PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gerd U Auffarth

Publications and source records attributed to Gerd U Auffarth.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Anterior chamber depth in relation to refractive status measured with the Orbscan II Topography System.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the anterior chamber depth (ACD) according to refractive status, assess the reliability of repeated ACD measurements using the Orbscan II Topography System (Bausch and Lomb), compare Orbscan II and IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) ACD measurements, and investigate the correlation between refraction, axial length (AL), and ACD. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. METHODS: In this clinical study, 60 patients with a mean age of 43.8 years +/- 18.74 (SD) were assigned to 1 of 3 groups of 20 patients each according to refraction: emmetropia group; hyperopia group (mean +4.84 +/- 1.60 diopters [D]); myopia group (mean -9.64 +/- 3.79 D). Using the Orbscan II system, 3 consecutive ACD measurements (apex and 3.0 mm zone) were performed. The IOLMaster was used to measure ACD and AL. RESULTS: The mean ACD (from epithelium) with the Orbscan II and IOLMaster, respectively, was 3.61 +/- 0.24 mm and 3.61 +/- 0.24 mm in the emmetropia group, 3.03 +/- 0.21 mm and 3.06 +/- 0.24 mm in the hyperopia group, and 3.72 +/- 0.26 mm and 3.73 +/- 0.23 mm in the myopia group. The standard deviation of the repeated Orbscan II measurements increased from 13 to 15 microm from the apex to the 3.0 mm zone. The difference between the apex and 3.0 mm zone of the cornea in all groups ranged from 0.1 to 0.12 mm. The mean AL was 23.52 +/- 0.82 mm in the emmetropia group, 22.14 +/- 0.64 mm in the hyperopia group, and 27.44 +/- 1.67 mm in the myopia group. There was a significant correlation between the spherical equivalent and AL (r = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly lower ACD values were found in the hyperopia group than in the other 2 groups. There was no difference in ACD between the emmetropia and myopia groups even though the AL in the myopia group was 4.0 mm longer. No statistical difference in ACD measurements was found between the Orbscan II and IOLMaster.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases.

PURPOSE: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (IOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. SETTING: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. RESULTS: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable IOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1%) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA IOLs. CONCLUSION: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable IOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other IOLs.

Device Removal↗