PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G V Kornek

Publications and source records attributed to G V Kornek.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Side effects during chemotherapy predict tumour response in advanced colorectal cancer.

To investigate whether a relationship between chemotherapy-associated adverse events and treatment efficacy exists, we have analysed the toxicity, objective response and survival data of 303 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients were divided into two groups: the first with beneficial effect (I, n = 245), and the second with progressive disease (II, n = 58). Differences in terms of incidence rates, type and severity of ad verse events were analysed with univariate and multivariate models. The median number of side effects in group I was 6 vs 4 in group II (OR=1.342; P= 0.0001). An inverse correlation between disease control and treatment tolerance was confirmed when side effects were analysed according to severity and type of treatment-associated toxicities (haematological: P = 0.0005 vs nonhaematological P = 0.0001). When median survival was analysed according to the number of adverse events, it was 10 (95% CI, 3-7), 16 (14-18), and 18 (16-20) months in case of 0-1, 2-5, and > or =6 adverse events, respectively (P = 0.01). In conclusion, the results of this analysis suggest that occurrence of side effects during chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer is an independent and reliable prognostic indicator for response and survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine or biweekly high-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a randomised phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma face a particularly dismal prognosis, and no standard palliative chemotherapy has yet been defined. Among several different single agents, mitomycin C and, more recently, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine and the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine, have been reported to exert antitumour activity. In view of a potential drug synergy, the present randomised phase II trial was initiated. The aim was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerance of mitomycin C (MMC) in combination with gemcitabine (GEM) or capecitabine (CAPE) in previously untreated patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients were entered in this study and randomly allocated to treatment with MMC 8 mg/m2 on day 1 in combination with GEM 2000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks, or MMC 8 mg/m2 on day 1 plus CAPE 2000 mg/m2/day on days 1-14, every 4 weeks. In both arms, chemotherapy was administered for a total of 6 months unless progressive disease occurred earlier. RESULTS: Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. The overall independent review committee-confirmed response rate among those treated with MMC + GEM was 20% (five of 25) compared with 31% (eight of 26) among those treated with MMC + CAPE. Similarly, median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.2 versus 5.3 months) and median overall survival (OS; 6.7 versus 9.25 months) tended to be superior in the latter combination arm. Chemotherapy was fairly well tolerated in both arms, with a comparably low rate of only grade 1 and 2 non-haematological adverse reactions. Also, only four (17%) patients in both treatment arms experienced grade 3 leukocytopenia, and three (13%) and four (17%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia in the MMC + GEM and MMC + CAPE arm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that both combination regimens are feasible, tolerable and clinically active. The MMC + CAPE arm, however, seems to be superior in terms of response rate, PFS and OS, and should therefore be selected for further clinical investigation in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is an active antitumor agent in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and has shown potential synergistic activity with the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine in previous phase I/II trials. Based on this background and in order to define the therapeutic potential and tolerance of this combination more precisely, the present randomized multicenter phase II trial was initiated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 83 patients to treatment with biweekly gemcitabine 2,200 mg/m(2) given as a 30 min intravenous infusion on day 1, or the same treatment plus oral capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) given from days 1 to 7. In both arms, chemotherapy was administered for a duration of 6 months unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The efficacy of the two treatment arms was evaluated according to standard criteria, i.e. objective response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as by analysis of clinical benefit response. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate among the 42 patients treated with gemcitabine alone was 14% compared with 7/41 (17%) among those treated with the combination arm. Similar to response rates, there was no apparent difference between the two groups in terms of median PFS (4.0 versus 5.1 months) and median OS (8.2 versus 9.5 months) in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Of 61 patients with tumor-related symptoms, who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 10/30 (33%) and 15/31 (48.4%) experienced significant palliation in the gemcitabine and combination arm, respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated in both arms with only four versus six patients experiencing WHO grade 3 symptoms. Apart from the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome in 10 patients, no major increase in incidence and/or degree of adverse reactions was noted in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial suggest a fairly good therapeutic index for the combination of biweekly high-dose gemcitabine and capecitabine for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Despite a somewhat superior clinical benefit response rate, no advantage over single-agent gemcitabine, however, was noted in terms of objective efficacy parameters.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed has demonstrated an encouraging therapeutic index in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma. The aim of this multi-institutional study was to determine the antitumor potential of this combination in patients with metastatic gastric cancer failing prior palliative first-line chemotherapy, and to reconfirm its favorable toxicity profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 21 patients with metastatic gastric cancer, who progressed while on or within 6 months after discontinuing palliative first-line chemotherapy, participated in this study. They received raltitrexed 3,0 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) both given intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: One patient achieved a partial response, 6 had stable disease, and 14 patients progressed. Median progression-free and overall survival from the onset of salvage chemotherapy was 2.0 and 4.5 months, respectively. Hematologic adverse reactions, specifically neutropenia and anemia were common, though generally mild to moderate with only 3 patients experiencing grade 3/4 toxicity. The most frequent non-hematologic adverse events included nausea/emesis, asthenia, and transient elevation of liver functional parameters, again with grade 3 symptoms occurring only in a minority of patients. CONCLUSION: Despite reproducibility of a favorable toxicity profile of oxaliplatin + raltitrexed, our data suggest that this combination regimen has no substantial antitumor activity in patients with progressive, chemotherapeutically pretreated metastatic gastric cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Follow-up investigations in colorectal cancer].

