PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

George C Fahey

Publications and source records attributed to George C Fahey.

28 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Nutritional genomics: implications for companion animals.

This is an exciting time for biological scientists as the "omics" era continues to evolve and shape the way science is understood and conducted. As genome sequencing of the human comes to a close, other mammals are in line to be sequenced. Along with pigs and cows, dogs are now on the high priority list for sequencing, and cats may soon follow suit. Until sequence data are available, genetic maps may be used to reveal important physical characteristics of a genome. Genome mapping is important in identifying gene placement, but gives little information regarding function. Therefore, functional genomics, including the global analysis of RNA and protein expression, protein localization and protein-protein interactions will emerge as important areas of study. The major use of the dog and cat genome maps hitherto has been for the study of human and veterinary medicine. These powerful resources also can be applied to the field of nutritional genomics and proteomics, enhancing our understanding of metabolism and optimizing companion animal nutritional and health status. Genomics has begun to be applied to nutritional research, but issues specifically relevant to companion animals have not been elucidated thus far. The study of genomics and proteomics will be crucial in areas such as nutrient requirement determination, disease prevention and treatment, functional ingredient testing and others. Nutritional genomics and proteomics will definitely play a vital role in the future of pet foods.

Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena↗

Estimates of starch digestion in the rat small intestine differ from those obtained using in vitro time-sensitive starch fractionation assays.

The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the rate and extent of starch disappearance from the small intestine of the rat fed selected starch sources, 2) to determine the ratios of the major starch fractions [rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS)] in those starch sources using two in vitro methods and 3) to compare the two data sets to determine the accuracy of the in vitro methods. Diets were prepared using cornstarch, potato starch, amylomaize, maltodextrin, modified maltodextrin or pullulan. Starch sources and diets were analyzed for starch fractions by two in vitro methods. Diets were fed to rats, intestinal contents were collected and the ethanol-induced precipitate from the contents was analyzed to obtain a digestion curve that was mathematically modeled for comparison to results obtained using the two in vitro methods. Only the cornstarch diet had a defined amount of RDS, SDS and RS. The RDS concentration obtained from the intestinal contents of the rats fed the cornstarch diet differed (P < 0.05) from that determined by one in vitro method but was consistent with the value obtained using the other in vitro method. All other digestible starch values obtained differed (P < 0.05) among methods except for that of amylomaize. Starch fractions in starch sources obtained using in vitro procedures differed (P < 0.05) from values obtained for diets. The rate of disappearance differed (P < 0.05) between in vivo and in vitro procedures. There was minimal agreement between in vitro methods tested, and there was also minimal agreement between in vitro and in vivo results. Classification of starch into RDS and SDS components cannot be accomplished for a variety of starch sources, with cornstarch being the major exception.

Animals↗

Fructooligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilus modify bowel function and protein catabolites excreted by healthy humans.

The objective of this experiment was to determine whether supplementation with fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and (or) Lactobacillus acidophilus (LAC) affected bowel function and fermentative end-product concentrations in feces of healthy humans. Subjects (n = 68) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study design. After a 4-wk baseline period, subjects consumed one of the following treatments twice daily for 4 wk: 1) 3 g sucrose + 80 mg cornstarch; 2) 3 g FOS + 80 mg cornstarch; 3) 3 g sucrose + 1 x 10(9) colony-forming units (cfu) LAC; or 4) 3 g FOS + 1 x 10(9) cfu LAC. Subjects completed 7-d bowel function forms and 3-d dietary records before collection of fresh stool samples at wk 4, 6 and 8. Statistical analyses were performed on differences from baseline using the General Linear Models procedure of SAS. Fructooligosaccharides decreased fecal ammonia (P = 0.07) and isovalerate (P = 0.12) concentrations at wk 6. At wk 8, FOS tended (P = 0.11) to increase fecal putrescine concentrations. Lactobacillus decreased fecal organic matter percentage at wk 6 (P < 0.05) and 8 (P = 0.07). At wk 6 and 8, LAC increased (P < 0.05) fecal 2-methylindole, total indole, and total indole and phenol concentrations. At wk 8, LAC decreased fecal agmatine (P = 0.08) and phenylethylamine (P < 0.05) concentrations. In conclusion, FOS and LAC modified several metabolites associated with gut health, with FOS tending to be beneficial (decreased fecal protein catabolites) and LAC being negative (increased fecal protein catabolites).

