Biomedical subjects

George K Hung

Publications and source records attributed to George K Hung.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Incremental retinal-defocus theory of myopia development--schematic analysis and computer simulation.

Previous theories of myopia development involved subtle and complex processes such as the sensing and analyzing of chromatic aberration, spherical aberration, spatial gradient of blur, or spatial frequency content of the retinal image, but they have not been able to explain satisfactorily the diverse experimental results reported in the literature. On the other hand, our newly proposed incremental retinal-defocus theory (IRDT) has been able to explain all of these results. This theory is based on a relatively simple and direct mechanism for the regulation of ocular growth. It states that a time-averaged decrease in retinal-image defocus area decreases the rate of release of retinal neuromodulators, which decreases the rate of retinal proteoglycan synthesis with an associated decrease in scleral structural integrity. This increases the rate of scleral growth, and in turn the eye's axial length, which leads to myopia. Our schematic analysis has provided a clear explanation for the eye's ability to grow in the appropriate direction under a wide range of experimental conditions. In addition, the theory has been able to explain how repeated cycles of nearwork-induced transient myopia leads to repeated periods of decreased retinal-image defocus, whose cumulative effect over an extended period of time results in an increase in axial growth that leads to permanent myopia. Thus, this unifying theory forms the basis for understanding the underlying retinal and scleral mechanisms of myopia development.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Effect of putting grip on eye and head movements during the golf putting stroke.

The objective of this article is to determine the effect of three different putting grips (conventional, cross-hand, and one-handed) on variations in eye and head movements during the putting stroke. Seven volunteer novice players, ranging in age from 21 to 22 years, participated in the study. During each experimental session, the subject stood on a specially designed platform covered with artificial turf and putted golf balls towards a standard golf hole. The three different types of grips were tested at two distances: 3 and 9 ft. For each condition, 20 putts were attempted. For each putt, data were recorded over a 3-s interval at a sampling rate of 100 Hz. Eye movements were recorded using a helmet-mounted eye movement monitor. Head rotation about an imaginary axis through the top of the head and its center-of-rotation was measured by means of a potentiometer mounted on a fixed frame and coupled to the helmet. Putter-head motion was measured using a linear array of infrared phototransistors embedded in the platform. The standard deviation (STD, relative to the initial level) was calculated for eye and head movements over the duration of the putt (i.e., from the beginning of the backstroke, through the forward stroke, to impact). The averaged STD for the attempted putts was calculated for each subject. Then, the averaged STDs and other data for the seven subjects were statistically compared across the three grip conditions. The STD of eye movements were greater (p < 0.1) for conventional than cross-hand (9 ft) and one-handed (3 and 9 ft) grips. Also, the STD of head movements were greater (p < 0.1; 3 ft) for conventional than cross-hand and one-handed grips. Vestibulo-ocular responses associated with head rotations could be observed in many 9 ft and some 3 ft putts. The duration of the putt was significantly longer (p < 0.05; 3 and 9 ft) for the one-handed than conventional and cross-hand grips. Finally, performance, or percentage putts made, was significantly better (p < 0.05; 9 ft) for cross-hand than conventional grip. The smaller variations, both in eye movements during longer putts and head movements during shorter putts, using cross-hand and one-handed grips may explain why some golfers, based on their playing experience, prefer these over the conventional grip. Also, the longer duration for the one-handed grip, which improves tempo, may explain why some senior players prefer the long-shaft (effectively one-handed grip) putter.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Multi-directional shifts of optokinetic responses to binocular-rivalrous motion stimuli.

Previous dichoptic experiments showed that dissimilar stationary pattern stimuli resulted in the perception of binocular rivalry, whereas oppositely-directly moving grating stimuli resulted in alternating optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and the perception of binocular motion rivalry. The present study extended these dichoptic motion experiments by introducing obliquely-oriented targets with the aim of probing further the cortical mechanisms underlying binocular processing of motion. Two-dimensional eye movements were recorded along with their subjective perceptual responses. The stimuli consisted of two tilted gratings, one moving diagonally upwards and to the right (UR, 45 degrees ) and the other diagonally upwards and to the left (UL, 135 degrees ), which were presented dichoptically to subjects under two stimulus modes. For the non-exchange mode, the OKN slow phases exhibited three types of directional shifts. Two of these directional shifts tracked the stimuli (i.e. UR or UL), whereas the third moved purely upwards (UP). Since physically there was no upward-moving target, the OKN and perceptual responses appeared to be associated with a perceptual interocular grouping of the two dichoptic stimuli in their reassembled vector-sum direction. The OKN shifts were also found to be highly correlated with the psychophysical responses of motion perception. For the rapid-exchange mode, in which the stimuli were rapidly exchanged between the two eyes, the OKN slow phases exhibited primarily two types of directional shifts, UR and UL, but no UP responses for most subjects. It also appeared that these two coherent motion percepts, UL and UR, were interocularly regrouped from the exchanged stimuli. Moreover, the lack of perceptual grouping to create an UP response in the rapid-exchange mode indicated that temporal integration of at least 200 ms was necessary for the development of a reassembled vector-sum-direction motion percept. The findings under both stimulus modes support the stimulus-feature rivalry hypothesis, in which higher cortical centers mediate interocular perceptual grouping and the associated motor response.

Cerebral Cortex↗

PubMed2002

A dual-mode dynamic model of the human accommodation system.

The function of the accommodation system is to provide a clear retinal image of objects in the visual scene. The system was previously thought to be under simple continuous (i.e., single mode of operation) feedback control, but recent research has shown that it is under discontinuous (i.e., two stimulus-dependent modes of operation) feedback control by means of fast and slow processes. A model using MATLAB/SIMULINK was developed to simulate this dual-mode behavior. It consists of fast and slow components in a feedback loop. The fast component responds to step target disparity with an open-loop movement to nearly reach the desired level, and then the slow component uses closed-loop feedback to reduce the residual error to an acceptable small level. For slow ramps, the slow component provides smooth tracking of the stimulus, whereas for fast ramps, the fast component provides accurate staircase-like step responses. Simulation of this model using a variety of stimuli, including pulse, step, ramp, and sinusoid, showed good agreement with experimental results. Thus, this represents the first dynamic model of accommodation that can accurately simulate the complex dual-mode behavior seen experimentally. The biological significance of this model is that it can be used to quantitatively analyze clinical deficits such as amblyopia and accommodative insufficiency.

Accommodation, Ocular↗