PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G V Stimson

Publications and source records attributed to G V Stimson.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Indications of prevalence, practice and effects of anabolic steroid use in Great Britain.

A growing number of reports of anabolic-androgenic streroid (AS) use in Great Britain (GB) among non-competitive groups have emerged since the beginning of 1990s. A study was commissioned by the Departments of Health for England, Scotland and Wales, to explore the extent and uses of AS from the public health point of view. As a part of a wider investigation into AS use, 21 gymnasia in England, Scotland and Wales were surveyed by questionnaire. The response rate was 59%. We found that of the 1667 participants, 9.1% of the men and 2.3% of the women had taken AS at some time and 6% of the men and 1.4% of the women were current users. Considerable variation in the prevalence of use was found, ranging from no reports in three of the gymnasia, up to 46%. We also investigated patterns of AS use and perceived side-effects in a wide-ranging group of AS users (n = 110), who were recruited through social networks. In-depth interviews with the users revealed that the 97 men (27+/-7 years) and 13 women (25+/-5 years) had been using AS regularly for 2.05+/-1.7 years and 1.9+/-2 years, respectively. Seventy-two injected AS. While most injected themselves, 25% were mainly injected by their friend. Up to 16 different drugs were taken by interviewees during the present or last cycle. Polydrug use was common and dosage taken exceeded therapeutic recommendations. Sixteen interviewees did not report side-effects, while the majority reported two or more. Many of these were cosmetic. Of the 97 men interviewed, 56% reported testicular atrophy, 52% gynaecomastia, 36% elevated blood pressure, 56% fluid retention, 26% injuries to tendons, 22% nosebleeds and 16% more frequent colds. Six men reported problems with kidney function and five with liver function. Problems with sleep were reported by 37%. Of the 13 women interviewed, eight reported menstrual irregularities, eight fluid retention, four clitoral enlargement, three decreased breast size and two elevated blood pressure. Four reported sleeplessness.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Professional ideologies and the development of syringe exchange: Wales as a case study.

This paper is derived from an evaluative study of HIV prevention programs for drug injectors across Wales. It considers how different professional territories and ideologies, concepts of drug misuse and models of HIV prevention may influence policy development. The research involved monitoring the introduction and development of agency and community based syringe exchange schemes and initiatives taken by community pharmacists. Interviews with staff, managers and administrators, and descriptions of service history, development and delivery inform the discussion. HIV prevention varied in different areas of Wales depending on the particular professional group involved, local ideologies regarding drug use treatment, and the extent to which HIV prevention was seen either as a specialist area of expertise and specific remit of drug workers or a generic health care task. Drug agencies with an abstinence policy rejected syringe exchange; instead, prevention in those areas developed in ad hoc ways as health care workers and pharmacists attempted to develop a community based service. Drug agencies with a pre-existing harm minimisation model easily integrated syringe exchange into their work and played the major part in establishing the service, but there was difficulty in extending it beyond their professional caseloads. As there were disincentives to use treatment agencies, and their catchment areas were limited, these factors influenced effective service provision.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1996

Prevalence of markers for hepatitis B virus and HIV-1 among drug injectors in London: injecting careers, positivity and risk behaviour.

Concerns about the risks of HIV infection among drug injectors have eclipsed concerns about the prevalence and transmission of hepatitis, and in particular hepatitis B virus infection. Findings are reported from surveys undertaken with two separate community-recruited samples of drug injectors in London collected in 1992 (n = 505) and in 1993 (n = 507). Anonymized confirmed testing of saliva shows 51.5% of drug injectors in 1992 and 47.9% in 1993 to be antibody positive to the core antigen of hepatitis B virus (anti-HBc). Approximately half of the drug injectors confirmed as anti-HBc positive were unaware that they had been infected with hepatitis. Anti-HIV-1 prevalence was considerably lower at 7.0% in 1992 and 6.9% in 1993. Multivariate analyses showed anti-HBc positivity to be most likely among older injectors with longer injecting careers who had a history of having shared used needles and syringes. HIV-1 positivity was also associated with a history of having shared injecting equipment as well as with recent sharing (i.e. in the last 6 months). Unlike anti-HBc positivity, there were no associations between HIV-1 positivity and age or length of injecting career. Younger injectors with shorter injecting careers were more likely to report recent sharing of used injecting equipment than older injectors with longer injecting careers. We note the potential for continued transmission of HBV and HIV-1, particularly among younger injectors. We recommend an integrated strategy to maximize the health of drug injectors, of which HIV and HBV prevention is a part. There is a need to widen the availability of HBV vaccinations for HBV negative drug injectors and their sexual partners and for clear guidelines to drug injectors about the relative efficacy of bleach to disinfect injecting equipment of HBV and HIV.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Who should collect Opiate Treatment Index data in opiate treatment outcome monitoring: clinic staff or researchers?

