Subcellular micromolecular pharmacotherapy using computer-assisted microarray analysis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Biomedical subjects
G W McCormack
Publications and source records attributed to G W McCormack.
Phase II trial of recombinant leukocyte A interferon (IFN-alpha 2A) plus 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and the combination cimetidine with BCNU in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma.
Sixty-two patients with biopsy-proven, measurable disseminated malignant melanoma received either the combination IFN-alpha 2A with BCNU (30 patients) or the combination cimetidine with BCNU (32 patients) in parallel noncomparative Phase II trials. From patients receiving IFN-alpha 2A plus BCNU, we observed a 7% response rate: 1 complete response (CR) and 1 partial response (PR) (soft tissue disease with durations of 6.9 and 11.5+ months, respectively). Median time to progression (MTP) was 1.8 months and median survival time (MST) was 3.8 months. Myelosuppression and a flu-type illness were the most common toxicities. From patients receiving cimetidine plus BCNU, the response rate was 16%: 4 PRs (soft tissue disease, 3.8 months; visceral, 2.1, 4.0+, and 9.7 months) and 1 CR (soft tissue, 14.3+ months). MTP and MST were 1.9 and 5.5 months, respectively. Myelosuppression and nausea/vomiting were the most common side effects. Although each of these regimens had great conceptual allure, neither offered any durable impact on the natural history of disseminated malignant melanoma. Nevertheless, alternative combinations of biological response modifiers (BRMs) and BRMs with biochemical modulators or cytotoxic agents may provide some useful alternatives for further clinical investigations.
Adult↗
A controlled trial of cyproheptadine in cancer patients with anorexia and/or cachexia.
Anorexia, cachexia, and resultant weight loss are major clinical problems in a substantial proportion of patients with advanced cancer. Effective means of alleviating these problematic symptoms are lacking. Extensive clinical data demonstrate a weight enhancing effect for the serotonin antagonist, cyproheptadine, in several clinical situations. In addition, sound basic research suggests that cyproheptadine may be helpful in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. Because of this, the authors performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial using cyproheptadine, 8 mg orally three times a day in 295 patients with advanced malignant disease. Patients assigned to cyproheptadine had less nausea (P = 0.02), less emesis (P = 0.11), more sedation (P = 0.07), and more dizziness (P = 0.01) than placebo patients. Patients' appetites, measured by serial patient-completed questionnaires, appeared to be mildly enhanced by cyproheptadine. Unfortunately, cyproheptadine did not significantly abate progressive weight loss in these patients with advanced malignant disease; patients assigned to cyproheptadine lost an average of 4.5 pounds per month compared to 4.9 pounds per month for patients assigned to a placebo (P = 0.72).
Adult↗
Evaluation of trilostane plus hydrocortisone in women with metastatic breast cancer and prior hormonal therapy exposure.
Trilostane, which causes a perturbation of adrenal steroidogenesis, was studied in combination with hydrocortisone in 32 women with progressive metastatic breast cancer. Trilostane was administered orally at a dosage level of 240 mg four times daily after escalation over the first 10 days from 60 mg four times daily. Hydrocortisone was given orally at doses of 10 mg at 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and 20 mg at bedtime. Patients must have been postmenopausal (81%) or previously castrated (19%), had a response to the hormonal treatment just prior to study (81%) or a positive estrogen receptor at time of entry on study (41%), and a measurable indicator lesion. The number of prior hormonal therapies was 1 in 19 patients (59%), 2 in 12 patients (38%), and 3 in 1 patient (3%), respectively. Twelve patients (38%) achieved an objective response, and a 95% confidence interval for this result is from 21 to 56%. The median time to disease progression was 140 days, median duration of response was 278 days, and median survival was 556 days. Common toxicities included lethargy, lightheadedness, diarrhea, and abdominal discomfort. Eleven patients required a dosage reduction, usually because of gastrointestinal side effects, and one additional patient had the trilostane discontinued because of leukopenia. We conclude that the combination of trilostane plus hydrocortisone appears to have definite antitumor activity in women with metastatic breast cancer who have characteristics favorable for response to hormonal therapy.
Adult↗
Randomized trial of doxorubicin alone or combined with vincristine and mitomycin C in women with metastatic breast cancer.
