Commentary on Nordenfelt's 'On Health, ability and activity: Comments on some basic notions in the ICF'.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Persons with Disabilities↗
Biomedical subjects
G Stucki
Publications and source records attributed to G Stucki.
Content comparison of health status measures for obesity based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the content covered by twelve obesity-specific health status measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). DESIGN: Obesity-specific health status measures were identified and then linked to the ICF separately by two trained health professionals according to standardized guidelines. The degree of agreement between health professionals was calculated by means of the kappa (kappa) statistic. Bootstrapped confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The obesity-specific health-status measures were compared on the component and category level of the ICF. MEASUREMENTS: welve condition-specific health-status measures were identified and included in this study, namely the obesity-related problem scale, the obesity eating problems scale, the obesity-related coping and obesity-related distress questionnaire, the impact of weight on quality of life questionnaire (short version), the health-related quality of life questionnaire, the obesity adjustment survey (short form), the short specific quality of life scale, the obesity-related well-being questionnaire, the bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system, the bariatric quality of life index, the obesity and weight loss quality of life questionnaire and the weight-related symptom measure. RESULTS: In the 280 items of the eight measures, a total of 413 concepts were identified and linked to the 87 different ICF categories. The measures varied strongly in the number of concepts contained and the number of ICF categories used to map these concepts. Items on body functions varied form 12% in the obesity-related problem scale to 95% in the weight-related symptom measure. The estimated kappa coefficients ranged between 0.79 (CI: 0.72, 0.86) at the component ICFs level and 0.97 (CI: 0.93, 1.0) at the third ICF's level. CONCLUSION: The ICF proved highly useful for the content comparison of obesity-specific health-status measures. The results may provide clinicians and researchers with new insights when selecting health-status measures for clinical studies in obesity.
Adaptation, Psychological↗
The ICF comprehensively covers the spectrum of health problems encountered by health professionals in patients with musculoskeletal conditions.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate, whether the International Classification of Functioning, Disablity and Health (ICF) comprehensively covers the spectrum of health problems encountered by medical doctors and physiotherapists in patients with musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS: A worldwide e-mail survey with questionnaires that requested lists of relevant areas in the ICF components-body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors-in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, low back pain and osteoporosis was conducted. The suitability of linking the named concepts to the ICF as well as the precision of the linking was characterized by assigning the concepts to six groups. RESULTS: All concepts that were named by the experts could be linked to the ICF, with the exception of personal factors. Between 32% (environmental factors) and 51% (activities and participation) of the named concepts were linked to an ICF category with an identical meaning and the same grade of precision. All other named concepts were linked to ICF categories with a lower level of precision, or encompassed more than one ICF category, or were linked to an ICF category with a related, but not identical meaning. CONCLUSIONS: The ICF covers comprehensively the spectrum of problems encountered in patients with musculoskeletal conditions by clinical experts throughout the world. This strengthens the validity of the ICF in the view of the users and will encourage the use of ICF-based applications such as the ICF checklist and the now-developed ICF Core Sets.
Activities of Daily Living↗
Predictors for response to rehabilitation in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of logistic regression models with three different definitions of responder.
OBJECTIVE: To identify pre-treatment predictors of who will benefit from a 3-4-week comprehensive rehabilitation intervention in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with assessments at admission to the clinic and after 6 months was conducted. Two hundred and fifty patients from the rehabilitation clinic Rehaclinic Zurzach, Switzerland, were included. Three different measures of response to a 3-4-week comprehensive rehabilitation intervention were used: one indirect measure (minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) global score=18% improvement), one direct measure (transition question) and a combination of both criteria. Responders were predicted by a sequential logistic regression analysis with nine personal variables, five lifestyle risk factors, seven psychological status variables and the WOMAC global baseline score. RESULTS: The set of statistically significant predictors was dependent on the definition of response. The comparison of predictors that were statistically significant in any of the prediction models showed similar odds ratios (ORs) for the majority of predictors across three regression models with the different response definitions as dependent variable. Female gender, absence of depressive symptoms (dep), history of complementary medicine (cm) and low comorbidity (com) were the most stable predictors and had ORs above 2.0 (female) and above 1.5 (dep, cm, com) across the three regression models with different response definitions. CONCLUSION: A set of predictors for the outcome of rehabilitation in patients with OA was identified. If these predictors could be confirmed in future research, this knowledge might help to adopt and individualize the treatment of patients who are, at present, less likely to respond.