The Opiate Treatment Index (OTI), an instrument designed to monitor treatment outcome of opioid users, is becoming increasingly popular among clinicians and researchers in the United Kingdom. This study was designed to examine how the OTI would perform when administered by clinic staff compared to externally contracted researchers in clinical settings. In a confidential setting, the OTI was administered twice to 55 opioid users from two London clinics, in a random fashion, once by trained clinic staff and once by researchers within a 2-week period. The data generated by both groups were similar with respect to social functioning, physical health and psychological adjustment. Where differences occurred, in almost all the cases they were not statistically significant. Clients reported slightly higher levels of drug use episodes, injecting behaviour and criminal activity to researchers. In both groups, none of the clients admitted to paid sex, and low levels of criminal activity and illicit drug use are reported-findings which are most probably related to the stability of these patients rather than systematic under-reporting. Although this cross-sectional study showed that the OTI could be applied equally effectively by clinic staff and researchers in clinical settings, further research is needed to examine whether the situation would hold true in routine outcome monitoring. To ensure that reliable and valid data are generated in routine monitoring of treatment programmes, several issues relating to clinic staff (e.g. motivation, time); clients (e.g. co-operation, confidentiality) and researchers (e.g. cost) need to be addressed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

"Just using old works": injecting risk behaviour in prison.

A minority of injecting drug users engage in high risk injecting behaviours when in prison. In the United Kingdom between a quarter and a third of injectors who enter prison inject when in prison, and of these about three-quarters share needles and syringes. In the present study, 44 drug injectors who had been released from prison for no longer than 6 months were recruited and interviewed in three geographical areas in England. Interviewees were asked to recount their experiences of drug use during their most recent period of imprisonment. The majority of interviewees were male (38/44), had a mean age of 28 years, with a mean age of 16 years at first drug use, were primarily opiate users (39) and had multiple imprisonments. All respondents reported drug use when imprisoned and drug injecting was reported by 16 interviewees. Most injected at irregular intervals and at a reduced level, compared with injecting when in the community. Nine reported using needles and syringes that others had previously used. When considering other injecting equipment, more sharing occurred than was actually reported. Much re-use of equipment was viewed simply as "using old works". The sharing of "cookers" and "filters", and drug sharing by "backloading" and "frontloading" were common. The concept of "sharing" tended to be understood by respondents as related to the use of tools of injection (needles and syringes rather than other equipment); the use of tools in the act of injection (rather than for mixing drugs); proximity (multiple use of needles and syringes in the presence of others); temporality (shorter time elapse between consecutive use of needles and syringes previously used by another) and source (hired rather than borrowed or bought). We conclude that syringe sharing is an integral part of drug use and drug injecting in prison. Many of those interviewed displayed a restricted understanding of what denotes syringe sharing. Our data reinforce the need for interventions and initiatives to be developed within prisons to deal with the considerable risk posed by continued injecting drug use.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Reliability and validity of the Opiate Treatment Index among a sample of opioid users in the United Kingdom.

