PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gary J Kelloff

Publications and source records attributed to Gary J Kelloff.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Imaging and oncologic drug development.

For decades anatomic imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging has facilitated drug development in medical oncology by providing quantifiable and objective evidence of response to cancer therapy. In recent years metabolic imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography has added an important component to the oncologist's armamentarium for earlier detection of response that is now widely used and appreciated. These modalities along with ultrasound and optical imaging (bioluminescence, fluorescence, near-infrared imaging, multispectral imaging) have become used increasingly in preclinical studies in animal models to document the effects of genetic alterations on cancer progression or metastases, the detection of minimal residual disease, and response to various therapeutics including radiation, chemotherapy, or biologic agents. The field of molecular imaging offers potential to deliver a variety of probes that can image noninvasively drug targets, drug distribution, cancer gene expression, cell surface receptor or oncoprotein levels, and biomarker predictors of prognosis, therapeutic response, or failure. Some applications are best suited to accelerate preclinical anticancer drug development, whereas other technologies may be directly transferable to the clinic. Efforts are underway to apply noninvasive in vivo imaging to specific preclinical or clinical problems to accelerate progress in the field. Because resources are limited, and patient suffering from failed or ineffective therapy continues, a concerted effort is being made to address these issues. Many simultaneous activities involving academia; the pharmaceutical, device, and biotechnology industries; US Food and Drug Administration; National Cancer Institute; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; and specialized networks sponsored by the National Institutes of Health are beginning to address these issues to develop consensus recommendations and progress in this important area.

Drug Approval↗
PubMed2006

Progress in chemoprevention drug development: the promise of molecular biomarkers for prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer--a plan to move forward.

This article reviews progress in chemopreventive drug development, especially data and concepts that are new since the 2002 AACR report on treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia. Molecular biomarker expressions involved in mechanisms of carcinogenesis and genetic progression models of intraepithelial neoplasia are discussed and analyzed for how they can inform mechanism-based, molecularly targeted drug development as well as risk stratification, cohort selection, and end-point selection for clinical trials. We outline the concept of augmenting the risk, mechanistic, and disease data from histopathologic intraepithelial neoplasia assessments with molecular biomarker data. Updates of work in 10 clinical target organ sites include new data on molecular progression, significant completed trials, new agents of interest, and promising directions for future clinical studies. This overview concludes with strategies for accelerating chemopreventive drug development, such as integrating the best science into chemopreventive strategies and regulatory policy, providing incentives for industry to accelerate preventive drugs, fostering multisector cooperation in sharing clinical samples and data, and creating public-private partnerships to foster new regulatory policies and public education.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2006

Hypoxia: importance in tumor biology, noninvasive measurement by imaging, and value of its measurement in the management of cancer therapy.

PURPOSE: The Cancer Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute convened a workshop to assess the current status of hypoxia imaging, to assess what is known about the biology of hypoxia as it relates to cancer and cancer therapy, and to define clinical scenarios in which in vivo hypoxia imaging could prove valuable. RESULTS: Hypoxia, or low oxygenation, has emerged as an important factor in tumor biology and response to cancer treatment. It has been correlated with angiogenesis, tumor aggressiveness, local recurrence, and metastasis, and it appears to be a prognostic factor for several cancers, including those of the cervix, head and neck, prostate, pancreas, and brain. The relationship between tumor oxygenation and response to radiation therapy has been well established, but hypoxia also affects and is affected by some chemotherapeutic agents. Although hypoxia is an important aspect of tumor physiology and response to treatment, the lack of simple and efficient methods to measure and image oxygenation hampers further understanding and limits their prognostic usefulness. There is no gold standard for measuring hypoxia; Eppendorf measurement of pO(2) has been used, but this method is invasive. Recent studies have focused on molecular markers of hypoxia, such as hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and carbonic anhydrase isozyme IX (CA-IX), and on developing noninvasive imaging techniques. CONCLUSIONS: This workshop yielded recommendations on using hypoxia measurement to identify patients who would respond best to radiation therapy, which would improve treatment planning. This represents a narrow focus, as hypoxia measurement might also prove useful in drug development and in increasing our understanding of tumor biology.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗
PubMed2005

The progress and promise of molecular imaging probes in oncologic drug development.

