PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gary A Bannon

Publications and source records attributed to Gary A Bannon.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Human subjects without peanut allergy demonstrate T cell-dependent, TH2-biased, peanut-specific cytokine and chemokine responses independent of TH1 expression.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a major cause of anaphylaxis. Regulation of immune responses to peanut allergen, particularly why sensitization does not usually progress to allergic reactions, is not well investigated. Most studies focus exclusively on serologic responses and individuals with peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the existence, prevalence, and nature of peanut-specific, T cell-dependent cytokine and chemokine responses of adults who eat peanut without having symptoms. METHODS: We developed systems to examine specific immunity in peanut-tolerant individuals who had (1) negative histories and negative peanut skin test responses, (2) negative histories and positive peanut skin test responses, and (3) clinically apparent peanut allergy. After primary culture of PBMCs restimulated with whole peanut extract, we quantified responses characteristic of TH1 (IFN-gamma and CXCL10) and TH2-like immunity (IL-5, IL-13, CCL17, and CCL22) using ultrasensitive ELISAs. Antigen-presenting cell costimulatory requirements (CD4, HLA-DR, CD80/86, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA4] Ig) were determined. RESULTS: T cell-dependent, peanut-specific IL-5, IL-13, and CCL22 were common in peanut-tolerant individuals, regardless of whether they had positive or negative skin test responses. These were blocked by anti-CD4 and were dependent on CD28/CD86 costimulation. None of the 70 individuals studied had demonstrable IFN-gamma or CXCL10 responses to peanut. All demonstrated TH1 and TH2 responses to the ubiquitous recall antigen streptokinase. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitatively similar and quantitatively increasing peanut-specific TH2 responses in the consistent absence of putatively protective TH1 immunity were found in both peanut-tolerant individuals and those with peanut allergy. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The continuum of responses between individuals with negative and individuals with positive skin test results, rather than TH1 versus TH2 bias, might be important in peanut allergy.

Adolescent↗

Evaluation of available IgE-binding epitope data and its utility in bioinformatics.

This paper reviews the role played by IgE-binding epitopes in eliciting clinical symptoms, the types of IgE-binding epitopes in allergenic proteins, the methods used to identify IgE-binding epitopes, and the availability of IgE-binding epitopes in allergenic sources. Finally, bioinformatics methods to assess protein allergenicity using knowledge of IgE-binding epitopes are discussed.

Allergens↗

Animal models of food allergy: opportunities and barriers.

The potential for animal models to mimic the human disease process makes them an attractive tool for determining disease mechanisms, predicting disease triggers, and testing treatment regimens. With this in mind, animal models of food allergy have been receiving increasing attention as research tools to answer some of the difficult questions regarding food-allergy disease. Most of the food-allergy animal models developed to date have been designed to test reagents for immunotherapeutic treatment of allergic disease and to predict the potential human allergenicity of proteins. Current animal models under development are rodent, swine, and dog. The variables affecting development of such models include allergen concentration, allergen matrix or food source, allergen route of exposure, duration, animal age, adjuvant use, and dose range of allergens. Each model presents opportunities for and barriers to a fuller understanding of the allergic response. The conditions inherent to each model and the intended purpose of the study should therefore be considered prior to its use.

Allergens↗

The value of short amino acid sequence matches for prediction of protein allergenicity.

Typically, genetically engineered crops contain traits encoded by one or a few newly expressed proteins. The allergenicity assessment of newly expressed proteins is an important component in the safety evaluation of genetically engineered plants. One aspect of this assessment involves sequence searches that compare the amino acid sequence of the protein to all known allergens. Analyses are performed to determine the potential for immunologically based cross-reactivity where IgE directed against a known allergen could bind to the protein and elicit a clinical reaction in sensitized individuals. Bioinformatic searches are designed to detect global sequence similarity and short contiguous amino acid sequence identity. It has been suggested that potential allergen cross-reactivity may be predicted by identifying matches as short as six to eight contiguous amino acids between the protein of interest and a known allergen. A series of analyses were performed, and match probabilities were calculated for different size peptides to determine if there was a scientifically justified search window size that identified allergen sequence characteristics. Four probability modeling methods were tested: (1) a mock protein and a mock allergen database, (2) a mock protein and genuine allergen database, (3) a genuine allergen and genuine protein database, and (4) a genuine allergen and genuine protein database combined with a correction for repeating peptides. These analyses indicated that searches for short amino acid sequence matches of eight amino acids or fewer to identify proteins as potential cross-reactive allergens is a product of chance and adds little value to allergy assessments for newly expressed proteins.

Allergens↗

Allergenic characteristics of a modified peanut allergen.

