A new ABCA1 mutation associated with low HDL cholesterol but without coronary artery disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Genovefa Kolovou.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The relationship between apolipoprotein (apo) E and vascular disease has been the subject of a considerable amount of research. However, this relationship is far from clearly defined. This deficiency appears to be due to a multitude of factors. Among these are differences in ethnicity, age (and possibly gender), diagnostic criteria, and environmental factors (eg, diet and smoking) that have contributed to the contradictory findings. Several diseases and their treatment may also influence this relationship. There are also documented interactions between apo E genotypes and other genes or vascular risk factors. One possible clinically relevant application of identifying the apo E genotype could be to assess the response to a particular drug treatment. It may also be that apo E polymorphism will become a good predictor of vascular death (eg, from myocardial infarction or stroke) rather than an indicator of the risk of developing vascular disease but without an acute ischemic event. More research is required to define the place of apo E genotyping in the management of vascular disease in its various forms. Whatever the future brings, the evaluation of apo E genotypes will need to be rapid, cheap, and technically undemanding before this investigation becomes widely available and clinically relevant.
Studies in several populations have indicated that genetic variation at the apolipoprotein E (apoE) structural locus influences the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed at investigating whether apoE polymorphism has an allelic and/or genotypic impact on the risk of MI in Greek patients with CAD. We compared apoE gene polymorphism in a group of patients with angiographically confirmed CAD but not MI [CAD/MI (-)-group, n = 143] and a group of age and sex-matched CAD patients who had experienced a non-fatal Ml [CAD/MI (+)-group, n = 124]. The patients were also compared with a group of healthy younger individuals (n = 240) with no family history of CAD. The apoE genotype distribution differed significantly between the two groups of CAD patients (p = 0.02). The epsilon2 allele was 5.3-fold less frequent in the CAD/ MI (+)-group compared with the CAD/MI (-)-group (1.2% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.01). The frequency of the epsilon2 allele in healthy subjects was 8.1%, which is 6.8-fold higher than in CAD/MI (+)-patients (p = 0.001) and twice as high compared with all CAD patients (p = 0.02). No differences in epsilon4 allele frequencies were observed between CAD/MI (+)- and CAD/MI (-)-patients (10.9% vs. 9.8%), or between patients with CAD and healthy subjects (10.3% vs. 10.2%). In summary, the epsilon4 allele was not found to be associated with an increased risk for CAD or MI. In contrast, a negative association of the epsilon2 allele with Ml was observed among Greek patients with CAD.