BACKGROUND: In view of improved surgical techniques and other local treatment modalities, i.e. radiofrequency ablation, cryosurgery, and the availability of new active cytotoxic agents, which in the neoadjuvant treatment setting may allow curative resection of liver or lung metastases and locoregional recurrences in up to 30% of cases, the ASCO and ESMO recommendations 2002 should be up-dated. CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS: According to the ASCO, history, clinical examination and CEA assessments should be performed every 3 months for > or =2 years after initial diagnosis and annually thereafter, whereas the ESMO discourages any routine laboratory examinations. Furthermore, rather in contrast to the ASCO guidelines, which do not recommend proctosigmoidoscopy in patients with rectal cancer (unless postoperative radiochemotherapy has not been effected) the ESMO suggests endoscopic +/- endosonographic evaluations of the rectosigmoid every 6 months for 2 years and colonoscopy only every 5 years. Chest x-ray and abdominal ultrasound are not suggested, except in symptomatic patients and in case of elevated CEA levels. POSSIBLE NEW SURVEILLANCE RECOMMENDATIONS: History, clinical examination and CEA testing should be performed every 3 months for 2 years after diagnosis and annually thereafter. Similarly, liver sonography or CT-scan +/- chest x-ray should be performed every 6 months for 2 years and annually thereafter. Because of significantly improved local control in patients with rectal cancer undergoing total mesorectal excision +/- preoperative radiotherapy, the frequency of rectosigmoidoscopy should be reduced.

Aftercare↗
PubMed2003

Capecitabine as salvage therapy for a breast cancer patient with extensive liver metastases and associated impairment of liver function.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer metastasizing to the liver with presence of a parenchymatous icterus presents a therapeutic dilemma. Treatment-related toxicity can be unpredictable due to altered drug clearance, and bilirubin exceeding 5,0 mg/dl is generally considered an absolute contraindication for the administration of cytotoxic agents. The pharmacokinetics of capecitabine--an active oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug for the treatment of advanced breast cancer--are not affected in patients with mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction, but there are no data available for patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia. PATIENT AND METHODS: We herein report the case of a female patient with advanced breast cancer with predominant liver metastases and severe hyperbilirubinemia (12 mg/dl). The patient received oral capecitabine at a dose of 2,500 mg/m2/day in 2 divided doses for 2 weeks, followed by 1 week rest. RESULTS: Several assessments of liver function parameters including serum bilirubin showed a decrease to normal values within 2.5 months. After 7 courses of treatment, a partial remission was confirmed by CT scan. Treatment with capecitabine was well tolerated with grade 2 hand-and-foot syndrome and mild nausea being the only side effects. CONCLUSION: This case report suggests that capecitabine can be safely administered without dose adjustment in patients with extensive liver metastases and hepatic dysfunction.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2002