Adult↗

Fructooligosaccharides and Lactobacillus acidophilus modify gut microbial populations, total tract nutrient digestibilities and fecal protein catabolite concentrations in healthy adult dogs.

The objective of this research was to determine whether fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and (or) Lactobacillus acidophilus (LAC) affected concentrations of gut microbial populations, fermentative end products and nutrient digestibilities in healthy adult dogs. Two experiments were performed using 40 adult dogs (20 dogs/experiment). Dogs in each experiment were randomly assigned to one of 4 treatments. Twice daily, treatments were given orally via gelatin capsules: 1) 2 g sucrose + 80 mg cellulose; 2) 2 g FOS + 80 mg cellulose; 3) 2 g sucrose + 1 x 10(9) colony forming units (cfu) LAC; or 4) 2 g FOS + 1 x 10(9) cfu LAC. Data were analyzed by the General Linear Models procedure of SAS. In Experiment 1, FOS resulted in lower (P = 0.08) Clostridium perfringens and greater fecal butyrate (P = 0.06) and lactate (P < 0.05) concentrations. In Experiment 2, FOS supplementation increased (P < 0.05) bifidobacteria, increased lactobacilli (P = 0.08), increased fecal lactate (P = 0.06) and butyrate (P < 0.05), and decreased (P < 0.05) fecal ammonia, isobutyrate, isovalerate and total branched-chain fatty acid concentrations. Dogs fed LAC had the highest fecal concentrations of hydrogen sulfide and methanethiol in Experiment 1 and dimethyl sulfide in Experiment 2, whereas dogs fed FOS had the lowest concentrations of these compounds. Overall, FOS appeared to enhance indices of gut health by positively altering gut microbial ecology and fecal protein catabolites, whereas LAC was more effective when fed in combination with FOS rather than fed alone.

Animals↗

Oral administration of arabinogalactan affects immune status and fecal microbial populations in dogs.

Seven ileally cannulated dogs were randomly assigned to a control or arabinogalactan (AG) treatments in a 7 x 7 Latin square design to evaluate effects of oral AG administration on nutritional and immunological characteristics. Arabinogalactan treatments included a high (1.65 g/d) and low (0.55 g/d) dose of AG100, AG1000 or AG3000 provided via gelatin capsules. Arabinogalactan forms differed in purification procedures. Each period consisted of a 6-d adaptation followed by a 4-d collection. Blood and fresh fecal samples were collected on d 10 of each period. Fecal score increased (P < 0.02) in dogs supplemented with the low dose of AG1000. Ileal and total tract dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) digestibilities were not affected by treatment. Dogs supplemented with the high dose of AG1000 tended (P = 0.15) to have a higher concentration of total aerobic fecal bacteria than control dogs. Dogs supplemented with the low dose of AG1000 and the high dose of AG3000 had higher concentrations of fecal lactobacilli (P = 0.04) and tended to have higher concentrations of fecal bifidobacteria (P < or =0.16) compared with control dogs. Dogs fed the low dose of AG3000 tended (P = 0.10) to have a lower concentration of fecal Clostridium perfringens compared with control dogs. Arabinogalactan treatments did not affect (P > 0.05) serum immunoglobulin G, M or A concentrations. Specific forms and doses of AG increased white blood cell, neutropil and eosinophil concentrations. Arabinogalactan is a unique dietary fiber that affects the digestive physiology and immunological characteristics of dogs.

Animals↗

Supplemental fructooligosaccharides and mannanoligosaccharides influence immune function, ileal and total tract nutrient digestibilities, microbial populations and concentrations of protein catabolites in the large bowel of dogs.

