PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

George L Bakris

Publications and source records attributed to George L Bakris.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Antihypertensive therapy in the presence of proteinuria.

The presence of proteinuria is a well-known risk factor for both the progression of renal disease and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and decreases in urine protein excretion level were associated with a slower decrease in renal function and decrease in risk of cardiovascular events. Increased blood pressure has a major role in the development of proteinuria in patients with either diabetic or nondiabetic kidney disease, and all recent guidelines recommend a blood pressure goal less than 130/80 mm Hg in patients with proteinuria to achieve maximal renal and cardiovascular protection. Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin system, ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, should be used as first-line antihypertensive therapy in patients with proteinuria because they seem to have a blood pressure-independent antiproteinuric effect, and if blood pressure levels are still out of goal, a diuretic should be added to this regimen. A combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with an angiotensin receptor blocker or other classes of medications shown to decrease protein excretion, such as nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists or aldosterone receptor blockers, should be considered to decrease proteinuria further. This review provides an extended summary of current evidence regarding the associations of blood pressure with proteinuria, the rationale for currently recommended blood pressure goals, and the use of various classes of antihypertensive agents in proteinuric patients.

Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2007

Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.

The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have each published guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention: the ADA has issued separate recommendations for each of the cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes, and the AHA has shaped primary and secondary guidelines that extend to patients with diabetes. This statement will attempt to harmonize the recommendations of both organizations where possible but will recognize areas in which AHA and ADA recommendations differ.

American Heart Association↗
PubMed2006

Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.

The American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have each published guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention: The ADA has issued separate recommendations for each of the cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes, and the AHA has shaped primary and secondary guidelines that extend to patients with diabetes. This statement will attempt to harmonize the recommendations of both organizations where possible but will recognize areas in which AHA and ADA recommendations differ.

American Heart Association↗
PubMed2006

Review: Insulin and endothelin: an interplay contributing to hypertension development?

CONTEXT: The aim of this article was to review the existing data on the interactions among insulin, insulin resistance, and endothelin and how those contribute to the development of hypertension in insulin-resistant states. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search of MEDLINE database was performed to identify English-language articles published during the last 20 yr. Search terms used were endothelin, insulin, insulin resistance, and hyperinsulinemia in combination with blood pressure and hypertension. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also evaluated for relevant information. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Several mechanisms connect insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia with blood pressure elevation in the context of the metabolic syndrome, i.e. sodium retention, sympathetic activation, and impairment of endothelial nitric oxide production. Accumulating evidence suggests that activation of the endothelin system seems to be another important, yet less discussed, mechanism. In vitro studies have shown that insulin stimulates both endothelin-1 production and action on the vascular wall. In vivo, high levels of insulin result in increase in circulating endothelin-1 in healthy individuals, and this effect is also seen in insulin-resistant subjects, a relationship not observed with nitric oxide production. Moreover, endothelin receptor antagonism effectively reduces blood pressure in animal models of insulin resistance and hypertension. On the other hand, elevation of endothelin-1 levels can further increase insulin resistance, forming possibly a deleterious circle. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelin-1 may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of hypertension in insulin-resistant states. Future research should examine the potential of endothelin receptor antagonism to help blood pressure control in patients with insulin resistance.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Controlled-release carvedilol in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Carvedilol is a beta1-, beta2-, and alpha1-adrenergic blocker that is approved for the treatment of hypertension. A new once-daily, controlled-release (CR) formulation of carvedilol has been shown to be effective in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. In this article, we summarize the primary results of, and present additional analyses from, that trial. A total of 338 patients with essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >/=90 and </=109 mm Hg) were randomized to receive carvedilol CR 20, 40, or 80 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary objective was to compare the effects of the 3 carvedilol CR doses with placebo on 24-hour mean blood pressure using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Mean DBP and systolic BP (SBP) at the drug trough (20-24 hour) blood levels for carvedilol CR and comparison of DBP and SBP at the drug peak (3-7 hour) blood levels for each dose of carvedilol CR and placebo were investigated. The effects of carvedilol CR on heart rate and pulse pressure were also examined. Once-daily administration of carvedilol CR, alone or in combination with other agents, produced clinically and statistically significant reductions compared with placebo for both DBP and SBP after 6 weeks of treatment for the following parameters: trough blood pressure by office cuff or ABPM measurements, peak blood pressure by ABPM, and 24-hour mean blood pressure by ABPM. Placebo-corrected trough-to-peak ratios for DBP were >0.6 for each carvedilol CR dose. Heart rate and pulse pressure were each significantly reduced compared with placebo for each carvedilol CR dose. We conclude that carvedilol CR is a very effective antihypertensive agent with clear dose-related peak blood pressure reduction and continuous 24-hour control.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Cardiovascular risk factors in hypertension: rationale and design of studies to investigate the effects of controlled-release carvedilol on regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and lipid profile.