Effective combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and/or erythropoietin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

A phase II trial was performed to determine the antitumour efficacy and tolerance of combined paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoetic growth factor support in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Forty-five patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer were entered in this trial. Treatment consisted of 2-weekly courses of paclitaxel 160 mg per m2 and cisplatin 60 mg per m2 both given on day 1. Depending on absolute neutrophil counts on the days of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration (1000-2000 per microl), a 5-day course of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg x kg(-1) per day was given subcutaneously; in addition, if haemoglobin was <12.0 mg dl(-1), erythropoietin 10 000 IU was administered subcutaneously three times per week. The confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 44%, including five complete (11%) and 15 partial remissions (33%). Twelve patients had stable disease (27%), 11 (24%) progressed while on chemotherapy, and two patients were not evaluable. The median time to response was 3 months, the median time to progression 7.0 months, and the median survival time was 11.2 months with 12 patients currently alive. Haematologic toxicity was common, though WHO grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only five patients (11%). Apart from total alopecia in 16 patients (36%), severe non-haematologic adverse reactions included grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in six (13%) and anaphylaxis in two patients. In addition, there was one patient each who experienced grade 3 emesis, diarrhea, and infection, respectively. Our data suggest that the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without G-CSF and/or erythropoietin has promising therapeutic activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Absence of therapeutic efficacy of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide in advanced primary hepatic cholangiocellular cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder despite in vivo somatostatin-receptor expression.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the biliary system is a rare tumour entity, and patients with advanced disease face a dismal prognosis. Because of the absence of standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary carcinoma and reports of expression of receptors for somatostatin (SST), we performed a phase II study to evaluate the clinical potential of the long-acting SST analogue lanreotide (LAN) for treatment of this disease. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with histologically verified primary hepatic cholangiocellular cancer or primary adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder were enrolled in the study. Before initiation of therapy, SST-receptor scintigraphy using 111In-DOTA-LAN was carried out in eight patients to check for in vivo expression of SST receptors. Thirty milligrams of a slow-release formulation of LAN was administered by deep intramuscular injection every 2 weeks until progression or patients wished to withdraw. Restaging by means of computed tomography was performed every 8 weeks, and response was assessed according to World Health Organisation standard criteria. In addition, weight, performance status, analgesic intake and subjective pain perception were recorded every 4 weeks, along with evaluation of tumour markers CEA and Ca 19-9. RESULTS: Tumour sites were visualized by means of 111In-DOTA-LAN in all 8 patients. A total of 161 injections were administered, the median number per patient being 5 (range 2-36). Side effects were generally mild, only two patients complained of mild nausea and one patient had meteorism attributed to therapy. Therapeutic results, however, were disappointing, with only one patient demonstrating complete remission (CR), which lasted for 18 months before diagnosis of recurrence. Four patients had stable disease (SD) lasting between 3.5 and 9+ months accompanied by weight gain and improvement in performance status in 2 cases, while the remaining 15 patients progressed during therapy. The median time to progression was 2.5 months (range 1-18), and the median survival was 4.5 months (range 1.5-18+ months). No clear-cut correlation between scan result and therapeutic outcome could be demonstrated, as not only the patient with CR and two with SD, but also five patients with progressive disease had a positive scan result. CONCLUSION: Our data show that adenocarcinomas of the gallbladder and hepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas express SST receptors in vivo as judged by 111In-DOTA-LAN scintigraphy. Despite this fact, LAN did not display therapeutic activity in this study.