PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Gerhard Danzer

Publications and source records attributed to Gerhard Danzer.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

[Evaluation of the effectiveness of psychosomatic in-patient treatment on the basis of subjective and objective criteria].

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of psychosomatic in-patient treatment was evaluated using patients' subjective health ratings and objective data provided by health insurance companies. Associations between subjective and objective criteria were investigated. METHODS: 318 patients participated in the study. They completed questionnaires on physical complaints, moods and everyday functioning upon hospital admission, at discharge and at one-year follow-up. Insurance companies provided data for 140 of these patients (44 %). Sick leave and the utilization of in-patient treatment were assessed for a period of two years before and two years after psychosomatic treatment. RESULTS: As expected, subjective health status improved. The utilization of in-patient treatment decreased in both years after treatment compared to the year before. Sick leave increased in the first year after treatment but decreased significantly below the base level in the second year after treatment. Self-efficacy expectations and being employed were found to be predictors for long-term reduction in the length of in-patient treatment. Subjective and objective criteria were only slightly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Sick leave and utilization of in-patient treatment were found to increase considerably in the year before psychosomatic treatment. Therefore, pre-post differences over the entire period were only marginal. The change in subjective criteria was more immediate, while changes in some objective parameters were delayed. Both subjective and objective criteria should be included in outcome studies.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Advanced anorexia nervosa, associated with pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, and soft-tissue emphysema without esophageal lesion.

OBJECTIVE: We describe the case of a 20-year-old female patient suffering from anorexia nervosa since the age 15 of years. When admitted, she was 168 cm tall with a weight of 35 kg (body mass index [BMI] = 12.4). A week after admission, the patient complained of retrosternal pain, and a few hours later she developed extensive soft-tissue emphysema. METHODS: The X-ray picture of her thorax showed left-hand supraclavicular and infraclavicular emphysema, extensive emphysema in both sides of the soft tissue of the throat, a left-hand apical pneumothorax (4 mm), and a pneumomediastinum. RESULTS: We discuss the extent to which these symptoms are interrelated in the sense of a causal nexus. CONCLUSION: We ruled out any other differential-diagnostic etiopathogenic factors and concluded that the cause of our patient's soft-tissue emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum might well be autodestructive behavior.

Adult↗

Autodestructive syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The phenomenon 'autodestructive behaviour' is becoming an increasingly serious disease and cost factor in a wide range of medical fields. The present paper presents a survey of the literature on autodestructive behaviour, excluding psychotic, substance-induced or organic brain disorders. Starting out with a conceptual overview, the paper goes on to look into the epidemiology of autodestructive behaviour and the forms in which it manifests itself. METHOD: A literature search was conducted in Medline, Psycinfo and Psyndex using the search terms 'artifact', 'artificially induced', 'autodestructive', 'self-mutilation', 'factitious', 'self-harm', 'self-induced', 'self-inflicted', 'self-injuring' and 'self-mutilation' for the period from 1977 to 2003. RESULTS: Five of a total of 18 empirical studies describe the simultaneous occurrence of direct and indirect forms of autodestructive behaviour. Reported prevalence rates range from 0.032% to 9.36%. The ratio of females to males was found to be 2:1 (average age: 31.5 years; SD: 9.3 years); in contrast, the gender ratio was reversed for Munchausen's syndrome. The case history data presented are patchy and differ in terms of their priorities. We found a large number of codiagnoses, which seems to indicate that personality and dependence disorders, or substance misuse, are characteristic of both direct and indirect forms of autodestructive behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: The task at hand is to use a yet-to-be-developed nomenclature and adequately operational diagnostic criteria to work out standardised survey instruments that do justice to the heterogeneity of this disorder complex.

Comorbidity↗

[Living donor liver transplantation from the perspective of the donor: results of a psychosomatic investigation].

OBJECTIVES: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been gaining importance in the treatment of endstage liver disease in adults. Thus far, only few empirical studies have been published on the psychosocial situation of donors who are faced with the risk of medical complications after resection of the right hepatic lobe. The aims were to describe the clinical problems before and after transplantation and to contribute to the discussion of ethical issues based on empirical findings. METHODS: In the present overview, the pre-/post-transplant and follow-up periods are characterized from a psychosocial point of view using actual psychosocial and medical findings in living donors of the right hepatic lobe. RESULTS: Before LDLT, 11 % of potential donors were not recommended for the transplantation due to marked ambivalence about the operation. After donation 26 % of donors showed high values for anxious depression and physical complaints despite low rates of surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: For clinical psychosomatic evaluations of potential donors it is important to provide donors an opportunity to report any misgivings and anxieties as openly as possible. The psychosocial impairment and physical complaints of some donors after transplantation are yet not clearly understood. More psychosocial studies in this field will be necessary to investigate ethical questions and to develop criteria for an evidence-based medical care of living donors.