Patients at high risk for hypertension may require several therapeutic agents to lower their blood pressure to guideline-recommended targets. Some antihypertensive agents are more effective than others in protecting against cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Numerous beta-blocking agents have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of hypertension. Previous trials have demonstrated that although all beta-blockers effectively reduce blood pressure, there are differences in how they affect various metabolic factors. In 2 trials, a novel controlled-release (CR) formulation of carvedilol will be tested against other selective beta-blockers to determine whether differences exist in their individual effects on cardiovascular risk factors. These will be the first head-to-head trials using carvedilol CR to determine whether the differing pharmacologic actions among beta-blockers result in varying effects on cardiovascular risk factors.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Predictors of development of diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease taking antihypertensive medications (findings from the INternational VErapamil SR-Trandolapril STudy [INVEST]).

Knowledge of predictors of diabetes mellitus (DM) development in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who use antihypertensive therapy could contribute to decreasing this adverse metabolic consequence. This is particularly relevant because the standard of care, beta blockers combined with diuretics, may contribute to adverse metabolic risk. The INternational VErapamil SR-trandolapril STudy compared a calcium antagonist-based (verapamil SR) and a beta-blocker-based (atenolol) strategy with trandolapril and/or hydrochlorothiazide added to control blood pressure (BP) in patients with CAD. The 16,176 patients without DM at entry were investigated with regard to newly diagnosed DM during follow-up. Newly diagnosed DM was less frequent in the verapamil SR versus atenolol strategy (7.0% vs 8.2%, hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 0.95, p <0.01). Characteristics associated with risk for newly diagnosed DM included United States residence, left ventricular hypertrophy, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack, Hispanic ethnicity, coronary revascularization, hypercholesterolemia, greater body mass index, and higher follow-up systolic BP. Addition of trandolapril to verapamil SR decreased DM risk and addition of hydrochlorothiazide to atenolol increased risk. In conclusion, clinical findings associated with more severe vascular disease and Hispanic ethnicity identify a group at high risk for developing DM, whereas lower on-treatment BP and treatment with verapamil SR-trandolapril attenuated this risk.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Thiazide diuretics, potassium, and the development of diabetes: a quantitative review.

National guidelines and a recent clinical trial have supported the use of thiazide diuretics as the preferred initial pharmacological treatment for hypertension. However, evidence from this and other clinical trials have also found an increased incidence of new onset diabetes among those patients receiving thiazide diuretics. The mechanisms responsible for the increased incidence of diabetes with thiazide diuretics have not been fully elucidated. This article provides a review of intervention studies that included data on the relation between thiazide-induced hypokalemia and glucose intolerance. We conducted a literature search from 1966 to June 2004 to identify clinical trials using thiazide diuretics where the metabolic effects on potassium and glucose are reported. A total of 59 clinical trials constituting 83 thiazide diuretic study arms were identified. Trial size, length, type of thiazide diuretic, and dose varied substantially among the studies. The association between average changes in potassium and glucose in the study arms is considered jointly in a weighted statistical model. The Pearson's correlation coefficient, weighted by study sample size, for the relationship between glucose and potassium was -0.54 (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.36; P < 0.01). A sensitivity analysis, which considered subset analyses and effect of covariates, as well as inverse-variance weighting, supported this finding. These data suggest that thiazide-induced hypokalemia is associated with increased blood glucose. Treatment of thiazide-induced hypokalemia may reverse glucose intolerance and possibly prevent the future development of diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗
PubMed2006

An in-depth review of the evidence linking dietary salt intake and progression of chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Dietary salt has been debated for decades as having a potentially deleterious influence on human health. OBJECTIVES: To determine the quality of research and the relationship between dietary salt and markers for progression of kidney disease. METHODS: Data sources included 7 electronic databases comprehensively searched for literature published between January 1, 1966, and August 31, 2004, and a manual search of bibliographies of relevant papers, and consultation with experts in the field. Differences between the paired reviewers were reconciled through consensus or by a content expert. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion-exclusion criteria and were identified for review; however, the study methodologies were extremely heterogeneous. Conclusions commonly cited in the studies include: variations in salt consumption are directly correlated with albuminuria, and an increase in salt consumption is associated with an acute increase in glomerular filtration rate, while a reduction in salt consumption may slow the rate of renal function loss. CONCLUSIONS: The available published information, while highly variable in methods and quality, suggests that variations in dietary salt consumption directly influence albuminuria, with increasing salt intake associated with worsening albuminuria; however, results are inadequate and conflicting on the effects of dietary salt consumption on renal function, especially over a prolonged time. There was no evidence of a detrimental effect of reduced salt intake. On the other hand, there is consistent experimental evidence to link increased salt exposure with kidney tissue injury. On the basis of these data, we believe that dietary salt restriction should be considered in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Comorbidity↗
PubMed2006

Gender disparity in outcomes of care and management for diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.