As addressed by the recent Food and Drug Administration Critical Path Initiative, tools are urgently needed to increase the speed, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of drug development for cancer and other diseases. Molecular imaging probes developed based on recent scientific advances have great potential as oncologic drug development tools. Basic science studies using molecular imaging probes can help to identify and characterize disease-specific targets for oncologic drug therapy. Imaging end points, based on these disease-specific biomarkers, hold great promise to better define, stratify, and enrich study groups and to provide direct biological measures of response. Imaging-based biomarkers also have promise for speeding drug evaluation by supplementing or replacing preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, including target interaction and modulation. Such analyses may be particularly valuable in early comparative studies among candidates designed to interact with the same molecular target. Finally, as response biomarkers, imaging end points that characterize tumor vitality, growth, or apoptosis can also serve as early surrogates of therapy success. This article outlines the scientific basis of oncology imaging probes and presents examples of probes that could facilitate progress. The current regulatory opportunities for new and existing probe development and testing are also reviewed, with a focus on recent Food and Drug Administration guidance to facilitate early clinical development of promising probes.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Development of cancer chemopreventive drugs based on mechanistic approaches.

One of the most important medical practices of the 21st century is the chemoprevention of cancer. Much progress has been made in this new emerging field, but much work remains before widespread use and practice of cancer prevention becomes commonplace. Cancer chemoprevention includes the concepts of inhibition, reversal, and retardation of the cancer process. The process of carcinogenesis requires 20-40 years to reach invasive cancer. This process follows multiple, diverse, and complex pathways in a stochastic process, called clonal evolution. Many of these pathways appear amenable to inhibition, reversal, or retardation at various points. It is urgent that we identify key pathways in the evolution of the cancer cell, which can be exploited to prevent this carcinogenesis process. Basic researchers are identifying many genetic lesions and epigenetic processes associated with the progression of precancer to invasive disease. These precancer lesions are also called intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). Many of these early precancerous lesions favor cell division over quiescence and protect cells against apoptosis when signals are present. Many oncogenes, which are active during early development, are reactivated in adulthood by aberrant gene promoting errors. Normal regulatory genes can become mutated, making them insensitive to normal regulatory signals. Tumor suppressor genes are deleted or mutated rendering them inactive. These are several of a wide range of defects in cellular machinery, which can lead to evolution of the cancer phenotype. Errors may not have to appear in a defined order for cells to progress along the cancer pathway. To conquer this diverse disease, it is necessary to attack multiple key pathways at once for a predetermined period of time. Agent combination prevention strategies are, therefore, essential to decrease cancer morbidity. Each cancer type, organ location, or individual genetic background may require a custom combination of prevention strategies to be successful.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

2-[(18)F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) assesses a fundamental property of neoplasia, the Warburg effect. This molecular imaging technique offers a complementary approach to anatomic imaging that is more sensitive and specific in certain cancers. FDG-PET has been widely applied in oncology primarily as a staging and restaging tool that can guide patient care. However, because it accurately detects recurrent or residual disease, FDG-PET also has significant potential for assessing therapy response. In this regard, it can improve patient management by identifying responders early, before tumor size is reduced; nonresponders could discontinue futile therapy. Moreover, a reduction in the FDG-PET signal within days or weeks of initiating therapy (e.g., in lymphoma, non-small cell lung, and esophageal cancer) significantly correlates with prolonged survival and other clinical end points now used in drug approvals. These findings suggest that FDG-PET could facilitate drug development as an early surrogate of clinical benefit. This article reviews the scientific basis of FDG-PET and its development and application as a valuable oncology imaging tool. Its potential to facilitate drug development in seven oncologic settings (lung, lymphoma, breast, prostate, sarcoma, colorectal, and ovary) is addressed. Recommendations include initial validation against approved therapies, retrospective analyses to define the magnitude of change indicative of response, further prospective validation as a surrogate of clinical benefit, and application as a phase II/III trial end point to accelerate evaluation and approval of novel regimens and therapies.

