PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

G T Pavlidis

Publications and source records attributed to G T Pavlidis.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Eye movement differences between dyslexics, normal, and retarded readers while sequentially fixating digits.

The eye movements of 13 dyslexics, 10 normal, and 16 retarded readers were recorded while they sequentially fixated 7 equidistantly spaced digits from left to right (L----R) and right to left (R----L). This nonreading task simulated the sequential motor components of the reading process. Dyslexics and their controls were selected on the basis of comprehensive and quantifiable criteria. All three groups were of the same chronological age. The dyslexics and retarded readers had also the same reading difficulties, but the causes of their problems were different. Dyslexics made significantly more regressions than the normal or the retarded readers in both directions (L----R and R----L). These results were in line with the ones reported in similar studies and suggest that the dyslexics' erratic eye movements and their excessive number of regressions are present even in nonreading, nonverbal sequential tasks. It may, therefore, be possible to use the eye movement records from nonreading sequential tasks for the objective diagnosis of dyslexia. As such tasks do not depend on reading, they may even be used before reading age.

Adolescent

Erratic eye movements and dyslexia: factors determining their relationship.

Studies of dyslexia often produce contradictory results. Studies of eye movement are not an exception to this rule. The differences between Black, et al.'s 1984 and Pavlidis's 1981 eye-movement results are mainly due to differences in: (a) unquantifiable and variable criteria for selection of subjects, (b) incompatible experimental designs and procedures, (c) varying stimulus characteristics, and (d) major differences in the methods of data acquisition and analysis. The solution of these problems requires the establishment of quantifiable Research Diagnostic Criteria for Dyslexia and the use of compatible methods of data acquisition and analysis. The adoption of these standards would lead to a better understanding of dyslexia and would also make possible meaningful replications of major studies.

Dyslexia

Erratic sequential eye-movements in dyslexics: comments and reply to Stanley et al.

The results of the Pavlidis' dyslexia studies are consistent with the existing literature and have also been recently replicated using the same subject selection criteria, instructions to subjects, experimental procedures, tests and analyses. Stanley et al.'s: (a) subject selection criteria, (b) instructions to subjects, (c) experimental procedures, (d) temporo-spatial characteristics of the sequentially illuminated LEDs and (e) data analysis procedures differ from those used in the Pavlidis' studies and, therefore, also differ their results.

Attention