PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

G Walt

Publications and source records attributed to G Walt.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Financing the World Health Organisation: global importance of extrabudgetary funds.

From 1948, when WHO was established, the Organisation has relied on the assessed contributions of its member states for its regular budget. However, since the early 1980s the WHO World Health Assembly has had a policy of zero real growth for the regular budget and has had to rely increasingly, therefore, on attracting additional voluntary contributions, called extrabudgetary funds (EBFs). Between 1984-85 and 1992-93 the real value of the EBFs apparently increased by more than 60% and in the 1990-91 biennium expenditure of extrabudgetary funds exceeded the regular budget for the first time. All WHO programmes, except the Assembly and the Executive Board, receive some EBFs. However, three cosponsored and six large regular programmes account for about 70% of these EBFs, mainly for vertically managed programmes in the areas of disease control, health promotion and human reproduction. Eighty percent of all EBFs received by WHO for assisted activities have been contributed by donor governments, with the top 10 countries (in Europe, North America and Japan) contributing about 90% of this total, whereas the UN funds and the World Bank have donated only about 6% of the total to date. By contrast, about 70% of the regular budget expenditure has been for organisational expenses and for the support of programmes in the area of health systems. Despite the fact that the more successful programmes are heavily reliant on EBFs, there are strong indications that donors, particularly donor governments, are reluctant to maintain the current level of funding without major reforms in the leadership and management of the Organisation. This has major implications for WHO's international role as the leading UN specialised agency for health.

Budgets↗

Aid coordination for health sector reform: a conceptual framework for analysis and assessment.

Recent widespread interest in health sector policy and institutional reform in lower income countries has coincided with heightened concern for aid coordination. Because the health budgets of many low income countries are highly aid dependent, donors are strongly placed to make aid conditional on health care reforms. However, given the growing number and heterogeneity of multilateral, bilateral and international non-governmental donors operating in many of these countries, there is concern that if external efforts are not coordinated, the aims of health care reform--namely improving efficiency, effectiveness and equity--will not be met. Evidence is mounting that without effective coordination arrangements, donors may weaken rather than improve fragile health systems, undermining attempts to reform those systems. This paper traces the factors fuelling current interest in coordination, in particular with reference to its contribution to the goals of health sector reform. Aid coordination is defined and its principles elaborated. A framework is developed by which to assess the variety of coordination mechanisms which are evolving at the county level. In light of this framework, a case is made for greater and more critical analysis of aid coordination arrangements. The paper concludes that if health sector reform is to be successful in low income countries, current enthusiasm for coordination needs to be harnessed. The framework offered here provides a way of assessing the variety of coordination mechanisms currently proliferating, which could be used to enhance health sector reform.

Developing Countries↗

Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis.

Policy analysis is an established discipline in the industrialized world, yet its application to developing countries has been limited. The health sector in particular appears to have been neglected. This is surprising because there is a well recognized crisis in health systems, and prescriptions abound of what health policy reforms countries should introduce. However, little attention has been paid to how countries should carry out reforms, much less who is likely to favour or resist such policies. This paper argues that much health policy wrongly focuses attention on the content of reform, and neglects the actors involved in policy reform (at the international, national sub-national levels), the processes contingent on developing and implementing change and the context within which policy is developed. Focus on policy content diverts attention from understanding the processes which explain why desired policy outcomes fail to emerge. The paper is organized in 4 sections. The first sets the scene, demonstrating how the shift from consensus to conflict in health policy established the need for a greater emphasis on policy analysis. The second section explores what is meant by policy analysis. The third investigates what other disciplines have written that help to develop a framework of analysis. And the final section suggests how policy analysis can be used not only to analyze the policy process, but also to plan.

Africa↗

WHO under stress: implications for health policy.

A crisis is increasingly challenging the authority and prestige of the United Nations' specialized agencies. Although the World Health Organization is still held in great repute, it has not escaped criticism. Member countries have expressed concern about WHO's bureaucratic procedures, costs, proliferation of meetings, reports, lack of budget transparency. Doubts have been cast on the effectiveness of some programmes. This paper argues that such criticisms must be understood within the context of the huge changes that have occurred since WHO was established in the late 1940s. There has been a major shift in the financing of WHO, with extrabudgetary funding now providing more than half the total budget, which has implications for policy influence within the Organization. Policy is also being decided within an increasingly political milieu. These changes put significant pressure on the Organization in a number of ways, and it is essential to generate a public debate about WHO's future role if the Organization is to retain the esteem within which it is generally held. This paper makes an initial contribution to that debate.

Budgets↗

Are large-scale volunteer community health worker programmes feasible? The case of Sri Lanka.

National community health worker (CHW) programmes supported by Ministries of Health have been introduced in a number of countries as part of their primary health care policy. Although in many of these programmes the CHWs are salaried or receive an honorarium, there are a number of large-scale programmes in which CHWs work as unpaid volunteers. This paper looks at one such programme in Sri Lanka, in order to understand the motivation of such volunteers and to consider the feasibility of relying on volunteers to support primary health care policies. The lessons from the Sri Lanka case are generalized to other studies. The conclusion is that large-scale community level volunteer programmes will be characterized by high attrition and low activity rates and will only be sustainable under particular enabling conditions.

Community Health Workers↗

National community health worker programs: how can they be strengthened?

This article is based on a collaborative research study of policy and practice in national community health worker (CHW) programs in developing countries. The study involved a review of the relevant literature, case studies in Botswana, Colombia and Sri Lanka, and an international workshop where the future of such programs was discussed. The findings of this research are discussed under four headings: unrealistic expectations, poor initial planning, problems of sustainability, and the difficulties of maintaining quality. It is clear that existing national community health worker programs have suffered from conceptual and implementation problems. However, given the interest and political will, governments can address these problems by adopting more flexible approaches within their CHW programs, by planning for them within the context of all health sector activities rather than as a separate activity, and by immediately addressing weaknesses in task allocation, training and supervision. CHWs represent an important health resource, whose potential in extending coverage and providing a reasonable level of care to otherwise underserved populations must be fully tapped.

Botswana↗

Why health improves: defining the issues concerning 'comprehensive primary health care' and 'selective primary health care'.

What is the impact of technology on improving the life situations of people, especially the poor? How is this impact analyzed in terms of health improvements? These questions are paramount in the minds of health planners as they pursue national policies of primary health care, a policy popularized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and accepted by over 150 governments at Alma Ata in 1978. The purpose of this paper is to explore these questions in depth. It begins by giving the background to the debate, then examines the origins of two concepts which have dominated the field, those of 'primary health care' and 'selective primary health care.' On this basis it suggests areas of differences in the two concepts and discusses the policy and practical implications of confusing the two approaches. The paper suggests that the differences are firstly who controls the outcome of technological interventions and the perceived time frame in which plans can be carried out.

Health Policy↗