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Intermittent weekly high-dose capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I/II study in first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this phase I study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of an intermittent weekly capecitabine regimen in combination with oxaliplatin. Furthermore, we intended to explore its safety at the recommended dose, and to assess its principal antitumor activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer who previously were unexposed to palliative chemotherapy were enrolled on to this disease-oriented phase I trial. They were treated with a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) administered as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1) plus escalating doses of capecitabine (given at two divided daily doses from days 1 to 7), repeated every 2 weeks. The dose of oral fluoropyrimidine was escalated in consecutive cohorts of three to six patients from 2500 to 4000 mg/m(2)/day. After having defined the toxic dose, nine additional patients were entered at the MTD/recommended dose to confirm its safety profile, and assure suitability for future phase II/III studies. RESULTS: In the phase I part of the study, 21 patients were enrolled, and a total of 222 courses were administered through four dose levels of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2). Gastrointestinal toxicities, predominantly diarrhea, were the principal DLTs. Other severe adverse events included grade 3 asthenia, acute neurological symptoms and skin toxicity. The combination was not myelosuppressive, eliciting only sporadically grade 3/4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia. There was no alopecia, and only a few patients experienced mild symptoms of hand-foot syndrome. Externally reviewed objective responses were noted in 15 of all 30 evaluable patients (overall response rate, 50%; 95% confidence interval 31% to 69%) including three complete remissions and median progression-free survival was 8.8 months (range 7-14+ months). CONCLUSIONS: Overall results of this study indicate that the administration of clinically relevant single-agent doses of both capecitabine and oxaliplatin is feasible and seems to result in promising therapeutic activity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. On the basis of the toxicological profile of the combination regimen shown in the present study, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h intravenous infusion every 2 weeks administered in combination with capecitabine 3500 mg/m(2)/day x7 in two divided doses is recommended for further evaluations.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Phase II study with docetaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Since the combination of cisplatin and docetaxel have demonstrated activity in squamous cell carcinomas of the lung and oesophagus before, promising results in recurrent metastatic head and neck cancer were expected. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1998 and October 2000, 40 patients entered this trial, 38 of whom were evaluable. Six patients were previously untreated, 24 had surgery and/or radiotherapy and 13 had received chemoradiation and/or surgery. Therapy consisted of 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel (1-hour infusion) and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin (90-min infusion) on day 1, repeated every three weeks for a maximum of 6 courses. All patients received corticosteroids routinely, 5-HT3-antagonists, and hydration. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 52.5% (95% confidence interval, 36.1 to 68.5%) including 7 complete (17.5% complete response; CR) and 14 partial remissions (35% partial response; PR). The overall response rate in patients who had no prior treatment (n = 6) was 100%, including 3 CR and 3 PR. In patients who had prior surgery and/or radiotherapy (n = 21) an overall response rate of 42.8% was observed, including 2 CR and 7 PR; 8 patients (38.1%) had stable disease, while disease progressed in 3 (14.3%). Six of 13 patients (46.2%) who had prior chemoradiation +/- surgery responded, including 2 CR (15.4%) and 4 PR (30.8%), no change was seen in 4 patients (30.8%) and tumour progressed in 2 (15.4%). The median response duration for all patients was 10 months (range, 3-20), the median overall survival was 11 months (range, 1-30). Myelosuppression was commonly observed; WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 12 patients (30%) each, and was complicated by septicaemia in 5 cases. WHO grade 3 anaemia was observed in only 3 patients (7.5%). Severe non-hematologic toxicity except for alopecia was rarely observed, and included diarrhea in 2 (5%), nausea/vomiting in 2 patients (5%) and stomatitis in 1 patient (2.5%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and cisplatin in combination is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of head and neck cancer with an excellent response rate in previously untreated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer with a Biweekly Oxaliplatin plus Irinotecan Combination Regimen.