Attempts to treat peanut allergy using traditional methods of allergen desensitization are accompanied by a high risk of anaphylaxis. The aim of this study was to determine if modifications to the IgE-binding epitopes of a major peanut allergen would result in a safer immunotherapeutic agent for the treatment of peanut-allergic patients. IgE-binding epitopes on the Ara h 2 allergen were modified, and modified Ara h 2 (mAra h 2) protein was produced. Wild-type (wAra h 2) and mAra h 2 proteins were analyzed for their ability to interact with T-cells, their ability to bind IgE, and their ability to release mediators from a passively sensitized RBL-2H3 cell line. Multiple T-cell epitopes were identified on the major peanut allergen, Ara h 2. Ara h 2 amino acid regions 11-35, 86-125, and 121-155 contained the majority of peptides that interact with T-cells from most patients. The wAra h 2 and mAra h 2 proteins stimulated proliferation of T-cells from peanut-allergic patients to similar levels. In contrast, the mAra h 2 protein exhibited greatly reduced IgE-binding capacity compared to the wild-type allergen. In addition, the modified allergen released significantly lower amounts of beta-hexosaminidase, a marker for IgE-mediated RBL-2H3 degranulation, compared to the wild-type allergen.

2S Albumins, Plant↗

Comparative potency of Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 in immunochemical and functional assays of allergenicity.

To assess the relative potency of the major peanut allergens, Ara h 1 and Ara h 2, we examined the relative ability of purified proteins to bind IgE on immunoblots, to cross-link allergen specific IgE in an in vitro assay of degranulation based on RBL SX-38 cells, and to bind IgE in the ImmunoCap assay. Sera from 12 highly sensitive, peanut allergic patients were studied in all assays. IgE immunoblots with crude peanut extracts showed binding of IgE to multiple bands including the 63 kDa and 17-19 kDa bands that contain Ara h 1 and Ara h 2, respectively. In the functional assay, Ara h 2 was more potent than Ara h 1 in 11 of 12 sera tested with a median potency that was 52.5-fold more than Ara h 1 (P < 0.005). Contrary to findings with the functional assay, IgE immunoblots with purified Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 showed substantially lighter binding of IgE to Ara h 2 compared with Ara h 1 (P = 0.02). The ImmunoCap assay gave intermediate results with slightly more IgE binding to Ara h 2 than to Ara h 1 (P = 0.005). In conclusion, Ara h 2 is a very potent allergen and is much more potent than Ara h 1 for most sera using an in vitro assay of IgE cross-linking and cell activation. This finding is different from what was predicted based on immunoblots or with the ImmunoCap assay.

2S Albumins, Plant↗

What makes a food protein an allergen?

Food allergens are almost always proteins, but not all food proteins are allergens. This one statement sums up the purpose of this article, defining the difference between an innocuous food protein and a food allergen. The simplest answer is that a food allergen has the ability to first elicit an IgE response, and then, on subsequent exposures, to elicit a clinical response to the same or similar protein. However, this simplistic answer avoids the more complex issues of defining the biochemical characteristics that allow a food protein to survive the extremes of food processing, escape the digestive enzymes of the human gastrointestinal tract, and interact with the immune system. More than 700 allergen sequences have been identified from food and nonfood sources. However, despite increasing knowledge of the structure and amino acid sequences of the identified allergens, only a few biochemical characteristics can be associated with food allergens. Food allergen characteristics, including abundance of the protein in the food; multiple, linear IgE binding epitopes; resistance of the protein to digestion and processing; and allergen structure are discussed, and the possible reasons they predispose some food proteins to become allergens are suggested.

Allergens↗

New approaches for treatment of peanut allergy: chances for a cure.

Food allergy is a major cause of life-threatening hypersensitive reactions. Food-induced anaphylaxis is the most common reason for a person to present to the emergency department for treatment of the anaphylactic reaction. Avoiding the allergenic food is the only currently available method for sensitized patients to prevent further reactions. Strict avoidance of specific foods is accepted treatment of food-induced allergic reactions but is often an unrealistic therapeutic strategy for the treatment and prevention of food-induced hypersensivity reactions for the many reasons. Desirable therapeutic strategies for the treatment and prevention of the food allergies must be safe, relatively inexpensive, and easily administered. Recent advances in the understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying allergic disease and better characterization of food allergens have greatly expanded the potential therapeutic option for future use. Several different forms of immunodulatory therapies are currently under investigation: peptide immunotherapy, mutated protein immunotherapy, allergen DNA immunization, vaccination with immunostimulatory DNA sequences, and anti-immunoglobulin E-therapy.

Allergy and Immunology↗

Monitoring peanut allergen in food products by measuring Ara h 1.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is an important health problem in the United States, affecting approximately 0.6% of children. Inadvertent exposure to peanut is a risk factor for life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to develop an immunoassay for a major peanut allergen, Ara h 1, to detect peanut allergen in foods so that the risk of inadvertent exposure can be reduced. METHODS: A specific 2-site monoclonal antibody-based ELISA was developed to measure Ara h 1 in foods. The sensitivity of the assay was 30 ng/mL. Ara h 1 was measured in foods (n = 83) with or without peanut and in experiments to optimize allergen yield and to determine peanut contamination in spiked foods. RESULTS: Ara h 1 levels in food products ranged from less than 0.1 microg/g to 500 microg/g. Ara h 1 measured in ng/mL was transformed to microg/g for food products. Peanut butter contained the highest amounts of Ara h 1. Peanut extracts contained from 0.5 to 15 mg Ara h 1/g of peanut depending on the extraction conditions. Optimal extraction of Ara h 1 was obtained by using phosphate buffer with 1 mol/L NaCl and Tween at 60 degrees C. Ara h 1 was not always detected in presence of chocolate under the extraction conditions tested. Spiking experiments showed that the assay could detect approximately 0.1% Ara h 1 contamination of food with ground peanut. There was an excellent correlation between Ara h 1 levels and peanut content measured by using a commercial polyclonal antibody-based ELISA (r = 93, n = 31, P <.001). CONCLUSION: A new sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody-based ELISA was used to monitor Ara h 1 content in food products. This assay should be useful for monitoring peanut contamination in the food manufacturing and processing industry and in developing thresholds for sensitization or allergic reaction in persons with peanut allergy.

