PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

George Lister

Publications and source records attributed to George Lister.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Barriers to following the supine sleep recommendation among mothers at four centers for the Women, Infants, and Children Program.

OBJECTIVES: The risk for sudden infant death syndrome in black infants is twice that of white infants, and their parents are less likely to place them in the supine position for sleep. We previously identified barriers for parents to follow recommendations for sleep position. Our objective with this study was to quantify these barriers, particularly among low-income, primarily black mothers. DESIGN/METHODS: We conducted face-to-face interviews with 671 mothers, 64% of whom were black, who attended Women, Infants, and Children Program centers in Boston, Massachusetts, Dallas, Texas, Los Angeles, California, and New Haven, Connecticut. We used univariate analyses to quantify factors that were associated with choice of sleeping position and multivariate logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios for the 2 outcome variables: "ever" (meaning usually, sometimes, or last night) put infant in the prone position for sleep and "usually" put infant in the supine position to sleep. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of mothers reported supine, 25% side, 15% prone, and 1% other as the usual position. Thirty-four percent reported that they ever placed infants in the prone position. Seventy-two percent said that a nurse, 53% a doctor, and 38% a female friend or relative provided source of advice. Only 42% reported that a nurse, only 36% a doctor, and only 15% a female friend or relative recommended the supine position for sleep. When a female friend or relative recommended the prone position, mothers were more likely ever to place their infants in the prone position and less likely usually to choose supine compared with those who received no advice from friends or relatives. When a doctor or a nurse recommended a nonsupine position, the mothers were less likely to choose supine compared with those who received no advice from a doctor or a nurse. Mothers who trusted the opinion of a doctor or a nurse about infant sleeping position were more likely to place their infants in the supine position. Half of the mothers believed that infants were more likely to choke when supine, and they were less likely to place their infants supine. Mothers who believed that infants are more comfortable in the prone position (36%) were more likely to place their infants prone. Twenty-nine percent believed that having their infants sleep with an adult helps prevent sudden infant death syndrome, and only 43% believed that sudden infant death syndrome is related to sleeping position. CONCLUSIONS: We identified specific barriers to placing infants in the supine position for sleep (lack of or wrong advice, lack of trust in providers, knowledge and concerns about safety and comfort) in low-income, primarily black mothers that should be considered when designing interventions to get more infants onto their back for sleep.

Adult↗

Factors that influence use of a home cardiorespiratory monitor for infants: the collaborative home infant monitoring evaluation.

BACKGROUND: As part of the Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation, a home monitor was developed to record breathing, heart rate, other physiologic variables, and the time the monitor was used. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of monitor use, factors that influence use, and validity of a model developed to predict use. DESIGN: We developed a model to predict monitor use using multiple linear regression analysis; we then tested the validity of this model to predict adherence for the first week of monitoring and for the subsequent 4-week period (weeks 2-5). SETTING: Clinical research centers in Chicago, Ill; Cleveland, Ohio; Honolulu, Hawaii; Los Angeles, Calif; and Toledo, Ohio. Patients Preterm infants, infants younger than 1 month with a history of autopsy-confirmed sudden infant death syndrome in a sibling, and infants with an idiopathic apparent life-threatening event were divided into 2 cohorts based on enrollment date. Main Outcome Measure Mean hours of monitor use per week. RESULTS: In cohort 1, the variables available before monitoring were only weakly associated with total hours of monitor use in weeks 2 to 5 (total model r(2) = 0.08). However, when hours of monitor use in week 1 were included as a variable to predict monitor use in weeks 2 to 5, the r(2) increased to 0.64 for hours of monitor use per week. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that monitor use in the first week was the most important variable for predicting subsequent monitor use. The study suggests that a major focus of home monitoring should be adherence in the first week, although it remains to be tested whether this adherence can be altered.

Adolescent↗

Outcome of coma in children.

Coma following a hypoxic-ischemic event is a serious condition and common reason for admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. Because coma has a high rate of mortality and morbidity in children, and the clinician may be unsure of the outcome very early in the course, it is important to have strategies to define prognosis. Although most studies have been conducted in adults, we review factors predicting outcome from coma of nontraumatic causes in infants and children. We consider the relation between physical findings, commonly accessible laboratory tools, and outcome, and comment on some newer techniques that may become more available for clinical purposes.

Adolescent↗

Brain death in children.

In 1981, the Report of the Medical Consultants on the Diagnosis of Death established guidelines for the diagnosis of brain death and, in 1995, the American Academy of Neurology published practice parameters to standardize determination of brain death. In 1987, the American Academy of Pediatrics established guidelines for determining brain death in children. Despite the establishment of these guidelines, the declaration of "death" based on the cessation of brain function remains complex and controversial. In this review are discussed the current guiding principles and the controversies in the diagnosis of brain death in children.

Age Factors↗

Barriers to following the back-to-sleep recommendations: insights from focus groups with inner-city caregivers.

BACKGROUND: African American infants have a higher incidence of SIDS and increased risk of being placed in the prone position for sleep. OBJECTIVE: To determine new barriers and more information about previously identified barriers that interfere with adherence to the Back-to-Sleep recommendations among inner-city, primarily African Americans. DESIGN/METHODS: We conducted 9 focus groups with caregivers of infants and young children from women, infants, and children centers and clinics in New Haven and Boston. Themes were identified using standard qualitative techniques. RESULTS: Forty-nine caregivers participated, of whom 86% were African American, 6% were Hispanic, 4% were white, and 4% were other. Four themes were identified: 1) SAFETY: Participants chose the position for their infants based on which position they believed to be the safest. Some participants did not choose to put their infants in the supine position for sleep because they feared their infants would choke; 2) Advice: Participants relied on the advice of more experienced female family members. Health care providers were not uniformly a trusted source of advice; 3) Comfort: Participants made choices about their infants sleeping positions based on their perceptions of whether the infants appeared comfortable. Participants thought that their infants appeared more comfortable in the prone position; 4) Knowledge: Some participants had either limited or erroneous knowledge about the Back-to-Sleep recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We identified multiple barriers to adherence to recommendations regarding infant sleep position. Data obtained from these focus groups could be used to design educational interventions aimed at improving communication about and adherence to the Back-to-Sleep recommendations.

Adult↗