The goal of this study was to examine whether supplemental fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and (or) mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) influenced indices of gut health of dogs. Adult female dogs (n = 4) surgically fitted with ileal cannulas were fed a dry, extruded, kibble diet twice daily. At each feeding, the following treatments were administered: 1) Control (no FOS or MOS); 2) 1 g FOS; 3) 1 g MOS; or 4) 1 g FOS + 1 g MOS. Fecal, ileal and blood samples were collected during the last 4 d of each 14-d period to measure protein catabolite concentrations, microbial populations, immune characteristics and nutrient digestibilities. Treatment means were compared using preplanned orthogonal contrasts. Dogs supplemented with MOS had lower (P = 0.05) fecal total aerobes and tended to have greater (P = 0.13) Lactobacillus populations. Ileal immunoglobulin (Ig) A concentrations were greater (P = 0.05) in dogs supplemented with FOS + MOS vs. control. Lymphocytes (% of total white blood cells) were greater (P < 0.05) in dogs supplemented with MOS. Serum IgA concentrations also tended (P = 0.13) to be greater in dogs supplemented with MOS. Dogs supplemented with FOS and FOS + MOS had lower (P < 0.05) fecal total indole and phenol concentrations. Dogs supplemented with MOS tended to have lower ileal DM (P = 0.149) and OM (P = 0.146) digestibilities vs. control. Results of this study suggest that dietary supplementation of FOS and MOS may have beneficial effects on colonic health and immune status of dogs.

Animals↗

In vitro fermentation properties of selected fructooligosaccharide-containing vegetables and in vivo colonic microbial populations are affected by the diets of healthy human infants.

Salsify (Tragopogon porrifolius) and gobo (Arctium lappa) are root vegetables that contain high concentrations of naturally occurring fructooligosaccharides (FOS), nondigestible oligosaccharides that have prebiotic effects on the intestinal microflora. The objective of this study was to compare colonic microbial populations and the fermentation characteristics of gobo and salsify in breast-fed vs. formula-fed infants. Fecal inoculum from breast-fed and formula-fed infants consuming either no solid foods, cereal, or fruit and vegetable purees were fermented in vitro with sweet potato puree plus gobo, salsify puree or a control vegetable, carrot. Breast-fed and formula-fed infants had similar fecal bacteria concentrations, with the exception of Clostridium perfringens (P < 0.10). Introduction of solid foods into the diet of infants was associated with increased fecal concentrations of bifidobacteria (P < 0.10) and decreased concentrations of total aerobes (P < 0.01), C. perfringens (P < 0.001) and Escherichia coli (P < 0.10). Inoculum from feces of breast-fed infants resulted in greater acetate production, whereas inoculum from feces of formula-fed infants resulted in greater propionate and butyrate production (P < 0.05). Fermentation of FOS-containing vegetables by infant fecal inoculum did not differ significantly from fermentation of carrots as assessed by total short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production. The addition of solids to the diet of infants was associated with increased production of acetate and total SCFA (P < 0.05). It appears that both the composition and fermentative activity of the colonic microflora of human infants is affected by breast-feeding and solid food consumption, but not by short-term exposure to low concentrations of FOS-containing substrates.

Bacteria, Aerobic↗

Resistant starch as related to companion animal nutrition.

Companion animal diets may contain up to 50% starch, derived from cereal grains. The amount of resistant starch (RS) in an ingredient depends on the origin and form of the ingredient and on the processing conditions to which the ingredient has been exposed. Extrusion has proven to be a means of optimizing utilization of starch by companion animals. Although the RS fraction of starch typically decreases by extrusion, retrogradation can result in increased concentrations of this fraction. Limited research exists regarding the effects of RS in companion animal nutrition and gastrointestinal health. Existing in vitro and in vivo research indicates that certain RS sources are readily fermented in the large bowel, producing short-chain fatty acids, whereas others are less fermentable, resulting in excellent laxation properties. Feeding dogs a diet high in RS may result in an increase in fecal bulk due to an increased excretion of microbial matter in those cases where RS is highly fermentable, or to indigestibility of the RS source in other cases. RS has a role to play as a potential proxy for dietary fiber, especially for those companion animals fed diets high in protein and fat and devoid of traditional dietary fiber.

Animal Feed↗