Anxiety↗

Psychosocial situation of living donors: moods, complaints, and self-image before and after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has developed into an established therapy for terminal liver diseases. There is, however, little knowledge of the psychosocial situation of living donors. The aim of this study was to investigate the course of donors' moods, physical complaints, and self-image in the preoperative decision process and six months after surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: Fifty-two potential donors were evaluated at the Charité Berlin. On the basis of the clinical interview, seven (13%) potential donors were not recommended for LDLT for psychosocial reasons. Twenty-six donors underwent liver resection and were re-evaluated six months after surgery. Donors' moods were investigated with the Berlin Mood Questionnaire (BMQ) and their physical complaints were assessed by the Giessen Complaint Questionnaire (GCQ). The Narcissism Inventory (NI-90) was used to assess their self-image. RESULTS: Potential donors who were not recommended for surgery showed significantly higher values for negative moods, physical complaints, and 'narcissistic rage". After surgery, donors' self-images were generally stabilized. Nevertheless, five donors (19%) showed high values for "threatened self" before and after transplantation, as well as high values for negative moods and complaints after LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: The resection of the right hepatic lobe holds promise of a good psychosocial outcome, with stable self-image and self-esteem for most donors. A minority of donors exhibited enhanced perception of distress and low self-esteem before and after surgery, which can easily be overlooked in the preoperative evaluation. A psychometric assessment of self-image before transplantation should be added to the clinical interview evaluation of potential living donors.

Adult↗

Motivation for living-donor liver transplantation from the donor's perspective: an in-depth qualitative research study.

BACKGROUND: There has been a lack of systematic in-depth research on the motives of living liver donors before transplantation that could contribute to an advanced understanding of their situation and to a more precise psychosocial evaluation, to protect the autonomy for decision, and to prevent psychosocial complications. METHODS: Twenty-eight living liver donors were assessed preoperatively through a semistructured clinical interview. The taped and transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of grounded theory and empirically grounded type construction. RESULTS: Various factors contribute to the donor's motivation for donation: the relationship to the recipient, the personal attitude of the donor, his or her personal history, family dynamics, the donor's personal profit, and the exceptional situation of the recipient's life-threatening disease combined with the life-rescuing possibility of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In reference to this, five "ideal types" of living donors emerged from the authors' data. CONCLUSIONS: A complete absence of coercion on the decision to donate seems unrealistic because of the dynamics initiated by the life-threatening condition of the recipient. It is important that donors feel they are gaining something by donation to be sufficiently motivated and that their profit is of an emotional or moral nature (i.e., the donation being set in an emotionally meaningful context). A mature relationship with the recipient usually provides such a context. The role of the clinician as a part of LDLT dynamics has a decisive influence.

Adult↗

[Personality and donor-recipient relationships of potential donors before living donor liver transplantation--diagnostics with the repertory-grid technique].

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is developing into an established therapy for terminal liver diseases in adults. Potential donors are faced with the risk of postoperative complications and are subject to a high level of psychological pressure and ambivalent feelings. Our assumption is that ambivalent feelings before donation are crucially influenced by the personality and the quality of the donor-recipient relationship. In highly motivated donors we expected a positive description of the recipient and a similarity in the characterisation of the donor and recipient. METHODS: 58 potential living donors were evaluated between March 2000 and June 2001. On the basis of the clinical interview 10 were rated as unsuited for donation. Among those potential donors assessed as unsuited, we found a high level of ambivalent feelings. For 50 potential donors we gained a set of completed psychometric diagnostic questionnaires. A Repertory-grid investigation was conducted with a total of 28 potential donors. Seven of them were not recommended as living donors. The relationship between donors and recipients was analysed concerning constructs that were most important to the characterisation of the donor or recipient. By means of inter-element distances self-concept of donors and donor-recipient relation were analysed. RESULTS: Ambivalent candidates who were not recommended as living donors tended to describe the recipient negatively (selfish, carping, and unable to take criticism) and did not show a similarity in the characterisations of self and ideal-self. Whereas the highly motivated candidates were marked by a closeness of self and ideal-self concepts. Both groups saw the recipient as indifferent. CONCLUSION: Closeness between self and ideal-self-indicating satisfaction with the decision to donate seems to be one suitable criterion to distinguish between highly motivated potential donors on the one hand and ambivalent candidates on the other hand. Another criterion appears to be a description of the recipient that indicates either a functioning or ill-functioning communication between donor and recipient with respect to the donation.

Adult↗

Psychosocial data of potential living donors before living donor liver transplantation.

In view of the scarcity of organ resources for transplantation, donation by living donors is assuming greater significance now that the technical-surgical problems involved have been solved. In the period between December 1999 and December 2000, 47 potential living liver donors were evaluated and a total of 27 hepatic lobes were transplanted at the Virchow-Klinikum of the Charité Hospital in Berlin. The close personal relationships between recipients and donors gives reason to anticipate high levels of psychosocial pressure during the pre-operative evaluation process; this process consists in part in looking into donor motivation, ambivalence and anxiety. The pre-operative psychometric evaluation of 40 potential living donors indicated that most of the potential donors see themselves as 'super-healthy' and tend to adapt to social expectations, while on the other hand those seven potential living donors not accepted for psychosocial reasons were marked by heightened values for anxious depression and pessimism. The results indicate in most cases a great willingness to donate and on the other hand a high level of obvious psychological pressure for a low number of potential donors. For the latter, both the clinical evaluation interview and the psychometric diagnostics used revealed clear-cut feelings of anxiety and ambivalence towards transplantation.