BACKGROUND: Both oxaliplatin and irinotecan have demonstrated antitumor activity in pretreated colorectal cancer; experimental and early clinical data suggest that these two drugs may act synergistically. The aim of this study was to document the therapeutic index of a biweekly combination regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer failing prior palliative first-line chemotherapy with raltitrexed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study 27 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were analyzed, who progressed while on or within 6 months after discontinuation of palliative first-line chemotherapy with raltitrexed. They received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) both given on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The confirmed overall response rate was 37% (95% confidence interval, 19.4-57.7%), including 2 complete and 8 partial remissions. 12 additional patients (44.4%) had stable disease, and in only 5 cases (18.5%) disease progression was not influenced by chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival for all 27 patients was 8 months (range, 1-16+ months), and 16 patients (59%) are still alive after a median follow-up time of 12.5 months. Hematologic adverse reactions, specifically leukocytopenia and neutropenia, were common though generally mild to moderate with grade 4 toxicity occurring in only 2 cases. The most frequent non-hematologic adverse events included gastrointestinal symptoms; severe nausea/emesis and diarrhea, however, were noted in only 2 and 3 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the described biweekly combination regimen of oxaliplatin and irinotecan has substantial antitumor activity in patients with progressive, raltitrexed-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Because of its favorable toxicity profile, further evaluation of this combination seems warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Impact of hemoglobin level and use of recombinant erythropoietin on efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

PURPOSE: We assessed the influence of hemoglobin level and r-HuEPO administration on response to chemoradiotherapy, locoregional tumor control, and overall survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for a squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 191 study patients were treated with mitomycin C (15 mg/m(2) day 1), 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5), and radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions weeks 1-5), followed by resection of the primary tumor bed and neck dissection at the General Hospital Vienna, Austria, between November 1989 and October 1998 for a T2-4, N0-3, M0 SCC of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Starting in May 1996, patients with a low hemoglobin (Hgb) before or during chemoradiotherapy received r-HuEPO 10,000 IU/kg s.c. 3-6 times/week until the week of surgery. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, Hgb level and use of r-HuEPO were independent prognostic factors for response to chemoradiotherapy and locoregional tumor control (p < 0.01). Pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy was also predictive of locoregional control (p < 0.001). Patients with a pretreatment Hgb > or = 14.5 g/dL had significantly higher complete response, locoregional control, and survival rates than the patients with a pretreatment Hgb < 14.5 g/dL who did not receive r-HuEPO (p < 0.05). The response, control, and survival rates in patients with a pretreatment Hgb < 14.5 g/dL given r-HuEPO were significantly higher than in low Hgb patients not given r-HuEPO (p < or = 0.001) and equivalent to patients with a pretreatment Hgb > 14.5 g/dL (p > or = 0.3). CONCLUSION: Low pretreatment Hgb is a negative prognostic factor for oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCCA patients, but was completely abrogated by r-HuEpo administration during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Randomized trials of radiation and/or chemotherapy with or without r-HuEPO for patients whose Hgb level is either low at the start of therapy or is anticipated to become low during therapy are indicated.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2001

Oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: results of a Phase I-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin and raltitrexed both are active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: They have different mechanisms of action and toxicity profiles and have shown at least additive effects in experimental and preliminary clinical studies. The aim of this disease oriented Phase I-II study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and the objective response rate of this combination in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Between April 1998 and March 1999, 69 patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma who previously were unexposed to palliative chemotherapy were enrolled. In the Phase I part of the study, 27 patients were treated with 3-weekly courses of a fixed dose of raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2) given as a 15-minute intravenous infusion) followed by a 2-hour infusion of oxaliplatin, which was escalated in consecutive cohorts of three to six patients from 85 mg/m(2) to 100 mg/m(2), 120 mg/m(2), 130 mg/m(2), and 140 mg/m(2). After having defined the toxic dose, 42 additional patients were entered at one dose level below to define the therapeutic index of this combination more precisely. RESULTS: In the Phase I part of the study, during the first three dose levels, only one patient each experienced DLT (Grade 3 increase in transaminases, diarrhea, and stomatitis); at level 4, two of the first six patients entered had Grade 3 neutropenic infection or peripheral neurotoxicity, whereas dose level 5 (oxaliplatin 140 mg/m(2)) constituted the toxic dose with three of three patients experiencing DLT (Grade 3 asthenia, transient amaurosis, and diarrhea with Grade 4 neutropenia). Externally reviewed objective responses were noted in 9 of these 27 patients (33%), and stable disease occurred in 12 patients (44.4%). Among the 42 patients who were treated subsequently at the MTD level (Phase II portion), 20 patients (47.6%) responded (95% confidence interval, 32-62.6%), and 21 patients (50%) had stable disease. Their median progression free survival was 9.0 months, and the median overall survival, with 42 patients (67%) currently alive, is > 14.5 months. Treatment tolerance at the MTD was acceptable, with only 9 of 42 patients (21%) experiencing Grade 3-4 neutropenia; Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse reactions included increase in serum transaminases in 6 patients, peripheral neuropathy in 3 patients, diarrhea in 3 patients, and both stomatitis and emesis in only 1 patient each. CONCLUSIONS: The described objective response and toxicity data, which are in agreement with preliminary results of other Phase I-II studies, support the promising therapeutic potential of this combination in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Due to its substantial antitumor activity, tolerance (at the recommended MTD level), and convenient 3-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Combined radiochemotherapy of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mitomycin C plus 24-hour continuous infusional gemcitabine.

BACKGROUND: In locally advanced pancreatic cancer, the combination of chemotherapy with radiotherapy is gaining increasing importance; although, in view of the reported long-term results of several contemporary trials, further improvements are certainly warranted. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined-treatment modality consisting of systemic chemotherapy with 24-h continuous infusional gemcitabine and mitomycin C, plus external beam radiotherapy in patients with localized unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Systemic chemotherapy consisted of mitomycin C 8 mg/m2 given as i.v. bolus injection on day 1 and gemcitabine administered as a 24-h continous infusion once weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 100 mg/m2 and dose levels were escalated in consecutive cohorts of 3-6 patients to 130 and 160 mg/m2, utilizing an escalating-dose Phase I trial design. Radiation therapy using megavolt irradiation (total dose, 45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/day) of 6 MV photons or greater with a 3- or 4-field technique was delivered concurrently for 5-6 weeks. RESULTS: Between January 1997 and August 1998, a total of 15 patients were enrolled in this trial, all of whom were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. The dose-limiting toxicities at the 160 mg/m2 gemcitabine level were myelosuppression, specifically neutropenia +/- thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal symptoms, including stomatitis, vomiting, and diarrhea. Only 1 partial response was observed (7%), and disease was stabilized in 10 additional patients (67%). The median time to progression was 5.5 months (range, 2-12 months). Whereas all patients developed distant metastases, locoregional failure occurred in only 3. The median survival time was 8.3 months (range, 2.5 to 22.0+ months), and the 1-year survival rate was 13.3%. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when given as prolonged infusion in combination with mitomycin C and radiation therapy was 130 mg/m2/week. Therapeutic results suggest that combined chemoradiation with this regimen is feasible and effective for local control of pancreatic cancer, but essentially ineffective in counteracting metastatic tumor growth.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of docetaxel, vinorelbine with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1998 and March 1999, 57 patients participated in this trial. Forty-two patients received this combination as first-line and 15 patients as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64.3% (95% confidence interval, 48.1% to 78.4%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy, including eight complete (19%) and 19 partial remissions (45.3%); 11 patients (26.2%) had disease stabilization, and only four (9.5%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in eight (53.3%) of 15 objective responses, four had stable disease, and three had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 12 months in the first-line and 9.8 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 18 months, 38 patients (65%) were still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 neutropenia both occurred in 18 patients (32%) and was complicated by septicemia in four cases; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in two patients (4%), and grade 3 anemia was seen in only one patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity, except for alopecia, was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in two patients (4%), and stomatitis, peripheral neuropathy, and skin toxicity each in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and vinorelbine with or without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients previously exposed to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.

Adult↗