PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Savoia

Publications and source records attributed to G Savoia.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Follow-up of patients tested for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Malignant hyperthermia is an inherited disorder of skeletal muscle characterized by muscle contracture and hypermetabolic crisis following exposure to halogenated anaesthetics and depolarizing muscle relaxants. We planned this follow-up to get more information about the safety of non-triggering anaesthesia in susceptible patients; the safety of the use of trigger agents in non-susceptible patients and any minor sequelae following the biopsy. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 244 patients tested for susceptibility between 1998 and 2004 enquiring about sequelae from the biopsy, subsequent experience with anaesthesia and difficulties encountered because of the investigation. RESULTS: Replies were received from 129 patients. Thirty-four complained about sequelae from the biopsy: 10 reported headache and nausea; 16 experienced pain and a lack of strength in the biopsed leg and 8 found the scar less than satisfactory. Ten patients found it difficult to find a diagnostic centre. Eighteen reported problems and/or delay when they had needed a subsequent anaesthetic. Fourteen patients found the anaesthesiologist reluctant to anaesthetize them and four experienced a delay. Forty-three patients received anaesthesia since their biopsy. Complete medical records were available for 24 anaesthetic exposures in 23 patients. No documented perioperative complications occurred. Only three non-susceptible patients received one trigger agent. CONCLUSIONS: It is safe to use trigger-free anaesthesia in susceptible patients. The difficulties encountered by patients to be anaesthetized and the management of the majority of non-susceptible patients during general anaesthesia show the need of more accurate educational programmes and methods for promoting patient-centred care.

Adolescent↗

Monitored anesthesia care and loco-regional anesthesia. Vascular surgery use.

Association of locoregional techniques such as deep and superficial cervical block, lumbar epidural and/or peripheral blocks, and conscious sedation with hypnotic drugs (propofol 1-3 mg/kg/h or midazolam 2-4 mg/h) and/or opiates drugs (sufentanil 5-10 mcg or remifentanil 0.05-0.1 mcg/kg/min) is actually, the gold standard for vascular surgery. Our personal experience is based on 328 patients submitted to carotid endarterectomy, aneurysm repair and peripheral surgery.

Analgesia↗

Sufentanil: an overview of its use for acute pain management.

UNLABELLED: The knowledge of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of new opioid drugs is necessary so that anaesthesiologists can choose which one to use, considering the patient's pathophysiology, the surgical procedure, and the dose required to obtain the desired effect. Aim of this review was to evaluate relevant trials on perioperative sufentanil in order to design an optimal strategy for administration. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials on perioperative sufentanil analgesia were identified by Medline research, Embase, Biosis, Scisearch and references mentioned in relevant reviews were hand searched from 1988 to June 2001. RESULTS: Twenty-four trials were considered eligible; they were divided according to the use of sufentanil in abdominal surgery, paediatric surgery and other types of surgery (orthopaedic, maxillo-facial, thoracotomy, lithotripsy, etc.). It was possible to compare the use of iv and epidural sufentanil, in iv PCA and PCEA, in continuous infusion, alone or in combination with local anaesthetics (various concentrations of ropivacaine, bupivacaine), with clonidine, adrenaline and ketamine. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of sufentanil in perioperative epidural or intravenous analgesia resulted the same or better than other drugs used commonly despite context-sensible half-life advantages. Its association with local anaesthetics or adjuvant drugs prolongs its action and sometimes decreases the side effects. From the examined trials results that sufentanil can be used at very low doses and its association with local anaesthetics, clonidine, ketamine, and adrenaline by epidural, intravenous or intrathecal route for perioperative analgesia (intra and postoperative) and by various types of administration (PCA, PCEA, fixed intervals doses, continuous infusion, etc.).

Acute Disease↗

[Systemic review of trials on the use of tramadol in the treatment of acute and chronic pain].