Adult↗

Psychosocial outcome of living donors after living donor liver transplantation: a pilot study.

In view of the scarcity of organ resources available for transplantation, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is gaining growing importance in the treatment of chronically terminal liver diseases. In the period between December 1999 and October 2000, 47 potential living liver donors were evaluated and 24 right hepatic lobes and two left lateral segments were transplanted at the Virchow-Klinikum of the Charité Hospital in Berlin. The present study looks into biomedical and psychosocial parameters of 23 donors before and 6 months after LDLT. Our aims were to investigate the development of psychosocial parameters after donation and the relationship between psychosocial findings and post-operative complications. Most donors showed an improved quality of life (QoL) after LDLT when compared with pre-operative results. Twenty-six percent of donors show high values for 'tiredness', 'fatigue' and 'limb pain' following donation. The post-operative complications had no influence on the psychosocial outcome. In this pilot study the resection of the right hepatic lobe amounts to a safe operation for donors and holds promise of a good psychosocial outcome for most donors, irrespective of donation-related complications. The pronounced complaints appears to indicate psychological tension and distress in some donors following donation.

Adult↗

Psychosomatic interrelations following liver transplantation.

It is well described that quality of life (QoL) improved after liver transplantation. The aim of the present study was to investigate how psychosocial parameters develop after liver transplantation (LTX) and whether post-operative complaints are the result of osteoporosis or patient somatization. The prospective study looks into biomedical and psychosocial parameters of 82 LTX patients before, 1 and 3 yrs after transplantation. Osteoporosis was measured by bone mineral density (BMD) and psychosocial parameters were assessed with validated questionnaires measuring complaints, mood and overall QoL. Overall QoL and mood improved after liver transplantation, while back and limb pain increased continuously. Back and limb pain were highly correlated with reduced bone density and high values for tiredness and depressive anxiety. Back and limb pain of patients following liver transplantation may indicate the development of a post-operative depression in some cases. The treatment offered by an essentially biologically based medicine may promote the manifestation of this depression as a somatization disorder.

Adolescent↗

[Self-destructive behaviour - occurrence and typological classification in an university psychosomatic unit]

The occurrence of self-destructive phenomena (direct self-harm; self-induced disease; self-harm delegated to medical staff) in all patients referred to the psychosomatic consultation service and all outpatients during 14 months and all discharged of the psychosomatic ward during 2 months (N=1057) is determined by the typological-descriptive assessment of Willenberg et al. (1997). Self-destructive behaviour was documented in n=79 cases (7.5%), in 40.5% of these on suspicion. 62% showed recurrent self-harm. In 15% there was a high risk to health, in 4% mortal danger. 51% hurt themselves overtly, 24% secretly. Direct self-harm occurred in 71%, self-induced disease in 48%, delegated self-harm in 35% of the cases (39% overlap). An average of 15 years passes between early precursor symptoms and the reference to the psychosomatic unit. Compared to the control group of psychosomatic patients, self-destructive patients are more often female (81%), younger, less frequently married (statistically confounded with age), more frequently medically certified and sick for more than one year. In sum, they have as many somatic diagnoses (M=0.75) but significantly more psychosocial diagnoses (ICD-10: F) (M=1.86 vs. M=1.40). Bulimia, addiction / substance abuse, and personality disorders proved to be more frequent co-diseases, anxiety disorders were underrepresented. Occurrence and relevance of self-destructive or facticious disorders are apparently underrated, so far. ICD-10 criteria are insufficient to cover all relevant types of self-destructive behaviour.

Journal Article↗

Impaired psychosocial outcome of donors after living donor liver transplantation: a qualitative case study.

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of the right hepatic lobe has been developing into an established therapy for treating pre-terminal liver diseases. There is little experience available on the psychosocial outcome of living donors. The aim of this first qualitative case study was to investigate the patterns for impaired psychosocial outcome in donors after LDLT. Donor hepatectomies were performed in 30 donors at the Charité Berlin. Six months after surgery, the six of the 30 donors with negative moods and physical complaints in psychometric monitoring were examined. The post-operative interviews were transcribed and analysed using current qualitative research methods. These six donors (20%) reported various unspecific complaints and psychological conflicts. Sadness was expressed about organ rejection and death of the recipient. Anxieties about the recipient and their own health were verbalized. Disappointment and anger refer to the experience that they were not as fully appreciated by the medical system and their social environment as expected. The negative emotions of donors with impaired psychosocial outcome could be related to a decrease in self-esteem in the post-operative course. Adequate medical and psychological treatment opportunities for these donors should be provided.

Adult↗