Aged↗
[Structures of acute rheumatic care].
Severe rheumatological systemic diseases demand high levels of diagnostic and therapeutic measures and differentiated and complex methods of care. In Germany, specialised rheumatologists and, if hospitalisation is indicated, specialised rheumatology hospitals or departments are responsible for the treatment of these patients. Early rehabilitation procedures, provided by a multidisciplinary therapeutic team, are an important component of the treatment concept in these facilities. Early rehabilitation is integrated into the patients acute medical treatment plan, with careful consideration of the patients current health problems and functional capabilities (body functions and structures, activities and participation as outlined in the ICF), thereby providing a comprehensive, integrated therapy strategy which has long been acknowledged as necessary for the successful treatment of rheumatoid patients. This article presents an analysis concerning the development, organisation, facilities and processes of the acute medical in-patient care for patients with rheumatological disorders in Germany. In total there are 4188 beds in 88 acute hospitals exclusively available for rheumatological in-patients in Germany at present. There is at least one facility specialised in rheumatology in every German federal state. The density of care in the German federal states varies between 131.8 beds per 1 million inhabitants in Bremen and 9 beds per 1 million inhabitants in Saxony. In most regions of Germany the acute in-patient care for patients with rheumatological disorders is provided by hospitals specialised in rheumatology. Rheumatological patients are treated in a variety of hospital departments. In the year 2000 only 47% of the inpatients with rheumatoid arthritis, 56% of those with ankylosing spondylitis and 28% of those with systemic lupus erythematosus were treated in a ward specialising in rheumatology. Rheumatoid arthritis, with a total share of nearly 30%, was the most frequently treated rheumatic disease in wards specialising in rheumatology, followed by soft tissue disorders (e.g. fibromyalgia), diseases with systemic involvement of connective tissue and inflammatory spinal disorders such as ankylosing spondylitis.
Acute Disease↗
[Clinical outcome measures in hand- and finger joint osteoarthritis from the patient perspective].
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease. While research activities in OA have concentrated on the knee and hip in recent years, knowledge and research results in the field of hand OA are still limited. In order to measure the effects of treatment or to obtain information on the course of a disease and the health status of a patient, outcome measures are commonly used in rheumatology. Such measures are variables which can be quantified and which represent either the perspective of health professionals or the perspective of patients or both. The aim of this article is to evaluate clinical outcome measures and corresponding instruments which are currently used for patients with hand OA, and to examine whether these measures and instruments represent the perspective of patients. For hand OA, measurements of disease activity and inflammation, function and performance, pain, mobility and stiffness, deformity and aesthetic damage are recommended by experts. Corresponding instruments are available for most of these outcome measures, but these often do not sufficiently represent the perspective of the patients. Some instruments lack reliability because standardized protocols for measurement have not yet been developed.
Arthralgia↗
[Recommendations for the management of ankylosing spodylitis after ASAS/EULAR. Evaluation in the German language area].
AIM: Our aim was to adapt and implement the evidence based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spodylitis (AS) of the "Assessments in AS" (ASAS) International Working Group together with the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) within the framework of a competence network (CN) in rheumatology in the German language area. METHODS: The ASAS/EULAR project calculated the effective size (ES), rate ratio, number of patients requiring treatment (number needed to treat, NNT) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The strength of the recommendations was determined through the evidence level found in the literature, the risk-benefit trade-off and the clinical experience of the experts. The recommendations were recently published in English. All of the centers taking part in the study area Spondyloarthritis (SpA) CN, as well as an additional 35 experts, were sent the English manuscript. All 35 participants were asked to evaluate the ten main management recommendations on a scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS: The recommendations encompass the use of drugs such as non-steroid anti-inflammatories (NSAR), which, along with conventional NSAR include coxibs and the parallel application of gastroprotectives, so called disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, biologicals, simple analgesics, local and systematic glucocorticoids, non-drug therapies (such as patient training, medical training therapy and physiotherapy), in addition to surgical treatment methods. Moreover, three general recommendations were formulated and a therapy scheme created, taking into consideration the various clinical manifestations. The strength of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations was generally high. There was a marked consensus between the German speaking experts and the international proposal: a mean of 9.13 with relatively low variation between the recommendations. SUMMARY: Ten key recommendations for the treatment of AS were developed. These were strengthened by a systematic search of the literature and by expert consensus. The large group of German speaking experts were largely in agreement with the proposal. This can be seen as a starting point for the dissemination and implementation of the recommendations.