Although diabetes lies among the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in both men and women, current evidence suggests that it has a much stronger effect on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in women than in men. Moreover, diabetic women have not experienced the decline in CHD mortality observed in diabetic men and individuals without diabetes over the past three decades. Apart from a more pronounced direct effect of diabetes on the vascular wall, this greater impact of diabetes on CHD risk in women could be associated with a heavier burden of other traditional cardiovascular risk factors within the context of the metabolic syndrome, a stronger effect of the metabolic syndrome on CVD, and a less aggressive management of the various risk factors in diabetic women compared with men. This article discusses the recent evidence on the gender differences in the outcomes of CVD and the management of risk factors associated with diabetes and the metabolic syndrome, highlighting the need for better treatment strategies of diabetes and the other components of the metabolic syndrome in diabetic women.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed2006

Measuring the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: Traditional clinical trials in hypertension measure the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs but may not fully assess their effectiveness in clinical practice. Community-based trials can provide this information but are limited because usually they are of open-label design and potentially subject to observer bias. Therefore, we used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), an automated and objective measure of blood pressure (BP) to overcome these shortcomings in a large community-based trial. METHODS: Patients with hypertension, either untreated or currently on treatment, were started on, or switched to, the angiotensin receptor blocker telmisartan 40 mg daily; after 2 weeks, if office BP remained > or = 140/85 mm Hg, the dose was increased to 80 mg, and if necessary, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg was added after a further 4 weeks and continued for the final 4-week period. Baseline and treatment ABPM measurements were completed in 940 previously untreated patients and 675 previously treated patients. RESULTS: The average reduction of the entire cohort was -10.7/-6.5 mm Hg (P < .0001; mean 24-hour BPs were reduced by 12/8 and 8/5 mm Hg in the untreated and previously treated patients, respectively). In contrast, the office BPs fell by an average of 23/12 and 17/10 mm Hg in previously untreated and treated patients. In 401 patients whose baseline 24-hour BP was > or = 130/85 mm Hg, the mean decrease in 24-hour BP was 16.8/11.4 mm Hg. Based on ABPM criteria, the BP was fully controlled (< 130/85 mm Hg) in 70% of patients, and based on office measurement criteria (< 140/90 mm Hg), in 79%. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP monitoring demonstrated excellent control rates by telmisartan monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Observer and measurement bias was substantial based on the changes from baseline by clinical measurements in contrast to ambulatory BP recordings. The successful use of this procedure in primary care research will create further opportunities to define the effectiveness of treatment in the environment in which it is customarily prescribed.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Microalbuminuria.

Microalbuminuria, originally described more than 3 decades ago as a predictor of nephropathy in patients who had type 1 diabetes mellitus and associated with higher cardiovascular risk, is now linked with increased risk for cardiovascular events rather than progression to end-stage kidney disease. This article reviews the role of microalbuminuria in the context of atherosclerotic vascular disease. It presents the methods for microalbuminuria assessment in clinical practice, its relations with other cardiovascular risk factors, and the pathophysiologic associations between microalbuminuria and vascular damage. In addition, this article discusses the prognostic significance of microalbuminuria for cardiovascular disease as well as existing therapeutic interventions for reducing urine albumin excretion in patients who are at high cardiovascular risk.

Albuminuria↗
PubMed2006

Rosiglitazone reduces microalbuminuria and blood pressure independently of glycemia in type 2 diabetes patients with microalbuminuria.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that rosiglitazone combined with metformin provides a greater reduction in microalbuminuria and blood pressure than metformin and glyburide at comparable levels of glycemic control. METHODS: In a double-blind, parallel-group design 389 participants with type 2 diabetes were followed for 32 weeks. RESULTS: Urinary albumin: creatinine ratio was significantly reduced at 32 weeks compared with baseline in the rosiglitazone plus metformin group (-22.7%; P < 0.01) but not in the glyburide plus metformin comparator group (-7.1%; P = 0.32). Patients who completed the study (81.5%) demonstrated a treatment difference of -19.5% (P = 0.03), favoring the rosiglitazone group. Rosiglitazone plus metformin reduced both mean 24-h systolic (-3.4 mmHg; P = 0.01) and diastolic (-2.5 mmHg; P < 0.01) ambulatory blood pressure compared with glyburide plus metformin. Addition of rosiglitazone to metformin also reduced levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen and activity, C-reactive protein, von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen compared with addition of glyburide. CONCLUSIONS: Rosiglitazone added to background therapy with metformin provides greater reductions in microalbuminuria and blood pressure as compared with glyburide. These additional improvements in microalbuminuria, blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers were observed despite comparable improvements in glycemic control in both groups and may be related to the anti-inflammatory properties of rosiglitazone.

Adult↗