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18↗
PubMed2005

N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide is more potent than other phenylretinamides in inhibiting the growth of BRCA1-mutated breast cancer cells.

Women with germline mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer. The synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR) has been shown to have a clinical chemopreventive activity in patients with premenopausal breast cancer. Since BRCA1 mutations are associated with an early-onset breast cancer, usually before menopause, we hypothesized that 4-HPR may be an effective chemopreventive agent against breast tumors exhibiting BRCA1 mutations. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and mechanisms of action of 4-HPR and its phenylretinamide analogues in BRCA1-mutated breast cancer cells. At clinically relevant doses, 4-HPR induced apoptosis in human (HCC1937) and murine (W0069, W525) BRCA1-mutated breast cancer cells. Among the various phenylretinamides tested, N-(2-carboxyphenyl)retinamide (2-CPR) and 3-CPR significantly inhibited the growth of HCC1937 cells; however, they were not as potent as 4-HPR in this respect. We also determined the mechanisms by which 4-HPR induces apoptosis in BRCA1-mutated breast cancer cells. The extent to which 4-HPR induced apoptosis in BRCA1-mutated cells correlated with the increases in nitric oxide (NO) production and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) II and NOSIII expression. Use of a NOS inhibitor to block NO production suppressed the inhibitory effects of 4-HPR in all cell lines. These in vitro results suggest that 4-HPR may be an effective chemopreventive agent against breast tumors that exhibit BRCA1 mutations because of its ability to induce NO-mediated apoptosis in such tumors.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2005

New science-based endpoints to accelerate oncology drug development.

Although several new oncology drugs have reached the market, more than 80% of drugs for all indications entering clinical development do not get marketing approval, with many failing late in development often in Phase III trials, because of unexpected safety issues or difficulty determining efficacy, including confounded outcomes. These factors contribute to the high costs of oncology drug development and clearly show the need for faster, more cost-effective strategies for evaluating oncology drugs and better definition of patients who will benefit from treatment. Remarkable advances in the understanding of neoplastic progression at the cellular and molecular levels have spurred the discovery of molecularly targeted drugs. This progress along with advances in imaging and bioassay technologies are the basis for describing and evaluating new biomarker endpoints as well as for defining other biomarkers for identifying patient populations, potential toxicity, and providing evidence of drug effect and efficacy. Definitions and classifications of these biomarkers for use in oncology drug development are presented in this paper. Science-based and practical criteria for validating biomarkers have been developed including considerations of mechanistic plausibility, available methods and technology, and clinical feasibility. New promising tools for measuring biomarkers have also been developed and are based on genomics and proteomics, direct visualisation by microscopy (e.g., confocal microscopy and computer-assisted image analysis of cellular features), nanotechnologies, and direct and remote imaging (e.g., fluorescence endoscopy and anatomical, functional and molecular imaging techniques). The identification and evaluation of potential surrogate endpoints and other biomarkers require access to and analysis of large amounts of data, new technologies and extensive research resources. Further, there is a requirement for a convergence of research, regulatory and drug developer thinking - an effort that will not be accomplished by individual scientists or research institutions. Research collaborations are needed to foster development of these new endpoints and other biomarkers and, in the United States (US), include ongoing efforts among the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Cancer Institute (NCI), academia, and industry.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2003

Retinoid receptor-dependent and independent biological activities of novel fenretinide analogues and metabolites.