To validate the Opiate Treatment Index (OTI) for use in the United Kingdom, 72 subjects attending two methadone clinics in London completed confidential interviews with two researchers at two points in time, 1-2 weeks apart. About half the interviews were conducted by the same interviewer on both occasions, and the remaining by different interviewers. These research designs enabled an estimation of the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of the instrument. Subjects' responses were validated against key worker reports and self-reported drug use against urinalysis results. The majority of the respondents were males (65%) and their mean age was 34.2 years (range 21-52; SD 8.5). Test-retest reliability coefficients were high for all the scales (range 0.77-0.86) in both the same and different interviewer situations. The internal reliability of the scales was generally high (Cronbach's alpha: range 0.34-0.93). The correlation with key workers' reports was high with the percentage agreement on the items ranging 74-100 (mean 87). The percentage agreement of self-reported drug use with urinalysis results was high (range 69-95; mean 89). These findings are similar to those obtained among Australian subjects and suggest a high cross-cultural validity for the OTI. Minor changes to the OTI have been incorporated into a modified version for use in the UK.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

HIV-1 prevalence in community-wide samples of injecting drug users in London, 1990-1993.

OBJECTIVE: To provide time-trend estimates of HIV-1 prevalence among injecting drug users (IDU) in London. DESIGN: HIV-1 prevalence and HIV testing behaviour were measured in four serial point prevalence surveys of IDU recruited at multiple sites in community-based non-treatment and drug treatment settings between 1990 and 1993. METHODS: Community subjects were recruited through social network sampling by trained indigenous interviewers; treatment subjects were interviewed at agencies. With informed consent, subjects responded to a structured questionnaire covering risk behaviour. Volunteered saliva samples were tested anonymously for anti-HIV-1. Statistical comparisons across years were examined using mixed binomial logistic and log-linear models. Pearson's chi 2 and Fisher's exact tests were also used for some two-group comparisons. RESULTS: Similar samples were recruited each year. HIV-1 prevalence rate declined from 12.8% in 1990, 9.8% in 1991, 7.0% in 1992, to 6.9% in 1993. The statistical modelling suggested that the overall trend in prevalence rates was one of decelerating decline. There was no difference in prevalence rate by gender and length of injecting. Less than one-half (46%) had received a named HIV test. Over one-half of the HIV-positive IDU were unaware of their status. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of decline in HIV prevalence rate is attributed to changes in risk behaviour following HIV prevention interventions.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Sex, drugs, intervention, and research: from the individual to the social.

Epidemiological estimates of the sexual risk behavior of drug users have provided essential indicators to the current and future prevalence of HIV transmission. An overview of recent research shows the majority of drug injectors to be sexually active, low levels of reported condom use, a significant minority of female injectors to be involved in prostitution, relatively high levels of sexual mixing between drug injectors and noninjectors, and only scant indications of sexual behavior change. Epidemiological studies of risk, however, are unable to yield the data required to understand the interaction between individual risk behavior and social relationships. This is required if obstacles to safer sex compliance and sexual behavior change are to be overcome, and demands recognition of the influence and importance of social context on the production of sexual risk behavior in future research and intervention designs. In response, the paper explores the future role of qualitative research in understanding the social relations of "risk" and in contributing toward theoretical advancements in explanations of risk perception and risk behavior. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of this analysis for developing interventions which aim to target social relationships as agents of social network and community change.

Condoms↗
PubMed1995

AIDS and injecting drug use in the United Kingdom, 1987-1993: the policy response and the prevention of the epidemic.

