PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gabrielle Whan

Publications and source records attributed to Gabrielle Whan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Determining effective centroid position in biomechanical testing: a technique for simplifying whole bone analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whole bone in vitro biomechanical compressive testing can be complicated by three factors: sample asymmetry, heterogeneous material properties, and unknown effective centroid location. METHOD OF APPROACH: The technique presented here facilitates the calculation of effective centroid position, modulus of elasticity and equivalent uniform strain magnitude for a cross section of bone from a simple whole bone compressive test. Simplification of section response to load is achieved through a combination of linear beam and simple planer geometry theory. The technique requires three longitudinal strain gauges be affixed around the test specimen cross section of interest, gauge position need not be determined. Sample loading is then accomplished using a simple four point loading jig. RESULTS: Results of the technique are presented on an object with known elasticity and geometry, an aluminium tube, and seven pairs of equine third metacarpal whole bones. CONCLUSIONS: Average cross section modulus of elasticity, equivalent uniform cross section strain, and effective centroid locations were all predicted to within the range of published values. Employing the testing setup and analysis technique presented in this paper resulted in a significant savings in both implementation complexity and cost over previously available techniques.

Algorithms↗

Development and testing of a modular strain measurement clip.

A novel, multi-use, low-stiffness and low-cost transducer for measuring in vitro strains has been developed and tested. Currently available strain measurement methods are either too expensive, too complicated or too inflexible for multi-use strain measurement. The stainless-steel modular strain measurement clip introduced here was instrumented with four 350 Omega axial strain gauges in a full Wheatstone bridge configuration to take advantage of commonly available strain gauge amplifier equipment. Adjustable extension arms were designed to allow greater application versatility. The clip was calibrated and produced a linear response (R(2)>0.99) over a minimum of 1.04 mm at high amplifier gain. With reduced amplifier settings, testing showed a linear response over a range of 30.5 mm (R(2)>0.99). Clip stiffness was 0.6N/mm of extension arm tip displacement for minimal instrumentation artifact. A validation test was conducted through a comparison of strain clips, surface-mounted strain gauges and theoretical strain in an aluminium rod subjected to axial tensile loading. The two measurement techniques were used to determine the modulus of elasticity of the aluminium rod. Results were within 6% of the known modulus of elasticity for aluminium. A comparative biomechanical test was also performed on an equine third metacarpal specimen. The traditional bonded strain gauging method produced similar results as the new strain clip, but failed to measure ultimate strains since all strain gauges failed prior to specimen failure. Further investigations into the multiple uses of the clip are underway and recommendations for future versions of the clip are given.

Animals↗