, striking activity has been observed in previously untreated patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, a disease not generally considered responsive to alkylating agents. When administered at high doses (greater than 140 mg/m2) requiring bone marrow reinfusion, melphalan effects a high response rate (but no improvement in survival) in a variety of nonhematologic tumor types, including resistant tumors such as melanoma and colon carcinoma. In contrast, in poor-prognosis patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, or neuroblastoma, high-dose melphalan-containing regimens have yielded both high response rates and improved survival, despite considerable toxicity. Additional clinical trials will be necessary to define the spectrum of activity of lower doses of IV melphalan and to define subgroups of patients most likely to benefit from high-dose melphalan.

Administration, Oral