Fenretinide (4-HPR) is a retinoid analogue with antitumor and chemopreventive activities. In addition to 4-HPR, there are several other new phenylretinamides bearing hydroxyl, carboxyl, or methoxyl residues on carbons 2, 3, and 4 of the terminal phenylamine ring [N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (2-HPR), N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide, N-(2-carboxyphenyl)retinamide, N-(3-carboxyphenyl)retinamide, N-(4-carboxyphenyl)retinamide, and N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide (4-MPR) ]. It is hypothesized that these agents can act independent of the nuclear retinoid receptor pathway. To test this hypothesis directly, we have analyzed the activity of these phenylretinamides in vitro on a panel of F9 murine embryonal carcinoma cell lines, which includes wild-type (F9-WT) and mutant cells that have disrupted genes for both retinoid X receptor alpha and retinoic acid receptor gamma retinoid receptors (F9-KO). The F9-KO cells lack almost all measurable response to all-trans-retinoic acid, the primary biologically active retinoid. Two distinct effects of retinamides were identified. The first is a rapid, dose-dependent induction of cell growth inhibition (reduced cell viability), and the second is a slower induction of differentiation and accumulation of cells in the G(1) phase of the cell cycle that was observed with a concentration of 1 micro M, for only those phenylretinamides bearing charged (hydroxyl or carboxyl) groups on the terminal phenylamine ring. The induction of differentiation and G(1) accumulation was only observed in the F9-WT cells, indicating that this effect is receptor-dependent. 4-MPR, a major metabolite of 4-HPR, lacks a charged group on the terminal phenylamine ring and did not induce retinoid receptor-dependent effects, but did induce cell growth inhibition. Thus, 4-MPR may play a role in the clinical activity of 4-HPR. This study further reveals the mechanism of action of these novel phenylretinamides and supports continued investigation into their development as chemopreventive drugs.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

9-cis-retinoic acid but not 4-(hydroxyphenyl)retinamide inhibits prostate intraepithelial neoplasia in Noble rats.

In most previous studies, the incidence and multiplicity of chemically induced prostate tumors have been used as end points for assessing the efficacy of various chemopreventive agents. In this study, we used prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in Noble rats as an intermediate end point to examine the chemopreventive efficacy of two retinoids, 9-cis-retinoic acid (9cRA) and 4-(hydroxyphenyl)retinamide, which in previous studies have shown promising inhibitory effects on various carcinogenesis models. We found that 80-100% of Noble rats treated for 36 weeks with testosterone + 17beta-estradiol developed multiple PIN lesions predominantly in the dorso-lateral prostate, which appears relevant to the place of origin of PIN and carcinoma in the human prostate. 9cRA at 50 or 100 mg/kg diet significantly decreased the multiplicity of PIN, whereas 4-(hydroxyphenyl) retinamide at 392 or 784 mg/kg diet, did not have an inhibitory effect on PIN. Thus, we provide for the first time evidence that the testosterone + 17beta-estradiol-induced PIN in Noble rats could be used as a potential intermediate end point in assessing the efficacy of retinoids and possibly of other agents on prostate carcinogenesis, and that 9cRA alone or in combination with other agents may have clinical promise in preventing the development of prostate cancer in men.

Alitretinoin↗
PubMed2002

Treatment and prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia: an important target for accelerated new agent development.

Precancer or intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) is a noninvasive lesion that has genetic abnormalities, loss of cellular control functions, and some phenotypic characteristics of invasive cancer and that predicts for a substantial likelihood of developing invasive cancer. The AACR Task Force on the Treatment and Prevention of IEN has delineated the relationship between IEN and cancer risk as well as the clinical benefit that can be derived from reducing IEN burden. Although several effective endoscopic and surgical treatments for IEN have become standard medical practice, these interventions can confer morbidity and do not treat the entire epithelial field at risk. The incidence of many epithelial cancers is continuing to rise, the number of individuals at risk is increasing with the aging population, and the rapid advancement of imaging and molecular diagnostics is bringing to light precancers that were heretofore clinically silent. There is therefore an urgent need to rapidly develop new treatment and prevention agents for IEN. The AACR IEN Task Force recommends focusing on established precancers as the target for new agent development because of the close association between dysplasia and invasive cancer and because a convincing reduction in IEN burden provides patient benefit by reducing cancer risk and/or by decreasing the need for invasive interventions. The IEN Task Force proposes several clinical trial designs that provide practical and feasible approaches to the rapid development of new agents to treat and prevent precancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