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to verify the effectiveness of tramadol in the treatment of non-oncologic chronic pain, oncologic chronic pain and postoperative acute pain, applying the principles of meta-analytic analysis to randomized clinical trials (TCR). METHODS: I: Medline research of the TCR on the question in the period between 1989-1999, II: exclusion of single TCR through the question of Moore and Mcquay; calculation of the relative risk reduction (RRR), of the number needed to treat (NNT), of the odds ratio (OR) and of the typical odds ratio (TOR) of the trials which responded to characteristics of correct randomization and blindness, which expressed citation of the patients excluded from trial, and patients with measurable analgesic effectiveness (number of patients with reduction of the pain intensity 50%). RESULTS: 52 trials extracted from Medline: 10 on the treatment of non-oncologic chronic pain, 36 on the treatment of postoperative acute pain and 6 on the treatment of oncologic chronic pain. Responded fully to requirements: 8 studies (3 for non-oncologic chronic pain, 3 for postoperative acute pain and 2 for oncologic pain). The OR was 0.55 (-0.31/1.41); 0.44 (1.04/1.92) and 0.98 (0.5/1.46); the RRR was 0.26 (-0.19/0.71), 0.38 (0.15/0.61), 0.005 (0.19/0.20) and the NNT 6.6 (6.39/6.81), 5.26 (5.12/5.4), infinity in the 3 trials selected between those that concern the treatment of the nononcologic chronic pain (with TOR: 0.57 and confidence index: 0.23-0.9); the OR was 0.36 (1.06/1.78), 0.78 (-0.08/-1.64) and 1.12 (0.54/1.69); the RRR was 0.26 (-0.18/0.7), 0.07 (-0.2/0.35), -0.01 (-0.09/0.07) and the NNT 4.7 (4.42/4.58), 20 (19.8/20.20), infinity in the trials on the treatment of postoperative acute pain (with TOR: 0.4 and confidence index: -0.6-0.86); the OR was 0.53 (-0.67/1.73), 0.27 (-0.71/1.12); the RRR was 0.19 (-0.33/0.72), 0.35 (0.02/0.68) and the NNT 7.1 (6.78/7.42), 3.57 (3.37/3.76) in those that involved the treatment of oncologic chronic pain (with TOR: 0.49 and confidence index: 0.36-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Although the short number of trials which can treated by the metanalytic technique the treatment with tramadol, compared comparison's to drugs (morphine, pentazocine, bupremorphine, etc.) determined a slight improvement in analgesic parameters or at least in analgesic effectiveness.

Humans↗

Peri-operative prophylaxis with phenytoin: dosage and therapeutic plasma levels.

Early postoperative epilepsy is a frequent complication of supratentorial intracranial surgery. The lack of consensus on prophylaxis of early postoperative seizures with phenytoin (PHT) may be due to the different dosages used in several studies, owing to inadequate therapeutic plasma level. The aim of this study was to evaluate which dosage of PHT can maintain the therapeutic range in the early postoperative period. Twenty patients operated on for supratentorial neoplasms were randomly allocated to receive, during the last hour of the surgical procedure, loading doses of either 10 mg/kg (group A, n = 10) or 15 mg/kg (group B, n = 10) of PHT. PHT infusion rate never exceeded 30 mg/min. Six hours after the loading dose, PHT maintenance treatment (250 mg, i.v., every 8 hours) was started in all patients. PHT plasma levels were evaluated from the end of the intra-operative loading infusion up to 24 h. During the first six hours after the loading dose, phenytoin plasma levels fell below the therapeutic range (10-20 mg/l) in 7 out of the 10 patients receiving 10 mg/kg, while in the patients treated with 15 mg/kg, PHT plasma levels were always in the therapeutic range (P < or = 0.0001). PHT maintenance dose was sufficient to keep plasma levels within the therapeutic range in 8 patients in group A, and in all the patients in group B. It is concluded that a loading dose of 15 mg/kg, followed by postoperative treatment, is necessary to guarantee therapeutic plasma levels of phenytoin in the immediate postoperative period, when seizure risk is very high.

Adult↗

Propofol anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing paediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of propofol to induce and maintain anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing paediatric patients (age 2 weeks-11 years) during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the CNS. METHODS: All patients were spontaneously breathing, without intubation, and received supplemental O2. Pulse rate, blood pressure (BP), electrocardiogram and EtCO2 were recorded in all patients, and in 38 subjects SpO2 was also monitored. Patients were divided in 2 groups according to their body weights: Group A (n = 34, bwt < or = 10 kg), and Group B (n = 48, bwt > 10 kg). RESULTS: Dosage of propofol during the time of induction (from insertion of the i.v. cannula to positioning on the MRI table) was significantly higher in smaller children (Group A; 5.4 +/- 2.2 (SD) mg/kg) as compared to children with bwt above 10 kg (Group B; 3.7 +/- 1.6 mg/kg). Propofol dosage for maintenance of anaesthesia was significantly higher in smaller children (Group A: 10.1 +/- 5.7 vs Group B: 7.1 +/- 3.0 mgkg-1 h-1, P = 0.003). During the time of induction, transient episodes of reduced BP (< or = 20%) occurred in 6 patients in Group A and 2 patients in Group B. During anaesthesia in Group B there was 1 episode of oxygen desaturation (95%), and 3 episodes of short and mild increases of EtCO2(< or = 52 mmHg). No other side effects occurred in any patient. MRI studies were successfully completed, only 3 sequences (Group A) had to be restarted. CONCLUSION: Propofol can be safely used for total intravenous anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