This paper assesses policy development, service changes and trends in HIV infection and risk behavior among injecting drug users (IDUs) in the United Kingdom. In 1986, the U.K. was faced with the possible rapid spread of HIV infection among IDUs. The combination of an outbreak of HIV infection with prevalence levels of 50% or more in Edinburgh, the recent diffusion of drug injecting, and high levels of syringe-sharing risk behaviour, suggested that HIV infection might spread rapidly through IDU populations. HIV prevention activities commenced in 1986 and developed in 1987. The first report on AIDS and Drugs Misuse by the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs in 1988 was a major catalyst for change. It supported and legitimized emergent views on new ways of working with drug users. Between 1988 and 1993 innovative public health projects increased the ability to target vulnerable populations through syringe distribution, expansion of methadone treatment and outreach to hard-to-reach populations. There were major changes in service philosophy and practices, as ideas of harm minimization, accessibility, flexibility and multiple and intermediate goals were developed. There is evidence that these public health projects encouraged extensive changes in the health behaviour of IDUs. There have been major reductions in syringe-sharing risk behaviour and sharing syringes is no longer the norm. Evaluation of specific interventions (e.g. syringe-exchange) shows their importance in encouraging reductions in risk behaviour. Levels of HIV infection in IDUs remain low by international standards. Outside of London rates of about 1% have been reported; London has a low and declining prevalence of infection to around 7% in 1993; previous high levels in Edinburgh (55%) have since declined to 20%. Britain has to date avoided the rapid increase in HIV infection among injectors that has occurred in many parts of the world. The same period saw the continuation of high prevalence levels in New York and many European cities, and the explosive spread of HIV in many countries in south-east Asia. This paper acknowledges the difficulties is proving links between social interventions and epidemic prevention. It argues that there is prima facie evidence for the success of public health prevention, that the collection of intervention approaches in the U.K. had a significant impact on IDUs behaviour, and that this has helped prevent an epidemic of HIV infection among IDUs. The U.K. experience adds to the growing evidence of the significance of early interventions in encouraging behaviour change and in limiting the spread of HIV infection.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1995

Crack use and injection on the increase among injecting drug users in London.

Fears of a crack 'epidemic' in the United Kingdom of the kind experienced in the United States remain unfounded. However, findings from an ongoing serial point HIV prevalence study indicate that the use and injection of crack cocaine among injecting drug users (IDUs) in London is on the increase. Data on patterns of drug use and drug injection were collected over 4 years (1990-93), from IDUs recruited from both drug treatment and community-based settings. All respondents were asked about their drug use in the 6-month period prior to interview. The use of crack cocaine increased significantly from 16% in 1990 to 59% in 1993 and the injection of crack cocaine from 1% to 27%, respectively. The findings suggest that crack cocaine is being injected more regularly, with increases over the 4-year period in those who reported injecting the drug at least once per week. In response this paper considers both the health implications of, and the treatment response to, the increasing use and injection of crack cocaine among IDUs in London.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Changes in the injecting risk behaviour of injecting drug users in London, 1990-1993.

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in the injecting risk behaviour of injecting drug users (IDU) in London between 1990 and 1993. DESIGN: Injecting risk behaviour was measured over 4 years (1990-1993) in a serial point HIV prevalence study of 2062 IDU recruited in both drug treatment and non-treatment community-based settings within greater London. The study used a structured questionnaire and common sampling and interview strategy developed by a World Health Organization technical group and implemented in 13 cities. METHODS: Log-linear models were used to assess patterns of change over years and of differences in injecting risk behaviour, including syringe sharing and syringe hygiene between 1990 and 1993. The log likelihood chi 2 statistic, G2, was used to test statistical significance. Changes in the mean values were assessed first using parametric tests assuming normality and the results were compared with Kruskal-Wallis (non-parametric) tests. Pearsons chi 2 was used to measure differences in frequency of sharing occasions and partner selectivity. RESULTS: An overall reduction in injecting risk behaviour was observed during the first 2 years of this study, including a decline in syringe sharing (both accepting and passing on used syringes), the number of sharing partners and the frequency of sharing occasions. Most sharers restricted sharing to sexual partners and close friends. The majority of sharers reported always cleaning injecting equipment. Main source of sterile equipment was pharmacies and syringe exchanges. Indirect sharing (of spoons, filters, and by front- or backloading) was reported. Since 1991 there has been a stabilization in risk behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that IDU in London have made positive reductions in risk behaviour. Levels of syringe sharing were substantially lower than those reported up to 1987 before AIDS awareness and the introduction of HIV prevention measures. The majority did not share syringes or confined their sharing to close friends and sexual partners, and if shared, cleaned their syringes. Continuation of indirect sharing indicates the need for more detailed prevention messages. While the initial decline in syringe-sharing rates may be attributed to the wide availability of sterile injecting equipment and other preventive measures, it may now be necessary to look beyond current intervention initiatives to develop interventions which seek to change the social etiquette of sharing and move towards the long-term maintenance of low levels of injecting risk behaviour.

Adult↗