PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Verrastro

Publications and source records attributed to G Verrastro.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating.

PURPOSE: To quantify the quality of vision achieved with multifocal and bifocal contact lenses. METHODS: We analyzed differential light sensitivity by computerized automatic perimetry in 21 patients wearing monofocal soft contact lenses (group 1, controls) and multifocal and bifocal contact lenses (groups 2 and 3, respectively). Seven patients each were fitted with multifocal or bifocal contact lenses; seven patients were without contact lenses (without correction for testing the visual periphery and with near-vision correction using monofocal contact lens for testing the central 30 degrees of vision). The type of correction was randomly changed in a crossover fashion so that each eye was examined at different times with different corrections. Humphrey 640 VFA computerized automated perimetry was used to test visual fields at baseline, 45 days, and 3, 4.5, and 6 months. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found between the global sensitivities (GS) of the central visual field in patients with near-vision monofocal contact lenses and with bifocal contact lenses (P=0.0273) and between the GS of the central visual fields with multifocal contact lenses and with bifocal contact lenses (P=0.0261). In both cases, the GS were significantly reduced with bifocal contact lenses (total GS: group 1, 11256 dB (Decibels); group 2, 11154 dB; group 3, 10679 dB). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that there is reduced differential light sensitivity in the central 30 deg of the visual field with bifocal contact lenses compared with multifocal contact lenses and monofocal contact lenses (controls).

Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic↗
PubMed1998

A comparative study of computerised visual field testing and optic disc morphometric parameters in the follow-up of primary open angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between computerised visual field testing and optic disc morphometric parameters (rim area, rim/disc area ratio, cup/disc area ratio and optic disc surface smoothness (ODSS)) in the follow-up of a group of patients affected by primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Reliable automated perimetry (Humphrey 640 VFA, central 30-2 threshold program) was performed at T0 (the enrollment time), T1 (after 6 +/- 1 months; range 5-7 months), T2 (12 +/- 1 months), T3 (18 +/- 1 months), and T4 (the end of the follow-up period: 24 +/- 2 months) in one eye randomly chosen from each of 30 POAG patients. Computerised optic disc analysis (IMAGEnet X Rev-3-51b, Topcon Europe, The Netherlands) was performed at T0 and T4. To evaluate the correlation between morphometric parameters and computerised visual field testing, the stability or worsening of visual field test was evaluated by means of 'Mean Deviation linear regression analysis' (STATPAC 2 software); that of morphometric parameters was studied using their coefficients of variation. A rank of '0' was assigned to stability and a rank of '1' to worsening. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate statistically the correlations between visual field analysis and morphometric parameters. Furthermore kappa statistic was used to evaluate the agreement of morphometric parameter changes with visual field progression analysis. RESULTS: According to the MD slope regression analysis, in 18 patients the visual fields were stable while in 12 they were worsening during the follow-up period. In 86.65% of patients (n = 26) the morphometric parameter ODSS and visual field analysis were concordant (p < 0.0001). In 80% of patients (n = 24) the cup/disc area ratio and visual field analysis were concordant (p < 0.001). The other morphometric parameters (rim area, rim/dics area ratio) were less correlated with visual field analysis than ODSS (p < 0.05). The agreement of visual field analysis with all the morphometric parameters was good (kappa = 0.690, 95% confidence interval (CI) of kappa = 0.589-0.790). The agreement of visual field analysis with ODSS and cup/disc area (kappa = 0.688; 95% CI = 0.511-0.864) was better than the agreement of visual field analysis with rim area and rim/disc area ratio (kappa = 0.438; 95% CI = 0.260-0.655). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the progression of visual field damage and optic nerve head morphometric parameters should both be taken into account in glaucoma follow-up. Among the morphometric parameters evaluated by means of Topcon IMAGEnet, ODSS and (to a lesser extent) the cup/disc ratio should have the greatest weight.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Ischemic optic neuritis in Churg-Strauss syndrome.

There are few reports of neuro-ophthalmologic involvement in Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSs). We described a case of unilateral optic atrophy in a 46-year-old-white man with CSs. The patient had severe bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, hypereosinophilia (8%) and peripheral neuropathy. The visual acuity in his right eye was light perception. At the biomicroscopy there were no corneal and conjunctival lesions. Ophthalmoscopy showed a pale right optic disc and fluorangiography revealed a marked hypofluorescence of the disc at early phase of angiogram. We suggested that the optic atrophy was most probably due to vasculitis of the ciliary arteries.

Atrophy↗
PubMed1997

[Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents: their topical use in the treatment of xerophthalmia secondary to Sjögren's syndrome].

The authors, in a case-control study, analyzed the topical application of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (flurbiprofene drops) in patients affected by keratoconjunctivitis sicca in Sjögren's syndrome. The variation of break-up-time values, and xerophthalmia grade were analyzed. A mild increase of mean values of break-up-time (two seconds in the treated group), and a mild decrease of xerophthalmia grade were found.

Administration, Topical↗