Allergens↗

Protein structure plays a critical role in peanut allergen stability and may determine immunodominant IgE-binding epitopes.

Hypersensitivity to peanuts is a reaction mediated by IgE Abs in response to several peanut protein allergens. Among these allergenic proteins, Ara h 2 is one of the most commonly recognized allergens. Ara h 2 is a 17-kDa protein that has eight cysteine residues that could form up to four disulfide bonds. Circular dichroism studies showed substantial changes in the secondary and tertiary structures of the reduced Ara h 2 as compared with the native protein. Upon treatment with trypsin, chymotrypsin, or pepsin, a number of relatively large fragments are produced that are resistant to further enzymatic digestion. These resistant Ara h 2 peptide fragments contain intact IgE-binding epitopes and several potential enzyme cut sites that are protected from the enzymes by the compact structure of the protein. The enzyme-treated allergen remains essentially intact despite the action of proteases until the fragments are dissociated when the disulfide linkages are reduced. Amino acid sequence analysis of the resistant protein fragments indicates that they contain most of the immunodominant IgE-binding epitopes. These results provide a link between allergen structure and the immunodominant IgE-binding epitopes within a population of food-allergic individuals.

2S Albumins, Plant↗

A neonatal swine model for peanut allergy.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy represents a significant health threat in the United States. The factors contributing to the severity of the allergic response and the immunopathogenic mechanisms underlying peanut allergy remain to be completely characterized. As yet, no animal model has been developed that will completely mimic the physical, immunologic, and histologic features of food allergy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to develop a neonatal pig model of peanut allergy that would mimic the allergic symptoms and the immunologic and histologic profile of human peanut allergy. METHODS: Newborn piglets sensitized intraperitoneally with peanut extract and cholera toxin were orally challenged repeatedly with peanut meal. Physical symptoms, including emesis, lethargy, diarrhea, and respiratory distress, were monitored to determine the allergic response. Immunologic assessment was conducted through use of skin testing and the antigenic response to peanut proteins. Histologically, tissues derived from the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and colon were assessed for morphologic changes after the oral challenge. RESULTS: Peanut-sensitized pigs responded with physical symptoms that mimicked those seen in double-blinded, placebo-controlled oral food challenges to peanuts in children and adults. Skin testing suggested an IgE-mediated response; this was confirmed by a negative passive cutaneous anaphylaxis response of heat-treated sera obtained from peanut-sensitized animals. Damage to villi of the small intestine was similar to that seen in endoscopically obtained tissue specimens from certain food-allergic individuals. CONCLUSION: The neonatal pig model of peanut allergy mimics the physical and immunologic characteristics of peanut allergy in human beings. The model will be useful for determining IgE-mediated mechanisms and conducting endoscopic histologic assessment of tissues and immunotherapeutic intervention strategies with repeated allergen challenges.

Anaphylaxis↗

Modification of peanut allergen Ara h 3: effects on IgE binding and T cell stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a major health concern due to the increased prevalence, potential severity, and chronicity of the reaction. The cDNA encoding a third peanut allergen, Ara h 3, has been previously cloned and characterized. Mutational analysis of the Ara h 3 IgE-binding epitopes with synthetic peptides revealed that single amino acid changes at critical residues could diminish IgE binding. METHODS: Specific oligonucleotides were used in polymerase chain reactions to modify the cDNA encoding Ara h 3 at critical IgE binding sites. Four point mutations were introduced into the Ara h 3 cDNA at codons encoding critical amino acids in epitopes 1, 2, 3 and 4. Recombinant modified proteins were used in SDS-PAGE/Western IgE immunoblot, SDS-PAGE/Western IgE immunoblot inhibition and T cell proliferation assays to determine the effects of these changes on in vitro clinical indicators of peanut hypersensitivity. RESULTS: Higher amounts of modified Ara h 3 were required to compete with the wild-type allergen for peanut-specific serum IgE. Immunoblot analysis with individual serum IgE from Ara-h-3-allergic patients showed that IgE binding to the modified protein decreased approximately 35-85% in comparison to IgE binding to wild-type Ara h 3. Also, the modified Ara h 3 retained the ability to stimulate T cell activation in PBMCs donated by Ara-h-3-allergic patients. CONCLUSIONS: The engineered hypoallergenic Ara h 3 variant displays two characteristics essential for recombinant allergen immunotherapy; it has a reduced binding capacity for serum IgE from peanut-hypersensitive patients and it can stimulate T-cell proliferation and activation.

Allergens↗