Analgesics↗
Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to outline the proposed development process for the ICF Core Sets for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) and to invite clinical and consumer experts to actively participate in this process. ICF Core Sets are selections of categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) that are relevant to persons with a specific condition or in a specific setting. METHOD: The project is a cooperation between the ICF Research Branch of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaboration Centre of the Family of International Classifications (DIMDI, Germany), the Classification, Assessment and Terminology (CAT) team and the Disability and Rehabilitation (DAR) team at WHO, the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and International Society for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM) and partner institutions across the world. The project will consist of four worldwide studies to be conducted from 2006 to 2007 with a proposed ICF Core Set Consensus Conference to be held in 2007. ICF categories relevant for SCI are to be identified by means of (I) an empirical study, (II) a systematic review of outcomes and measures used in SCI research (III) an expert survey and (IV) focus groups and semistructured interviews with persons with SCI. Consensus about items that have to be part of a Comprehensive and of a Brief ICF Core Set for SCI will be reached in a final ICF Core Set Consensus Conference. Subsequent field testing will be necessary to validate this first version of ICF Core Sets for SCI. INVITATION FOR PARTICIPATION: The development of ICF Core Sets is an inclusive and open process. Anyone who wishes to actively participate in this process is invited to contact the project coordinator (Monika.Scheuringer@med.uni-muenchen.de or http://www.icf-research-branch.org/research/spinalcord-injuries.htm). Individuals, institutions and associations can be formally associated as partners of the project.
Database Management Systems↗
ICF core sets: how to specify impairment and function in systemic lupus erythematosus.
The World Health Organization's International Classification of Function (ICF) is a tool to characterize and illuminate better the full of array of problems a patient faces when affected by disease. Specifying these problems is a particular challenge in a disease like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) because of the wide variety in organ systems involved, its variable activity and severity, and considerable ethnic and local differences. The authors of this manuscript believe, however, that a broader understanding will prove essential for optimal patient care, and that there is sufficient experience now in defining ICF Core Sets to successfully complete core sets for SLE. Therefore, we will embark on an international project for developing ICF Core Sets for SLE, which we here delineate. This development will include two versions: 1) The Brief ICF Core Set for SLE will be a very focused list of categories essential for SLE clinical trials; and 2) The Comprehensive ICF Core Set will be much broader and useful for guiding multidisciplinary assessment in patients with SLE. Both Core Sets will be developed in a formal decision-making and consensus process of health professionals integrating evidence gathered from preliminary studies. The final definition of the Core Sets will occur at a consensus conference which will integrate: i) a systematic review of the literature regarding the outcome measures used in clinical trials and selected observational studies; ii) focus groups or semi-structured interviews with SLE patients; iii) a Delphi exercise with world wide involvement of experts; and iv) the evidence from empirical studies. The development of these SLE ICF Core Sets is designed to be an inclusive, open, worldwide process. We therefore invite both SLE clinical experts and SLE patients to participate actively.
Consensus Statements as Topic↗
Identification of relevant ICF categories for indication, intervention planning and evaluation of health resort programs: a Delphi exercise.
Health resort programs have a long tradition, mainly in European countries and Japan. They rely on local resources and the physical environment, physical medicine interventions and traditional medicine to optimise functioning and health. Arguably because of the long tradition, there is only a limited number of high-quality studies that examine the effectiveness of health resort programs. Specific challenges to the evaluation of health resort programs are to randomise the holistic approach with a varying number of specific interventions but also the reliance on the effect of the physical environment. Reference standards for the planning and reporting of health resort studies would be highly beneficial. With the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), we now have such a standard that allows us to describe body functions and structures, activities and participation and interaction with environmental factors. A major challenge when applying the ICF in practice is its length. Therefore, the objective of this project was to identify the ICF categories most relevant for health resort programs. We conducted a consensus-building, three-round, e-mail survey using the Delphi technique. Based on the consensus of the experts, it was possible to come up with an ICF Core Set that can serve as reference standards for the indication, intervention planning and evaluation of health resort programs. This preliminary ICF Core Set should be tested in different regions and in subsets of health resort visitors with varying conditions.
Activities of Daily Living↗
ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis.
OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as a combined effort of the 'ASsessment in AS' international working group and the European League Against Rheumatism. METHODS: Each of the 22 participants was asked to contribute up to 15 propositions describing key clinical aspects of AS management. A Delphi process was used to select 10 final propositions. A systematic literature search was then performed to obtain scientific evidence for each proposition. Outcome data for efficacy, adverse effects, and cost effectiveness were abstracted. The effect size, relative risk, number needed to treat, and incremental cost effectiveness ratio were calculated. On the basis of the search results, 10 major recommendations for the management of AS were constructed. The strength of recommendation was assessed based on the strength of the literature evidence, risk-benefit trade-off, and clinical expertise. RESULTS: The final recommendations considered the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (conventional NSAIDs, coxibs, and co-prescription of gastroprotective agents), disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, treatments with biological agents, simple analgesics, local and systemic steroids, non-pharmacological treatment (including education, exercise, and physiotherapy), and surgical interventions. Three general recommendations were also included. Research evidence (categories I-IV) supported 11 interventions in the treatment of AS. Strength of recommendation varied, depending on the category of evidence and expert opinion. CONCLUSION: Ten key recommendations for the treatment of AS were developed and assessed using a combination of research based evidence and expert consensus. Regular updating will be carried out to keep abreast of new developments in the management of AS.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
ICF based comparison of disease specific instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis.
OBJECTIVES: To link validated and widely used instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) and to compare their contents, based on the results of the linking process. METHODS: The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Dougados Functional Index (DFI), the Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for the spondylarthropathies (HAQ-S), and the Revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ) were linked to the ICF separately by two trained health professionals according to 10 linkage rules. RESULTS: All concepts contained in the items of the selected instruments could be successfully linked to the ICF except for "illness" included in the HAQ-S. Altogether 55 different ICF categories were linked. Seven belonged to "body functions", 43 to "activities and participation", and five to "environmental factors". The component "body structure" was not contained in any of the four instruments. Only two ICF categories were common to all selected questionnaires, but there was a high level of concordance on the concepts represented in them. However, especially in terms of "activities and participation", the emphasised aspects differed. CONCLUSIONS: The ICF provides an excellent common framework for the comparison of disease specific instruments for ankylosing spondylitis. For a future revision of the ICF, a specification of major limitations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis is suggested.
Activities of Daily Living↗
[Early rehabilitation care in the hospital--definition and indication. Results of the expert group "Early Rehabilitation Care in the Hospital"].
As a result of the continuing development in recent medicine, and improvements of emergency services, an increasing number of patients are surviving serious disease and injury. This has increased the need for rehabilitation, starting already during the acute hospital stay. Early identification and rehabilitation may reduce overall costs and help patients to regain independence earlier. Since the eighties specialized early post-acute rehabilitation units have been increasingly implemented in German hospitals. With book 9 of the German Social Code (SGB IX) coming into effect in July 2001, early post-acute rehabilitation care in hospitals became accepted as a social right. However, the specifics of early rehabilitation care have not been defined. There is a lack of generally accepted indication criteria for early rehabilitation services. Similarly, the aims, objectives and methods need to be specified. It was the objective of a group of interested experts from different fields and backgrounds to achieve an interdisciplinary consensus in terms of conceptual definitions and terminology for all early rehabilitation care services in the acute hospital. The development of the definitions and criteria was achieved by using a modified Delphi-technique. By publishing this paper the group is providing information about its activities and results. Examples of typical cases from the various fields of early rehabilitation care were identified and described. Furthermore, the report points out a number of other problems in the area of early rehabilitation care, which have yet to be solved.
Persons with Disabilities↗
How to assess the impact of arthritis on the individual patient: the WHO ICF.
The ICF is not only a comprehensive and adequate framework for assessing the impact of arthritis on individual patients but also its impact on populations. The ICF framework and applications such as the ICF Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and low back pain are therefore likely to be used extensively not only in clinical practice but also in outcomes and rehabilitation research, education, health statistics, and regulation.