A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if combination therapy with doxorubicin, vincristine, and mitomycin C (DVM) was superior to doxorubicin alone in women with metastatic breast cancer for whom prior chemotherapy had failed. A total of 185 women were randomized to monthly courses of D (60 mg/m2, observation after 500 mg/m2); or D (50 mg/m2, maximum cumulative dose 500 mg/m2), V (1 mg/m2), and M (10 mg/m2, given every other cycle). Patients failing after D alone could receive V (1 mg weekly for 5 weeks, then 1.2 mg/m2 every 5 weeks) plus M (12 mg/m2 every 5 weeks). Objective responses were seen in 24 of 95 patients (25%) on D alone and 39 of 90 patients (43%) on DVM (two-sided p = 0.01). The time to disease progression distribution was significantly better for DVM (two-sided p = 0.02), but the magnitude of the advantage was small with the medians being 2.7 months for D and 4.2 months for DVM. There was no significant difference in survival between the two regimens. The degree of leukopenia was greater for DVM both in terms of median white blood cell nadir (1,300/microL versus 1,700/microL) and percentage of patients with a nadir less than 1,000/microL (33% versus 16%). A total of 45 patients received VM following D alone, and only seven (16%) achieved an objective response. We conclude that, despite a significantly higher response rate and longer time to progression, the degree of clinical benefit is not sufficient to recommend the combination of DVM over D alone as second-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. The level of efficacy seen with VM as tertiary therapy is low and is of such a magnitude to suggest that V adds little but toxicity to M.
Adult↗
Surgical adjuvant therapy of large-bowel carcinoma: an evaluation of levamisole and the combination of levamisole and fluorouracil. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.
A total of 401 eligible patients with resected stages B and C colorectal carcinoma were randomly assigned to no-further therapy or to adjuvant treatment with either levamisole alone, 150 mg/d for 3 days every 2 weeks for 1 year, or levamisole plus fluorouracil (5-FU), 450 mg/m2/d intravenously (IV) for 5 days and beginning at 28 days, 450 mg/m2 weekly for 1 year. Levamisole plus 5-FU, and to a lesser extent levamisole alone, reduced cancer recurrence in comparison with no adjuvant therapy. These differences, after correction for imbalances in prognostic variables, were only suggestive for levamisole alone (P = .05) but quite significant for levamisole plus 5-FU (P = .003). Whereas both treatment regimens were associated with overall improvements in survival, these improvements reached borderline significance only for stage C patients treated with levamisole plus 5-FU (P = .03). Therapy was clinically tolerable with either regimen and severe toxicity was uncommon. These promising results have led to a large national intergroup confirmatory trial currently in progress.
Adult↗
Role of hexamethylmelamine in the treatment of ovarian cancer: where is the needle in the haystack?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Altretamine↗
Pilot study of cyclophosphamide plus carboplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma.
Six patients with histologically proven stage III-IV ovarian carcinoma received carboplatin (CBDCA) (150 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2) monthly for 1 year unless disease progressed earlier. Six other patients received CBDCA (225 mg/m2) with the same cyclophosphamide dose monthly. Continued treatment with the higher CBDCA dose was not tolerable because of myelosuppression, but no other dose-limiting toxic effect was observed. Complete tumor regression was proven at secondary laparotomy in six of the 12 patients, and five of these remain disease-free from 26+ to 28+ months after beginning chemotherapy.
Aged↗
Comparison of cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin versus hexamethylmelamine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in combination as initial chemotherapy for stage III and IV ovarian carcinomas.
Among 187 women with stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma who participated in this comparative clinical trial, 181 were eligible for analysis. Of these patients, 89 received monthly treatment with CP [cyclophosphamide (1 g/m2) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2)] and 92 received monthly treatment with HCAP [hexamethylmelamine (150 mg/m2/day X 7), cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2), doxorubicin (30 mg/m2), and cisplatin (60 mg/m2)]. All treatments were administered iv on Day 1 of each monthly treatment cycle, except for hexamethylmelamine, which was administered orally on Days 2-8. With a median follow-up time of 30 months, survival curves for the two treatment groups were almost identical, as were their times to progression [estimated median survival, 24.6 months (Kaplan-Meier)]. Patient characteristics which significantly influenced survival were age, degree of histologic differentiation, extent of residual disease, stage of disease, and histologic type. Results of posttreatment laparotomies have been equal for the two treatment groups. Toxic effects of the two regimens have been similar, except for more frequent, more severe, and earlier neurotoxicity among patients treated with HCAP. Of the two regimens, CP has the better therapeutic index.
Adult↗
Growth rate patterns of solid tumors and their relation to responsiveness to therapy: an analytical review.
The clinical doubling times of human solid tumors are reviewed. Methods are also described for estimating subclinical tumor doubling times, and these methods are applied to Wilms' tumor, choriocarcinoma, Burkitt's tumor, and breast cancer. Rapidly growing tumors are often responsive to therapy, and such complete responses are often quite durable. Slowly growing tumors respond less favorably to therapy, and responses are generally not durable. Rapidly growing tumors in advanced stages are similar in their response behavior to the slowly growing tumors. A strategy based on cell kinetics principles and tumor doubling time data is proposed for improving therapeutic results in responsive tumors. Data on clinical and subclinical tumor doubling times are used to distinguish early recurrences from late recurrences in a given tumor type. Early recurrences call for intensification of induction therapy, whereas late recurrences call for prolongation of consolidative therapy. This strategy may also apply in adjuvant therapy of slowly growing tumors.
Humans↗