PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Georg Heinrich

Publications and source records attributed to Georg Heinrich.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical Relevance of Post-Treatment Circulating Tumor DNA Detection in Early Breast Cancer Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay: A 2-Year Landmark Analysis.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a biomarker to facilitate early identification of asymptomatic distant tumor spread in patients with breast cancer. The primary objective of this study was to assess clinical validity and prognostic value of post-treatment tissue-free ctDNA detection by evaluating its sensitivity for distant metastatic recurrence and its association with long-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were prospectively collected from patients with stage I-III early breast cancer who participated in the adjuvant SUCCESS-A phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02181101). In this study, plasma samples collected approximately 2 years after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy from 313 SUCCESS A patients without evidence of prior disease recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using a tissue-free epigenomic ctDNA assay (Guardant Reveal). Survival analyses were performed using a landmark approach based on the time of sample collection. RESULTS: Overall, ctDNA was detected in 18 of 313 samples (5.8%). Of all ctDNA detected samples, 94% (17/18) were from patients who subsequently developed a distant recurrence, with ctDNA detected at a median interval of 7.9 months before recurrence. ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with a significantly shorter distant recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio [HR], 33.3 [95% CI, 4.12 to 268]; P < .0001) and poorer overall survival (HR, 27.3 [95% CI, 1.15 to 647]; P < .0001). The sensitivity for distant recurrence in patients who had a sample collected within 1 year before recurrence was 73% (11/15). The specificity in nonrecurred patients was 99.6% (267/268). CONCLUSION: Tissue-free detection of ctDNA 2 years after adjuvant chemotherapy was highly prognostic in an early-stage breast cancer cohort, and can be used to stratify patients with early-stage breast cancer at high risk for recurrence during follow-up who may benefit from early interventions.

Humans

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus an Anthracycline-Free Regimen With Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important side effect despite new antiemetic drugs. This study tried to understand the occurrence of CINV in patients receiving two different chemotherapy regimens. As part of the randomized controlled clinical trial SUCCESS C (NCT00847444), 1582 of the 3463 patients completed CINV diaries. Patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) or TC (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide). CINV was evaluated hourly using a specially designed questionnaire. Endpoints of the study were complete response (no emesis) and total control (no nausea and no emesis) and were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses over three chemotherapy cycles. Eight hundred fourteen patients received FEC and 768 received TC; patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients receiving FEC had significantly more nausea and vomiting, with the main difference in the first 12&#x2009;h. In the first cycle, the 0-12-h nausea/emesis-free rates were 70%/41% for FEC and 91/76% for TC. By 24&#x2009;h after chemotherapy, the rates were 65%/33% (FEC) and 85%/60% (TC). The differences were similar in cycles 2 and 3. The detailed analysis of CINV in the study is unique and paves the way for modern CINV analysis of new therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Adult