Arthritis↗
Experts' beliefs on physiotherapy for patients with ankylosing spondylitis and assessment of their knowledge on published evidence in the field. Results of a questionnaire among international ASAS members.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess both the opinion of an international group of experts about the place and importance of physiotherapy in the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as well as the awareness of the responders about scientific evidence on efficacy and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy in AS. METHODS: An e-mail questionnaire ''Experts' Beliefs on Physiotherapy for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis'' has been sent to all 71 international ASsessment of Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) members. Completion of the twenty-eight-item questionnaire was done through the ASAS website (www.ASAS-group.org). RESULTS: The number of responders was 53 (response rate 73%). Altogether 94% of the responders regard themselves as experts in the field of clinical care for AS patients. There is almost unanimous (86-92%) consensus on the efficacy of physiotherapy (widely defined, i.e. as physical therapy-including exercises, application of physical modalities and spa-therapy) for patients with axial and peripheral joint manifestations of AS. Physiotherapy is considered to be indicated for both early AS (less than 2 years after diagnosis) (88%) and AS of longer duration (2 to 10 years) (94%), implying that this non-pharmaceutical intervention should be made available for or should be prescribed to AS patients. Also daily exercises at home are considered indicated for both early (less than 2 years after diagnosis) AS (90%) and AS of longer duration of disease (90%). High-level evidence (Cochrane reviews or publications of one or more randomized controlled clinical trials) favoring efficacy of physiotherapy was considered available by 33% of the participants, whereas 43% replied ''no'' and 24% did not know. Finally, excluding the costs of the intervention, 39% of the participants reported that Spa-therapy might reduce health care costs as usage of NSAIDs, physician visits and ability to work or sick leave, whereas 26% said ''no'' and 35% did not know. CONCLUSIONS: The international ASAS experts hold a favorable opinion on the efficacy of physiotherapy in AS, including group exercises and spa therapy, almost irrespective of disease duration and type of articular involvement (axial/peripheral). Awareness of published evidence on physiotherapy in AS is unsatisfactory.
Balneology↗
Commissioning of an NRC-type sealed water calorimeter at METAS using 60Co gamma-rays.
As part of a collaborative project between the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and the Swiss Federal Office of Metrology and Accreditation (METAS), a sealed water calorimeter was built at NRC and transferred to METAS. The calorimeter is operated at 4 degrees C and uses two thermistor probes in a sealed glass vessel containing high-purity water to measure the radiation-induced temperature rise. The various correction factors have been evaluated and the estimated standard uncertainty on the absorbed dose to water is 0.41%. An extensive set of measurements using 60Co gamma-rays was carried out at NRC and two ionization chambers were calibrated against the absorbed dose determined calorimetrically. The chambers were also calibrated against the NRC standard for absorbed dose. After transferring the calorimeter to METAS, a similar set of measurements was carried out using their 60Co beam and the same two ionization chambers were calibrated against the absorbed dose to water established at METAS. The discrepancy between the three sets of calibration coefficients was smaller than the estimated standard uncertainty of 0.47% on the ratio of any pair of calibration coefficients.
Calibration↗
[Patient-centered assessment of functional health in systemic sclerosis -- where are we now?].
Self-administered patient-centered questionnaires have been shown to be practical, reliable and valid in terms of evaluating functional limitations in rheumatic diseases. In systemic sclerosis a modified version of the HAQ and condition-specific questionnaires have been used. The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) does not comprehensively cover functional limitations in patients with systemic sclerosis. Visual Analogue Scales added to the modified HAQ reflect general and organ-specific symptoms only to some extent. The Self-administered Systemic Sclerosis Questionnaire (SySQ) includes general, organ-specific and musculoskeletal symptoms with a focus on functional limitations of the upper and lower extremities. The SySQ has not been examined longitudinally nor has it been validated cross-culturally. WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) could serve as a future reference framework and common language in terms of the design of new disease-specific, patient-centered, comprehensive questionnaires for systemic sclerosis as well as in the further improvement of established questionnaires.
Activities of Daily Living↗
Inpatient rehabilitation for hip or knee osteoarthritis: 2 year follow up study.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the course of pain, physical function, and other health dimensions after a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation intervention in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. METHODS: An observational, prospective cohort study with assessments at baseline (entry into clinic), 1 (discharge from inpatient rehabilitation), 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months after baseline. Consecutively referred patients to an inpatient rehabilitation centre fulfilling the inclusion criteria were studied. 3-4 week comprehensive rehabilitation intervention, including strengthening exercise, flexibility training, endurance training, relaxation strategies, and consultations for preventive measures, was carried out. Individual home rehabilitation programmes were taught. Generic health status was measured using the SF-36, condition specific health was measured with the WOMAC questionnaire. Effects were analysed with sensitivity statistics (effect size, ES) and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Data from 128 patients with complete follow up data were analysed. Both pain and physical function improved moderately (WOMAC pain: ES = 0.56, WOMAC function ES = 0.44) until discharge. Although the effect in pain reduction remained significant by month 24 (WOMAC: ES = 0.26), physical function deteriorated close to baseline values after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation of patients with OA of the hip or knee may improve pain and physical function in the mid-term, and pain in the long term.
Aged↗