PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G T McDonald

Publications and source records attributed to G T McDonald.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

A systems approach to the evaluation of natural resource management initiatives.

Adopting a new paradigm for natural resource and environmental policy that emphasises continuous change, adaptation and learning demands a new approach to evaluation to enable improvements in the way these initiatives contribute to sustainable resource use. Evaluation is fundamental to identifying change, supporting an adaptive approach that is flexible enough to meet the challenge of change, and enabling learning at individual, community, institutional and policy levels. Based on a consideration of changing approaches to natural resource management (NRM) policy and observations and experiences in the practical assessment of on-the-ground initiatives, the authors develop a set of principles for evaluation in NRM that: (a) addresses evaluation from a systems perspective, (b) links objective to consequence, (c) considers the fundamental assumptions and hypotheses that underpin core policy or program objectives, (d) is grounded in the natural resource, policy/institutional, economic, socio-cultural and technological contexts of implementation in practice, (e) establishes practical and valid evaluation criteria by which change can be monitored and assessed, (f) involves methodological pluralism including both quantitative and qualitative methods to ensure rigour and comprehensiveness in assessment, and (g) integrates different disciplinary perspectives (i.e. social, economic, environmental, policy and technological). The paper develops a systems-based evaluation framework that incorporates these principles and also recognises the multiple levels and nested nature of NRM policy, namely: problem characterisation, policy formulation and intent, program logic, and on-ground implementation. Finally, we demonstrate its utility through application to three contrasting Australian case studies: a community-based Integrated Catchment Management policy implementation; a resource information delivery system; and the development of a Decision Support System.

Australia↗

A system for developing and evaluating the clinical judgment of dental students.

A system for evaluating the clinical judgment of dental students in removable prosthodontics was presented. The major points of the system are as follows. Students must decide when the quality of their treatment is worthy of a grade. Three quality-level categories are used. Letters that have no intrinsic meaning are used to designate each quality level. Each item may be evaluated a maximum of four times by the student before remediation is instituted. Each attempt to evaluate the same procedure receives a lower point value. The final grade is determined as a percent of points earned out of a possible maximum. Faculty acceptance of the system is high. The system provides an easy means of feedback to students.

Clinical Competence↗